Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comparing experiments in discounted problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.16458 v3 pith:LY2BY7EF submitted 2024-05-26 econ.TH math.STstat.TH

Ludovic Renou , Xavier Venel This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.THmath.STstat.TH
keywords discountedexperimentsflowinformationonesproblemsstatechanges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper compares statistical experiments in discounted problems, ranging from the simplest ones where the state is fixed and the flow of information exogenous to more complex ones, where the decision-maker controls the flow of information or the state changes over time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Information Aggregation and Social Networks: Responsiveness and Overturning

    econ.TH 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    No network is uniformly optimal for information aggregation: under some signal distributions the star network uniquely maximizes the final agent's payoff, and under others the complete network does.

Pith tools