Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 76 references

Durgapal-Fuloria Bose-Einstein condensate stars within $ f(R,T) $ gravity theory

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs isotropic BEC star interiors with the Durgapal-Fuloria metric in f(R,T)=R+2ηT gravity and claims they satisfy all standard energy and stability conditions.

desk verdict Boundary matching fails: the tabulated F values do not satisfy Eq. (18), so the stability analysis is computed on a solution that is not the claimed compact star. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17334 v1 pith:LYX2VHEP submitted 2025-06-19 gr-qc hep-th

Meghanil Sinha , S. Surendra Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th PACS 04.50.Kd04.40.Dg
keywords Bose-EinsteincondensatestarsDurgapal-Fuloriametricf(RT)gravitycompactisotropicperfectfluidenergyconditionsstellarstabilitysurfaceredshift
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that a specific family of interior solutions describes realistic Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) stars in f(R,T) modified gravity. Using the Durgapal-Fuloria metric ansatz and the linear form $f(R,T)=R+2\eta T$, the authors solve the field equations for isotropic matter with the BEC equation of state $p=U\rho^2$ and match the interior to a Schwarzschild exterior at the stellar radius. They report that the resulting density and pressure are positive and decrease outward, that all standard energy conditions hold, that the equation-of-state parameter lies between 0 and 1, and that sound velocity, adiabatic index, and surface redshift all fall in the stable range. If these results hold, the work supplies new exact BEC star solutions in modified gravity and extends a known general-relativistic construction to a theory in which the energy-momentum tensor is not conserved.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the Durgapal-Fuloria metric ansatz, a rational form for the radial metric function that is finite everywhere inside the star and yields well-behaved density and pressure profiles. It closes the $f(R,T)$ field equations once the matter is fixed as an isotropic perfect fluid with the Gross-Pitaevskii BEC equation of state $p=U\rho^2$; the coupling constant $\eta$ in $f(R,T)=R+2\eta T$ measures the deviation from general relativity. The parameter $F$ is fixed by demanding continuity with the Schwarzschild exterior at $r=R$, and the stability analysis uses the velocity of sound, the adiabatic index, and the surface redshift as criteria.

What would settle it

Compute $2M/R$ for each Table 1 entry in geometrized units, with one solar mass equal to about 1.475 km. The CEN X-3 row gives $2M/R \approx 1.05$, exceeding the limit of 1 required for a Schwarzschild exterior, so if that star's listed mass and radius are correct the boundary matching used to fix $F$ cannot hold for it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Durgapal-Fuloria metric $e^{j(r)}=(7+14Fr^2+7Fr^4)/(7-10Fr^2-F^2r^4)$, combined with $f(R,T)=R+2\eta T$ and the Gross-Pitaevskii-derived equation of state $p=U\rho^2$, yields a one-parameter family of isotropic stellar models that pass every standard viability test. For the five observed compact objects listed in Table 1, the matching condition fixes the parameter $F$, and numerical profiles for $\eta=0.2$ show energy conditions, causality, adiabatic stability, and redshift bounds satisfied throughout the interior. The authors therefore conclude that they have introduced new, stable BEC stellar solutions in $f(R,T)$ gravity with enhanced precision relative to earlier models.

