Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Automatic Differentiation Variational Inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1603.00788 v1 pith:LYHOKC7Q submitted 2016-03-02 stat.ML cs.AIcs.LGstat.CO

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.LGstat.CO
keywords advimodelsinferenceprobabilisticscientistvariationalautomaticdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Probabilistic modeling is iterative. A scientist posits a simple model, fits it to her data, refines it according to her analysis, and repeats. However, fitting complex models to large data is a bottleneck in this process. Deriving algorithms for new models can be both mathematically and computationally challenging, which makes it difficult to efficiently cycle through the steps. To this end, we develop automatic differentiation variational inference (ADVI). Using our method, the scientist only provides a probabilistic model and a dataset, nothing else. ADVI automatically derives an efficient variational inference algorithm, freeing the scientist to refine and explore many models. ADVI supports a broad class of models-no conjugacy assumptions are required. We study ADVI across ten different models and apply it to a dataset with millions of observations. ADVI is integrated into Stan, a probabilistic programming system; it is available for immediate use.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inferring Galactic Parameters from Chemical Abundances: A Multi-Star Approach

    astro-ph.GA 2019-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The method recovers the IMF high-mass slope and Type Ia supernova rate to sub-percent precision from the chemical abundances of up to 200 simulated stars using a neural-network emulator and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.

  2. Rapid Mismatch Estimation via Neural Network Informed Variational Inference

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RME estimates end-effector mass and center-of-mass mismatches online in about 400 ms using proprioceptive feedback and a neural-network-guided variational inference.

  3. Bayesian Neural Networks: An Introduction and Survey

    stat.ML 2020-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey introducing Bayesian Neural Networks and comparing approximate inference methods to enable uncertainty quantification in neural network predictions.

Pith tools