Global well-posedness in a Hartree-Fock model for graphene

Umberto Morellini; William Borrelli

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 47 references

Global well-posedness in a Hartree-Fock model for graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the time-dependent Hartree-Fock dynamics of graphene has a unique solution for all times whenever the Fermi velocity exceeds a critical value.

desk verdict A valid, well-executed conditional global well-posedness theorem for 2D massless BDF dynamics; the abstract overstates the case for graphene because the physical application leans on a numerical Fermi-velocity threshold that the paper does not prove. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14028 v3 pith:LTUDABYP submitted 2024-11-21 math-ph cond-mat.mes-hallmath.APmath.MP

William Borrelli , Umberto Morellini This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phcond-mat.mes-hallmath.APmath.MP MSC 35Q4181V70

keywords grapheneHartree-FockBogoliubov-Dirac-Fockglobalwell-posednessmasslessDiracoperatormean-fieldapproximationCoulombinteractionFermivelocity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a global well-posedness theorem for the time-dependent Hartree-Fock equations that describe electrons in a graphene sheet interacting through instantaneous Coulomb forces and an external, time-dependent charge density. Such a density models local defects placed on the carbon monolayer. Because graphene's electrons behave as massless Dirac fermions with a small Fermi velocity, the effective coupling is strong and perturbative methods fail, so the authors use the non-perturbative Bogoliubov-Dirac-Fock framework, adapted from three-dimensional quantum electrodynamics to two dimensions with the Fermi sea in place of the Dirac sea. The main result says that, whenever the Fermi velocity is at least a critical value depending only on the ultraviolet cutoff, the Cauchy problem has a unique solution for all times. If correct, this means the electron state does not blow up in finite time, and questions such as scattering can be posed on a rigorous footing.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the Bogoliubov-Dirac-Fock (BDF) energy $E^\phi_{\mathrm{BDF}}(Q)$, the Hartree-Fock energy of a state relative to the free Fermi sea, written in terms of the renormalized density matrix $Q=\gamma-P^0_-$, together with the associated mean-field operator $D_Q=v_F\sigma\cdot(-i\nabla)-\nu*|\cdot|^{-1}+\rho_Q*|\cdot|^{-1}-Q(x,y)/|x-y|$. The energy is bounded below by a coercive expression whose leading term is the kinetic energy, provided the Fermi velocity satisfies $v_F\ge v_c=h^{-1}(2)$; that same condition, through a Hardy-type inequality, controls the exchange term by the kinetic term. Along the evolution the energy is not conserved, but its time derivative is controlled by the external charge $\nu$, and an exponential-growth bound keeps it finite on finite time intervals; combined with coercivity this keeps the norm on the space $Y$ finite for all times. The space $Y$ encodes finite kinetic energy, finite Hilbert-Schmidt regularity of $Q|D_0|^{1/2}$, and finite Coulomb energy of the density.

