Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 127 references

(2+1) Lorentzian quantum cosmology from spin-foams: opportunities and obstacles for semi-classicality

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs a computable (2+1)-dimensional Lorentzian spin-foam cosmology and shows that reproducing classical solutions depends on the path-integral measure and on excluding causality-violating strut configurations.

desk verdict A careful, self-aware construction of an effective (2+1)-dimensional spin-foam cosmology model; the headline conclusions hold within the stated assumptions, and the main limitation (vertex-level stationary-phase factorization) is openly acknowledged rather than hidden. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08109 v3 pith:LQUNPZOA submitted 2024-11-12 gr-qc hep-th

Alexander F. Jercher , José Diogo Simão , Sebastian Steinhaus This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th MSC 83C4583C2783F05 PACS 04.60.Pp98.80.Qc
keywords spinfoamsLorentzianquantumgravitycosmology(2+1)dimensionsReggecalculuscausalityviolationsscalarfieldclockpathintegralmeasure
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a symmetry-reduced, semi-classical spin-foam model can be a workable quantum cosmology in (2+1) dimensions, and that its classical limit is controlled as much by the path-integral measure as by the action. Starting from a coherent-state Lorentzian spin-foam vertex, the authors replace the full lattice amplitude by a product of single-vertex stationary-phase approximations with Hessian-determinant measures, couple a minimally massive scalar field, and evaluate partition functions and strut-length expectation values on one and two frusta. On a single frustum with time-like struts the real part of the strut-length expectation value generically follows the classical Regge solution, while including space-like struts introduces causality violations that are not exponentially suppressed and drive expectation values away from classicality. Adding a bulk spatial slice shows that the measure can suppress the classical saddle point so strongly that expectation values stop matching classical solutions, whereas a modified toy measure restores the match. The paper concludes that the causally regular sector is a viable quantum-cosmology model, but that measure choices and causal character, not just the exponential of the action, decide whether semi-classicality is realized.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the semi-classical vertex amplitude of a Lorentzian 3-frustum, obtained by applying a stationary phase approximation to the coherent-state (2+1) spin-foam vertex and then symmetry-reducing the boundary data to two flat squares connected by four struts. Its phase is the real part of the Lorentzian Regge action, which takes different forms in the three causal sectors (space-like struts with space-like or time-like trapezoids, and time-like struts); its measure factor is the inverse square root of the Hessian determinant of the spin-foam action at the critical points, and the massive scalar field contributes an extra phase $e^{iS_\phi}$. This object is used to define the effective partition function by summation and integration over bulk strut lengths, spatial edge lengths, and scalar-field values, with Wynn's epsilon algorithm accelerating the infinite strut sums.

What would settle it

Compute the stationary-phase approximation of the full two-frustum amplitude with a bulk spatial slice as a single, un-factorized integral, including Sectors I and II, and compare the resulting strut and spatial-edge expectation values with the classical Regge solutions. If causality-violating configurations acquire an imaginary action and are exponentially suppressed, or if the full-complex Hessian measure resolves the $l_1$ saddle point, the paper's measure-bound conclusion is overturned; if the deviations persist, the central claim is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is this: the effective partition function built from the (2+1) Lorentzian coherent spin-foam amplitude reproduces classical Regge cosmology in the causally regular sector, yet the agreement is fragile. For a single 3-frustum with time-like struts (Sector III), the real part of the bulk strut-length expectation value $\langle m \rangle_{\mathrm{iii}}$ tracks the classical solution $m_{\mathrm{cl}}$ over wide ranges of edge lengths, scalar-field values, and masses, with deviations dominated by the discreteness of the length spectrum and saddle-point resolution; the imaginary part tends toward $-1/2$. The model is only convergent for non-zero scalar-field mass $\mu$, and $\langle m \rangle_{\mathrm{iii}}$ is discontinuous at $\mu=0$. When space-like struts (Sectors I and II) are included, causality-violating configurations contribute without exponential suppression because the semi-classical vertex amplitude contains only the real part of the Lorentzian Regge action, and the resulting expectation values deviate substantially from classical solutions. On a two-frustum lattice with a bulk spatial slice, the per-vertex measure suppresses the $l_1$-integration saddle point so strongly that expectation values no longer match classical solutions; replacing the measure with a toy measure that resolves the saddle yields close-to-classical values. The central conclusion is that the effective path integral is a viable quantum cosmology model in the causally regular sector, with the caveat that the path-integral measure is decisive for semi-classicality.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument assumes that the spin-foam amplitude on the extended lattice can be faithfully replaced by a product of independent single-vertex stationary-phase amplitudes, so that the measure is a product of local Hessian factors; if the true semi-classical amplitude of the full complex does not factor this way, the computed measure effects and the absence of exponential suppression of causality violations could be artifacts of that local approximation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the causally regular Sector III, the single-frustum effective path integral gives strut-length expectation values whose real part agrees with the classical Regge solution, so this restricted model can serve as a concrete arena for quantum-cosmology questions such as clock dynamics and bounce scenarios.
  • A non-zero scalar-field mass is required for convergence; at $\mu=0$ the path integral diverges and expectation values are discontinuous, so massive or otherwise oscillating clock fields are necessary in this Lorentzian setting.
  • Causality violations from space-like struts are generically not negligible in this model, because the semi-classical amplitude lacks the imaginary deficit angles that would suppress them; deviations from classical expectation values can exceed 10 percent, in contrast to effective spin-foam models where suppression keeps deviations below $4\times10^{-4}$.
  • Time-like struts are essential for classicality, strengthening the case that spin-foam quantum gravity must include all causal characters of discrete geometry.
  • On extended complexes with a bulk spatial slice, the path-integral measure, not just the action, determines whether saddle points are resolved; a toy measure that does not suppress the saddle restores near-classical expectation values.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the missing suppression is an artifact of the vertex-by-vertex stationary phase approximation, then a full asymptotic evaluation of the glued two-frustum amplitude should restore complex deficit angles and exponentially suppress Sectors I and II; this is directly testable with complex-critical-point methods.
  • The recurring imaginary part $-1/2$ of the strut-length expectation value may be a measure-independent signature of the discrete Lorentzian path integral; computing the same expectation value with the toy measure on a single frustum would show whether the shift persists.
  • The toy-measure result suggests a practical criterion for choosing effective measures in symmetry-reduced spin-foam cosmology: the measure should not suppress the classical saddle-point region in the intermediate integrations. A natural extension is to derive such a measure from the stationary phase approximation of the whole complex rather than of single vertices.
  • One could test whether the $\mu\to0$ discontinuity persists after refining the length spectrum, which would indicate whether it is a physical feature rather than a discretization artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an effective (2+1)-dimensional Lorentzian cosmological spin-foam model by taking a recently proposed coherent-state vertex amplitude for SU(1,1), factorizing the amplitude on a cubical lattice into single-vertex amplitudes, and replacing each vertex by its stationary-phase asymptotic form with an inverse-square-root Hessian measure. A massive scalar field is coupled through an ad-hoc discretized matter action, and the resulting effective partition function is studied numerically for a single 3-frustum and for a two-frustum complex with one bulk spatial slice. The main results are: in the causally regular Sector III (time-like struts) the real part of the strut-length expectation value generically tracks the classical Regge solution and is discontinuous in the mass at µ = 0; Sectors I and II (space-like struts) are not exponentially suppressed and produce substantial deviations; and the two-frustum computation fails to reproduce classical values, which is attributed to the measure suppressing the l1 saddle point, while a toy measure restores agreement for some observables. The paper explicitly acknowledges the factorization assumption and its potential failure in Sec. 3.7.

