Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Magnetic octupole Hall effect in heavy transition metals

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In 4d and 5d transition metals, an applied electric field generates a transverse magnetic octupole current with conductivity up to ~10^3 (ℏ/e)(Ω cm)^-1, a magnetic octupole Hall effect driven by orbital texture and spin-orbit coupling.

desk verdict Systematic MOHC table for 14 transition metals, solid mechanism, but the reducible octupole operator means the material ranking is provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02516 v2 pith:M2W6U7HO submitted 2025-07-03 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Insu Baek , Seungyun Han , Hyun-Woo Lee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magneticoctupoleHalleffecttransitionmetalsaltermagnetNéelvectordynamicsorbitaltexturespin-orbitcouplingconductivityfirst-principlescalculation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

d-wave altermagnets order by a magnetic octupole, and a current of octupole moment can exert torque on the Néel vector. This paper asks which ordinary nonmagnetic metals can generate such an octupole current electrically, and identifies a large magnetic octupole Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals: transverse octupole conductivities of order $10^{2}$ (ℏ/e)(Ω cm)^-1, with bcc Mo, fcc Rh, bcc W, hcp Re, and fcc Pt exceeding $10^{3}$. The mechanism is traced to orbital texture combined with spin-orbit coupling, so the effect should be generic in strong-SOC metals rather than a special property of one material. If the calculation is right, these metals provide practical sources of octupole current for studying and controlling Néel-vector dynamics in d-wave altermagnets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the atomic magnetic octupole operator O^q_nm ≡ (1/$ℏ^{2}$){L_n,L_m}S_q, an anticommutator of two orbital angular momentum components multiplied by a spin component; up to the radial factor, it represents the spin-density angular profile r_n r_m S_q. The paper computes its Hall response from the Kubo formula over Wannier-interpolated Bloch states, and explains the mechanism with a low-energy p-orbital Hamiltonian H=ℏ²k²/2m - η(L·k)² + λL·S, where the η term creates the orbital texture and λ is spin-orbit coupling. The same operator set also supplies the definition of the octupole current $J^{{O^q_{mn}}$}_j = ½{v_j,O^q_{mn}} used in the linear-response calculation.

