Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 90 references

The paper claims that a kagome magnet with noncoplanar spin order realizes a zero-field fractional Chern insulator at one-third filling, with stronger interactions broadening the range of scalar spin chirality where the state survives.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 00:35 UTC pith:LY6LETJZ

load-bearing objection A careful ED study with a promising θ–V/t phase diagram, but the headline broadening claim depends on a single-band projection used far beyond its stated validity regime. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27833 v1 pith:LY6LETJZ submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mes-hall

Scalar-spin-chirality-driven fractional Chern insulator on a kagome lattice

Shinnosuke Tsutsumi , Koji Kudo , Kentaro Nomura This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords kagome latticefractional Chern insulatorscalar spin chiralityexact diagonalizationflat bandtopological orderspectral flowν=1/3 state
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that a noncoplanar magnetic order on a kagome lattice, quantified by the scalar spin chirality of three localized spins, turns the lattice into a zero-field host of a fractional Chern insulator at one-third filling. Building an effective one-band model that keeps both the repulsive interaction and the finite band dispersion, the authors identify a broad region in the polar-angle–interaction plane where the ground state matches the known flat-band FCI manifold. They report that increasing the interaction strength relative to the band dispersion extends the FCI region to a wider range of spin chirality. The state is diagnosed as an FCI through a threefold quasidegenerate ground state, a finite gap that survives the thermodynamic limit, and a spectral flow that returns after three flux insertions. If correct, this points to kagome magnets with chiral spin textures as a material platform for fractional topological phases without any external magnetic field.

Core claim

The central claim is that at filling ν=1/3, the projected chiral kagome model realizes a fractional Chern insulator for a substantial range of the umbrella-spin polar angle θ, provided the nearest-neighbor repulsion V is strong enough compared with the hopping t. The paper's phase diagram (θ, V/t) shows that the FCI region widens as V/t grows, with the three lowest states in the momentum sectors predicted for a ν=1/3 FCI at all inspected finite dispersions. Beyond the overlap indicator, the authors show the threefold ground-state quasi-degeneracy, a charge gap E4−E1 that extrapolates finite in the thermodynamic limit while E3−E1 appears to vanish for flat band but rises for finite t/V, and a

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the scalar spin chirality of three noncoplanar spins in a unit cell, which converts the kinetic hopping into complex amplitudes and endows the lowest band with Chern number 1 while keeping it nearly flat. The argument runs through an effective spinless model obtained in the strong exchange-coupling limit, then a single-band projection that retains the kinetic dispersion; the FCI diagnosis uses the overlap of the interacting ground states with the flat-band-limit FCI states, the generalized momentum counting rule for threefold degeneracy, and twisted-boundary spectral flow showing a three-flux periodicity.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation is performed in a model projected to the lowest band, and the paper assumes this projection remains faithful at V/t up to 5 even though the interaction then far exceeds the direct band gap that separates that band from the others.