Significance. If taken as an effective model, the paper provides a concrete and numerically feasible route from a spin-foam amplitude to cosmological expectation values, with measure factors derived from Hessian determinants rather than chosen ad hoc. It also identifies a genuine obstruction: causality-violating configurations are not suppressed when only the real part of the Lorentzian Regge action enters the semiclassical amplitude, and it demonstrates that measure factors can dominate semiclassical behavior in extended complexes. The numerical strategy is largely reproducible, the comparison to classical Regge solutions is parameter-free, and the main limitations are stated transparently. The significance for full spin-foam quantum gravity is conditional: the effective model is well defined, but whether its conclusions carry over to the full amplitude depends on resolving the factorization issue that the paper itself flags.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2 (Eqs. (3.11)–(3.13)) and Sec. 3.7] The effective amplitude is defined by factorizing the full amplitude into single-vertex semiclassical amplitudes, and the paper states that 'the product of the individual semi-classical vertex amplitudes does not correspond to the semi-classical amplitude of the total complex' (Sec. 3.7, point 2, citing [52]). Both headline conclusions—the absence of exponential suppression of causality-violating Sectors I/II (Sec. 4.4, Fig. 11) and the measure-driven loss of classicality in the two-frustum model (Sec. 5.2, Table 1)—are obtained with this factorized measure. As the paper acknowledges, a full-complex stationary phase could yield complex deficit angles (restoring suppression) or a different Hessian (removing the l1-saddle suppression). The claims about spin-foam semiclassicality are therefore not yet supported for the full model; they should be explicitly restricted to the effective model, or a two-vertex/full-complex asymptotic check should be added.
  2. [Sec. 4.4 (Eqs. (4.17)–(4.20), Fig. 11)] The Sector I contribution is evaluated by numerically interpolating the Hessian determinant det Hϑ between discrete points (page 36: 'we interpolate the Hessian determinant numerically between a large number of discrete points'), because no analytic formula is available. Since the integrand is rapidly oscillatory and the deviations Δ in Fig. 11 are the quantitative basis for the claim that causality violations are not suppressed, the absence of convergence tests or error estimates for this interpolation leaves the result uncertain. Please report the interpolation error and test robustness with respect to the number and location of sample points.
  3. [Sec. 5.2.3 and Table 1] For the two-frustum partition function ZX2, the expectation value ⟨φ1⟩ depends strongly on the cutoff scheme JN: the triangular scheme gives 1.43 − 2.13i while the rectangular scheme gives 0.32 − 1.01i, and a further truncation N′ < N was required because of divergences. This contradicts the statement in Sec. 5.2.3 that Wynn's algorithm yields results 'that do not depend strongly on the cutoff scheme JN,' which appears to hold only for m0, m1, and l1. The scheme dependence of ⟨φ1⟩ weakens the interpretation that the failure to reproduce classical solutions is due purely to the measure; please address convergence of this observable and report the sensitivity explicitly.
  4. [Sec. 5.3 and Table 1] The toy model is described as yielding 'geometric and matter expectation values close to the classical solutions,' but Re{⟨m0⟩toy} = 3.82 deviates by about 74% from mcl0 = 2.20, and Re{⟨l1⟩toy} = 21.26 deviates by about 19% from lcl1 = 17.83; only ⟨m1⟩ and ⟨φ1⟩ are within 5%. The conclusion in Sec. 6 that the toy measure restores semiclassicality should be qualified, since the toy model demonstrates that some measure can improve agreement but does not show that the spin-foam measure is close to classical in all variables.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 3.1] The abstract uses 'hypercubical lattice' while Sec. 3.1 and elsewhere use 'cubical lattice'; please unify the terminology.
  2. [Secs. 3.4 and 3.5] The symbol µ is used for both the scalar field mass (Eq. (3.28)) and the measure factors µ1,ϑ (Eq. (3.23)); the paper notes this at the end of Sec. 3.5, but the double use is still confusing in Sec. 4.3 and Figs. 9–12, and a different symbol for one of the two quantities would improve readability.
  3. [Eqs. (2.20)–(2.22)] Expressions such as vcb · vab × vac are written without defining the precedence of the dot and cross products; adding parentheses would remove ambiguity.
  4. [Appendix A heading] The appendix title appears as 'A F acts and Conventions on SU(1,1)'; this is likely a typo for 'Facts and Conventions'.
  5. [Sec. 4.1 and Sec. 4.3] The numerical results do not report error bars, stopping criteria, or working precision for the Wynn-accelerated sums; a short description of the convergence tolerance and precision settings would strengthen reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No fitted-input circularity: the Regge benchmark is external and the Hessian measure is derived, not inverted; the main caveat is the explicitly acknowledged factorization assumption, which is a limitation rather than a circular step.

