Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

The Spin(16)×Spin(16) heterotic string on AdS3×S3×S3×S1, tachyon-free at the standard point, develops a level-matched tachyon in the (16,1) representation when a specific Wilson line is turned on, so the classical moduli space has unstable

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:42 UTC pith:M4GO33E2

load-bearing objection First explicit Wilson-line tachyon on AdS3, built on plausible but unverified lattice manipulations. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.19369 v2 pith:M4GO33E2 submitted 2025-12-22 hep-th

Non-supersymmetric strings on AdS₃: a world-sheet perspective

Giorgio Leone This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords AdS3non-supersymmetric stringsSpin(16)×Spin(16) heteroticWilson linestachyonsSL(2,R) WZW modelworld-sheet partition functiontype 0B superstring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper builds a one-loop world-sheet description for two non-supersymmetric string theories on AdS3×S3×T4 and AdS3×S3×S3×S1: the tachyonic type 0B superstring and the Spin(16)×Spin(16)⋊Z2 heterotic string, which is normally tachyon-free. Its central result is that the heterotic theory loses that property under deformation: turning on a particular Wilson line on the AdS3×S3×S3×S1 background produces a level-matched tachyon in the (16,1) representation of so(16)⊕so(18). The tachyon appears because the Wilson line shifts right-moving lattice momenta and allows a formerly forbidden NS ground state to satisfy mass-shell and level-matching conditions. This matters because it shows that a classically stable non-supersymmetric AdS3 vacuum can be destabilized by a marginal deformation, and it provides explicit formulas for scanning the classical moduli space for such dangerous regions. The paper also confirms that the type 0B superstring is tachyonic on both backgrounds.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Spin(16)×Spin(16)⋊Z2 heterotic string on AdS3×S3×S3×S1, though tachyon-free at the standard point, develops a level-matched tachyon when the Wilson line A=(1,0^7;(1/3)^8) is turned on at R^2=α'/18. From the q-expansion of the deformed one-loop partition function, the (v,c)+(c,v) sector of the (1,17) Narain lattice has a non-zero q^{1/2} \bar{q}^{1/2} coefficient, and the state transforms as (16,1) under so(16)⊕so(18). Both the holomorphic NS ground state and the anti-holomorphic ground state have conformal weight 1/2, so level matching and the mass-shell condition are satisfied and the state is a genuine tachyon. Without the Wilson line, no such N=0 level-ma

What carries the argument

The central object is the one-loop torus partition function of the world-sheet CFT, built from refined SL(2,R) characters for the AdS3 factor, su(2) characters for the two S3 factors, free-fermion characters, the (1,1) circle lattice, and the (1,17) Narain lattice of the gauge sector. The load-bearing mechanism is the Wilson-line deformation of that lattice: a vector A enters the left- and right-moving momenta as m−λ·A − (A·A)n/2 and λ + A n, and after a Poisson resummation the lattice splits into sectors labelled by the conjugacy classes (i1,i2) of the two so(16) factors. The partition function is then expanded in q and \bar{q}, and the spectrum is read by imposing the mass-shell condition

Load-bearing premise

The computation assumes that switching on the Wilson line only shifts the momenta in the internal lattice that encodes the gauge sector, leaving the AdS3 part of the world-sheet, the two S3 factors, and the GSO projection untouched; if the deformation also changes the AdS3 level or the spectral-flow structure, the tachyon could disappear.

