Developing a Transferable Federated Network Intrusion Detection System

Abu Shafin Mohammad Mahdee Jameel; Aly El Gamal; Shreya Ghosh

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 23 references

Developing a Transferable Federated Network Intrusion Detection System

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that maximizing transferability relationships during preprocessing and federated aggregation lets a CNN-based intrusion detector recognize unknown attacks while keeping local detection rates high.

desk verdict Plausible federated IDS design with a real circularity risk, but the unreadable full text means the central transferability claim is unverifiable from this submission. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09060 v1 pith:M465JOLH submitted 2025-08-12 cs.CR cs.LGcs.NIeess.SP

Abu Shafin Mohammad Mahdee Jameel , Shreya Ghosh , Aly El Gamal This is my paper

classification cs.CRcs.LGcs.NIeess.SP

keywords intrusiondetectionfederatedlearningtransferabilityunknownattacksconvolutionalneuralnetworkblock-basedaggregationsecuritydatapreprocessing

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Network intrusion detection must handle attacks that no one has labeled yet, and doing this across many connected devices means no single site holds all traffic. This paper claims that a federated—distributed, update-sharing—CNN-based detector can learn from known attacks in a way that transfers to unknown ones, by increasing the number of 'transferability relationships' the training data exposes. The proposed method combines a two-step preprocessing stage with a Block-Based Smart Aggregation (BBSA) algorithm, and reports that this pairing improves detection of unseen attacks without sacrificing each device's detection of local known attacks. If the claim holds, intrusion detection models could be trained across real network deployments and then recognize new attack families without retraining on centralized data, and the same recipe would carry across datasets and backbone architectures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the transferability relationship—a regularity in feature space that lets a pattern learned on one attack type also separate an unseen attack type. The two-step preprocessing maximizes how many such relationships the training data exposes; BBSA then combines local model blocks selectively, preserving blocks that carry these relationships and limiting the influence of blocks fitted to local quirks. Together they turn a standard CNN for tabular network flows into a detector whose useful knowledge is not tied to the specific attack labels it saw.

What would settle it

Train the system on a standard IDS dataset with one entire attack class withheld, meaning no samples from that class appear during training or validation, then measure detection on that withheld class. If the transferability-aware preprocessing and BBSA aggregation do not beat a plain federated CNN with naive averaging on the withheld class, the central claim is falsified. The withheld class must not influence any design choice in preprocessing or aggregation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that transferability can be engineered rather than hoped for. The paper defines transferability relationships as regularities between known and unknown attack classes that a model can exploit, then builds two mechanisms to maximize how many such relationships appear in training. The first is a two-step data preprocessing stage that reorganizes or selects features so these relationships are more visible. The second is BBSA, which aggregates local models block by block rather than wholesale, keeping the parts of each client model that preserve transferability relationships while limiting the influence of parts that only fit local quirks. In the paper's telling, this is why

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline assumes that the number of transferability relationships exposed by preprocessing is a faithful measure of—and a reliable lever for—a model's ability to detect attack types that never appear in training.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A federated IDS built this way should flag attack families that were absent from all clients' training labels.
Clients keep strong local detection, so adding transferability does not force a trade-off with known-attack protection.
The pipeline is portable: reported transferability holds when moving to another dataset and when swapping in a different backbone model.
Raw network traffic can stay on each device; only model updates are shared, which is the privacy motivation for federated intrusion detection.
The two-step preprocessing and BBSA are modular additions to existing federated training, so they can be combined with other local IDS models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the transferability-relationship count is the active ingredient, then detection of unseen attacks should track that count even when the CNN is swapped for a simpler classifier; a reader could test this by varying only the preprocessing step.
The block-wise aggregation idea is not specific to intrusion detection—it could apply to any federated task with skewed class distributions, though the paper does not test that.
The method's reach is bounded by the flow-feature representation: attacks that avoid changing those statistics, such as encrypted or low-volume stealth traffic, may not share transferability relationships with known classes.
Because the paper reports transferability across datasets and backbones, the implication left unstated is that the preprocessing and aggregation, rather than the CNN itself, do most of the generalizing; an ablation replacing the CNN with a logistic regression would make this explicit.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a federated IDS paper whose abstract claims superior transferability via a CNN plus two-step preprocessing and a Block-Based Smart Aggregation algorithm. The stated aim—using known attacks to detect unknown ones—is practical, and the authors ship a GitHub link, which counts for something. But the abstract alone reports no numbers and no evaluation protocol, and the full text we received is mojibake, so nobody can actually check the methods or results. That limits everything below.