full rationale

I find no circular step in the sense of Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The target expectation values are computed from a fixed amplitude and compared to classical Regge solutions obtained independently from Eq. (4.12); the mass μ, boundary lengths, and scalar-field values are inputs, not tuning parameters. The measure factors in Eq. (3.23) are obtained from the Hessian of the single-vertex stationary-phase approximation, not from inverting the expectation values, so the single-frustum agreement shown in Figs. 7–9 is a genuine external consistency check. The absence of exponential suppression of causality-violating sectors follows directly from the computed asymptotic form Eq. (3.19) containing only Re{SR}; this is a derived property of the vertex amplitude, not an input assumed to prove the conclusion. The main caveat is the factorization assumption in Eqs. (3.11)–(3.13) and the acknowledged statement in Sec. 3.7 that 'the product of the individual semi-classical vertex amplitudes does not correspond to the semi-classical amplitude of the total complex [52]'. This makes the full-complex conclusions conditional, and the citation [52] is self-citational with overlapping authorship, but the paper itself flags the issue explicitly and presents the result as a statement about the effective model under that assumption, not as a proven property of the full spin-foam amplitude. The Sec. 5.3 toy measure is also clearly labeled a toy model constructed to resolve the saddle, so it is not presented as a prediction from the full spin-foam measure. I therefore assign score 2: minor self-citations and a provisional factorization premise, but no circular reduction of the central derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on three categories of input: group theory of SU(1,1), the coherent-state spin-foam vertex of [45] with its hand-added Gaussian constraint, and a sequence of explicit modeling choices (factorization, stationary phase per vertex, ad-hoc scalar coupling, spin-length identification). No free parameters are fitted to the target expectation values; the mass, boundary data, and the Sec. 5.3 toy measure are hand-chosen inputs. No new physical entities such as particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Scalar field mass µ = varied from 0.001 to 0.08 (example 0.05)
    Mass of the minimally coupled scalar field; introduced as a regulator to render the partition function convergent (Secs. 3.5 and 4.3). It is a physical input varied in numerical studies, not fitted to data.
  • Spin-length identification offset = 1/2
    The choice l = s + 1/2 maps the SU(1,1) continuous-series length gap (Sec. 3.3). This affects the discrete spectrum and the resolution of saddle points; it is a convention, not a fitted constant.
  • Toy measure µ_toy = function of l0, l1, m0, m1 (Eq. 5.12)
    An ad-hoc measure chosen to satisfy finiteness, decay, and non-suppression of saddle points, used to demonstrate that the measure controls semi-classicality (Sec. 5.3). It is hand-chosen and not derived from the spin-foam model.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math SU(1,1) representation theory and Plancherel decomposition as presented in Appendix A are correct and applicable.
    The coherent-state model is based on unitary irreps of SU(1,1); the paper relies on these group-theoretic facts without proof.
  • domain assumption The coherent-state spin-foam model of [45], including the ad-hoc Gaussian constraint C for space-like edges, defines the fundamental vertex amplitude.
    The construction starts from this recently proposed model; the Gaussian constraint is introduced by hand and is not derived from first principles (Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2.3)).
  • ad hoc to paper The amplitude factorizes into single-vertex amplitudes and the stationary phase approximation applies vertex-by-vertex.
    The effective model replaces the full amplitude by a product of asymptotic vertex amplitudes (Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.13)). The paper states this is an assumption and may fail on extended complexes (Sec. 3.7, point 2).
  • ad hoc to paper The minimally coupled massive scalar field contributes an ad-hoc factor e^{iS_phi} with the discretized action of Eq. (3.27).
    The matter coupling is added ad hoc to the gravity amplitude; the paper acknowledges it ignores possible modifications of the measure and discretization ambiguities (Sec. 3.5, footnote 8).
  • domain assumption Semi-classical identification of spins with edge lengths (l = s + 1/2 for space-like edges, -k = m for time-like struts).
    This identification sets the spectrum and the length gap (Sec. 3.3), and affects numerical results, such as the ability to resolve saddle points (Sec. 4.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of (2+1) Lorentzian quantum cosmology from spin-foams: opportunities and obstacles for semi-classicality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LQUNPZOA

@misc{pith2026241108109,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: (2+1) Lorentzian quantum cosmology from spin-foams: opportunities and obstacles for semi-classicality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LQUNPZOA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08109}
}
read the original abstract