Load-bearing premise

The model stands or falls on the assumption that each tabulated star's radius is larger than its Schwarzschild radius so the interior can be matched to the exterior; the CEN X-3 entry, at its listed mass and radius, violates that condition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same Durgapal-Fuloria ansatz can generate new isotropic-fluid stellar models in $f(R,T)$ gravity by swapping in different equations of state.
  • The tabulated values of $F$ give a ready-made normalization for fitting the model to the masses and radii of the five candidate compact objects.
  • Because $\eta=0$ recovers general relativity, the model offers a controlled way to quantify how modified gravity shifts BEC star density, pressure, and stability.
  • The positive energy-condition and causality results make this solution available as a background for future perturbation or oscillation studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not in the paper: a continuous mass-radius relation. Computing $M(R)$ from the matched solutions and comparing with compact-star constraints would make the model testable beyond the five tabulated points.
  • Not in the paper: a check of the exterior-matching condition for every table entry. In geometrized units the CEN X-3 row gives $2M/R \approx 1.05 > 1$, so the Schwarzschild match used to fix $F$ cannot be valid for that candidate as listed.
  • Not in the paper: a survey over the coupling constant $\eta$. Mapping the stability criteria as $\eta$ varies would show how much modified-gravity coupling the solution can tolerate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs static, spherically symmetric Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) star models in f(R,T)=R+2ηT gravity using the Durgapal-Fuloria metric ansatz and the BEC equation of state p=Uρ^2. The parameter F in the metric is fixed by matching to a Schwarzschild exterior using the observed masses and radii of five compact stars listed in Table 1. The paper states that numerical derivation yields the density and pressure profiles, and then reports checks of energy conditions, the EoS parameter, density and pressure gradients, sound speed, adiabatic index, and surface redshift. The authors conclude that the models are stable, causal, and realistic, and that new BEC stellar solutions in modified gravity have been introduced.

Significance. If the construction were valid, it would offer a moderately interesting extension of BEC star models to f(R,T) gravity, with the virtue of checking several physical viability criteria. The paper also engages a relevant literature and presents the material in a readable outline. However, the central result is not currently established: the derivation of the density and pressure profiles is not shown, the tabulated boundary parameters do not satisfy the stated junction conditions, and the reported adiabatic index is inconsistent with the assumed BEC equation of state. The manuscript provides no reproducible code or machine-checked derivations, so the claimed 'enhanced precise results' cannot be verified from the text as it stands.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, after Eq. (23)] The paper states that 'Numerical derivation yields the density and the pressure outcomes' but does not provide the differential equations solved, the boundary conditions used, the numerical scheme, or any code. Since every subsequent check (energy conditions, EoS parameter, sound speed, adiabatic index, surface redshift) is evaluated on these numerical profiles, this omission makes the central claim of the paper unverifiable and non-reproducible.
  2. [Eq. (18) and Table 1] The tabulated values of F do not satisfy the boundary matching condition. With G=c=1 and 1 M_sun = 1.475 km, the compactness 2M/R for PSR B0943+10 is about 0.227, so the exterior Schwarzschild factor is 1-2M/R ≈ 0.773; yet substituting R=2.6 km and F=1.49e-5 into Eq. (19) gives e^{j(R)} ≈ 1.0003. For CEN X-3, 2M/R ≈ 1.05, so no Schwarzschild exterior with the advertised mass exists at all. Thus the F values in Table 1 are not the solutions of Eq. (18), and all subsequent profiles and stability tests describe configurations that are not matched to the claimed compact objects.
  3. [Eq. (23) and Figure 10] The adiabatic index shown in Figure 10 is inconsistent with the assumed BEC equation of state. For p = U ρ^2, one has dp/dρ = 2Uρ = 2p/ρ, so Γ = (ρ+p)/p · dp/dρ = 2(1+p/ρ), which is always ≥ 2. Figure 10 reports Γ ≈ 1.5 throughout the star. Figure 6 similarly shows ω = p/ρ increasing with r, whereas p=Uρ^2 with a radially decreasing density profile would require ω to decrease outward. The numerical profiles therefore do not satisfy the BEC EoS that the paper claims to use.
  4. [Section 2, Eqs. (11)-(22)] The metric function i(r) is never explicitly determined. Equations (21) and (22) involve i'(r) and i''(r), and Eq. (14) is a first-order equation for p, but the paper does not state how i(r) is obtained or how the boundary condition p(R)=0 is enforced in the numerical derivation. Consequently, the surface redshift calculation using Eq. (31) and the gradients shown in Figures 7 and 8 are not reproducible from the information given.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The text repeatedly uses 'adiabetic' instead of 'adiabatic' (e.g., Section 4.2 and the conclusion).
  2. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract describes 'finite temperature BEC stars,' but the introduction states the paper aims to explore 'zero temperature BEC stellar framework'; the manuscript should clarify which regime is actually modeled.
  3. [Table 1] The table does not state the units of F, and the numerical values for masses and radii are given without uncertainties or references to the observational sources; this is needed for a quantitative comparison.
  4. [Figures 1-11] The figures lack axis labels with physical units, and the legend entries such as 'F1', 'F2', 'F3' are not defined consistently with the table values; for example, Figure 1 uses 'F1=0.0000149', 'F2=0.0000203', 'F3=0.0000283' but Table 1 contains five F values.
  5. [References] Several references are incomplete or informal, including [10] with lowercase 'f(r)' and [31] cited as an arXiv preprint; the paper should be checked against the journal's reference style.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the only fitted parameter is anchored to observed masses and radii, and the subsequent stability tests are independent checks rather than predictions of the same data.

