Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The State of Sparse Training in Deep Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.10369 v1 pith:LXZEAMFH submitted 2022-06-17 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords sparsenetworkstraininglearningcomputerdeepdomainnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of sparse neural networks has seen rapid growth in recent years, particularly in computer vision. Their appeal stems largely from the reduced number of parameters required to train and store, as well as in an increase in learning efficiency. Somewhat surprisingly, there have been very few efforts exploring their use in Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL). In this work we perform a systematic investigation into applying a number of existing sparse training techniques on a variety of DRL agents and environments. Our results corroborate the findings from sparse training in the computer vision domain - sparse networks perform better than dense networks for the same parameter count - in the DRL domain. We provide detailed analyses on how the various components in DRL are affected by the use of sparse networks and conclude by suggesting promising avenues for improving the effectiveness of sparse training methods, as well as for advancing their use in DRL.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NeuroTrails: Training with Dynamic Sparse Heads as the Key to Effective Ensembling

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dynamic sparse training of multiple heads on a shared backbone outperforms full dense ensembles on ImageNet and C4 while using less compute.

Pith tools