What would settle it

Recompute the MOHC for the 14 metals with the physical radial weight retained (for example, the -√5⟨r²⟩/3 factor for p orbitals) instead of setting it to unity; if the relative ranking among bcc Mo, fcc Rh, bcc W, hcp Re, and fcc Pt changes materially, the reported gigantic values and the proposed material choices are artifacts of the normalization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the magnetic octupole Hall effect is large and ubiquitous in 4d and 5d transition metals. Using the atomic magnetic octupole operator O^q_nm=(1/$ℏ^{2}$){L_n,L_m}S_q and a Kubo-formula first-principles calculation, the paper reports MOHC values at room temperature with magnitude $10^{2}$–$10^{3}$ (ℏ/e)(Ω cm)^-1, with maximum |$χ^{{O_x}}$_{xy,zx}|=1432 for fcc Rh and $χ^{{O_z}}$_{yz,zx}=1569 for fcc Pt. The authors further show that the effect arises because an electric field drives orbital-angular-position dynamics (orbital texture), and spin-orbit coupling converts that orbital motion into a transverse flow of spin-and-orbital composite octupole moment; without SOC the contributions cancel. The sign of the yzS_z component tracks ⟨L·S⟩ just as the spin Hall conductivity does, while the xyS_x component is negative in all studied metals. These results position the octupole Hall current as a companion to the spin Hall current, with distinct material preferences for applications.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the atomic operator built from the anticommutator of two orbital angular momenta times spin, with the radial prefactor set to one, faithfully represents the magnetic octupole density that couples to the Néel vector in a d-wave altermagnet; that operator also contains dipole and quadrupole parts, so the ranking could shift if the physical coupling weights the pure octupole piece differently.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A magnetic octupole current can be generated electrically in an ordinary nonmagnetic heavy metal, which makes octupole injection into d-wave altermagnets feasible in bilayer devices.
  • For purely octupole-driven Néel-vector torque, hcp Zr and hcp Hf are the best choices because they combine small spin Hall conductivity with large MOHC; fcc Pt, fcc Rh, fcc Pd, and bcc W offer both large spin and octupole torques.
  • The MOHC sign of the yzS_z component follows the sign of ⟨L·S⟩, so the same material-design rules used for spin Hall sign selection should apply to octupole currents.
  • AM/HM bilayers should exhibit a magnetic octupole Hall magnetoresistance, a counterpart of spin Hall magnetoresistance, whose dependence on Néel direction could be used to read out altermagnetic order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The octupole operator used here is reducible, so the reported Hall conductivities mix anisotropic magnetic dipole and magnetic toroidal quadrupole responses with the pure rank-3 octupole; if the Néel-vector coupling in a specific altermagnet weights only the pure octupole part, the optimal heavy metal could differ from the ranking given in the paper.
  • Because the proposed mechanism is orbital texture plus spin-orbit coupling, the same effect should appear in heavy-element compounds and heterostructures, not only the 14 elemental metals tabulated here.
  • The angular fingerprints derived from the two-orbital model (sin φ vs sin 3φ) could be resolved by measuring octupole torque as a function of crystal orientation, providing a direct experimental test of the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. Baek, Han, and Lee study the magnetic octupole Hall effect (MOHE) in 4d and 5d transition metals. They define an atomic magnetic octupole operator O^q_nm = (1/ℏ^2){L_n, L_m}S_q, compute the corresponding Hall conductivities for two symmetry-allowed components (χ^{Ox_xy}_{zx} and χ^{Oz_yz}_{zx}) using a Kubo formula with Wannier-interpolated first-principles bands, and report values of order 10^2–10^3 (ℏ/e)(Ω cm)^{-1} in fourteen elemental metals (Table I). They compare these values with spin Hall conductivities taken from Ref. [29] and propose that hcp Zr and hcp Hf are optimal for isolating octupole currents, while fcc Pt, fcc Rh, fcc Pd, and bcc W combine large spin and octupole responses. The paper further develops a p-orbital model with orbital texture and spin-orbit coupling to explain the microscopic origin, and Appendix A decomposes the octupole operator into anisotropic magnetic dipole (AMD), magnetic toroidal quadrupole (MTQ), and reduced magnetic octupole (RMO) contributions.