We construct an effective cosmological spin-foam model for a (2+1) dimensional spatially flat universe, discretized on a hypercubical lattice, containing both space- and time-like regions. Our starting point is the recently proposed coherent state spin-foam model for (2+1) Lorentzian quantum gravity. The full amplitude is assumed to factorize into single vertex amplitudes with boundary data corresponding to Lorentzian 3-frusta. A stationary phase approximation is performed at each vertex individually, where the inverse square root of the Hessian determinant serves as a measure for the effective path integral. Additionally, a massive scalar field is coupled to the geometry, and we show that its mass renders the partition function convergent. For a single 3-frustum with time-like struts, we compute the expectation value of the bulk strut length and show that it generically agrees with the classical solutions and that it is a discontinuous function of the scalar field mass. Allowing the struts to be space-like introduces causality violations, which drive the expectation values away from the classical solutions due to the lack of an exponential suppression of these configurations. This is a direct consequence of the semi-classical amplitude only containing the real part of deficit angles, in contrast with the Lorentzian Regge action used in effective spin-foams. We give an outlook on how to evaluate the partition function on an extended discretization including a bulk spatial slice. This serves as a foundation for future investigations of physically interesting scenarios such as a quantum bounce or the viability of massive scalar field clocks. Our results demonstrate that the effective path integral in the causally regular sector serves as a viable quantum cosmology model, but that the agreement of expectation values with classical solutions is tightly bound to the path integral measure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [52]

    Asante, J.D

    S.K. Asante, J.D. Sim˜ ao and S. Steinhaus, Spin-foams as semiclassical vertices: Gluing constraints and a hybrid algorithm , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 046002 [ 2206.13540]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, A short review of loop quantum gravity , Rept. Prog. Phys. 84 (2021) 042001 [ 2104.04394]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [2]

    Calcagni, S

    G. Calcagni, S. Kuroyanagi, S. Marsat, M. Sakellariadou, N. Tamanini and G. Tasinato, Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in quantum gravity , Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 135000 [1904.00384]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [3]

    P´ erez,The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity , Living Rev

    A. P´ erez,The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity , Living Rev. Relativity 16 (2013) 3 [1205.2019]. – 54 –

    arXiv 2013

  5. [4]

    Oriti, The group field theory approach to quantum gravity , in Approaches to Quantum Gravity: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter , D

    D. Oriti, The group field theory approach to quantum gravity , in Approaches to Quantum Gravity: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter , D. Oriti, ed., (Cambridge, UK), Cambridge University Press (2007) [ gr-qc/0607032]

    arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    Marchetti and D

    L. Marchetti and D. Oriti, Effective relational cosmological dynamics from Quantum Gravity, JHEP 05 (2021) 025 [ 2008.02774]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Oriti, L

    D. Oriti, L. Sindoni and E. Wilson-Ewing, Emergent Friedmann dynamics with a quantum bounce from quantum gravity condensates , Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 224001 [1602.05881]

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Gielen and L

    S. Gielen and L. Sindoni, Quantum Cosmology from Group Field Theory Condensates: a Review, SIGMA 12 (2016) 082 [ 1602.08104]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 127 references
  1. [9]

    Jercher, D

    A.F. Jercher, D. Oriti and A.G.A. Pithis, Emergent cosmology from quantum gravity in the Lorentzian Barrett-Crane tensorial group field theory model , JCAP 01 (2022) 050 [2112.00091]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Agullo and P

    I. Agullo and P. Singh, Loop Quantum Cosmology, in Loop Quantum Gravity: The First 30 Years, A. Ashtekar and J. Pullin, eds., pp. 183–240, WSP (2017), DOI [ 1612.01236]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    B. Bahr, S. Kl¨ oser and G. Rabuffo, Towards a Cosmological subsector of Spin Foam Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 086009 [ 1704.03691]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bianchi, C

    E. Bianchi, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, Towards spinfoam cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 084035 [ 1003.3483]

    2010 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Dittrich and J

    B. Dittrich and J. Padua-Arg¨ uelles,Lorentzian Quantum Cosmology from Effective Spin Foams, Universe 10 (2024) 296 [ 2306.06012]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    M. Han, H. Liu, D. Qu, F. Vidotto and C. Zhang, Cosmological Dynamics from Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity with Scalar Matter , 2402.07984

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Engle, R

    J. Engle, R. Pereira and C. Rovelli, Loop-Quantum-Gravity Vertex Amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 161301 [ 0705.2388]

    2007 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Engle, E.R

    J. Engle, E.R. Livine, R. Pereira and C. Rovelli, LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter , Nucl. Phys. B 799 (2008) 136 [ 0711.0146]

    2008 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bianchi, T

    E. Bianchi, T. Krajewski, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, Cosmological constant in spinfoam cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 104015 [ 1101.4049]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Rennert and D

    J. Rennert and D. Sloan, A Homogeneous Model of Spinfoam Cosmology , Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 235019 [ 1304.6688]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Sarno, S

    G. Sarno, S. Speziale and G.V. Stagno, 2-vertex Lorentzian Spin Foam Amplitudes for Dipole Transitions, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50 (2018) 43 [ 1801.03771]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Gozzini and F

    F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto, Primordial Fluctuations From Quantum Gravity , Front. Astron. Astrophys. Cosmol. 7 (2021) 629466 [ 1906.02211]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Frisoni, F

    P. Frisoni, F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for graph refinement in spinfoam cosmology , Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023) 105001 [ 2207.02881]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Frisoni, F