What looks genuinely new: the specific combination, and the explicit attempt to maximize the number of transferability relationships rather than just local accuracy. That is a reasonable design goal for federated IDS, where clients see different attack distributions. The cross-dataset and cross-backbone claims, if supported, would matter for the subfield.

The soft spot, and it's a real one, is the circularity risk. "Transferability relationships" are both the optimization target and the claimed outcome. If the evaluation measures the same relationships the algorithm maximizes—for example, agreement on known classes across clients—then "superior transferability" could be an artifact of fitting the target, not evidence of zero-day generalization. The abstract doesn't say whether evaluation uses held-out attack types or held-out relationships. That is exactly the experiment that would make the claim convincing. I want to be clear: I am not saying the authors are wrong. There's only no evidence in front of us, and the corrupted text means we can't fill that gap.

The code is a positive. It makes the work independently checkable, which is more than many papers can say.

Who is it for: people working on federated learning for intrusion detection, and anyone designing transfer or zero-day evaluation protocols. I would send it to a serious referee because the topic is real, the code is public, and the circularity concern is resolvable with a clear look at the evaluation section. But the referee needs to demand the held-out attack-type protocol and actual numbers before this becomes citable.

For us: not something I'd cite yet. Maybe worth a reading group discussion about what counts as transferability evaluation.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a federated network intrusion detection system based on a CNN with two-stage data preprocessing and a Block-Based Smart Aggregation (BBSA) algorithm. The stated goal is to improve detection of unknown attacks by maximizing the number of 'transferability relationships.' The abstract claims superior transferability performance, strong local detection rates, and generalization across datasets and backbone architectures, with code available on GitHub. However, the body of the manuscript as provided is corrupted (mojibake) and unreadable, and the abstract itself contains no quantitative results, experimental protocol, or definitions of the key metrics. Thus the central claims cannot currently be verified from the manuscript.

Significance. If substantiated, the idea of explicitly encouraging transferability in a federated intrusion detection system would be a useful contribution to network security, particularly for zero-day/unknown attack detection. The authors' decision to release code is a positive step toward reproducibility. Nevertheless, the significance cannot be assessed from the present submission: the abstract states results without numbers, the evaluation methodology is undefined, and the full text is not legible. The potential circularity in using the number of 'transferability relationships' as both the optimization target and the evaluation criterion is a serious concern that must be addressed.

major comments (4)

[Abstract] The central claim of 'superior transferability performance' is stated without any quantitative support: no detection rates, no baselines, no standard deviations, and no dataset names are reported. The abstract also does not define the transferability metric. As written, the main claim is unfalsifiable.
[Methods: two-step pre-processing and BBSA (described in the Abstract)] These algorithms are explicitly designed to 'maximize the number of transferability relationships.' If the evaluation counts the same relationships, then 'superior transferability' may be a direct consequence of the optimization objective rather than an independent property of unknown-attack generalization. The paper must specify whether evaluation is performed on held-out attack types/relationships and must report a metric separate from the training objective.
[Full text (all sections after the Abstract)] The body of the manuscript is unreadable in the submitted copy (corrupted Unicode/mojibake). Consequently, the experimental setup, data preprocessing, federated partitioning, baseline comparisons, and aggregation details cannot be verified. A GitHub repository is not a substitute for a self-contained paper; the manuscript itself must present all necessary methodology and results.
[Abstract, generalization claim] The assertion that the method is 'generalizable, exhibiting transferability potential across datasets and even with different backbones' is not accompanied by any experiment description, table, or statistical test. At minimum, the paper must specify the datasets and backbone architectures used and report per-experiment results, including detection rates and transferability metrics.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The phrase 'deployed in a distributed setup across devices connected to a network' is vague; specify the federated topology, number of clients, and communication protocol.
[General] The GitHub repository URL should be formatted as a clickable reference with a version/commit number; otherwise the code cannot be uniquely identified for reproducibility.
[General] The paper would benefit from a formal list of contributions and a clear evaluation protocol (datasets, train/test splits, held-out attack classes, baseline methods, and evaluation metrics).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No demonstrable circularity in the available text; the supplied full text is corrupted, so no derivation chain can be inspected.