What would settle it

An exact-diagonalization study of the full spinless model on the same lattice sizes (e.g., 6×4 at θ/π=0.25 and V/t=5) without any band projection: if the three lowest states either fail to show a finite charge gap or do not evolve into one another with three-flux periodicity, the projected-model result is an artifact of truncation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At θ/π=0.25 and strong interactions, the ground-state manifold is threefold quasidegenerate with the momenta prescribed by the ν=1/3 FCI counting rule.
  • The charge gap E4−E1 stays finite as system size grows for all inspected t/V, and the splitting E3−E1 increases for finite t/V when the aspect ratio is close to unity, supporting a true thermodynamic FCI.
  • Spectral flow under twisted boundary conditions shows the three lowest states exchange among themselves and return to the initial configuration only after three flux quanta, a fingerprint of fractionalized charge.
  • The FCI window in scalar spin chirality widens monotonically as V/t increases, meaning the topological phase is stabilized rather than destroyed by stronger interactions relative to band dispersion.
  • The flat-band limit itself supports the FCI only for 0.15≲θ/π≲0.45; the paper's findings extend this range when interactions dominate, making the effect more accessible.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paper argues that the many-body physics depends only on the solid angle subtended by the three spins, the same FCI should appear for any noncoplanar texture with the same chirality, not just the umbrella arrangement; comparing two different spin configurations with equal chirality would be a direct test.
  • The overlap indicator is measured against flat-band-limit states, so a genuine FCI with the same topological order but a different microscopic wavefunction could be missed; a many-body Chern-number computation would settle the region boundaries more reliably.
  • If materials with tunable spin textures (for instance under magnetic field or strain) can sweep through the identified (θ, V/t) region, a zero-field quantized Hall response at ν=1/3 should be observable; this is an experimental consequence the paper leaves implicit.
  • The trend that stronger interactions widen the FCI window suggests that intermediate coupling, where the single-band picture is least trustworthy, is also where the phase is most stable; resolving that tension requires a multiband treatment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a kagome-lattice model of spinful electrons coupled to classical localized spins in an umbrella configuration. In the strong-exchange limit the model reduces to a spinless chiral kagome model whose lowest band has Chern number 1 and a tunable bandwidth controlled by the umbrella angle θ. The authors construct a lowest-band-projected effective Hamiltonian that retains both the finite band dispersion and the nearest-neighbor repulsion, and they use exact diagonalization at filling ν=1/3 to claim a fractional Chern insulator (FCI) phase. The evidence comprises a large overlap of the three lowest states with flat-band-limit states (Fig. 3), threefold quasidegeneracy in the expected momentum sectors (Figs. 4–5), a charge gap that extrapolates to a finite value (Fig. 6a), and three-flux spectral flow (Fig. 7). The central claim is that increasing V/t relative to the bandwidth stabilizes the FCI over a broader range of scalar spin chirality θ.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a useful contribution: it places FCI physics in a spin-chirality-driven kagome magnet with a tunable band dispersion, and the θ-dependence provides a concrete experimental handle. The diagnostics are standard and are applied largely honestly; the paper includes an external benchmark against the known FCI model of Ref. [11] at θ/π=0.31 (Fig. 8b). However, the strength of the claim is limited by two interconnected issues: the single-band projection is used far outside its stated validity regime, and the overlap indicator is partly self-referential. With an unprojected benchmark or a restricted phase diagram, the result would be a solid contribution to the FCI literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, Eq. (8), Figs. 2(b) and 3] The effective Hamiltonian H_eff is introduced under the condition that 'the interaction strength is smaller than the band gap.' Yet Fig. 3 maps the FCI region up to V/t=5, while Fig. 2(b) shows that ε_gap is comparable to the bandwidth and below 1t in the θ range of interest; at θ/π=0.25, V=5t exceeds ε_gap by roughly an order of magnitude. All diagnostics—overlap, gap scaling, and spectral flow—are computed within H_eff, so they cannot test the validity of the projection itself. For V ≫ ε_gap, virtual interband processes can renormalize the effective interaction and alter the ground-state character. The central claim that stronger interactions broaden the FCI would be much more convincing if the projected model were benchmarked against the unprojected H_spinless of Eq. (4) on small clusters, or if the phase diagram were restricted to the regime V/ε_gap ≲ 1.
  2. [Eq. (11) and Appendix, Fig. 8] The overlap reference states |Ψ_i(θ,∞)⟩ are the flat-band-limit eigenstates of the same projected Hamiltonian. The overlap measure therefore mostly certifies adiabatic continuity within H_eff, and the FCI label inherits that model's identification. The external anchor at θ/π=0.31 (Fig. 8b) checks only one value of θ. To reduce the self-referential character of the overlap diagnostic, the authors should either show that the flat-band-limit states at general θ satisfy an independent FCI criterion (e.g., a many-body Chern number or entanglement spectrum), or explicitly state that Fig. 3 maps continuity to the flat-band-limit FCI manifold rather than an absolute identification.
  3. [§3.3, Fig. 6(b)] The finite-size scaling of E3−E1, which controls the threefold ground-state degeneracy, is not conclusive. The text first states that finite t/V data suggest a finite value in the thermodynamic limit, then argues that the increase is caused by aspect-ratio deviations and that E3−E1 may vanish if the aspect ratio is kept near unity. With only one or two system sizes per t/V, the aspect-ratio and finite-size dependences cannot be disentangled. Since the quasidegeneracy is one of the main FCI diagnostics, a more systematic scaling—for example, several aspect ratios at fixed Ne or a fixed-aspect-ratio sequence—is needed to support the claim that the splitting tends to zero.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2] The statement that the results apply to any spin configuration because they depend only on scalar spin chirality is not substantiated. In the spin-polarized model the nearest-neighbor hopping amplitude t χ_i†χ_j depends on the angle between neighboring spins, not only on the solid angle of each triangle. Since the numerical study is for the umbrella configuration, either restrict the claim or explain why the dependence drops out.
  2. [Fig. 3] The color map lacks a quantitative threshold for 'O close to unity.' Please provide a colorbar and state the threshold used to define the red FCI region.
  3. [Fig. 6(b)] The aspect-ratio annotations are difficult to read. Consider making the labels explicit in the caption and using a consistent symbol for each t/V value.
  4. [Fig. 7(b)] The three-flux periodicity is said to be visible only in the inset. Please clarify how the inset establishes period tripling and consider plotting the flux over a wider interval.
  5. [§2.3] The phrase 'the interaction strength is smaller than the band gap' is not a precise quantitative condition. Please specify a criterion (e.g., V/ε_gap below some bound) and state where it is satisfied in Fig. 3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: FCI diagnostics are externally anchored and include parameter-free gap and spectral-flow checks.

