REVIEW 2 cited by
Large Language Model for Vulnerability Detection: Emerging Results and Future Directions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Previous learning-based vulnerability detection methods relied on either medium-sized pre-trained models or smaller neural networks from scratch. Recent advancements in Large Pre-Trained Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable few-shot learning capabilities in various tasks. However, the effectiveness of LLMs in detecting software vulnerabilities is largely unexplored. This paper aims to bridge this gap by exploring how LLMs perform with various prompts, particularly focusing on two state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Our experimental results showed that GPT-3.5 achieves competitive performance with the prior state-of-the-art vulnerability detection approach and GPT-4 consistently outperformed the state-of-the-art.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
VISION: Robust and Interpretable Code Vulnerability Detection Leveraging Counterfactual Augmentation
LLM-generated counterfactual code pairs with flipped vulnerability labels, used to train a GNN, sharply improve CWE-20 detection and attribution on the released CWE-20-CFA benchmark.
-
Large Language Models for In-File Vulnerability Localization Can Be "Lost in the End"
Large language models detect in-file vulnerabilities best when the vulnerable code appears early in the file, a 'lost-in-the-end' effect, and chunking files into smaller blocks can increase recall.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.