What would settle it

A numerical evaluation of the function $h(v_F)$ defined in the paper, using the explicit expression for the function $g$, would determine the critical velocity $v_c=h^{-1}(2)$ to enough precision to know whether $v_F\simeq 1.1$ satisfies the theorem's hypothesis; if $v_c$ turns out to be above $1.1$, the theorem's condition fails for graphene.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 2.7: for a fixed ultraviolet cutoff $\Lambda>0$, a time-dependent charge density $\nu\in C^1([0,+\infty),\mathcal{C})$, and an initial state whose renormalized density matrix $Q_I=\gamma_I-P^0_-$ lies in the space $Y$, the Cauchy problem for $\gamma(t)=Q(t)+P^0_-$, namely $i\frac{d}{dt}\gamma(t)=[D_{Q(t)},\gamma(t)]$ with $\gamma(0)=\gamma_I$ and $\gamma(t)^2=\gamma(t)$, admits a unique global solution $\gamma\in C^1([0,+\infty),P^0_-+Y)$ provided $v_F\ge v_c=h^{-1}(2)$. Here $P^0_-$ is the projector onto the negative spectral subspace of the massless Dirac operator $D_0=-i\sigma\cdot\nabla$, and $D_Q$ is the mean-field operator containing kinetic, external, direct, and exchange terms. The proof works because the Bogoliubov-Dirac-Fock energy, although not conserved in the time-dependent external field, stays bounded on finite time intervals and controls the natural norm of the state; this is exactly where the condition on the Fermi velocity enters, through an inequality that lets kinetic energy dominate the exchange term.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on the condition that the Fermi velocity is at least the critical value $v_F\ge v_c=h^{-1}(2)$, which guarantees the exchange energy is dominated by the kinetic energy; the paper's rigorous estimate leaves $v_c<2.056$, so whether real graphene with $v_F\simeq 1.1$ is covered still depends on the numerical value $v_c\simeq 0.36$ being correct.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any initial state satisfying the hypotheses, the Hartree-Fock evolution is defined for all $t\ge 0$ and is unique, so no finite-time blow-up can occur.
Time-dependent external charge densities, modeling local defects that move or change in time, are admitted as long as they are $C^1$ with values in the Coulomb space.
The ground state of the stationary problem is a stationary solution of the evolution equation, so the theorem covers perturbations of it.
Because the solution's energy and norm remain controlled, long-time questions such as scattering are well-posed and can be investigated rigorously.
If the numerical value $v_c\simeq 0.36$ is correct, the theorem covers graphene at its physical Fermi velocity $v_F\simeq 1.1$, as the paper argues.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the same scheme should transfer to other two-dimensional Dirac materials with a conical band dispersion, provided the exchange-control condition can be verified with the material's own Fermi velocity; this is a testable modification of the function $h$.
Editorial inference: the exponential energy bound is likely not sharp; under extra decay assumptions on $\dot{\nu}$, the method may yield polynomial or uniform bounds, which would be relevant for scattering theory.
Editorial inference: the theorem concerns instantaneous Coulomb interactions and neglects photons, spin, and lattice-scale effects; adding those would require extra terms in $D_Q$ and is a natural stress test of the global well-posedness result.
Editorial inference: the rigorous bound $v_c<2.056$ does not by itself cover graphene, so closing the gap between that bound and the numerical value $v_c\simeq 0.36$ is a concrete numerical-analytical challenge.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this is a competent extension of the 3D massive BDF evolution results to the 2D massless graphene model, and the main theorem is valid as stated with its hypothesis. The one thing to keep in mind is that the "graphene" part of the abstract is not fully covered by the proof: the theorem requires vF ≥ vc = h^{-1}(2), and for graphene's vF ≈ 1.1 there is only the numerical estimate vc ≈ 0.36 from [34]. The rigorous bound vc < 2.056 is too weak to imply it. The authors say exactly this in the introduction, so the mathematical statement is honest; the abstract is not.

What is actually new: this is the first global well-posedness result for the time-dependent Hartree-Fock/BDF equation in 2D massless Dirac graphene with time-dependent external potentials. It adapts the strategy of [33,41] from massive 3D to massless 2D, and the main nontrivial new ingredient is handling the momentum-dependent Fermi velocity veff(p) and the associated Kohn anomaly. The proof is standard but careful: local Lipschitz flow in the Y norm, preservation of the projector structure, and an energy bound with Grönwall's lemma. I see no circularity: the coercivity of the energy comes from [34], and the evolution framework from [33], both independent of the present claim. The numerics are not fitted here, just imported from [34].

Soft spots: Theorem 2.7 omits a hypothesis on the initial datum—it should say explicitly that γI is an orthogonal projection (equivalently −P0− ≤ QI ≤ P0+), not just QI ∈ Y. The proof uses it and the statement needs it. There are a few typographical slips; Step II of Lemma 3.2 has a mismatched heading. These are minor. The main limitation is the physical interpretation: the rigorous theorem applies to a range of parameters that is not shown to include graphene. The numerical estimate vc≈0.36 is load-bearing for the abstract's claim. This is not a defect in the theorem but it is a real gap between title/abstract and result, and it should be fixed before publication.