What would settle it

Independently recompute the deformed partition function (4.25) with A=(1,0^7;(1/3)^8) at R^2=α'/18 without assuming that the Wilson line leaves the SL(2,R) WZW sector and the GSO projection inert, and check whether the q^{1/2} \bar{q}^{1/2} coefficient in the (v,c)+(c,v) sector survives level matching and the physical-state conditions; if it does not, the claimed tachyon is an artefact of the decoupling assumption.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The undeformed Spin(16)×Spin(16) heterotic string on AdS3×S3×S3×S1 is tachyon-free; the deformed one is not, so the classical moduli space contains both safe and dangerous regions.
  • Any vacuum in a tachyonic region is at best perturbatively stable; non-perturbatively the theory can tunnel toward those regions, so the Wilson-line background is not a stable vacuum.
  • The same mechanism is expected on AdS3×S3×T4, where the paper says the same analysis applies with little modification, and the general formulas allow other Wilson lines and radii to be scanned.
  • The type 0B superstring on both backgrounds has level-matched N=0 states from unflowed continuous representations and is therefore tachyonic, in contrast to the type IIB superstring on the same spaces.
  • The results give a world-sheet starting point for deciding which non-supersymmetric AdS3 vacua are stable beyond the flat-space approximation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same Wilson-line mechanism probably operates across a whole region of the (R,A) moduli space, not just the single point R^2=α'/18, A=(1,0^7;(1/3)^8); the paper's condition (4.38) can be evaluated numerically along other slices to map the tachyonic region's boundary.
  • Beyond the paper: a holographic dual of the non-supersymmetric background, if it exists, should show a corresponding instability when the operator dual to the Wilson-line modulus is turned on; identifying that operator would provide an independent check of the world-sheet result.
  • Beyond the paper: the paper leaves the one-loop torus two-point computation of the moduli masses to future work; an obvious next step is to compute whether one-loop corrections push the mass below the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound in the tachyon-free regions.
  • Beyond the paper: since the tachyon sits in (16,1), a natural extension is to ask whether the tachyonic direction can be lifted by turning on additional Wilson lines or by moving to non-geometric compactifications, as is done in flat-space constructions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies non-supersymmetric string theories on AdS3 in a worldsheet CFT framework. For the type 0B superstring and the non-tachyonic Spin(16)×Spin(16)⋊Z2 heterotic string on AdS3×S3×T4 and AdS3×S3×S3×S1, the author constructs one-loop partition functions using the SL(2,R) WZW characters of Maldacena–Ooguri and the standard decomposition of the internal CFT. The type 0B analysis identifies tachyons from unflowed continuous representations. The heterotic analysis first shows that the undeformed theory is tachyon-free and then turns on a Wilson line on the internal S1/gauge lattice. The central explicit example is on AdS3×S3×S3×S1 with A=(1,07;(1/3)8) at R2=α′/18, where the expansion in Eq. (4.33) is claimed to exhibit a level-matched tachyon in the (16,1) representation of so(16)⊕so(18). General conditions and numerical slices are also given for locating tachyonic regions.