full rationale

The central derivation is exact diagonalization of the projected effective Hamiltonian H_eff (Eq. 8), a standard construction that is not defined in terms of the claimed FCI outcome. The overlap diagnostic of Eq. 11 compares finite-V eigenstates with flat-band-limit eigenstates of the same Hamiltonian, but the FCI character of those reference states is independently established: at θ/π≈0.31 in the flat-band limit the model is identified with the known FCI model of Refs. [10,11], and Fig. 8(b) benchmarks the implementation against Ref. [11]. The momentum-counting rule Eq. (10) is the standard FCI signature from Ref. [9]. Moreover, the finite-size scaling of the energy gaps (Fig. 6) and the spectral flow under twisted boundary conditions (Fig. 7) are computed without using the overlap criterion, so they provide independent support for the FCI identification. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is used. The paper does state in §2.3 that the projection assumes 'the interaction strength is smaller than the band gap,' yet Fig. 3 extends to V/t=5 where this condition may be violated; that is a truncation/correctness concern rather than circularity, because it does not reduce the claimed result to its inputs. Overall, no circular step is present in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of modeling choices: the strong-exchange spinless reduction (§2.2), the single-band projection (§2.3), the restriction to on-site and nearest-neighbor interactions (Eq. 1), the umbrella parameterization of the magnetic order, and the identification of FCI reference states via the momentum counting rule (Eq. 10) and overlap criterion (Eq. 11). θ and V/t are scanned control parameters, not fitted values. No new physical entities are introduced; the topological band is the known Ohgushi-Murakami-Nagaosa chiral-spin mechanism [58].