This paper is for mathematical physicists working in the BDF programme; it deserves a serious referee. I would accept it for review, and ask for a revised abstract plus the missing initial-data hypothesis.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies a time-dependent Hartree-Fock (Bogoliubov-Dirac-Fock) model for graphene with a sharp ultraviolet cutoff Λ, including a time-dependent external Coulomb potential generated by a charge density ν(t). The main result, Theorem 2.7, states that if the Fermi velocity satisfies vF ≥ vc = h^{-1}(2), then the Cauchy problem (28) for the evolution of the one-body density matrix has a unique global solution γ(t) ∈ C^1([0,∞), P_-^0 + Y). The proof proceeds through four steps: a local Lipschitz analysis of the mean-field vector field in the space Y (Lemma 3.2), preservation of the projection property (Lemma 3.3), a Grönwall-type bound for the BDF energy with a correcting term (Lemma 3.4), and the resulting global bound on the Y-norm (Lemma 3.5). The argument is a 2D adaptation of the 3D QED framework of Hainzl–Lewin–Sparber.

Significance. The result is a rigorous global well-posedness statement for a non-perturbative mean-field evolution relevant to graphene, extending the BDF framework to two dimensions with massless Dirac dispersion and time-dependent external fields. The proof is detailed and uses the coercivity of the BDF energy, avoiding smallness assumptions on the initial data. The reliance on established results from [34] and [33] is transparent, and the paper explicitly identifies the advantage over nonlinear Dirac models. The main caveat is that the theorem's hypothesis on vF is not rigorously verified for the physical value vF≈1.1; the rigorous bound vc<2.056 is insufficient, and the condition relies on a numerical estimate from [34]. Additionally, the critical case vF=vc is not handled by the proof.

major comments (3)

[Section 1 and Theorem 2.7] The theorem is stated under the condition vF ≥ vc = h^{-1}(2), but the paper only proves the rough bound vc < 2.056 (Section 1, p.3) and cites a numerical estimate vc ≈ 0.36 from [34]. Since the physical Fermi velocity of graphene is vF ≈ 1.1, it is not rigorously established that the theorem applies to graphene. The abstract and title claim a 'global well-posedness result for graphene' without this caveat. Please state explicitly that the physical regime is covered only under the numerically supported assumption h(1.1) ≤ 2, or strengthen the rigorous bound.
[Theorem 2.7 and Lemmas 3.4–3.5] The inequality (48) contains the factor (1 - h(vF)/2). At the endpoint vF = vc, one has h(vF)=2 and this factor vanishes, so the energy bound from Lemma 3.4 does not control tr(D0 Q). Lemma 3.5 then cannot bound the Schatten norms of Q(t) as claimed. The theorem's hypothesis vF ≥ vc therefore needs to be strengthened to vF > vc, or a separate argument must be supplied for the critical case.
[Lemma 3.2, Step II] The estimate for the S2 component of [V'_Q, P_-^0] is displayed as || [V'_Q,P_-^0] |D0| ||_{S2} ≤ 2 ||D0||_∞ || Q(x,y)/|x-y| ||_{S2}. The norm required by (30) is || |D0|^{1/2} [V'_Q,P_-^0] ||_{S2}; the displayed bound is not sufficient because |D0| may vanish near p=0. Replacing |D0| by |D0|^{1/2} and ||D0||_∞ by || |D0|^{1/2} ||_∞ gives a valid estimate by the same Hardy argument. Please correct and confirm that the subsequent bounds go through.

minor comments (6)