full rationale

The only readable evidence is the abstract. It states that the authors 'develop algorithms to maximize the number of transferability relationships' and later report 'superior transferability performance.' This wording could in principle describe an in-sample optimization objective, but it does not, by itself, exhibit a specific reduction from a claimed prediction to a fitted input or self-citation. There is no equation, evaluation protocol, or definition of 'transferability relationships' in the provided text that would allow me to demonstrate that the reported transferability performance is the same quantity being optimized. The supplied 'full text' is Unicode-corrupted mojibake and cannot be parsed into sections, equations, or evaluation details. Under the hard rules, concerns about possible tautology or unknown held-out attack classes are not circularity findings unless I can quote the paper and exhibit the reduction. I cannot do that here. The abstract's additional claim of generalization 'across datasets and even with different backbones' suggests cross-dataset evaluation, which would be an external check, though its details are unavailable. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity, with score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides insufficient detail to enumerate all parameters and axioms. These entries are inferred from the high-level description.

free parameters (1)

BBSA block configuration and any aggregation hyperparameters
Not described in the abstract; these could affect the reported transferability.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Deep learning models trained on known attack types can transfer knowledge to unknown attack types through observed transferability relationships.
The paper's stated goal is to use knowledge from known attacks to detect unknown attacks; this is the core premise of the transferability approach.
domain assumption Federated aggregation of local model updates preserves the utility of the models and enables transferability.
The distributed setup and BBSA algorithm rely on the assumption that aggregating models from different devices yields a better global model without sacrificing local detection performance.
domain assumption Convolutional neural networks are a suitable model family for network intrusion detection features.
The paper selects a CNN as its model; this is a common but unproven assumption for the specific feature representation used.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Developing a Transferable Federated Network Intrusion Detection System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M465JOLH

@misc{pith2026250809060,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Developing a Transferable Federated Network Intrusion Detection System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M465JOLH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09060}
}

read the original abstract

Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are a vital part of a network-connected device. In this paper, we develop a deep learning based intrusion detection system that is deployed in a distributed setup across devices connected to a network. Our aim is to better equip deep learning models against unknown attacks using knowledge from known attacks. To this end, we develop algorithms to maximize the number of transferability relationships. We propose a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, along with two algorithms that maximize the number of relationships observed. One is a two step data pre-processing stage, and the other is a Block-Based Smart Aggregation (BBSA) algorithm. The proposed system succeeds in achieving superior transferability performance while maintaining impressive local detection rates. We also show that our method is generalizable, exhibiting transferability potential across datasets and even with different backbones. The code for this work can be found at https://github.com/ghosh64/tabfidsv2.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

[1]

Lansky, Jan and Ali, Saqib and Mohammadi, Mokhtar and Majeed, Mohammed Kamal and Karim, Sarkhel H Taher and Rashidi, Shima and Hosseinzadeh, Mehdi and Rahmani, Amir Masoud , `` Deep learning-based intrusion detection systems: a systematic review ,'' IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 101\,574--101\,599, 2021

work page 2021
[2]

Saleh, Hadeel M. and Marouane, Hend and Fakhfakh, Ahmed , `` Stochastic Gradient Descent Intrusions Detection for Wireless Sensor Network Attack Detection System Using Machine Learning ,'' IEEE Access , vol. 12 , no. , pp. 3825--3836 , 2024

work page 2024
[3]

and Bailey, Mark M

Lin, Zong-Zhi and Pike, Thomas D. and Bailey, Mark M. and Bastian, Nathaniel D. , `` A Hypergraph-Based Machine Learning Ensemble Network Intrusion Detection System ,'' IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , pp. 1--13 , 2024

work page 2024
[4]