free parameters (3)
  • V/t (nearest-neighbor interaction strength) = scanned 0–5 (phase diagram, Fig. 3)
    Model control parameter; the headline claim is a statement about how the FCI region depends on it. Not fitted to any external target.
  • θ (umbrella polar angle) = scanned 0 ≤ θ/π ≤ 0.5
    Sets the scalar spin chirality and hence the band topology and dispersion; control parameter, not a fit.
  • FCI overlap threshold (Ō ≈ 1) = implicit; red region = Ō close to 1
    Diagnostic criterion defining the FCI boundary in Fig. 3; a choice of the authors, not a physical constant.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Strong exchange limit J_HS/t → ∞ projects the spinful model to a spinless chiral hopping model
    §2.2: the Chern band and its complex hoppings derive from this limit; real kagome magnets have finite exchange, multiple orbitals, and spin-orbit coupling.
  • domain assumption Projection onto the lowest band with interaction weaker than the band gap
    §2.3, Eq. (8): stated validity condition is V < band gap, but the headline regime (Fig. 3, V/t=5) has V about an order of magnitude above the gap, which is comparable to the bandwidth.
  • domain assumption Interactions restricted to on-site U and nearest-neighbor V
    Eq. (1): longer-range Coulomb tails, exchange and spin-flip scatterings are neglected in the projected Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption Umbrella parameterization of the noncoplanar order by a single angle θ
    Fig. 1(b): used throughout; the claimed generality to any spin configuration is asserted but not demonstrated (§2.1).
  • standard math Momentum counting rule of Eq. (10) identifies the ν=1/3 FCI ground-state sectors
    Taken from Ref. [9]; used to select the momentum sectors and to build overlap reference states; verified only at one point (θ/π=0.31) against Ref. [11].
  • domain assumption Overlap-matrix singular-value average Ō is a faithful FCI indicator
    Eq. (11), Ref. [87]: presumes the flat-band-limit reference states are genuine FCIs and that mixing with higher states is negligible.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 14143 in / 29220 out tokens · 265021 ms · 2026-08-01T00:35:49.922631+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) are the lattice analogs of the fractional quantum Hall states, emerging even without an external magnetic field. In this work, we demonstrate the emergence of the FCI states in a kagome magnet with a noncoplanar magnetic order that induces a finite scalar spin chirality. By incorporating in our model both electron-electron interactions and the effect of band dispersion, we find that stronger interactions relative to the band dispersion stabilize the FCI state over a broader range of scalar spin chirality. We characterize the emergent FCI state by calculating overlap with representative states, identifying the ground-state degeneracy and the finite energy gap in the thermodynamic limit, and tracking the spectral flow under multiple flux-quantum insertions. Our results suggest that kagome magnets with scalar spin chirality can be promising platforms for realizing FCIs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27833 by Kentaro Nomura, Koji Kudo, Shinnosuke Tsutsumi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of a kagome lattice considered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Average of the singular values of the overlap matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Low-lying many-body energy spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Low-lying many-body spectra as functions of the total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Low-energy spectral flow as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Low-energy spectrum as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two-Dimensional Magnetotransport in the Extreme Quantum Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1559 (1982)

    1982

  2. [2]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect: An Incompressible Quantum Fluid with Fraction- ally Charged Excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  3. [3]

    Arovas, J

    D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Frac- tional Statistics and the Quantum Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 722 (1984)

    1984

  4. [4]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional Quantization of the Hall Effect: A Hierarchy of Incompressible Quantum Fluid States, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  5. [5]

    B. I. Halperin, Statistics of Quasiparticles and the Hierarchy of Fractional Quantized Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1583 (1984)

    1984

  6. [6]

    Wen, Topological orders and edge excitations in fractional quantum Hall states, Adv

    X.-G. Wen, Topological orders and edge excitations in fractional quantum Hall states, Adv. Phys.44, 405 (1995)

    1995

  7. [7]

    D. N. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng, Frac- tional quantum Hall effect in the absence of Landau levels, Nature Communications2, 389 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Fractional Quantum Hall States at Zero Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  9. [9]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional Chern Insulator, Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  10. [10]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High- Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236802 (2011)

    2011

  11. [11]

    Y.-L. Wu, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Zool- ogy of fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B85, 075116 (2012)

    2012

  12. [12]

    A. G. Grushin, T. Neupert, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Enhancing the stability of a fractional Chern insulator against competing phases, Phys. Rev. B86, 205125 (2012)