Significance. If the central example is correct, this is a useful first worldsheet demonstration that non-supersymmetric heterotic AdS3 vacua can be destabilized by Wilson lines, extending flat-space results to finite AdS3 curvature. The paper adapts and combines substantial existing technology: refined SL(2,R) characters, spectrally flowed representations, and heterotic partition functions. It also gives explicit spectra for type 0B and the undeformed heterotic theory that will be valuable for future work on non-supersymmetric holography. The paper is not machine-checked, but the structure is internally consistent and the main external inputs are standard. The main risk is not circularity; it is that the crucial lattice resummation and the decoupling of the Wilson-line deformation are asserted rather than demonstrated, and the abstract overclaims the T4 case.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1.2, Eqs. (4.25)–(4.33)] The central tachyon claim is read from the q-expansion (4.33), specifically the O(q̄^{1/2}) term with coefficient 16. This is the output of the Poisson resummation leading to (4.26), but the manuscript only says it is a 'straightforward computation' and does not show the intermediate lattice sums or the decomposition of O8 into so(2)⊕so(3)⊕so(3) pieces. Since the phase factors and characteristic shifts in (4.25) are delicate, an arithmetic slip would move the state off the level-matching condition (4.36) and erase the claim. Please provide the full evaluation of the lattice sums, or at least list the lattice vectors (m,n,λ) contributing to the O(q̄^{1/2}) term and show explicitly that they give the (16,1) representation of so(16)⊕so(18). A short appendix or reproducible computation would be appropriate.
  2. [§4.1.2, before Eq. (4.21)] The Wilson-line deformation is implemented by replacing Γ(1,1) with Γ(1,17) in the factorized partition function (4.13), leaving the SL(2,R) WZW, the two S3 sectors, and the GSO projection unchanged. This is the weakest structural assumption: if the deformation coupled to the SL(2,R) currents or altered the spectral-flow/character structure, the mass-shell and tachyon computation would need revision. The text asserts decoupling because the worldsheet fermions and right-moving bosons are not coupled to the SL(2,R) bosons, but no explicit argument is given. Please justify this more thoroughly, for example by writing the exactly marginal operator corresponding to the Wilson line and showing that it commutes with the other CFT factors, or by demonstrating that the deformed partition function remains modular invariant with the same SL(2,R) and S3 characters.
  3. [Abstract and §4.1.2] The abstract claims that the Spin(16)×Spin(16)⋊Z2 heterotic string on both internal manifolds accommodates tachyonic Wilson lines. However, the explicit computation is performed only for the S3×S3×S1 background (Eqs. (4.24)–(4.35)); the T4 case is deferred with 'no conceptual obstruction' and 'same considerations apply with little modification'. Either provide the T4 analogue, or amend the abstract to state that the concrete example is for the S3×S3×S1 background and that T4 is expected to behave similarly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.26)] The text says 'with k,ℓ=0,1,2' before the sums over k,ℓ=0,…,17; this is a typo. Also spell out the substitutions m=18r+k and n=18s+ℓ explicitly.
  2. [Before Eq. (4.33)] The sentence repeats '(i1,i2)=(v,c)' twice; the second should be '(c,v)' or similar.
  3. [§4.1.2, after Eq. (4.36)] The tachyon identification would be clearer if the paper explicitly showed that the O(q̄^{1/2}) state lies in the unflowed continuous sector and that the resulting p in Eq. (3.63) is real, since in AdS3 'tachyon' is defined by the BF-bound condition discussed in §2.1.
  4. [Figures 4.1 and 4.2] The captions are present but the text should define the color coding in the caption itself and state the range of a1,a2. The choice R2=α′(1−(a12+a22)/2) is also not motivated; a brief explanation would help.
  5. [General notation] The notation for states such as |j;j1;j2;R1;R2⟩ is introduced gradually but not collected in one place. A short table or list of conventions would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Wilson-line tachyon is computed from the lattice data, not built into the ansatz; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The Spin(16)xSpin(16) heterotic partition function (4.13)-(4.14) is assembled from the standard sl(2,R) WZW characters, level-shifted su(2) characters, the GSO projection and the Narain lattice; the Wilson line enters only through the (1,17) lattice (4.21)-(4.25), following the flat-space treatment [86] and the explicit example [46]. The alleged tachyon is read from the q-expansion (4.33): the coefficient 16 qbar^{1/2} in the O8 sector is an output of the Poisson resummation with A=(1,0^7;(1/3)^8) and R^2=alpha'/18, not a parameter fitted to produce a tachyon. The level-matching and mass-shell checks (4.36)-(4.38) are independent consistency conditions. The Wilson line is imported from [46], but that is external evidence, not self-citation, and the AdS computation is new. The only self-citations are [47,48], cited in the introduction for flat-space no-tachyon theorems; the paper explicitly says it verifies the AdS case itself ('Nonetheless, we verify that, as in flat space, the type 0B superstring... is tachyonic'), so they are not load-bearing and do not make the derivation circular. The main unproven assumption—that a Wilson line deforms only the Narain lattice and leaves the sl(2,R) WZW and S3 sectors unchanged (around (4.21)-(4.26))—is a physical decoupling assumption; if wrong the tachyon claim would fail, but this is a correctness/scope risk, not a reduction of the conclusion to the input. The explicit computation is for S3 x S3 x S1, with T4 deferred, another scope limitation rather than circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central computation relies on standard WZW/CFT results and the flat-space Wilson-line prescription; no new entities are introduced. The main parametric freedom is the hand-chosen Wilson line used to exhibit the tachyon.