full rationale

The paper does not derive any target quantity from a quantity that was defined in terms of it. The only fitted parameter is F, determined (in principle) from the boundary condition Eq. (18) using the observed M and R of five candidate stars; mass and radius are inputs, not predictions. The subsequent profiles (density, pressure, energy conditions, sound speed, adiabatic index, redshift) are checks of physical viability of the resulting solution, not independent predictions to be compared with the same data. There are no self-citations by the present authors; the DP metric and BEC EoS are cited from external prior work. Some stability criteria are weak—for the quadratic EoS p = Uρ², the adiabatic index is identically Γ = 2(1+p/ρ) > 4/3 and the sound speed is V² = 2Uρ, so these tests largely restate the EoS—but this is a limitation of the validation, not a circular reduction of the central model construction. A separate concern, external to circularity, is that the tabulated F values do not appear to satisfy the advertised Schwarzschild matching condition e^{j(R)} = 1 − 2M/R (e.g., for PSR B0943+10, e^{j(R)} ≈ 1.00035 while 1 − 2M/R ≈ 0.773), which would undermine the physical interpretation but does not constitute input–output circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on several hand-chosen parameters (η, F, and BEC microphysics) and a set of domain assumptions about the theory and the stellar structure. The DP metric ansatz is ad hoc to this paper. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • eta (f(R,T) coupling constant) = 0.2
    Chosen by hand to exhibit the effect; no derivation or observational constraint is provided. All plots are for η = 0.2.
  • F (Durgapal-Fuloria metric parameter) = 0.0000149, 0.0000203, 0.0000283 (plus two others in Table 1)
    Computed from the boundary condition e^{j(R)} = 1 - 2M/R using observed masses and radii; the model's output depends on this fitting.
  • U (BEC interaction strength in EoS p = U ρ^2) = 4.17e-43 g cm^5/s^2 (from [55])
    Taken from prior literature with chosen microphysical inputs (α = 1 fm, M = 2 nucleon masses); not derived here.
  • M_cond (condensate particle mass) = 2m = 3.35e-24 g
    Assumed to be two nucleon masses to allow bosonic pairing; a modeling choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The gravitational theory is f(R,T) = R + 2ηT, with matter Lagrangian L_m = -p.
    This specific form is assumed throughout; the paper does not justify why this particular f(R,T) function is physical.
  • domain assumption The stellar interior is a perfect fluid with isotropic pressure.
    Spherically symmetric perfect fluid; no anisotropy or shear is considered.
  • domain assumption The matter obeys the BEC equation of state p(ρ) = U ρ^2.
    Taken from Chavanis-Harko [48]; assumed valid throughout the star.
  • ad hoc to paper The interior metric is given by the Durgapal-Fuloria ansatz (19).
    The metric is chosen for its singularity-free nature; it is an ansatz, not derived from the field equations.
  • domain assumption The exterior spacetime is Schwarzschild, with matching conditions at r=R.
    Standard matching, but the paper does not verify consistency with the field equations' trace terms at the surface.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Durgapal-Fuloria Bose-Einstein condensate stars within $ f(R,T) $ gravity theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LYX2VHEP

