REVIEW 3 cited by
OmniScience: A Domain-Specialized LLM for Scientific Reasoning and Discovery
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
OmniScience: A Domain-Specialized LLM for Scientific Reasoning and Discovery
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in advancing scientific knowledge and addressing complex challenges. In this work, we introduce OmniScience, a specialized large reasoning model for general science, developed through three key components: (1) domain adaptive pretraining on a carefully curated corpus of scientific literature, (2) instruction tuning on a specialized dataset to guide the model in following domain-specific tasks, and (3) reasoning-based knowledge distillation through fine-tuning to significantly enhance its ability to generate contextually relevant and logically sound responses. We demonstrate the versatility of OmniScience by developing a battery agent that efficiently ranks molecules as potential electrolyte solvents or additives. Comprehensive evaluations reveal that OmniScience is competitive with state-of-the-art large reasoning models on the GPQA Diamond and domain-specific battery benchmarks, while outperforming all public reasoning and non-reasoning models with similar parameter counts. We further demonstrate via ablation experiments that domain adaptive pretraining and reasoning-based knowledge distillation are critical to attain our performance levels, across benchmarks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Self-Refining Topology Optimization via an LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework
TopOptAgents deploys six LLM agents in self-refining loops to automate the full topology optimization workflow and succeeds on problem classes where single LLMs fail.
-
RLBoost: Harvesting Preemptible Resources for Cost-Efficient Reinforcement Learning on LLMs
RLBoost harvests preemptible GPUs for RL rollout via a hybrid architecture with adaptive offload, pull-based transfer, and token-level migration, delivering 1.51x-1.97x throughput and 28-49% better cost efficiency tha...
-
Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator
The paper proposes a four-role framework for LLMs in scientific innovation and reviews methods, benchmarks, and limitations across Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator roles.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.