Bakro, Mhamad and Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan and Alabrah, Amerah and Ashraf, Zubair and Ahmed, Md Nadeem and Shameem, Mohammad and Abdelsalam, Ahmed , `` An Improved Design for a Cloud Intrusion Detection System Using Hybrid Features Selection Approach With ML Classifier ,'' IEEE Access , vol. 11 , no. , pp. 64\,228--64\,247 , 2023

work page 2023
[5]

Barnard, Pieter and Marchetti, Nicola and DaSilva, Luiz A , `` Robust Network Intrusion Detection through Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) ,'' IEEE Networking Letters , vol. 4 , no. 3 , pp. 167--171 , 2022

work page 2022
[6]

Fu, Yanfang and Du, Yishuai and Cao, Zijian and Li, Qiang and Xiang, Wei , `` A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data ,'' Electronics , vol. 11, no. 6, p. 898, 2022

work page 2022
[7]

100 , pp

Koroniotis, Nickolaos and Moustafa, Nour and Sitnikova, Elena and Turnbull, Benjamin , `` Towards the development of realistic botnet dataset in the internet of things for network forensic analytics: Bot-iot dataset ,'' Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 100 , pp. 779--796 , 2019

work page 2019
[8]

, `` A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set ,'' in 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications , 2009, pp

Tavallaee, Mahbod and Bagheri, Ebrahim and Lu, Wei and Ghorbani, Ali A. , `` A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set ,'' in 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications , 2009, pp. 1--6

work page 2009

Show all 23 references

[9]

'' in ICISSp , 2018, pp

Sharafaldin, Iman and Lashkari, Arash Habibi and Ghorbani, Ali A , `` Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization. '' in ICISSp , 2018, pp. 108--116

2018
[10]

Moustafa, Nour , `` A new distributed architecture for evaluating AI-based security systems at the edge: Network TON-IoT datasets ,'' Sustainable Cities and Society , vol. 72, p. 102994, 2021

2021
[11]

Verkerken, Miel and D’hooge, Laurens and Wauters, Tim and Volckaert, Bruno and De Turck, Filip , `` Towards model generalization for intrusion detection: Unsupervised machine learning techniques ,'' Journal of Network and Systems Management , vol. 30 , no. 1 , pp. 1--25 , 2022

2022
[12]

1--27, 2022

Catillo, Marta and Del Vecchio, Andrea and Pecchia, Antonio and Villano, Umberto , `` Transferability of machine learning models learned from public intrusion detection datasets: the CICIDS2017 case study ,'' Software Quality Journal , pp. 1--27, 2022

2022
[13]

Rizvi, Syed and Scanlon, Mark and McGibney, Jimmy and Sheppard, John , `` Deep learning based network intrusion detection system for resource-constrained environments ,'' in Springer , 2023, pp. 1--7

2023
[14]

Rahman, Sawsan Abdul and Tout, Hanine and Talhi, Chamseddine and Mourad, Azzam , `` Internet of things intrusion detection: Centralized, on-device, or federated learning? '' IEEE Network , vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 310--317, 2020

2020
[15]

Ruzafa-Alcazar, Pedro and Fernandez-Saura, Pablo and Marmol-Campos, Enrique and Gonzalez-Vidal, Aurora and Hernandez-Ramos, Jose L and Bernal-Bernabe, Jorge and Skarmeta, Antonio F , `` Intrusion detection based on privacy-preserving federated learning for the industrial IoT ,...

2021
[16]

Cui, Jie and Sun, Hu and Zhong, Hong and Zhang, Jing and Wei, Lu and Bolodurina, Irina and He, Debiao , `` Collaborative Intrusion Detection System for SDVN: A Fairness Federated Deep Learning Approach ,'' IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems , vol. 34 , no. 9...

2023
[17]

Zhang, Jiazhen and Luo, Chunbo and Carpenter, Marcus and Min, Geyong , `` Federated Learning for Distributed IIoT Intrusion Detection using Transfer Approaches ,'' IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , 2022

2022
[18]

Brendan McMahan and Eider Moore and Daniel Ramage and Seth Hampson and Blaise Agüera y Arcas , `` Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data ,'' 2023

H. Brendan McMahan and Eider Moore and Daniel Ramage and Seth Hampson and Blaise Agüera y Arcas , `` Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data ,'' 2023 . [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05629

2023 arXiv
[19]

1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em IEEE , 2024 , pp

Ghosh, Shreya and Jameel, Abu Shafin Mohammad Mahdee and Gamal, Aly El , `` Improving Transferability of Network Intrusion Detection in a Federated Learning Setup ,'' in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning for Communication and Networking (ICMLCN) . 1em plus...