free parameters (2)
  • Wilson line vector A and radius R = A=(1,0^7;(1/3)^8), R^2=α'/18
    Hand-picked in §4.1.2 to make the tachyon computation analytically tractable; not derived from a principle.
  • Moduli-slice parameters a1,a2 = R^2=α'(1-(a1^2+a2^2)/2), k1s=k2s=3 or 10^6
    Illustrative two-parameter slice of the 19-parameter moduli space used in Fig 4.1-4.2; choice not justified beyond convenience.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Standard WZW/CFT technology for SL(2,R) and SU(2) at generic level, including spectral flow and character formulas (Section 2 and Appendix A).
    The entire spectrum analysis rests on the representation theory of the affine sl(2,R) algebra and its characters as reviewed in §2 and Appendix A.
  • domain assumption The mass formula m^2 = -Q_{so(2,2)} - 2s(s-1) and the claim that unflowed continuous representations violate the BF bound, identifying tachyons (Section 2.1).
    This defines what counts as a tachyon in AdS3 and is used to interpret the unflowed continuous spectrum in Sections 3 and 4.
  • domain assumption Criticality conditions (eqs. 3.8, 3.43, 4.1, 4.12) fix the relations among WZW levels.
    The backgrounds are required to saturate the central charge; these conditions are standard in AdS3 string theory.
  • domain assumption The Wilson-line deformation only modifies the internal (1,17) lattice factor, decoupled from the rest of the CFT (Section 4.1.2, eqs. 4.21-4.26).
    Imported from flat-space heterotic constructions, this factorization is assumed to hold in the curved AdS3 background without backreaction on the WZW level or GSO projection.
  • standard math GSO projections for type 0B and Spin(16)×Spin(16)⋊Z2 heterotic strings (eqs. 3.9, 4.3, 4.23).
    These are the standard modular-invariant projections defining the theories, taken from the literature.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 41398 in / 13909 out tokens · 126363 ms · 2026-08-03T14:42:31.449647+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore the quantisation of the tachyonic type 0B superstring and the non-tachyonic $\text{Spin}(16) \times \text{Spin}(16) \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2$ heterotic string on AdS$_3 \times S^3 \times T^4$ and AdS$_3 \times S^3 \times S^3 \times S^1$ backgrounds. Adapting the analysis for the supersymmetric and bosonic string theories to these set-ups, we provide a world-sheet description for a generic level of the $\text{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})$ WZW model, and we read the spectrum through the associated partition functions. Focusing on the low-energy theory, we show that the $\text{Spin}(16) \times \text{Spin}(16) \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2$ heterotic string on both backgrounds accommodates non-trivial Wilson lines that are responsible for the appearance of tachyonic regions in the classical moduli space, hence jeopardising the stability of the vacuum. We show this with a concrete example on the AdS$_3 \times S^3 \times S^3 \times S^1$ space and provide general formulas for a systematic analysis of the classical moduli space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.19369 by Giorgio Leone.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: We display the dispersion relation (E,s) for the discrete representations choosing for simplicity hT4 = q = q¯ = j ′ = 0, w = −2, k = 7. The points in green describe the states appearing both in the type IIB and type 0B superstring, while the points in red correspond to the additional sector entering the type 0B superstring. This admits a meaningful solution if −1 − 4j ′ (1 + j ′ ) − 4khT4 + 4k( 1 2 − N)… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: We show the plot of the vari￾ables {a1, a2} for the choice of the radius R 2 = α ′ (1 − (a 2 1 + a 2 2 )/2) and Wilson line A = (a1, 07 ; a2, 07 ) at k 1 s = k 2 s = 106 and j1 = j2 = 0. The blue region corresponds to tachyon-free points, while the red one to the tachyonic region. The presence of tachyonic regions in the tree-level moduli space is already telling us that the theory has non perturbative i… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on $AdS_{4}\times S^{3}\times S^{3}$

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic AdS4 × S³ × S³ solutions exhibit a coupled instability: comparable fluxes trigger perturbative tachyons, while brane nucleation drives unequal fluxes toward that tachyonic regime.

  2. Heterotic Strings on Enriques Surfaces

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Classification of shift vectors in heterotic orbifold compactifications on Enriques surfaces with spectrum analysis and tachyon projection for non-supersymmetric interpretations.