Significance. If the reported values are correct, this is a useful systematic first-principles study: it gives a materials list for generating magnetic octupole currents that can exert torque on d-wave altermagnets, and it connects the effect to the well-studied orbital texture mechanism. The manuscript's strengths are that the MOHC values are computed from a Kubo formula rather than fitted, the model calculation in Sec. IV provides a concrete microscopic mechanism, and the Appendix explicitly addresses the decomposition of the octupole operator. The main caveat is that the quantity computed in Table I is not a pure rank-3 octupole response according to the paper's own decomposition in Appendix A, which weakens the material-ranking claims as currently stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (1), Appendix A, Table I] The operator in Eq. (1) is a reducible rank-3 tensor, and Eq. (A3) shows that the two components tabulated in Table I, xyS_x and yzS_z, contain AMD and MTQ pieces in addition to the RMO. Figure 6 decomposes the MOHC only for fcc Pt, where RMO is the largest but not the only contribution. If the Néel-vector coupling N·O_ij in a d-wave altermagnet selects the rank-3 RMO component, then the material ranking in Table I and the proposed candidates (hcp Zr/Hf, Pt/Rh/W) are not yet established for the quantity relevant to octupole torque. The authors should compute the RMO-only contributions for all fourteen metals, or otherwise demonstrate that the signs and ranking are stable under projection onto the RMO component.
  2. [Sec. III.B, Table I] No numerical uncertainty or convergence information is provided for the MOHC values in Table I. The k-mesh, broadening Γ = 0.0259 eV, frozen window, and Wannier basis are fixed without tests. Hall conductivities in metals are sensitive to these parameters, and the SHC comparison is imported from Ref. [29] without an estimate of the combined error. Since the central quantitative claim is that several metals have 'gigantic' MOHCs of order 10^3 (ℏ/e)(Ω cm)^{-1}, the manuscript should include convergence tests with respect to the k mesh and smearing, and ideally error estimates on the tabulated values.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (15)] The formulas in Eq. (15) contain malformed expressions: the '− e^{-i(E5,k−E3,k)δt}]' terms appear to be missing an 'Im[' bracket, and there is a typo 'sinϕ compoent' later in the paragraph. Please correct these.
  2. [Sec. III.B] In the sentence following Table I, 'fcc Rh' is listed twice in the series 'fcc Rh, fcc Pd, fcc Rh, and fcc Pt'; one of them should presumably be a different material such as fcc Ir.
  3. [Appendix A] The sentence 'one can decompose the MOs xyS_x and yzS_y are decomposed as' contains a grammatical error and the second component should presumably be yzS_z rather than yzS_y.
  4. [References] References [18] and [37] appear to be the same paper by Kusunose, Oiwa, and Hayami; please deduplicate or cite appropriately.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the MOHC values are obtained from a parameter-free Kubo evaluation, and the model analysis is an explanatory check rather than a refit of the calculated conductivities.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim, the large MOHCs in Table I and Fig. 3, is computed directly from the Kubo formula, Eq. (5), using first-principles DFT/Wannier inputs. No parameter is fitted to the target conductivities; the only tunable inputs are physical/technical (Γ = 0.0259 eV, T = 300 K, k-mesh sizes, frozen windows). The octupole operator in Eq. (1) is explicitly motivated through Eqs. (2)-(3), and the paper openly states that the radial proportionality constant is set to unity for convenience, with the conversion to actual MO density deferred. This is a definitional choice, not a hidden injection of the result. The microscopic-origin argument in Sec. IV uses a model with orbital texture and SOC, but its parameters are not adjusted to reproduce the first-principles MOHC values; it only explains angular dependence and sign trends, and it is cross-checked by the tight-binding model in Appendix B. Same-group references [12,13,14,21,29] appear as motivation, as the source of the orbital-texture concept and model Hamiltonian, and as a source of SHC and numerical parameters, but the MOHC calculation itself does not reduce to those references. Appendix A is an important caveat: xyS_x and yzS_z are reducible and contain AMD/MTQ contributions, so the tabulated quantity may not be a pure octupole response. This is a validity concern about what the computed conductivity represents, not a circularity, because the paper does not claim these components are irreducible and does not define the result in terms of itself. The self-citations are thus not load-bearing for the central derivation, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with score 2 reflecting the modest self-reference burden rather than any equation-level circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the magnetic octupole current and MOHE were proposed in Ref [12], and the MO operator follows Refs [15-17,22]. The proposed MO Hall magnetoresistance is a device concept, not a new entity. The main ledger items are the reducible MO operator assumption, the model Hamiltonian parameters, and the energy broadening choice.

free parameters (3)
  • energy broadening Γ = 0.0259 eV
    Set to room-temperature broadening in the Kubo formula Eq. (5); no sensitivity analysis is reported, and MOHC values may depend on this choice.
  • model crystal field η = not specified
    Hamiltonian Eq. (6) parameter controlling orbital texture; used to illustrate the mechanism, not fitted to the target result.
  • model SOC λ = not specified
    Hamiltonian Eq. (6) spin-orbit coupling strength; required for nonvanishing MOHE in the model.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kubo formula in the clean limit with energy broadening Γ gives the intrinsic MOHC
    Used in Eq. (5); standard linear response but assumes no vertex corrections and independent-particle bands.
  • domain assumption O^q_mn = (1/ℏ^2){L_n,L_m}S_q captures the atomic magnetic octupole density r_n r_m S_q with radial factors dropped
    Eq. (1) and Sec. II; for p orbitals the proportionality is tied to Eq. (3), for d orbitals a similar relation is asserted, and the paper uses these operators in all MOHC calculations.
  • domain assumption The Néel vector of d-wave altermagnets couples linearly to the magnetic octupole through N·O_ij
    Motivates the application in Sec. V, citing Refs [11,12]; not derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper The p-orbital model Eq. (6) with orbital texture and SOC captures the microscopic origin in d-orbital heavy transition metals
    Sec. IV; the model is introduced to explain DFT results, and the paper asserts the mechanism is ubiquitous, but no direct mapping to each metal is given.
  • domain assumption DFT parameters from Ref [29] (lattice constants, muffin-tin radii, plane-wave cutoffs) are correct and sufficient for all 14 metals
    Sec. III B; no convergence checks are reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic octupole Hall effect in heavy transition metals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M2W6U7HO