    2012

  13. [13]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of Fractional Quan- tum Anomalous Hall States in Twisted MoTe2, Na- ture622(2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect, Nature622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Observation of Integer and Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effects in Twisted Bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. r. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Z. Ji, H. Park, M. E. Barber, C. Hu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, and Z.-X. Shen, Local probe of bulk and edge states in a fractional Chern insulator, Nature635, 578 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Redekop, C

    E. Redekop, C. Zhang, H. Park, J. Cai, E. Ander- son, O. Sheekey, T. Arp, G. Babikyan, S. Salters, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. E. Huber, X. Xu, and A. F. Young, Direct magnetic imaging of frac- tional Chern insulators in twisted MoTe2, Nature 635, 584 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Frac- tional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    S. H. Aronson, T. Han, Z. Lu, Y. Yao, J. P. But- ler, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Ju, and R. C. Ashoori, Displacement Field-Controlled Fractional Chern Insulators and Charge Density Waves in a Graphene/hBN Moir´ e Superlattice, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031026 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, Z. Hadjri, J. Yang, J. Seo, L. Shi, S. Ye, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and L. Ju, Extended quantum anomalous Hall states in graphene/hBN moir´ e superlattices, Nature637, 1090 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    J. Xie, Z. Huo, X. Lu, Z. Feng, Z. Zhang, W. Wang, Q. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Liu, Z. Song, X. C. Xie, J. Liu, and X. Lu, Tunable frac- tional Chern insulators in rhombohedral graphene superlattices, Nature Materials24, 1042 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Liu and E

    Z. Liu and E. J. Bergholtz, From fractional Chern insulators to Abelian and non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall states: Adiabatic continuity and or- bital entanglement spectrum, Phys. Rev. B87, 035306 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    Sohal, L

    R. Sohal, L. H. Santos, and E. Fradkin, Chern- Simons composite fermion theory of fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B97, 125131 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    Kupczy´ nski, B

    M. Kupczy´ nski, B. d. z. Jaworowski, and A. W´ ojs, Interaction-driven transition between the Wigner crystal and the fractional Chern insulator in topo- logical flat bands, Phys. Rev. B104, 085107 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Okamoto, N

    S. Okamoto, N. Mohanta, E. Dagotto, and D. N. Sheng, Topological flat bands in a kagome lattice multiorbital system, Commun. Phys.5, 198 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Claassen, L

    M. Claassen, L. Xian, D. M. Kennes, and A. Ru- bio, Ultra-strong spin–orbit coupling and topologi- cal moir´ e engineering in twisted ZrS2 bilayers, Nat. Commun.13, 4915 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Sethi, D

    G. Sethi, D. N. Sheng, and F. Liu, Anomalous bilayer quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B108, L161112 (2023). 6

    2023

  29. [29]

    A. V. Mallik, A. Agarwala, and T. Saha-Dasgupta, Correlation-driven nontrivial phases in single- bilayer kagome intermetallics, Phys. Rev. B108, 205125 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    O. M. i. Comas, A. G. Fonseca, S. Vaidya, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Refining Heuristic Predictors of Frac- tional Chern Insulators using Machine Learning, arXiv:2512.01873 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    A. G. Fonseca, E. Wang, S. Vaidya, P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Gradient-based search of quantum phases: discovering unconven- tional fractional Chern insulators, arXiv:2509.10438 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Lu and L

    T. Lu and L. H. Santos, Exciton-Anyon Binding in Fractional Chern Insulators: Spectral Fingerprints, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 256605 (2026)

    2026

  33. [33]

    Guo and M

    H.-M. Guo and M. Franz, Topological insulator on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B80, 113102 (2009)

    2009

  34. [34]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Na- ture464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Na- ture464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  35. [35]

    K. Kudo, T. Kariyado, and Y. Hatsugai, Many- Body Chern Numbers ofν= 1/3 and 1/2 States on Various Lattices, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan86, 103701 (2017)

    2017

  36. [36]