@misc{pith2026250617334,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Durgapal-Fuloria Bose-Einstein condensate stars within $ f(R,T) $ gravity theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LYX2VHEP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17334}
}
abstract

This manuscript studies the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) stars in the light of $ f(R,T) $ gravity here with Durgapal-Fuloria (DP) metric ansatz. The function under this study features as $ f(R,T) = R + 2\eta T $, where $ \eta $ represents the coupling constant. With the help of it, we have formulated a stellar model describing the isotropic matter here within. Our analysis covers energy conditions, equation of state (EoS) parameter and gradients of the energy-momentum tensor components for a valid BEC stellar framework within $ f(R,T) $ gravitational theory with satisfactory results. The model's stability has been validated via multiple stability criteria viz., the velocity of sound, study of adiabetic index and surface redshift where all are found to be lying within the acceptable range for our stellar model. Thus in all the cases we have found our model to be stable and realistic. From the graphical representations the impact of the coupling constant and the parameter of the DP metric potential are clearly visible. Thus we can state that with all the above-mentioned features we have introduced new stellar solutions for BEC stars with enhanced precise results in this modified gravity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17334 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Behavior of the density profile w.r.t r R for P SR − B0943 + 10, HERX − 1, SMCX − 4 and η = 0.2 Numerical derivation yields the density and the pressure outcomes for our stellar model in the interior. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Behavior of the pressure w.r.t r R for P SR − B0943 + 10, HERX − 1, SMCX − 4 and η = 0.2 Figures (1) and (2) demonstrate pressure and density positivity, peaking at the center and decreasing radially outward for 0 < r < R. This shows the model’s physical soundness [30]. 3.1 Energy conditions The stellar system requires the following energy inequalities to satisfy. Verifying them in f(R, T ) gravity’s tensor shows th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Plot of ρ + p vs r R for different parameter values with η = 0.2 F1=0.0000149 F2=0.0000203 F3=0.0000283 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.000024 0.000026 0.000028 0.000030 r ρ+3p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of ρ + 3p vs r R for different parameter values with η = 0.2 F1=0.0000149 F2=0.0000203 F3=0.0000283 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0000100 0.0000102 0.0000104 0.0000106 0.0000108 0.0000110 0.0000112 r ρ-p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plot of ρ − p vs r R for different parameter values with η = 0.2 3.2 EoS parameter Here our analysis centers on the EoS parameter ω with density, and pressure gradients in the interior. The EoS parameter is determined by the relation of ω = p ρ . (28) 8 [PITH_FULL_IMA…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Nature of ω vs r R for different parameter values with η = 0.2 F1=0.0000149 F2=0.0000203 F3=0.0000283 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 5.0×10-7 1.0×10-6 1.5×10-6 2.0×10-6 r ∂ ρ ∂ r [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Nature of ∂rρ vs r R for different parameter values with η = 0.2 F1=0.0000149 F2=0.0000203 F3=0.0000283 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 2×10-7 4×10-7 6×10-7 8×10-7 1×10-6 r ∂ p ∂ r [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Nature of ∂rp vs r R for different parameter values with η = 0.2 The graphical representation of the solution is given in figure (6). The results confirm with the predicted range of [0, 1]. We further analyze the gradients of the energy-momentum tensor components, depi…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: V 2 is plotted w.r.t r R for F = 0.0000149, F = 0.0000203, F = 0.0000283 with η = 0.2 Figure (9) shows that the parameter V 2 is decreasing radially outward and also remaining well below the speed of light. Thus we can rely on our hypothesized BEC star model within f(R…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Γ is plotted w.r.t ´ r R for F = 0.0000149, F = 0.0000203, F = 0.0000283 with η = 0.2 to be more stable within this gravitational theory. 4.3 Surface redshift To strengthen the stability and formulation of our proposed model we have also taken the help of surface reds…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: ZS is plotted w.r.t r R for F = 0.0000149, F = 0.0000203, F = 0.0000283 with η = 0.2 where positive values are expected within the structures. Figure (11) illustrates the surface redshift’s range i.e. within 0 and 2 affirming our model’s matter distribution’s validity…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G Riess et al, Astron

