REVIEW 1 cited by
A Unified Framework for Rank-based Evaluation Metrics for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The link prediction task on knowledge graphs without explicit negative triples in the training data motivates the usage of rank-based metrics. Here, we review existing rank-based metrics and propose desiderata for improved metrics to address lack of interpretability and comparability of existing metrics to datasets of different sizes and properties. We introduce a simple theoretical framework for rank-based metrics upon which we investigate two avenues for improvements to existing metrics via alternative aggregation functions and concepts from probability theory. We finally propose several new rank-based metrics that are more easily interpreted and compared accompanied by a demonstration of their usage in a benchmarking of knowledge graph embedding models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
TRIAGE: Trustworthy Retrieval Instrumentation And Graph Evaluation
TRIAGE instruments Graph-RAG with gold-free stage metrics and a usage-time diagnostic chain that localizes failures to extraction, graph/schema, or retrieval levers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.