[Theorem 2.7 and Lemma 3.3] The hypothesis on γI should explicitly require that γI is an orthogonal projection, i.e., γI^2 = γI (and 0 ≤ γI ≤ 1), since Lemma 3.3 uses A(0)=γI^2-γI=0 and the system (28) imposes γ(t)^2 = γ(t).
[Equation (2)] The second term in (2) is written -iσ1∂x2; it should be -iσ2∂x2.
[After Eq. (28)] The text says 'where PI is the initial datum'; this should be γI.
[Section 3, proof of Lemma 3.4] The notation P(t) is used without definition; it appears to mean γ(t) = Q(t) + P_-^0. Please define it.
[Notation] The paper uses D0 for both the free Dirac operator (2) and the effective operator (10); the distinction is occasionally blurred. Consider using a different symbol, e.g., \mathcal D_0, for the effective operator.
[Typesetting] The title contains 'HAR TREE-FOCK' due to a line break; ensure the final version uses the correct spacing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main theorem is an explicitly conditional result whose hypothesis is imported from independent prior work; the only load-bearing numerical input is flagged as a numerical estimate, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper proves Theorem 2.7 as a conditional statement: if v_F >= v_c = h^{-1}(2), then the Cauchy problem admits a unique global solution. The condition is not manufactured by the present derivation; it is the same coercivity condition imported from the independent ground-state analysis of graphene in [34] (Theorem 2.3 and Lemma 2.5), where h is defined in Eq. (15) from the effective mean-field operator. The proof of Theorem 2.7 uses this condition only as an explicit assumption, not as an output of the argument. No parameter is fitted to make the conclusion hold. The only numerical input, v_c ~ 0.36, is transparently reported as coming from [34] ('Numerical computations suggest a critical velocity v_c of approximately 0.36'), and the paper explicitly states that its own rigorous estimate gives only v_c < 2.0560. This is a rigor gap between the conditional theorem and the physical interpretation for graphene (v_F ~ 1.1), not a circular dependence of the proof on its own target. Lemmas 3.2-3.5 are proved directly in the paper: they establish local well-posedness, preservation of the projection property, a Grönwall bound for the BDF energy, and global existence. The cited results [33] and [34] are independent foundational statements about the 3D BDF evolution and the graphene ground state; they are not restatements of Theorem 2.7. The few self-citations in the paper ([40], [41]) are contextual remarks and are not load-bearing for the main theorem. No equation reduces to its input by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Therefore there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions of the BDF mean-field model with instantaneous Coulomb interaction and a UV cutoff, plus the coercivity of the BDF energy from prior work. No parameters are fitted and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The sharp ultraviolet cutoff Λ > 0 is a natural and valid regularization for graphene, and the model is studied on HΛ.
The lattice structure sets Λ proportional to the reciprocal of the lattice spacing; the authors use this to avoid renormalization (Section 2.2).
domain assumption The mean-field Hartree-Fock (BDF) approximation accurately describes the graphene dynamics.
The whole model is defined in this approximation; no derivation from first-principles QED is provided.
domain assumption The interaction is the instantaneous 3D Coulomb potential with e^2/(4πκ)=1.
The Hamiltonian (1) is taken from [11] in Coulomb gauge; photons are neglected.
domain assumption The external potential is a Coulomb potential generated by a charge density ν(t) ∈ C^1([0,∞), C).
This restricts the time-dependent electric potentials to those induced by local charge defects.
standard math The ground state properties of the BDF energy (Theorem 2.3 and Lemma 2.5 of [34]) hold for vF ≥ vc.
The coercivity and positivity of E^0_BDF are taken from [34]; this is prior work by other authors.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global well-posedness in a Hartree-Fock model for graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LTUDABYP