  3. Heterotic Strings on Enriques Surfaces

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Classifies shift vectors for heterotic orbifolds on Enriques surfaces, analyzes spectra, and interprets some models as non-supersymmetric 10D heterotic compactifications with tachyon projection.

  4. Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on $AdS_{4}\times S^{3}\times S^{3}$

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic string compactifications on AdS4 x S3 x S3 with two fluxes develop tachyonic instabilities when fluxes are close in magnitude and show inverse scale separation when far apart, but brane nu...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 71 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Anomaly cancellations in type I D9- D9 system and the USp(32) string theory,

    S. Sugimoto, “Anomaly cancellations in type I D9- D9 system and the USp(32) string theory,”Prog. Theor. Phys.102(1999) 685–699,arXiv:hep-th/9905159

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    Some properties of open string theories,

    A. Sagnotti, “Some properties of open string theories,” inInternational Workshop on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY 95), pp. 473–484. 9, 1995.arXiv:hep-th/9509080

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    Surprises in open string perturbation theory,

    A. Sagnotti, “Surprises in open string perturbation theory,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 56(1997) 332–343,arXiv:hep-th/9702093

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  4. [4]

    An O(16)×O(16) Heterotic String,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, P . H. Ginsparg, G. W. Moore, and C. Vafa, “An O(16)×O(16) Heterotic String,”Phys. Lett. B171(1986) 155–162

    1986

  5. [5]

    String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,

    L. J. Dixon and J. A. Harvey, “String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 93–105

    1986

  6. [6]

    Stability of String Vacua. 1. A New Picture of the Renormalization Group,

    C. Lovelace, “Stability of String Vacua. 1. A New Picture of the Renormalization Group,”Nucl. Phys. B273(1986) 413–467

    1986

  7. [7]

    Dilaton Tadpoles, String Condensates and Scale Invariance,

    W. Fischler and L. Susskind, “Dilaton Tadpoles, String Condensates and Scale Invariance,”Phys. Lett. B171(1986) 383–389

    1986

  8. [8]

    Dilaton Tadpoles, String Condensates and Scale Invariance. 2.,

    W. Fischler and L. Susskind, “Dilaton Tadpoles, String Condensates and Scale Invariance. 2.,”Phys. Lett. B173(1986) 262–264

    1986

  9. [9]

    Brane solutions in strings with broken supersymmetry and dilaton tadpoles,

    E. Dudas and J. Mourad, “Brane solutions in strings with broken supersymmetry and dilaton tadpoles,”Phys. Lett. B486(2000) 172–178,arXiv:hep-th/0004165

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  10. [10]

    Stability of AdS p ×M q compactifications without supersymmetry,

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, G. T. Horowitz, and I. Mitra, “Stability of AdS p ×M q compactifications without supersymmetry,”Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 064033, arXiv:hep-th/0105047

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  11. [11]

    Some interesting violations of the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound,

    S. S. Gubser and I. Mitra, “Some interesting violations of the Breitenlohner-Freedman bound,”JHEP07(2002) 044,arXiv:hep-th/0108239

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    Time and space dependent backgrounds from nonsupersymmetric strings,

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad, and C. Timirgaziu, “Time and space dependent backgrounds from nonsupersymmetric strings,”Nucl. Phys. B660(2003) 3–24, arXiv:hep-th/0209176

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  13. [13]

    On Climbing Scalars in String Theory,

    E. Dudas, N. Kitazawa, and A. Sagnotti, “On Climbing Scalars in String Theory,”Phys. Lett. B694(2011) 80–88,arXiv:1009.0874 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    AdSVacua from Dilaton Tadpoles and Form Fluxes,

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “AdSVacua from Dilaton Tadpoles and Form Fluxes,” Phys. Lett. B768(2017) 92–96,arXiv:1612.08566 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    On Classical Stability with Broken Supersymmetry,

    I. Basile, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, “On Classical Stability with Broken Supersymmetry,”JHEP01(2019) 174,arXiv:1811.11448 [hep-th]. 42