    K. Kudo, T. Yoshida, and Y. Hatsugai, Higher- Order Topological Mott Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 196402 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, and H. Kontani, Charge- loop current order andZ 3 nematicity mediated by bond order fluctuations in kagome metals, Nat. Commun.14, 7845 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Huang, R

    J. Huang, R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, S. Onari, and H. Kontani, Low temperature phase transitions in- side the CDW phase in the kagome metalsAV 3Sb5 (A= Cs,Rb,K): Significance of mixed-type Fermi surface electron correlations, Phys. Rev. B109, L041110 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, and H. Kontani, Dras- tic magnetic-field-induced chiral current order and emergent current-bond-field interplay in kagome metals, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences121, e2303476121 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Shimura, R

    K. Shimura, R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, S. Onari, and H. Kontani, Real-Space Loop Current Pat- tern in Time-Reversal-Symmetry Breaking Phase in Kagome Metals, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan93, 033704 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Asaba, A

    T. Asaba, A. Onishi, Y. Kageyama, T. Kiyosue, K. Ohtsuka, S. Suetsugu, Y. Kohsaka, T. Gaggl, Y. Kasahara, H. Murayama, K. Hashimoto, R. Tazai, H. Kontani, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, Q. Li, H. H. Wen, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Evidence for an odd-parity nematic phase above the charge-density-wave transition in a kagome metal, Nat. Phys.20, 40 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Nakazawa, Y

    K. Nakazawa, Y. Kato, and Y. Motome, Topologi- cal transitions by magnetization rotation in kagome monolayers of the ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Co-based shandite, Phys. Rev. B110, 085112 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Nakazawa, R

    S. Nakazawa, R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, S. Onari, and H. Kontani, Origin of switchable quasiparticle- interference chirality in loop-current phase of kagome metals measured by scanning-tunneling- microscopy, Nat. Commun.16, 9545 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Nakazawa, R

    S. Nakazawa, R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, S. Onari, and H. Kontani, Giant impurity effects on charge loop current order states in kagome metals, Phys. Rev. B111, 075161 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, T. Morimoto, and H. Kon- tani, Quantum metric–induced giant and reversible nonreciprocal transport phenomena in chiral loop- current phases of kagome metals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2503645122 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Huang, Y

    J. Huang, Y. Yamakawa, R. Tazai, T. Morimoto, and H. Kontani, Odd-parity bond order and in- duced nonreciprocal transport in the kagome metal CsTi3Bi5 driven by quantum interference, Phys. Rev. B111, 125153 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Onari, R

    S. Onari, R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, and H. Kontani, Paramagnon-Interference Mechanism for Three- Dimensional Bond Order in Kagome Metals A V3Sb5 (A = Cs, Rb, K): Analysis by the Density-Wave Equation, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 95, 044707 (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    H. Goto, R. Okugawa, and T. Tohyama, Chern insu- lators and topological flat bands in cavity-embedded kagome systems, Phys. Rev. B113, 165201 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Yamakawa and H

    Y. Yamakawa and H. Kontani, Superconductivity and the quasiparticle mass enhancement near the CDW critical point using Bethe-Salpeter method: Application to cuprates, arXiv:2508.19536 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, Y. Hu, J. L. Zuo, P. M. Sarte, E. C. Schueller, A. M. M. Abeykoon, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, R. Seshadri, L. Balents, J. He, and S. D. Wilson, CsV 3Sb5: AZ 2 Topological Kagome Metal with a Superconducting Ground State, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 247002 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    H. Zhao, H. Li, B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, T. Park, M. Ye, Z. Wang, L. Balents, S. D. Wil- son, and I. Zeljkovic, Cascade of correlated electron states in the kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5, Na- ture599, 216 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, S. Onari, and H. Kon- tani, Mechanism of exotic density-wave and beyond- Migdal unconventional superconductivity in kagome metal A V¡sub¿3¡/sub¿Sb¡sub¿5¡/sub¿ (A = K, Rb, Cs), Science Advances8, eabl4108 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    J. Yang, X. Yi, Z. Zhao, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. C. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, Y. Ye, J.-Y. You, B. Gu, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, H. Chen, H. C. Yang, G. Su, H. Gao, L. Zhao, and X. J. Zhou, Observation of flat band, Dirac nodal lines and topological surface 7 states in Kagome superconductor CsTi3Bi5, Nat. Comm...