    P. Frisoni, F. Gozzini and F. Vidotto, Primordial fluctuations from quantum gravity: 16-cell topological model, 2312.02399. – 55 –

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    M. Han, Z. Huang, H. Liu and D. Qu, Complex critical points and curved geometries in four-dimensional Lorentzian spinfoam quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 044005 [2110.10670]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    M. Han, H. Liu and D. Qu, Complex critical points in Lorentzian spinfoam quantum gravity: Four-simplex amplitude and effective dynamics on a double- ∆3 complex, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 026010 [ 2301.02930]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M. Han, H. Liu and D. Qu, A Mathematica program for numerically computing real and complex critical points in 4-dimensional Lorentzian spinfoam amplitude , 2404.10563

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Conrady and J

    F. Conrady and J. Hnybida, A spin foam model for general Lorentzian 4-geometries , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 185011 [ 1002.1959]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Conrady, Spin foams with timelike surfaces , Class

    F. Conrady, Spin foams with timelike surfaces , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 155014 [1003.5652]

    2010 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Jercher, S

    A.F. Jercher, S. Steinhaus and J. Th¨ urigen, Curvature effects in the spectral dimension of spin foams, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 066011 [ 2304.13058]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bahr and S

    B. Bahr and S. Steinhaus, Investigation of the Spinfoam Path integral with Quantum Cuboid Intertwiners, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 104029 [ 1508.07961]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Bahr and S

    B. Bahr and S. Steinhaus, Hypercuboidal renormalization in spin foam quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 126006 [ 1701.02311]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Assanioussi and B

    M. Assanioussi and B. Bahr, Hopf link volume simplicity constraints in spin foam models , Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020) 205003 [ 2005.12004]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Allen, F

    C. Allen, F. Girelli and S. Steinhaus, Numerical evaluation of spin foam amplitudes beyond simplices, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 066003 [ 2201.09902]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Asante, B

    S.K. Asante, B. Dittrich and J. Padua-Arguelles, Effective spin foam models for Lorentzian quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 195002 [ 2104.00485]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Asante, B

    S.K. Asante, B. Dittrich and H.M. Haggard, Discrete gravity dynamics from effective spin foams, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 145023 [ 2011.14468]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Asante, B

    S.K. Asante, B. Dittrich and H.M. Haggard, Effective Spin Foam Models for Four-Dimensional Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 231301 [ 2004.07013]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Barrett, M

    J.W. Barrett, M. Rocek and R.M. Williams, A Note on area variables in Regge calculus , Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 1373 [ gr-qc/9710056]

    1999 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Asante, B

    S.K. Asante, B. Dittrich and H.M. Haggard, The Degrees of Freedom of Area Regge Calculus: Dynamics, Non-metricity, and Broken Diffeomorphisms , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 135009 [ 1802.09551]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Regge, General relativity without coordinates, Nuovo Cimento 19 (1961) 558

    T.E. Regge, General relativity without coordinates, Nuovo Cimento 19 (1961) 558

    1961

  31. [40]

    Dittrich, S

    B. Dittrich, S. Gielen and S. Schander, Lorentzian quantum cosmology goes simplicial , Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 035012 [ 2109.00875]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Asante, B

    S.K. Asante, B. Dittrich and J. Padua-Arg¨ uelles, Complex actions and causality violations: applications to Lorentzian quantum cosmology , Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023) 105005 [2112.15387]. – 56 –

    2023 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Jercher, D

    A.F. Jercher, D. Oriti and A.G.A. Pithis, Complete Barrett-Crane model and its causal structure, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 066019 [ 2206.15442]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Liu and M

    H. Liu and M. Han, Asymptotic analysis of spin foam amplitude with timelike triangles , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 084040 [ 1810.09042]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Sim˜ ao and S

    J.D. Sim˜ ao and S. Steinhaus,Asymptotic analysis of spin-foams with timelike faces in a new parametrization, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 126001 [ 2106.15635]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Sim˜ ao,A new 2+1 coherent spin-foam vertex for quantum gravity , Class

    J.D. Sim˜ ao,A new 2+1 coherent spin-foam vertex for quantum gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) 195015 [ 2402.05993]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Jercher and S

    A.F. Jercher and S. Steinhaus, Cosmology in Lorentzian Regge calculus: causality violations, massless scalar field and discrete dynamics , Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) 105008 [2312.11639]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Jercher, J.D

    A.F. Jercher, J.D. Sim˜ ao and S. Steinhaus, Partial absence of cosine problem in 3d Lorentzian spin foams, 2404.16943

    arXiv

  39. [48]

    Davids, Semiclassical limits of extended Racah coefficients , J

    S. Davids, Semiclassical limits of extended Racah coefficients , J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 924 [gr-qc/9807061]

    2000 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Garcia-Islas, (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity, spin networks and asymptotics , Class

    J.M. Garcia-Islas, (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity, spin networks and asymptotics , Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 445 [ gr-qc/0307054]

    2004 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Freidel, A Ponzano-Regge model of Lorentzian 3-dimensional gravity , Nucl

    L. Freidel, A Ponzano-Regge model of Lorentzian 3-dimensional gravity , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 88 (2000) 237 [ gr-qc/0102098]

    2000 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Freidel and E.R

    L. Freidel and E.R. Livine, Ponzano-Regge model revisited III: Feynman diagrams and effective field theory , Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2021 [ hep-th/0502106]

    2006 arXiv

  43. [53]