@misc{pith2026241114028,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global well-posedness in a Hartree-Fock model for graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LTUDABYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14028}
}

read the original abstract

Graphene is a monolayer graphitic film in which electrons behave like two-dimensional Dirac fermions without mass. Its study has attracted a wide interest in the domain of condensed matter physics. In particular, it represents an ideal system to test the comprehension of 2D massless relativistic particles in a laboratory, the Fermi velocity being 300 times smaller than the speed of light. In this work, we present a global well-posedness result for graphene in the Hartree- Fock approximation. The model allows to describe the time evolution of graphene in the presence of external time-dependent electric potentials, such as those induced by local charge defects in the monolayer of carbon atoms. Our approach is based on a well established non-perturbative framework originating from the study of three-dimensional quantum electrodynamics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[34]

, Ground state properties of graphene in Hartree-Fock theory , Journal of Mathematical Physics, 53 (2012)

work page 2012
[33]

Hainzl, M

C. Hainzl, M. Lewin, and C. Sparber , Existence of global-in-time solutions to a generalized Dirac-Fock type evolution equation , Letters in Mathematical Physics, 72 (2005), pp. 99–113

work page 2005
[1]

Arbunich and C

J. Arbunich and C. Sparber , Rigorous derivation of nonlinear Dirac equations for wave propagation in honeycomb structures , Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59 (2018)

work page 2018
[2]

Bach, J.-M

V. Bach, J.-M. Barbaroux, B. Helffer, and H. Siedentop , On the stability of the relativ- istic electron-positron ﬁeld , Communications in Mathematical Physics, 201 (1999), pp. 4 45–460

work page 1999
[3]

Bejenaru and S

I. Bejenaru and S. Herr , The cubic Dirac equation: Small initial data in H 1( R3) , Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 335 (2014), pp. 43–82

work page 2014
[4]

, The cubic Dirac equation: Small initial data in H 1 2 ( R2) , Communications in Mathem- atical Physics, 343 (2015), pp. 515–562

work page 2015
[5]

Borrelli , Stationary solutions for the 2D critical Dirac equation wit h Kerr nonlinearity , Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 263 (2017), pp

W. Borrelli , Stationary solutions for the 2D critical Dirac equation wit h Kerr nonlinearity , Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 263 (2017), pp. 7941–796 4

work page 2017
[6]

, Weakly localized states for nonlinear Dirac equations , Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations, 57 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 47 references

[7]

, Symmetric solutions for a 2D critical Dirac equation , Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, 24 (2021)

2021
[8]

Borrelli and R

W. Borrelli and R. L. Frank , Sharp decay estimates for critical Dirac equations , Transac- tions of the American Mathematical Society, 373 (2019), pp. 2045–2070

2019
[9]

Bournaveas and T

N. Bournaveas and T. Candy , Global well-posedness for the massless cubic Dirac equatio n: Table 1, International Mathematics Research Notices, (2015), p. r nv361

2015
[10]

Cancès and C

E. Cancès and C. Le Bris , On the time-dependent Hartree-Fock equations coupled with a classical nuclear dynamics , Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 9 (19 99), pp. 963–990
[11]

A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, an d A. K. Geim , The electronic properties of graphene , Reviews of Modern Physics, 81 (2009), pp. 109–162

2009
[12]

J. M. Chadam and R. T. Glassey , Global existence of solutions to the Cauchy problem for time-dependent Hartree equations, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 16 (1975), pp. 1122–1130 . 22 WILLIAM BORRELLI AND UMBERTO MORELLINI

1975
[13]

Chaix and D

P. Chaix and D. Iracane , From quantum electrodynamics to mean-ﬁeld theory. I. The Bogoliubov-Dirac-Fock formalism, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Phys- ics, 22 (1989), pp. 3791–3814

1989
[14]

Chaix, D

P. Chaix, D. Iracane, and P. Lions , From quantum electrodynamics to mean-ﬁeld theory. II. Variational stability of the vacuum of quantum electrod ynamics in the mean-ﬁeld approxim- ation, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physic s, 22 (1989), pp. 3815–3828

1989
[15]

