Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Mapping the Neuro-Symbolic AI Landscape by Architectures: A Handbook on Augmenting Deep Learning Through Symbolic Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.22077 v1 pith:LWSZGPO2 submitted 2024-10-29 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords neuro-symbolicallowsarchitecturesframeworksneuralsymbolicbeeneither
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Integrating symbolic techniques with statistical ones is a long-standing problem in artificial intelligence. The motivation is that the strengths of either area match the weaknesses of the other, and $\unicode{x2013}$ by combining the two $\unicode{x2013}$ the weaknesses of either method can be limited. Neuro-symbolic AI focuses on this integration where the statistical methods are in particular neural networks. In recent years, there has been significant progress in this research field, where neuro-symbolic systems outperformed logical or neural models alone. Yet, neuro-symbolic AI is, comparatively speaking, still in its infancy and has not been widely adopted by machine learning practitioners. In this survey, we present the first mapping of neuro-symbolic techniques into families of frameworks based on their architectures, with several benefits: Firstly, it allows us to link different strengths of frameworks to their respective architectures. Secondly, it allows us to illustrate how engineers can augment their neural networks while treating the symbolic methods as black-boxes. Thirdly, it allows us to map most of the field so that future researchers can identify closely related frameworks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Neurosymbolic Reasoning Shortcuts under the Independence Assumption

    cs.LG 2025-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Conditionally independent neurosymbolic predictors cannot represent uncertainty over reasoning shortcuts except in rare partial-supervision cases, which limits their out-of-distribution reliability.

  2. Integrating Causality with Neurochaos Learning: Proposed Approach and Research Agenda

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining causal learning with Neurochaos Learning inside graph neural networks is proposed as a research direction, with open questions but no experimental validation.

Pith tools