    Barrett and T.J

    J.W. Barrett and T.J. Foxon, Semiclassical limits of simplicial quantum gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 543 [ gr-qc/9310016]

    1994 arXiv

  44. [54]

    Freidel, E.R

    L. Freidel, E.R. Livine and C. Rovelli, Spectra of length and area in (2+1) Lorentzian loop quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 1463 [ gr-qc/0212077]

    2003 arXiv

  45. [55]

    Perelomov, Generalized coherent states and their applications (1986)

    A.M. Perelomov, Generalized coherent states and their applications (1986)

    1986

  46. [56]

    Engle and R

    J. Engle and R. Pereira, Regularization and finiteness of the Lorentzian LQG vertices , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084034 [ 0805.4696]

    2009 arXiv

  47. [57]

    Ponzano and T.E

    G. Ponzano and T.E. Regge, Semiclassical limit of Racah coefficients , in Spectroscopic and group theoretical methods in physics , F. Bloch, ed., (Amsterdam), pp. 1–58, North-Holland (1968)

    1968

  48. [58]

    H¨ ormander,The fourier transformation , in The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I: Distribution Theory and Fourier Analysis , (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp

    L. H¨ ormander,The fourier transformation , in The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I: Distribution Theory and Fourier Analysis , (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 158–250, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2003), DOI

    2003

  49. [59]

    Don` a, M

    P. Don` a, M. Fanizza, G. Sarno and S. Speziale, SU(2) graph invariants, Regge actions and polytopes, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 045011 [ 1708.01727]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [60]

    Dona and S

    P. Dona and S. Speziale, Asymptotics of lowest unitary SL(2,C) invariants on graphs , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 086016 [ 2007.09089]. – 57 –

    2020 arXiv

  51. [61]

    Barrett, R.J

    J.W. Barrett, R.J. Dowdall, W.J. Fairbairn, H. Gomes and F. Hellmann, Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude , J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 112504 [0902.1170]

    2009 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Barrett, R.J

    J.W. Barrett, R.J. Dowdall, W.J. Fairbairn, F. Hellmann and R. Pereira, Lorentzian spin foam amplitudes: Graphical calculus and asymptotics , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 165009 [0907.2440]

    2010 arXiv

  53. [63]

    Kaminski, M

    W. Kaminski, M. Kisielowski and H. Sahlmann, Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL model with timelike tetrahedra, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 135012 [ 1705.02862]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [64]

    Asante and T

    S.K. Asante and T. Brysiewicz, Solving the area-length systems in discrete gravity using homotopy continuation, Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) 185006 [ 2402.17080]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Bahr and S

    B. Bahr and S. Steinhaus, Numerical evidence for a phase transition in 4d spin foam quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 141302 [ 1605.07649]

    2016 arXiv

  56. [66]

    Steinhaus and J

    S. Steinhaus and J. Th¨ urigen,Emergence of Spacetime in a restricted Spin-foam model , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 026013 [ 1803.10289]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [67]

    B. Bahr, G. Rabuffo and S. Steinhaus, Renormalization of symmetry restricted spin foam models with curvature in the asymptotic regime , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 106026 [1804.00023]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [68]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners and N. Turok, Lorentzian Quantum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 103508 [ 1703.02076]

    2017 arXiv

  59. [69]

    Dittrich and S

    B. Dittrich and S. Steinhaus, Path integral measure and triangulation independence in discrete gravity, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 044032 [ 1110.6866]

    2012 arXiv

  60. [70]

    Borissova, B

    J. Borissova, B. Dittrich, D. Qu and M. Schiffer, Spikes and spines in 3D Lorentzian simplicial quantum gravity , 2406.19169

    arXiv

  61. [71]

    Borissova, B

    J. Borissova, B. Dittrich, D. Qu and M. Schiffer, Spikes and spines in 4D Lorentzian simplicial quantum gravity , 2407.13601

    arXiv

  62. [72]

    Dittrich, W

    B. Dittrich, W. Kami´ nski and S. Steinhaus,Discretization independence implies non-locality in 4D discrete quantum gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 245009 [ 1404.5288]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [73]

    Fairbairn, Fermions in three-dimensional spinfoam quantum gravity , Gen

    W.J. Fairbairn, Fermions in three-dimensional spinfoam quantum gravity , Gen. Rel. Grav. 39 (2007) 427 [ gr-qc/0609040]

    2007 arXiv

  64. [74]

    Speziale, Coupling gauge theory to spinfoam 3d quantum gravity , Class

    S. Speziale, Coupling gauge theory to spinfoam 3d quantum gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) 5139 [ 0706.1534]

    2007 arXiv

  65. [75]

    Mikovic, Spin foam models of matter coupled to gravity , Class

    A.R. Mikovic, Spin foam models of matter coupled to gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 2335 [hep-th/0108099]

    2002 arXiv

  66. [76]

    Bianchi, M

    E. Bianchi, M. Han, C. Rovelli, W. Wieland, E. Magliaro and C. Perini, Spinfoam fermions, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 235023 [ 1012.4719]

    2013 arXiv

  67. [77]

    Han and C

    M. Han and C. Rovelli, Spin-foam Fermions: PCT Symmetry, Dirac Determinant, and Correlation Functions, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 075007 [ 1101.3264]

    2013 arXiv

  68. [78]

    Freidel and E.R

    L. Freidel and E.R. Livine, 3D Quantum Gravity and Effective Noncommutative Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 221301 [ hep-th/0512113]

    2006 arXiv

  69. [79]

    Livine and V

    E.R. Livine and V. Maris, Matter coupled to 3d Quantum Gravity: One-loop Unitarity , 2406.03190. – 58 –

    arXiv

  70. [80]