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    On warped string vacuum profiles and cosmologies. Part I. Supersymmetric strings,

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “On warped string vacuum profiles and cosmologies. Part I. Supersymmetric strings,”JHEP12(2021) 137,arXiv:2109.06852 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    On warped string vacuum profiles and cosmologies. Part II. Non-supersymmetric strings,

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “On warped string vacuum profiles and cosmologies. Part II. Non-supersymmetric strings,”JHEP12(2021) 138,arXiv:2109.12328 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    A 4D IIB flux vacuum and supersymmetry breaking. Part I. Fermionic spectrum,

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “A 4D IIB flux vacuum and supersymmetry breaking. Part I. Fermionic spectrum,”JHEP08(2022) 301,arXiv:2206.03340 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings,

    R. Antonelli and I. Basile, “Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings,”JHEP 11(2019) 021,arXiv:1908.04352 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    de Sitter in non-supersymmetric string theories: no-go theorems and brane-worlds,

    I. Basile and S. Lanza, “de Sitter in non-supersymmetric string theories: no-go theorems and brane-worlds,”JHEP10(2020) 108,arXiv:2007.13757 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Supersymmetry breaking, brane dynamics and the swampland,

    I. Basile, “Supersymmetry breaking, brane dynamics and the swampland,”PoS CORFU2021(2022) 164

    2022

  22. [22]

    String tension between de Sitter vacua and curvature corrections,

    I. Basile and A. Platania, “String tension between de Sitter vacua and curvature corrections,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 12, (2021) L121901,arXiv:2103.06276 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Revisiting Dudas-Mourad Compactifications,

    I. Basile, S. Raucci, and S. Thom ´ee, “Revisiting Dudas-Mourad Compactifications,” Universe8no. 10, (2022) 544,arXiv:2209.10553 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    On new vacua of non-supersymmetric strings,

    S. Raucci, “On new vacua of non-supersymmetric strings,”Phys. Lett. B837(2023) 137663,arXiv:2209.06537 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    On codimension-one vacua and string theory,

    S. Raucci, “On codimension-one vacua and string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B985(2022) 116002,arXiv:2206.06399 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Brane-like solutions and other non-supersymmetric vacua,

    J. Mourad, S. Raucci, and A. Sagnotti, “Brane-like solutions and other non-supersymmetric vacua,”JHEP10(2024) 054,arXiv:2406.14926 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Brane profiles of non-supersymmetric strings,

    J. Mourad, S. Raucci, and A. Sagnotti, “Brane profiles of non-supersymmetric strings,” JHEP09(2024) 019,arXiv:2406.16327 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    O(16)×O(16) heterotic theory onAdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4,

    D. Robbins and H. Saleem, “O(16)×O(16) heterotic theory onAdS 3 ×S 3 ×T 4,” arXiv:2510.20915 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    AdS vacua of non-supersymmetric strings,

    S. Raucci and A. Tomasiello, “AdS vacua of non-supersymmetric strings,” arXiv:2510.01324 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [30]

    Non-Supersymmetric AdS from String Theory,

    Z. K. Baykara, D. Robbins, and S. Sethi, “Non-Supersymmetric AdS from String Theory,”arXiv:2212.02557 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Comments on string theory on AdS(3),

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, and N. Seiberg, “Comments on string theory on AdS(3),”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 733–782,arXiv:hep-th/9806194

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  32. [32]

    Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum,

    J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, “Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum,”J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 2929–2960,arXiv:hep-th/0001053. 43

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    Strings in AdS(3) and the SL(2,R) WZW model. Part 2. Euclidean black hole,

    J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and J. Son, “Strings in AdS(3) and the SL(2,R) WZW model. Part 2. Euclidean black hole,”J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 2961–2977, arXiv:hep-th/0005183

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  34. [34]

    J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, “Strings in AdS(3) and the SL(2,R) WZW model. Part

  35. [35]

    Correlation functions,”Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 106006,arXiv:hep-th/0111180

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  36. [36]