    2023

  54. [54]

    Nagashima, K

    T. Nagashima, K. Ishihara, Y. Yamakawa, F. Chen, K. Imamura, M. Roppongi, R. Grasset, M. Kon- czykowski, B. R. Ortiz, A. C. Salinas, S. D. Wil- son, R. Tazai, H. Kontani, K. Hashimoto, and T. Shibauchi, Impact of charge-density-wave pat- tern on the superconducting gap in Vanadium-based kagome superconductors, Commun. Phys.8, 303 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    L. Wang, W. Wang, T. F. Poon, Z. Wang, C. W. Tsang, X. Liu, S. Wang, K. T. Lai, W. Zhang, J. L. Tallon, Y. Yamakawa, H. Kontani, R. Tazai, and S. K. Goh, Giant critical current peak induced by pressure in kagome superconductor RbV3Sb5, arXiv :2511.21195 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, and H. Kontani, Nematic chiral Superconductivity driven by chiral loop cur- rent order in kagome metals, arXiv:2508.04433t (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    K. Kudo, R. Nakai, H. Isobe, and K. Nomura, Topo- logical superconductivity on a kagome magnet cou- pled to a Rashba superconductor, arXiv:2602.07383 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Ohgushi, S

    K. Ohgushi, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Spin anisotropy and quantum Hall effect in the kagom´ e lattice: Chiral spin state based on a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B62, R6065(R) (2000)

    2000

  59. [59]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antifer- romagnet at room temperature, Nature527, 212 (2015)

    2015

  60. [60]

    E. Liu, Y. Sun, N. Kumar, L. Muechler, A. Sun, L. Jiao, S.-Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. Liang, Q. Xu, et al., Giant anomalous Hall effect in a ferromag- netic kagome-lattice semimetal, Nat. Phys.14, 1125 (2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    L. Ye, M. Kang, J. Liu, F. Von Cube, C. R. Wicker, T. Suzuki, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. C. Bell, et al., Massive Dirac fermions in a ferro- magnetic kagome metal, Nature555, 638 (2018)

    2018

  62. [62]

    Kobayashi, M

    K. Kobayashi, M. Takagaki, and K. Nomura, Ro- bust magnetotransport in disordered ferromagnetic kagome layers with quantum anomalous Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B100, 161301(R) (2019)

    2019

  63. [63]

    Fujiwara, Y

    K. Fujiwara, Y. Kato, H. Abe, S. Noguchi, J. Sh- iogai, Y. Niwa, H. Kumigashira, Y. Motome, and A. Tsukazaki, Berry curvature contributions of kagome-lattice fragments in amorphous Fe–Sn thin films, Nat. Commun.13, 3399 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    S. Sachdev, Kagome´- and triangular-lattice Heisen- berg antiferromagnets: Ordering from quantum fluc- tuations and quantum-disordered ground states with unconfined bosonic spinons, Phys. Rev. B45, 12377 (1992)

    1992

  65. [65]

    T.-H. Han, J. S. Helton, S. Chu, D. G. Nocera, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, C. Broholm, and Y. S. Lee, Fractionalized excitations in the spin-liquid state of a kagome-lattice antiferromagnet, Nature492, 406 (2012)

    2012

  66. [66]

    Watanabe, Y

    J. Watanabe, Y. Araki, K. Kobayashi, A. Ozawa, and K. Nomura, Magnetic orderings from spin–orbit coupled electrons on kagome lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.91, 083702 (2022)

    2022

  67. [67]

    Ito and K

    N. Ito and K. Nomura, Anomalous Hall effect and spontaneous orbital magnetization in antiferromag- netic Weyl metal, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.86, 063703 (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    Liu and L