    Kisielowski and J

    M. Kisielowski and J. Lewandowski, Spin-foam model for gravity coupled to massless scalar field, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 075006 [ 1807.06098]

    2019 arXiv

  71. [81]

    Oriti and H

    D. Oriti and H. Pfeiffer, A Spin foam model for pure gauge theory coupled to quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 124010 [ gr-qc/0207041]

    2002 arXiv

  72. [82]

    Mikovic, Spin foam models of Yang-Mills theory coupled to gravity , Class

    A.R. Mikovic, Spin foam models of Yang-Mills theory coupled to gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 239 [ gr-qc/0210051]

    2003 arXiv

  73. [83]

    Ali and S

    M. Ali and S. Steinhaus, Toward matter dynamics in spin foam quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 106016 [ 2206.04076]

    2022 arXiv

  74. [84]

    Rovelli, What Is Observable in Classical and Quantum Gravity? , Class

    C. Rovelli, What Is Observable in Classical and Quantum Gravity? , Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991) 297

    1991

  75. [85]

    Hoehn, A.R.H

    P.A. Hoehn, A.R.H. Smith and M.P.E. Lock, Trinity of relational quantum dynamics , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 066001 [ 1912.00033]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [86]

    Rovelli, Partial observables , Phys

    C. Rovelli, Partial observables , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 124013 [ gr-qc/0110035]

    2002 arXiv

  77. [87]

    Dittrich, Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity , Class

    B. Dittrich, Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity , Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 6155 [ gr-qc/0507106]

    2006 arXiv

  78. [88]

    Goeller, P.A

    C. Goeller, P.A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin, Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance , 2206.01193

    arXiv

  79. [89]

    Giesel and T

    K. Giesel and T. Thiemann, Scalar Material Reference Systems and Loop Quantum Gravity , 1206.3807

    arXiv

  80. [90]

    Bojowald, Loop Quantum Cosmology, Living Rev

    M. Bojowald, Loop Quantum Cosmology, Living Rev. Relativity 11 (2008) 4

    2008

  81. [91]

    Banerjee, G

    K. Banerjee, G. Calcagni and M. Martin-Benito, Introduction to Loop Quantum Cosmology , SIGMA 8 (2012) 016 [ 1109.6801]

    2012 arXiv

  82. [92]

    Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, Oxford University Press UK (2004)

    C. Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, Oxford University Press UK (2004)

    2004

  83. [93]

    Bojowald, L

    M. Bojowald, L. Martinez and G. Wendel, Relational evolution with oscillating clocks , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 106020 [ 2110.07702]

    2022 arXiv

  84. [94]

    Martinez, M

    L. Martinez, M. Bojowald and G. Wendel, Freeze-free cosmological evolution with a nonmonotonic internal clock , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 086001 [ 2309.07825]

    2023 arXiv

  85. [95]

    Dittrich, T

    B. Dittrich, T. Jacobson and J. Padua-Arg¨ uelles, de Sitter horizon entropy from a simplicial Lorentzian path integral, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 046006 [ 2403.02119]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [96]

    Oeckl, A ’General boundary’ formulation for quantum mechanics and quantum gravity , Phys

    R. Oeckl, A ’General boundary’ formulation for quantum mechanics and quantum gravity , Phys. Lett. B 575 (2003) 318 [ hep-th/0306025]

    2003 arXiv

  87. [97]

    Oeckl, General boundary quantum field theory: Foundations and probability interpretation, Adv

    R. Oeckl, General boundary quantum field theory: Foundations and probability interpretation, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 12 (2008) 319 [ hep-th/0509122]

    2008 arXiv

  88. [98]

    Oeckl, Probabilites in the general boundary formulation , J

    R. Oeckl, Probabilites in the general boundary formulation , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 67 (2007) 012049 [hep-th/0612076]

    2007 arXiv

  89. [99]

    Oeckl, Observables in the General Boundary Formulation , in Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical Advances in the Search for a Unified Framework , pp

    R. Oeckl, Observables in the General Boundary Formulation , in Quantum Field Theory and Gravity: Conceptual and Mathematical Advances in the Search for a Unified Framework , pp. 137–156, 2012, DOI [ 1101.0367]

    2012 arXiv

  90. [100]

    Steinhaus, Coarse Graining Spin Foam Quantum Gravity—A Review , Front

    S. Steinhaus, Coarse Graining Spin Foam Quantum Gravity—A Review , Front. in Phys. 8 (2020) 295 [ 2007.01315]. – 59 –

    2020 arXiv

  91. [101]

    Asante, B

    S.K. Asante, B. Dittrich and S. Steinhaus, Spin foams, Refinement limit and Renormalization, 2211.09578

    arXiv

  92. [102]

    Freidel, Group Field Theory: An Overview , Int

    L. Freidel, Group Field Theory: An Overview , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44 (2005) 1769 [hep-th/0505016]

    2005 arXiv

  93. [103]

    Oriti, The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory , in Foundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity , pp

    D. Oriti, The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory , in Foundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity , pp. 257–320, 10, 2011 [ 1110.5606]

    2011 arXiv

  94. [104]

    Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2004)

    C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2004)

    2004

  95. [105]

    Sorkin, Quantum mechanics as quantum measure theory , Mod

    R.D. Sorkin, Quantum mechanics as quantum measure theory , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9 (1994) 3119 [gr-qc/9401003]

    1994 arXiv

  96. [106]