    Superstrings on NS5 backgrounds, deformed AdS(3) and holography,

    D. Israel, C. Kounnas, and M. P . Petropoulos, “Superstrings on NS5 backgrounds, deformed AdS(3) and holography,”JHEP10(2003) 028,arXiv:hep-th/0306053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    Spectral Flow in AdS(3)/CFT(2),

    G. Giribet, A. Pakman, and L. Rastelli, “Spectral Flow in AdS(3)/CFT(2),”JHEP06 (2008) 013,arXiv:0712.3046 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    Higher spins on AdS 3 from the worldsheet,

    K. Ferreira, M. R. Gaberdiel, and J. I. Jottar, “Higher spins on AdS 3 from the worldsheet,”JHEP07(2017) 131,arXiv:1704.08667 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    BPS spectrum on AdS3×S3×S3×S1,

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar, and W. Li, “BPS spectrum on AdS3×S3×S3×S1,”JHEP03(2017) 124,arXiv:1701.03552 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings,

    L. Eberhardt, “A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings,”J. Phys. A55 no. 6, (2022) 064001,arXiv:2110.07535 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Tensionless string spectra on AdS3,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Tensionless string spectra on AdS3,”JHEP05 (2018) 085,arXiv:1803.04423 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Superstrings on AdS 3 at k=1,

    G. Giribet, C. Hull, M. Kleban, M. Porrati, and E. Rabinovici, “Superstrings on AdS 3 at k=1,”JHEP08(2018) 204,arXiv:1803.04420 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, and R. Gopakumar, “The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,”JHEP04(2019) 103,arXiv:1812.01007 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Deriving the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, and R. Gopakumar, “Deriving the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,”JHEP02(2020) 136,arXiv:1911.00378 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Tensionless strings onAdS 3 ×S 3 ×S 3 ×S 1,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and V . Sriprachyakul, “Tensionless strings onAdS 3 ×S 3 ×S 3 ×S 1,” arXiv:2411.16848 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    String theory on AdS 3 and the symmetric orbifold of Liouville theory,

    L. Eberhardt and M. R. Gaberdiel, “String theory on AdS 3 and the symmetric orbifold of Liouville theory,”Nucl. Phys. B948(2019) 114774,arXiv:1903.00421 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Non-Supersymmetric Heterotic Strings on a Circle,

    B. Fraiman, M. Gra ˜na, H. Parra De Freitas, and S. Sethi, “Non-Supersymmetric Heterotic Strings on a Circle,”arXiv:2307.13745 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Tachyons and misaligned supersymmetry in closed string vacua,

    C. Angelantonj, I. Florakis, and G. Leone, “Tachyons and misaligned supersymmetry in closed string vacua,”JHEP06(2023) 174,arXiv:2301.13702 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Tachyons and Misaligned Supersymmetry in orientifold vacua,

    G. Leone, “Tachyons and Misaligned Supersymmetry in orientifold vacua,”JHEP11 (2023) 066,arXiv:2308.09757 [hep-th]. 44

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Modular invariance, finiteness, and misaligned supersymmetry: New constraints on the numbers of physical string states,

    K. R. Dienes, “Modular invariance, finiteness, and misaligned supersymmetry: New constraints on the numbers of physical string states,”Nucl. Phys. B429(1994) 533–588, arXiv:hep-th/9402006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  51. [51]

    Misaligned Supersymmetry and Open Strings,

    N. Cribiori, S. Parameswaran, F. Tonioni, and T. Wrase, “Misaligned Supersymmetry and Open Strings,”JHEP04(2021) 099,arXiv:2012.04677 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Modular invariance, misalignment and finiteness in non-supersymmetric strings,

    N. Cribiori, S. Parameswaran, F. Tonioni, and T. Wrase, “Modular invariance, misalignment and finiteness in non-supersymmetric strings,”JHEP01(2022) 127, arXiv:2110.11973 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    A localising AdS 3 sigma model,

    L. Eberhardt and M. R. Gaberdiel, “A localising AdS 3 sigma model,” arXiv:2505.09226 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  54. [54]

    BRST quantization of string theory in AdS(3),

    A. Pakman, “BRST quantization of string theory in AdS(3),”JHEP06(2003) 053, arXiv:hep-th/0304230

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  55. [55]