    A. G Riess et al, Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter et al, Astrophys

    S. Perlmutter et al, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999). 12

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    D. J. Eisenstein et al, Astrophys. J. 633, 560 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    A. G. Riess et al, Astrophys. J. 607, 665 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    A. D. Felice. S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel. 13, 3 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Nojiri S

    S. Nojiri S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rep. 505, 59 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Stabile, A

    S Capozziello, A. Stabile, A. Troisi, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 2153 ( 2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Sharif, H

    A. Sharif, H. R. Kausar, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 80, 044004 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    T. P. Sotiriou, V. Faraoni, f (r) theories of gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    Faraoni, f (R) gravity: Successes and challenges, in 18th SIGRA V Conference ( 2008) arXiv:0810.2602 [gr-qc]

    V. Faraoni, f (R) gravity: Successes and challenges, in 18th SIGRA V Conference ( 2008) arXiv:0810.2602 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980)

    1980

  4. [12]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, Modified Gravity Theo ries on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution, Phys. Rept. 692, 1 (2017), arXiv :1705.11098 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Capozziello, M

    S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, Extended theories of gravity, Phys. Rep. 509, 167 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    Harko, F.S.N

    T. Harko, F.S.N. Lobo, S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 84 ( 2011) 024020

    2011

  7. [15]

    Moraes, J.D.V

    P.H.R.S. Moraes, J.D.V. Arba˜ nil, M. Malheiro, J. Cosmol. Astropar t. Phys. 06 (2016) 005

    2016

  8. [16]

    Yousaf, K

    Z. Yousaf, K. Bamba et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, 064059 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Yousaf, K

    Z. Yousaf, K. Bamba, M.Z.-u-H. Bhatti, Phys. Rev. D 93, 12404 8 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    S. S. Yazadjiev, D. D. Doneva, K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. D 9 1 (2015) 084018

    2015

  11. [19]

    A. Das, S. Ghosh, B.K. Guha, S. Das, F. Rahaman, S. Ray, Phys . Rev. D 95 (2017) 124011

    2017

  12. [20]

    Bhatti, Z

    M.Z. Bhatti, Z. Yousaf, M. Ilyas, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 690

    2017

  13. [21]

    Harko, Phys

    T. Harko, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 044067

    2014

  14. [22]

    Myrzakulov, Eur

    R. Myrzakulov, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2203 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    Jamil, D

    M. Jamil, D. Momeni, and R. Myrzakulov, Chin. Phys. Lett. 29, 10 9801 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Shabani, M

    H. Shabani, M. Farhoudi, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044048 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Sharif, Z

    M. Sharif, Z. Yousaf, Astrophys. Space Sci. 354, 471 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Noureen, M

    I. Noureen, M. Zubair, Astrophys. Space Sci. 356, 103 (2015 )

    2015

  19. [27]

    Noureen, M

    I. Noureen, M. Zubair, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 62 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Noureen, M

    I. Noureen, M. Zubair, A. A. Bhatti, and G. Abbas, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 323 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Hansraj, A

    S. Hansraj, A. Banerjee, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104020 (2018). 13

    2018

  22. [30]

    Kumar, H

    J. Kumar, H. D. Singh, A. K. Prasad (2021). A generalized Buch dahl model for compact stars in f (R, T ) gravity. Physics of the Dark Universe, 34, 100880

    2021

  23. [31]

    A. Das, S. Ghosh, B. K. Guha, S. Das, F. Rahaman, S. Ray, (20 17). Gravastars in f (R, T ) gravity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08873

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Alhamzawi, R

    A. Alhamzawi, R. Alhamzawi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1650020 (2 016)

  25. [33]

    Zubair, G

    M. Zubair, G. Abbas, I. Noureen, Astrophys. Space Sci. 361, 8 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Psaltis, Living Rev

    D. Psaltis, Living Rev. Relativity 11, 9 (2008)

    2008

  27. [35]

    Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the S tandard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys

    G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the S tandard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1–29 (2012), arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Chatrchyan et al

    S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Observation of a New Boson at a Ma ss of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30–61 (2012), arXiv:12 07.7235 [hep-ex]

    2012

  29. [37]

    Jetzer, Boson stars, Phys

    P. Jetzer, Boson stars, Phys. Rept. 220, 163–227 (1992)

    1992

  30. [38]

    F. E. Schunck, E. W. Mielke, General relativistic boson stars, C lass. Quant. Grav. 20, R301 – R356 (2003), arXiv:0801.0307 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S. L. Liebling, C. Palenzuela, Dynamical boson stars, Living Rev. Rel. 26, 1 (2023), arXiv:1202.5809 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J. R. Anglin, W. Ketterle, Bose-Einstein condensation of atomic gases, Nature (London) 416, 211–218 (2002)

    2002

  33. [41]

    Georgescu, 25 years of BEC, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 396 –396 (2020)

    I. Georgescu, 25 years of BEC, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 396 –396 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Dalfovo, S

    F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, Theory of b ose-einstein condensation in trapped gases, Reviews of Modern Physics 71, 463–512 (1999)

    1999

  35. [43]

    Pitaevskii, S

    L. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation (Claren don Press, Oxford, 2003)

    2003

  36. [44]

    Pethick, H

    C. Pethick, H. Smith, Bose-Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases (Cambridge University Press, UK, 2002)

    2002

  37. [45]

    O’Dell, S

    D. O’Dell, S. Giovanazzi, G. Kurizki, V. M. Akulin, Bose-einstein con densates with 1/r interatomic attraction: Electromagnetically induced gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett . 84, 5687–5690 (2000)

    2000

  38. [46]

    K. R. W. Jones, D. Bernstein, The self-gravitating Bose-Einst ein condensate, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 18, 1513–1533 (2001)

    2001

  39. [47]

    P. H. Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of newtonian self-gravita ting bose-einstein condensates with short-range interactions. i. analytical results, Physical Review D 84 (2011), 10.1103. Phys Rev D.84.043531

    2011

  40. [48]

    P. H. Chavanis, T. Harko, BoseEinstein Condensate general r elativistic stars, Phys. Rev. D 86, 064011 (2012), arXiv:1108.3986 [astro-ph.SR]. 14

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Kling, A

    F. Kling, A. Rajaraman, Towards an Analytic Construction of th e Wavefunction of Boson Stars, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044039 (2017), arXiv:1706.04272 [hepth]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Annulli, V

    L. Annulli, V. Cardoso, R. Vicente, Stirred and shaken: Dynamic al behavior of boson stars and dark matter cores, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135944 (2020), arXiv:200 7.03700 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  43. [51]

    C. G. Boehmer, T. Harko, Can dark matter be a Bose-Einstein c ondensate? JCAP 06, 025 (2007), arXiv:0705.4158 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Harko, Bose-Einstein condensation of dark matter solves t he core/cusp problem, JCAP 05, 022 (2011), arXiv:1105.2996 [astro-ph.CO]

    T. Harko, Bose-Einstein condensation of dark matter solves t he core/cusp problem, JCAP 05, 022 (2011), arXiv:1105.2996 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  45. [53]

    E. J. M. Madarassy, V. T. Toth, Evolution and dynamical prope rties of Bose-Einstein condensate dark matter stars, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044041 (2015), arXiv:1412.7 152 [hep-ph]

    2015

  46. [54]

    P. S. Aswathi, P. S. Keerthi, O. P. Jyothilakshmi, L. J. Naik, V. S reekanth, V. (2023). Rotating Bose-Einstein condensate stars at finite temperature. Physical Review D, 108(12), 123001

    2023

  47. [55]

    O. P. Jyothilakshmi, L. J. Naik, V. Sreekanth, (2024). Bose-E instein condensate stars in combined Rastall-Rainbow gravity. General Relativity and Gravitation, 56(11 ), 1-20

    2024

  48. [56]

