REVIEW 1 cited by
Nonleptonic two-body weak decays of charmed baryons
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Nonleptonic two-body weak decays of charmed baryons
read the original abstract
We analyze the two-body nonleptonic weak decays of charmed baryons, employing the pole approximation in tandem with the $SU(3)_F$ symmetry. We are able to make novel predictions for decay channels of $\Omega_c^0 \to {\bf B}_n P$ and ${\bf B}_{cc}\to {\bf B}_c^{A,S} P$ based on the experimental data of ${\bf B}_c^A \to {\bf B}_n P$. Here, ${\bf B}_n$, ${\bf B}_{c}^A$, ${\bf B}_c^S$ and ${\bf B}_{cc}$ are the low-lying octet, antitriplet charmed, sextet charmed and doubly charmed baryons, respectively, and $P$ is the pseudoscalar meson. Our findings reveal that the fitted effective Wilson coefficient ${\cal C}_+=0.469$ is notably smaller than the naive expectation, and the low-lying pole approximation fails to account for ${\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to n \pi^+ , \Xi^0 K^+)$, despite consistencies with the soft-meson limit. We further recommend the decay channel $\Xi_{cc}^+ \to \Xi_c^0 \pi^+ \to \Xi^- \pi^+\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-$ for exploring evidence of $\Xi_{cc}^+$, estimating the branching fraction at $(1.1\pm 0.6)\times 10^{-3}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Semileptonic and nonleptonic weak decays of bottom baryons $\Omega^{(*)}_{b}$
QCD sum-rule calculation predicts Ω_b^*→Ω_c and Ω_b→Ω_c^* semileptonic and nonleptonic decay widths, e.g. Γ(Ω_b^*→Ω_c eν)=(1.54+0.29−0.27)×10^-14 GeV.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.