@misc{pith2026250702516,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic octupole Hall effect in heavy transition metals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M2W6U7HO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02516}
}
read the original abstract

d-wave altermagnets have the magnetic octupole as their primary order parameter. A recent study [Han et al. arXiv 2409.14423 (2024)] demonstrated that magnetic octupole current can induce N\'eel vector dynamics. Therefore, identifying materials that can efficiently generate a magnetic octupole current is essential. In this paper, we investigate the magnetic octupole Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals. By employing atomic magnetic octupole operators, we calculate the magnetic octupole Hall conductivity using first-principles calculations. We also explore the microscopic origin of the magnetic octupole Hall effect and find that it results from the combined effect of orbital texture and spin-orbit coupling. Additionally, we analyze the ratio of spin Hall conductivity to magnetic octupole Hall conductivity across various materials and identify those that are optimal for observing magnetic octupole physics. We also discuss potential applications arising from the magnetic octupole Hall effect. Our work serves as a valuable reference for identifying materials suitable for studying magnetic octupole physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02516 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Description of the atomic MO with positive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Description of MOHE compared to SHE. (a) When an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Magnetic octupole Hall conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The eigenenergies of the Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) The eigenstates of Eq. (6) with no SOC. (b) When [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The total (dark), the AMD (blue), the MTQ (red), and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  2. [1]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid insta- bilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [2]

    Us- ing these states, we can diagonalize H with the following eigenenergies [Fig. 4(a)] E1,k = E2,k = E0,k = ℏ2k2 2m − (ηk2 +λ) 2 + s ηk2 +λ 2 !2 + 2λ2, (14a) E3,k = E4,k = E−,k = ℏ2k2 2m − (ηk2 +λ) 2 − s ηk2 +λ 2 !2 + 2λ2, (14b) E5,k = E6,k = E+,k = ℏ2k2 2m −ηk2 +λ. (14c) We then examine how these eigenstates respond to an ex- ternal electric fieldEx and...

    work page 2024

  4. [3]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, JPSJ 88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz ´alez- Hern´andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional mag- netism in doped fesb2, PNAS 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [7]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezo- magnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Prediction of low-z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014409 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    L.-D. Yuan, X. Zhang, C. Acosta, and A. Zunger, Uncovering spin-orbit coupling-independent hidden spin polarization of en- ergy bands in antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun.14, 5301 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    Yuan and A

    L.-D. Yuan and A. Zunger, Degeneracy removal of spin bands in collinear antiferromagnets with non-interconvertible spin- structure motif pair, Adv. Mater.35, 2211966 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered magnetic octupoles in d-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024)

    2024

  6. [13]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and orbital hall effects from orbital texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  7. [14]

    S. Han, D. Jo, I. Baek, S. Cheon, P. M. Oppeneer, and H.-W. Lee, Harnessing magnetic octupole hall effect to induce torque in altermagnets (2024), arXiv:2409.14423, LV18410

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Magnetically hidden order of kramers doublets in d1 systems: Sr2VO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 067205 (2009)

    2009

  9. [16]

    Han, H.-W

    S. Han, H.-W. Lee, and K.-W. Kim, Microscopic study of orbital textures, Curr. Appl. Phys 50, 13 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    Iwazaki, H

    R. Iwazaki, H. Shinaoka, and S. Hoshino, Material-based anal- ysis of spin-orbital mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, L241108 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    Tahir and H

    M. Tahir and H. Chen, Transport of spin magnetic multipole moments carried by bloch quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 106701 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    is reformed as [20] x2− y2 =⟨r2⟩C2−2 + C22 √ 2 =− √ 3 5 1 ℏ2⟨r2⟩ L2 x− L2 y , (3a) zx =⟨r2⟩C2−1− C21 √ 2 =− √ 3 5 1 ℏ2⟨r2⟩ n Lx, Lz o , (3b) 3z2− r2 =⟨r2⟩C20 =− √ 3 5 1 ℏ2⟨r2⟩ 2L2 z− L2 x− L2 y √ 3 , (3c) yz =⟨r2⟩ i(C2−1 + C21)√ 2 =− √ 3 5 1 ℏ2⟨r2⟩ n Ly, Lz o , (3d) xy =⟨r2⟩ i...