P. A. M. Dirac , Discussion of the inﬁnite distribution of electrons in the t heory of the positron, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical S ociety, 30 (1934), pp. 150–163. [16] , Théorie du positron , Solvay report, Gauthier-Villars XXV, 353S, (1934), pp. 20 3–212

1934
[17]

Escobedo and L

M. Escobedo and L. Vega , A semilinear Dirac equation in H s( R3) for s > 1, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 28 (1997), pp. 338–362

1997
[18]

M. J. Esteban, M. Lewin, and E. Séré , Variational methods in relativistic quantum mech- anics, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 45 (2008), pp. 535–593

2008
[19]

C. L. Fefferman and M. I. Weinstein , Honeycomb lattice potentials and Dirac points , Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 25 (2012), pp . 1169–1220

2012
[20]

, Wave packets in honeycomb structures and two-dimensional D irac equations, Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics, 326 (2013), pp. 251–286

2013
[21]

Fournais, J

S. Fournais, J. Lampart, M. Lewin, and T. Ø. Sørensen , Coulomb potentials and Taylor expansions in time-dependent density-functional t heory, Physical Review A, 93 (2016), p. 062510

2016
[22]

Giuliani and V

A. Giuliani and V. Mastropietro , Rigorous construction of ground state correlations in graphene: Renormalization of the velocities and Ward ident ities, Physical Review B, 79 (2009), p. 201403

2009
[23]

, The two-dimensional Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice , Communications in Mathematical Physics, 293 (2009), pp. 301–346

2009
[24]

Giuliani, V

A. Giuliani, V. Mastropietro, and M. Porta , Lattice gauge theory model for graphene , Physical Review B, 82 (2010), p. 121418

2010
[25]

461– 511

, Lattice quantum electrodynamics for graphene , Annals of Physics, 327 (2012), pp. 461– 511

2012
[26]

González, F

J. González, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. Vozmediano , Unconventional quasiparticle lifetime in graphite, Physical Review Letters, 77 (1996), pp. 3589–3592

1996
[27]

Gravejat, C

P. Gravejat, C. Hainzl, M. Lewin, and E. Séré , Construction of the Pauli-Villars- regulated Dirac vacuum in electromagnetic ﬁelds , Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 208 (2013), pp. 603–665

2013
[28]

Hainzl, M

C. Hainzl, M. Lewin, and R. Seiringer , A nonlinear model for relativistic electrons at positive temperature, Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 20 (2008), pp. 1283–1307

2008
[29]

Hainzl, M

C. Hainzl, M. Lewin, and E. Séré , Existence of a stable polarized vacuum in the Bogoliubov- Dirac-Fock approximation, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 257 (2005), pp. 5 15–562

2005
[30]

4483–4499

, Self-consistent solution for the polarized vacuum in a no-p hoton QED model , Journal of Physics A, 38 (2005), pp. 4483–4499

2005
[31]

Hainzl, M

C. Hainzl, M. Lewin, E. Séré, and J. P. Solovej , Minimization method for relativistic electrons in a mean-ﬁeld approximation of quantum electrod ynamics, Physical Review A, 76 (2007), pp. 52–104

2007
[32]

Hainzl, M

C. Hainzl, M. Lewin, and J. P. Solovej , The mean-ﬁeld approximation in quantum electro- dynamics: The no-photon case , Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 60 (2007) , pp. 546–596

2007
[35]

Heisenberg , Bemerkungen zur Diracschen Theorie des Positrons , Zeitschrift für Physik, 90 (1934), pp

W. Heisenberg , Bemerkungen zur Diracschen Theorie des Positrons , Zeitschrift für Physik, 90 (1934), pp. 209–231

1934
[36]

Leibbrandt , Introduction to the technique of dimensional regularizati on, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics, 47 (1975), pp

G. Leibbrandt , Introduction to the technique of dimensional regularizati on, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics, 47 (1975), pp. 849–876

1975
[37]