    N. K. Glendenning, Compact stars: Nuclear physics, particle ph ysics, and general relativity (Springer, 2000)

    2000

  49. [57]

    C. J. Pethick, T. Schaefer, A. Schwenk, Bose-Einstein conde nsates in neutron stars, (2015), arXiv:1507.05839 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Silveira, C

    V. Silveira, C. M. G. de Sousa, Boson star rotation: A Newtonian approximation, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5724–5728 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9508034

    1995 arXiv

  51. [59]

    X. Z. Wang, Cold bose stars: Selfgravitating BoseEinstein cond ensates, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124009 (2001)

    2001

  52. [60]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. H. Chan, T. Harko, S. D. Liang, C. S. Leung, Slowly rotating Bose Einstein Con- densate galactic dark matter halos, and their rotation curves, Eu r. Phys. J. C 78, 346 (2018), arXiv:1804.08079 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Danila, T

    B. Danila, T. Harko, a Z. Kov /acute.ts1acs, Thin accretion disks around cold Bose–Einstein condensate stars, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 203 (2015), arXiv:1504.06014 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Harko, E

    T. Harko, E. J. M. Madarassy, Finite temperature effects in Bo se-Einstein Condensed dark matter halos, JCAP 01, 020 (2012), arXiv:1110.2829 [astroph.GA]

    2012 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Harko, G

    T. Harko, G. Mocanu, Cosmological evolution of finite temperat ure Bose-Einstein Condensate dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 85, 084012 (2012), arXiv:1203.2984 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Latifah, A

    S. Latifah, A. Sulaksono, T. Mart, Boson star at finite temper ature, Phys. Rev. D 90, 127501 (2014), arXiv:1412.1556 [astro-ph.SR]

    2014 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bilic, H

    N. Bilic, H. Nikolic, Selfgravitating bosons at nonzero temperatu re, Nucl. Phys. B 590, 575–595 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0006065. 15

    2000 arXiv

  58. [66]

    J. R. Bhatt, V. Sreekanth, Boson stars: Chemical potential and quark condensates, (2009), arXiv:0910.1972 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Griffin, Conserving and gapless approximations for an inhomog eneous bose gas at finite temper- atures,” Phys

    A. Griffin, Conserving and gapless approximations for an inhomog eneous bose gas at finite temper- atures,” Phys. Rev. B 53, 9341–9347 (1996)

    1996

  60. [68]

    Zaremba, T

    E. Zaremba, T. Nikuni, A. Griffin, Dynamics of trapped bose gase s at finite temperatures, (1999), arXiv:cond-mat/9903029 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    1999 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Griffin, T

    A. Griffin, T. Nikuni, E. Zaremba, Bose-Condensed Gases at Finit e Temperatures (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009)

    2009

  62. [70]

    G. Q. Angulo, L. de la C. S. Gonzalez, A. P. Martinez, H. P. Rojas , Finite temperature effects on magnetized BoseEinstein condensate stars,” (2022), arXiv:2209.0 0136 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  63. [71]

    Harko, F

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024020 (2011)

    2011

  64. [72]

    P. H. R. S. Moraes, Astrophys. Space Sci. 352, 273 (2014)

    2014

  65. [73]

    Singh, C

    V. Singh, C. P. Singh, Astrophys. Space Sci. 356, 153(2015)

    2015

  66. [74]

    M. C. Durgapal, R. S. Fuloria, Gen. Relativity Gravitation 17 (198 5) 671

  67. [75]

    S. K. Maurya, G. Mustafa, S. Ray, B. Dayanandan, A. Aziz, A. Errehymy, Constraining maximum mass limit and physical properties of Durgapal–Fuloria complexity-fr ee solution under gravitational decoupling approach, Physics of the Dark Universe, Volume 42, 202 3, 101284, ISSN 22...

  68. [76]

    Sokoliuk, S

    O. Sokoliuk, S. Pradhan, P. K. Sahoo. Buchdahl quark stars w ithin f (Q) theory. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 1077 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022- 03273-7. 16

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.