2024
[20]

1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Tiny Papers @ ICLR 2023 , 2023

Ghosh, Shreya and Mahdee Jameel, Abu Shafin Mohammad and El Gamal, Aly , `` An Analysis of Transferability in Network Intrusion Detection using Distributed Deep Learning ,'' in The First Tiny Papers Track at ICLR 2023 . 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Tiny Papers @ ICLR 2023 , 2023

2023
[21]

Kingma and Jimmy Ba , `` Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization ,'' CoRR , vol

Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba , `` Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization ,'' CoRR , vol. abs/1412.6980 , 2014

2014 arXiv
[22]

046--051

Lim, Hyun-Kyo and Kim, Ju-Bong and Heo, Joo-Seong and Kim, Kwihoon and Hong, Yong-Geun and Han, Youn-Hee , `` Packet-based Network Traffic Classification Using Deep Learning ,'' in 2019 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAII...

2019
[23]

Kamalov, Firuz and Zgheib, Rita and Leung, Ho Hon and Al-Gindy, Ahmed and Moussa, Sherif , `` Autoencoder-based Intrusion Detection System ,'' in 2021 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET) , 2021, pp. 1--5

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Lansky, Jan and Ali, Saqib and Mohammadi, Mokhtar and Majeed, Mohammed Kamal and Karim, Sarkhel H Taher and Rashidi, Shima and Hosseinzadeh, Mehdi and Rahmani, Amir Masoud , `` Deep learning-based intrusion detection systems: a systematic review ,'' IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 101\,574--101\,599, 2021

work page 2021

[2] [2]

Saleh, Hadeel M. and Marouane, Hend and Fakhfakh, Ahmed , `` Stochastic Gradient Descent Intrusions Detection for Wireless Sensor Network Attack Detection System Using Machine Learning ,'' IEEE Access , vol. 12 , no. , pp. 3825--3836 , 2024

work page 2024

[3] [3]

and Bailey, Mark M

Lin, Zong-Zhi and Pike, Thomas D. and Bailey, Mark M. and Bastian, Nathaniel D. , `` A Hypergraph-Based Machine Learning Ensemble Network Intrusion Detection System ,'' IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , pp. 1--13 , 2024

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Bakro, Mhamad and Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan and Alabrah, Amerah and Ashraf, Zubair and Ahmed, Md Nadeem and Shameem, Mohammad and Abdelsalam, Ahmed , `` An Improved Design for a Cloud Intrusion Detection System Using Hybrid Features Selection Approach With ML Classifier ,'' IEEE Access , vol. 11 , no. , pp. 64\,228--64\,247 , 2023

work page 2023

[5] [5]

Barnard, Pieter and Marchetti, Nicola and DaSilva, Luiz A , `` Robust Network Intrusion Detection through Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) ,'' IEEE Networking Letters , vol. 4 , no. 3 , pp. 167--171 , 2022

work page 2022

[6] [6]

Fu, Yanfang and Du, Yishuai and Cao, Zijian and Li, Qiang and Xiang, Wei , `` A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data ,'' Electronics , vol. 11, no. 6, p. 898, 2022

work page 2022

[7] [7]

100 , pp

Koroniotis, Nickolaos and Moustafa, Nour and Sitnikova, Elena and Turnbull, Benjamin , `` Towards the development of realistic botnet dataset in the internet of things for network forensic analytics: Bot-iot dataset ,'' Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 100 , pp. 779--796 , 2019

work page 2019

[8] [8]

, `` A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set ,'' in 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications , 2009, pp

Tavallaee, Mahbod and Bagheri, Ebrahim and Lu, Wei and Ghorbani, Ali A. , `` A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set ,'' in 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications , 2009, pp. 1--6

work page 2009