E. H. Lieb and H. Siedentop , Renormalization of the regularized relativistic electron-positron ﬁeld , Communications in Mathematical Physics, 213 (2000), pp. 6 73–683. GLOBAL WELL-POSEDNESS IN A HARTREE-FOCK MODEL FOR GRAPHENE 23

2000
[38]

Machihara, K

S. Machihara, K. Nakanishi, and T. Ozaw a , Small global solutions and the nonrelativistic limit for the nonlinear Dirac equation , Revista Matemática Iberoamericana, 19 (2003), pp. 179– 194

2003
[39]

E. G. Mishchenko , Minimal conductivity in graphene: Interaction correction s and ultraviolet anomaly, Europhysics Letters, 83 (2008), p. 17005

2008
[40]

Morellini , The Pauli–Villars regularised free energy of Dirac’s vacuu m in purely magnetic ﬁelds , Annales Henri Poincaré, (2025)

U. Morellini , The Pauli–Villars regularised free energy of Dirac’s vacuu m in purely magnetic ﬁelds , Annales Henri Poincaré, (2025)

2025
[41]

, Relativistic electrons coupled with newtonian nuclear dyn amics, Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 419 (2025), pp. 460–480

2025
[42]

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Kats nelson, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov , Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene , Nature, 438 (2005), pp. 197–200

2005
[43]

P auli and F

W. P auli and F. Villars , On the invariant regularization in relativistic quantum th eory, Reviews of Modern Physics, 21 (1949), pp. 434–444

1949
[44]

Schwinger , Quantum electrodynamics

J. Schwinger , Quantum electrodynamics. I. A covariant formulation , Physical Review, 74 (1948), pp. 1439–1461

1948
[45]

, Quantum electrodynamics. II. Vacuum polarization and self -energy, Physical Review, 75 (1949), pp. 651–679

1949
[46]

, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization , Physical Review, 82 (1951), pp. 664–679

1951
[47]

Thaller , The Dirac equation , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin , 1992

B. Thaller , The Dirac equation , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin , 1992

1992
[48]

Zhang, Y.-W

Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim , Experimental observation of the quantum Hall eﬀect and Berry’s phase in graphene , Nature, 438 (2005), pp. 201–204. Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Matematica, P.zza L eonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy Email addre...

2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [34]

, Ground state properties of graphene in Hartree-Fock theory , Journal of Mathematical Physics, 53 (2012)

work page 2012

[2] [33]

Hainzl, M

C. Hainzl, M. Lewin, and C. Sparber , Existence of global-in-time solutions to a generalized Dirac-Fock type evolution equation , Letters in Mathematical Physics, 72 (2005), pp. 99–113

work page 2005

[3] [1]

Arbunich and C

J. Arbunich and C. Sparber , Rigorous derivation of nonlinear Dirac equations for wave propagation in honeycomb structures , Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [2]

Bach, J.-M

V. Bach, J.-M. Barbaroux, B. Helffer, and H. Siedentop , On the stability of the relativ- istic electron-positron ﬁeld , Communications in Mathematical Physics, 201 (1999), pp. 4 45–460

work page 1999

[5] [3]

Bejenaru and S

I. Bejenaru and S. Herr , The cubic Dirac equation: Small initial data in H 1( R3) , Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 335 (2014), pp. 43–82

work page 2014

[6] [4]

, The cubic Dirac equation: Small initial data in H 1 2 ( R2) , Communications in Mathem- atical Physics, 343 (2015), pp. 515–562

work page 2015

[7] [5]

Borrelli , Stationary solutions for the 2D critical Dirac equation wit h Kerr nonlinearity , Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 263 (2017), pp

W. Borrelli , Stationary solutions for the 2D critical Dirac equation wit h Kerr nonlinearity , Journal of Diﬀerential Equations, 263 (2017), pp. 7941–796 4

work page 2017

[8] [6]

, Weakly localized states for nonlinear Dirac equations , Calculus of Variations and Partial Diﬀerential Equations, 57 (2018)

work page 2018