  13. [21]

    Kwiatkowski, S

    T. Kwiatkowski, S. Olszewski, and A. Wierzbicki, Cubic har- monics in cartesian coordinates, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 11, 21 (1977)

    1977

  14. [22]

    Hayami and H

    S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Unified description of electronic orderings and cross correlations by complete multipole repre- sentation, JPSJ 93, 072001 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    D. Jo, D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals, Phys. Rev. B 98, 214405 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Han, H.-W

    S. Han, H.-W. Lee, and K.-W. Kim, Orbital Dynamics in Cen- trosymmetric Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 176601 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Murakami, N

    S. Murakami, N. Nagaosa, and S.-C. Zhang, Dissipationless quantum spin current at room temperature, Science 301, 1348 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    Sinova, D

    J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. A. Sinitsyn, T. Jungwirth, and A. H. MacDonald, Universal intrinsic spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126603 (2004)

    2004

  19. [27]

    Wimmer, H

    E. Wimmer, H. Krakauer, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, Full-potential self-consistent linearized-augmented-plane-wave method for calculating the electronic structure of molecules and surfaces: O2 molecule, Phys. Rev. B24, 864 (1981)

    1981

  20. [28]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  21. [30]

    Go, H.-W

    D. Go, H.-W. Lee, P. M. Oppeneer, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, First-principles calculation of orbital hall effect by wannier inter- polation: Role of orbital dependence of the anomalous position, Phys. Rev. B109, 174435 (2024)

    2024

  22. [31]

    Pizzi et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, J

    G. Pizzi et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  23. [32]

    Tanaka, H

    T. Tanaka, H. Kontani, M. Naito, T. Naito, D. S. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Intrinsic spin hall effect and orbital hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165117 (2008)

    2008

  24. [33]

    Kontani, T

    H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, D. S. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. In- 10 oue, Giant orbital hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous hall effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016601 (2009)

    2009

  25. [34]

    Salemi and P

    L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, First-principles theory of intrinsic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in metallic monoatomic crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 095001 (2022)

    2022

  26. [35]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron 5, 267–274 (2022)

    2022

  27. [36]

    Nakayama, M

    H. Nakayama, M. Althammer, Y.-T. Chen, K. Uchida, Y. Kaji- wara, D. Kikuchi, T. Ohtani, S. Gepr¨ags, M. Opel, S. Takahashi, R. Gross, G. E. W. Bauer, S. T. B. Goennenwein, and E. Saitoh, Spin hall magnetoresistance induced by a nonequilibrium prox- imity effect, Phys. Rev. Let...

    2013

  28. [37]

    X. H. Verbeek, D. Voderholzer, S. Sch¨aren, Y. Gachnang, N. A. Spaldin, and S. Bhowal, Nonrelativistic ferromagnetotriakon- tadipolar order and spin splitting in hematite, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043157 (2024)

    2024

  29. [38]

    Kusunose, R

    H. Kusunose, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Complete multipole basis set for single-centered electron systems, JPSJ 89, 104704 (2020)

    2020

  30. [39]

    Urru and N

    A. Urru and N. A. Spaldin, Magnetic octupole tensor decompo- sition and second-order magnetoelectric effect, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 447, 168964 (2022)

    2022

  31. [40]

    Kusunose, Description of multipole in f-electron systems, JPSJ 77, 064710 (2008)

    H. Kusunose, Description of multipole in f-electron systems, JPSJ 77, 064710 (2008)

    2008

  32. [41]

    Kuramoto, H

    Y. Kuramoto, H. Kusunose, and A. Kiss, Multipole orders and fluctuations in strongly correlated electron systems, JPSJ 78, 072001 (2009)

    2009

  33. [42]

    Hayami and H

    S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Essential role of the anisotropic magnetic dipole in the anomalous hall effect, Phys. Rev. B103, L180407 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.