Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Probabilistically Safe Robot Planning with Confidence-Based Human Predictions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.00109 v1 pith:LY3XF2TE submitted 2018-05-31 cs.RO cs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.LG
keywords humanpredictionsmodelmotionrobotaroundbehaviormodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In order to safely operate around humans, robots can employ predictive models of human motion. Unfortunately, these models cannot capture the full complexity of human behavior and necessarily introduce simplifying assumptions. As a result, predictions may degrade whenever the observed human behavior departs from the assumed structure, which can have negative implications for safety. In this paper, we observe that how "rational" human actions appear under a particular model can be viewed as an indicator of that model's ability to describe the human's current motion. By reasoning about this model confidence in a real-time Bayesian framework, we show that the robot can very quickly modulate its predictions to become more uncertain when the model performs poorly. Building on recent work in provably-safe trajectory planning, we leverage these confidence-aware human motion predictions to generate assured autonomous robot motion. Our new analysis combines worst-case tracking error guarantees for the physical robot with probabilistic time-varying human predictions, yielding a quantitative, probabilistic safety certificate. We demonstrate our approach with a quadcopter navigating around a human.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning to Assist: Collaborative VLAs for Implicit Human-Robot Collaboration

    cs.RO 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VLA models with inference-time steering mitigate action leakage in implicit human-robot collaboration, supporting longer horizons and yielding faster, more reliable assembly than shorter-horizon baselines in a 16-pers...

  2. Active Probing with Multimodal Predictions for Motion Planning

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An MPC framework that uses a Wasserstein-based risk metric and a Boltzmann model of agent behavior to actively probe and infer other vehicles' intentions in multimodal prediction settings.

Pith tools