    Craig, F

    D.A. Craig, F. Dowker, J. Henson, S. Major, D. Rideout and R.D. Sorkin, A Bell inequality analog in quantum measure theory , J. Phys. A 40 (2007) 501 [ quant-ph/0605008]

    2007 arXiv

  97. [107]

    Frauca and R.D

    A.M. Frauca and R.D. Sorkin, How to Measure the Quantum Measure , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 (2017) 232 [ 1610.02087]

    2017 arXiv

  98. [108]

    Dowker, S

    F. Dowker, S. Johnston and R.D. Sorkin, Hilbert Spaces from Path Integrals , J. Phys. A 43 (2010) 275302 [ 1002.0589]

    2010 arXiv

  99. [109]

    Sorkin, Lorentzian angles and trigonometry including lightlike vectors , 1908.10022

    R.D. Sorkin, Lorentzian angles and trigonometry including lightlike vectors , 1908.10022

    1908 arXiv

  100. [110]

    Wynn, On a device for computing the em(sn) transformation , Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation 10 (1956) 91

    P. Wynn, On a device for computing the em(sn) transformation , Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation 10 (1956) 91

    1956

  101. [111]

    Weniger, Nonlinear sequence transformations for the acceleration of convergence and the summation of divergent series , Computer Physics Reports 10 (1989) 189 [math/0306302]

    E.J. Weniger, Nonlinear sequence transformations for the acceleration of convergence and the summation of divergent series , Computer Physics Reports 10 (1989) 189 [math/0306302]

    1989

  102. [112]

    Don` a and P

    P. Don` a and P. Frisoni,Summing bulk quantum numbers with Monte Carlo in spin foam theories, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 106008 [ 2302.00072]

    2023 arXiv

  103. [113]

    Schmidt, Xxxii

    R.J. Schmidt, Xxxii. on the numerical solution of linear simultaneous equations by an iterative method, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 32 (1941) 369

    1941

  104. [114]

    D. Shanks, Non-linear transformations of divergent and slowly convergent sequences , Journal of Mathematics and Physics 34 (1955) 1 [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sapm19553411]

    1955 doi

  105. [115]

    van Dam and M

    H. van Dam and M. Veltman, Massive and mass-less yang-mills and gravitational fields , Nuclear Physics B 22 (1970) 397

    1970

  106. [116]

    Hahn, The CUBA library , Nucl

    T. Hahn, The CUBA library , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A559 (2006) 273 [ hep-ph/0509016]

    2006 arXiv

  107. [117]

    Don` a, M

    P. Don` a, M. Fanizza, G. Sarno and S. Speziale, Numerical study of the Lorentzian Engle-Pereira-Rovelli-Livine spin foam amplitude , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 106003 [1903.12624]

    2019 arXiv

  108. [118]

    Gozzini, A high-performance code for EPRL spin foam amplitudes , Class

    F. Gozzini, A high-performance code for EPRL spin foam amplitudes , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 225010 [ 2107.13952]

    2021 arXiv

  109. [119]

    Dona and P

    P. Dona and P. Frisoni, How-to Compute EPRL Spin Foam Amplitudes , Universe 8 (2022) 208 [2202.04360]

    2022 arXiv

  110. [120]

    Steinhaus, Monte Carlo algorithm for spin foam intertwiners , Phys

    S. Steinhaus, Monte Carlo algorithm for spin foam intertwiners , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 026022 [2403.04836]. – 60 –

    2024 arXiv

  111. [121]

    Asante and S

    S.K. Asante and S. Steinhaus, Efficient Tensor Network Algorithms for Spin Foam Models , 2406.19676

    arXiv

  112. [122]

    Jercher, L

    A.F. Jercher, L. Marchetti and A.G.A. Pithis, Scalar cosmological perturbations from quantum entanglement within Lorentzian quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 066021 [2308.13261]

    2024 arXiv

  113. [123]

    Jercher, L

    A.F. Jercher, L. Marchetti and A.G.A. Pithis, Scalar cosmological perturbations from quantum gravitational entanglement , Class. Quant. Grav. 41 (2024) 18LT01 [2310.17549]

    2024 arXiv

  114. [124]

    Bargmann, Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group , Annals Math

    V. Bargmann, Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group , Annals Math. 48 (1947) 568

    1947

  115. [125]

    Lindblad and B

    G. Lindblad and B. Nagel, Continuous bases for unitary irreducible representations of SU(1, 1),

  116. [126]

    Lindblad, Eigenfunction expansions associated with unitary irreducible representations of su(1,1), Phys

    G. Lindblad, Eigenfunction expansions associated with unitary irreducible representations of su(1,1), Phys. Scripta 1 (1970) 201

    1970

  117. [127]

    Ruehl, Lorentz group and harmonic analysis , W A Benjamin, Inc, United States (1970)

    W. Ruehl, Lorentz group and harmonic analysis , W A Benjamin, Inc, United States (1970)

    1970

  118. [128]

    Pukanszky, On the Plancherel theorem of the 2 × 2 real unimodular group, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 69 (1963) 504

    L. Pukanszky, On the Plancherel theorem of the 2 × 2 real unimodular group, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 69 (1963) 504

    1963

  119. [129]

    Takahashi, Sur les fonctions spheriques et la formule de plancherel dans le groupe hyperbolique, Japanese journal of mathematics :transactions and abstracts 31 (1961) 55

    R. Takahashi, Sur les fonctions spheriques et la formule de plancherel dans le groupe hyperbolique, Japanese journal of mathematics :transactions and abstracts 31 (1961) 55. – 61 –

    1961

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.