Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Handwritten Text Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.05396 v1 pith:M2NCPHTX submitted 2023-07-11 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords recognitiontexthandwrittenasciicharactercharactersdataelectronic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

OCR (Optical Character Recognition) is a technology that offers comprehensive alphanumeric recognition of handwritten and printed characters at electronic speed by merely scanning the document. Recently, the understanding of visual data has been termed Intelligent Character Recognition (ICR). Intelligent Character Recognition (ICR) is the OCR module that can convert scans of handwritten or printed characters into ASCII text. ASCII data is the standard format for data encoding in electronic communication. ASCII assigns standard numeric values to letters, numeral, symbols, white-spaces and other characters. In more technical terms, OCR is the process of using an electronic device to transform 2-Dimensional textual information into machine-encoded text. Anything that contains text both machine written or handwritten can be scanned either through a scanner or just simply a picture of the text is enough for the recognition system to distinguish the text. The goal of this papers is to show the results of a Convolutional Neural Network model which has been trained on National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) dataset containing over a 100,000 images. The network learns from the features extracted from the images and use it to generate the probability of each class to which the picture belongs to. We have achieved an accuracy of 90.54% with a loss of 2.53%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Digitization of Document and Information Extraction using OCR

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper describes a standard OCR-plus-LLM extraction pipeline and reports unsupported accuracy percentages with no code, data, or baselines.

Pith tools