Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

3D-PreMise: Can Large Language Models Generate 3D Shapes with Sharp Features and Parametric Control?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.06437 v1 pith:LS7SBTWJ submitted 2024-01-12 cs.GR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.GRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsparametricindustrialmodelsshapesd-premisefeaturesgenerate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in implicit 3D representations and generative models have markedly propelled the field of 3D object generation forward. However, it remains a significant challenge to accurately model geometries with defined sharp features under parametric controls, which is crucial in fields like industrial design and manufacturing. To bridge this gap, we introduce a framework that employs Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate text-driven 3D shapes, manipulating 3D software via program synthesis. We present 3D-PreMise, a dataset specifically tailored for 3D parametric modeling of industrial shapes, designed to explore state-of-the-art LLMs within our proposed pipeline. Our work reveals effective generation strategies and delves into the self-correction capabilities of LLMs using a visual interface. Our work highlights both the potential and limitations of LLMs in 3D parametric modeling for industrial applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Test-Time Scaling for CAD Generation via Verifier-Free Consensus Selection

    cs.CE 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Geometric consensus selection, which returns the most representative compiled CAD model in a sampled pool, outperforms a VLM verifier on geometry metrics and matches it on topology.

  2. Human-in-the-Loop: Quantitative Evaluation of 3D Models Generation by Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Quantitative geometry scores across four input types show semantic richness improves LLM-generated CAD fidelity, with code-based prompts reaching perfect scores only after human code edits.

Pith tools