    J. Liu and L. Balents, Anomalous Hall effect and topological defects in antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetals: Mn3Sn/Ge, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 087202 (2017)

    2017

  69. [69]

    Kuroda, T

    K. Kuroda, T. Tomita, M.-T. Suzuki, C. Bareille, A. A. Nugroho, P. Goswami, M. Ochi, M. Ikhlas, M. Nakayama, S. Akebi, et al., Evidence for mag- netic Weyl fermions in a correlated metal, Nat. Mater.16, 1090 (2017)

    2017

  70. [70]

    T. Higo, H. Man, D. B. Gopman, L. Wu, T. Koret- sune, O. M. J. van ’t Erve, Y. P. Kabanov, D. Rees, Y. Li, M.-T. Suzuki, S. Patankar, M. Ikhlas, C. L. Chien, R. Arita, R. D. Shull, J. Orenstein, and S. Nakatsuji, Large magneto-optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole domains in an anti- ferromagnetic metal, Nat. Photonics12, 73 (2018)

    2018

  71. [71]

    T. Higo, D. Qu, Y. Li, C. L. Chien, Y. Otani, and S. Nakatsuji, Anomalous Hall effect in thin films of the Weyl antiferromagnet Mn3Sn, Applied Physics Letters113, 202402 (2018)

    2018

  72. [72]

    Lin, J.-H

    Z. Lin, J.-H. Choi, Q. Zhang, W. Qin, S. Yi, P. Wang, L. Li, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Sun, et al., Flatbands and emergent ferromagnetic order- ing in Fe3Sn2 kagome lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 096401 (2018)

    2018

  73. [73]

    S. Fang, L. Ye, M. P. Ghimire, M. Kang, J. Liu, M. Han, L. Fu, M. Richter, J. van den Brink, E. Kaxiras, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Fer- romagnetic helical nodal line and Kane-Mele spin- orbit coupling in kagome metal Fe 3Sn2, Phys. Rev. B105, 035107 (2022)

    2022

  74. [74]

    A. K. Nayak, J. E. Fischer, Y. Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A. C. Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. K¨ ubler, et al., Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolin- ear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge, Sci. Adv.2, e1501870 (2016)

    2016

  75. [75]

    Kiyohara, T

    N. Kiyohara, T. Tomita, and S. Nakatsuji, Giant anomalous Hall effect in the chiral antiferromagnet Mn3Ge, Phys. Rev. Applied5, 064009 (2016)

    2016

  76. [76]

    J.-R. Soh, F. de Juan, N. Qureshi, H. Jacobsen, H.- Y. Wang, Y.-F. Guo, and A. T. Boothroyd, Ground- state magnetic structure of Mn 3Ge, Phys. Rev. B 101, 140411(R) (2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    Q. Wang, Y. Xu, R. Lou, Z. Liu, M. Li, Y. Huang, D. Shen, H. Weng, S. Wang, and H. Lei, Large 8 intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in half-metallic fer- romagnet Co3Sn2S2 with magnetic Weyl fermions, Nat. Commun.9, 3681 (2018)

    2018

  78. [78]

    D. F. Liu, A. J. Liang, E. K. Liu, Q. N. Xu, Y. W. Li, C. Chen, D. Pei, W. J. Shi, S. K. Mo, P. Dudin, et al., Magnetic Weyl semimetal phase in a Kagom´ e crystal, Science365, 1282 (2019)

    2019

  79. [79]

    Ozawa and K

    A. Ozawa and K. Nomura, Two-orbital effective model for magnetic Weyl semimetal in kagome- lattice shandite, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123703 (2019)

    2019

  80. [80]

    Ikeda, K

    J. Ikeda, K. Fujiwara, J. Shiogai, T. Seki, K. No- mura, Kentaro Ext, and A. Tsukazaki, Critical thickness for the emergence of Weyl features in Co3Sn2S2 thin films, Commun. Mater.2, 18 (2021)

    2021

Showing first 80 references.