    Modular invariance of SU(1,1) strings,

    M. Henningson, S. Hwang, P . Roberts, and B. Sundborg, “Modular invariance of SU(1,1) strings,”Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 350–355

    1991

  56. [56]

    Notes on fSL(2,R)representations,

    A. Kitaev, “Notes on fSL(2,R)representations,”arXiv:1711.08169 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    The no ghost theorem for AdS(3) and the stringy exclusion principle,

    J. M. Evans, M. R. Gaberdiel, and M. J. Perry, “The no ghost theorem for AdS(3) and the stringy exclusion principle,”Nucl. Phys. B535(1998) 152–170,arXiv:hep-th/9806024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  58. [58]

    Finitely Reducible Realizations of theN=2 Superconformal Algebra,

    J. D. Lykken, “Finitely Reducible Realizations of theN=2 Superconformal Algebra,” Nucl. Phys. B313(1989) 473–491

    1989

  59. [59]

    No ghost theorem for SU(1,1) string theories,

    S. Hwang, “No ghost theorem for SU(1,1) string theories,”Nucl. Phys. B354(1991) 100–112

    1991

  60. [60]

    Beyond the large N limit: Nonlinear W(infinity) as symmetry of the SL(2,R) / U(1) coset model,

    I. Bakas and E. Kiritsis, “Beyond the large N limit: Nonlinear W(infinity) as symmetry of the SL(2,R) / U(1) coset model,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7S1A(1992) 55–81, arXiv:hep-th/9109029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  61. [61]

    Modular invariance of string theory on AdS(3),

    A. Kato and Y. Satoh, “Modular invariance of string theory on AdS(3),”Phys. Lett. B 486(2000) 306–313,arXiv:hep-th/0001063

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  62. [62]

    String theory on AdS(3): Some open questions,

    P . M. Petropoulos, “String theory on AdS(3): Some open questions,”PoStmr99(1999) 055,arXiv:hep-th/9908189

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  63. [63]

    String theory on AdS(3),

    J. de Boer, H. Ooguri, H. Robins, and J. Tannenhauser, “String theory on AdS(3),”JHEP 12(1998) 026,arXiv:hep-th/9812046

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  64. [64]

    Interacting strings on AdS(3),

    G. Giribet and C. A. Nunez, “Interacting strings on AdS(3),”JHEP11(1999) 031, arXiv:hep-th/9909149

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  65. [65]

    Holographic Weyl anomaly in string theory,

    L. Eberhardt and S. Pal, “Holographic Weyl anomaly in string theory,”SciPost Phys.16 no. 1, (2024) 027,arXiv:2307.03000 [hep-th]. 45

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Infinite dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms,

    V . G. Kac and D. H. Peterson, “Infinite dimensional Lie algebras, theta functions and modular forms,”Adv. Math.53(1984) 125–264

    1984

  67. [67]

    Gauge fields as composite boundary excitations,

    S. Ferrara and C. Fronsdal, “Gauge fields as composite boundary excitations,”Phys. Lett. B433(1998) 19–28,arXiv:hep-th/9802126

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  68. [68]

    On N=8 supergravity on AdS(5) and N=4 superconformal Yang-Mills theory,

    S. Ferrara, C. Fronsdal, and A. Zaffaroni, “On N=8 supergravity on AdS(5) and N=4 superconformal Yang-Mills theory,”Nucl. Phys. B532(1998) 153–162, arXiv:hep-th/9802203

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  69. [69]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,”Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183–386, arXiv:hep-th/9905111

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  70. [70]

    Supergravity and the Spinor Dual Model,

    F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk, and D. I. Olive, “Supergravity and the Spinor Dual Model,”Phys. Lett. B65(1976) 282–286

    1976

  71. [71]

    Supersymmetry, Supergravity Theories and the Dual Spinor Model,

    F. Gliozzi, J. Scherk, and D. I. Olive, “Supersymmetry, Supergravity Theories and the Dual Spinor Model,”Nucl. Phys. B122(1977) 253–290

    1977

  72. [72]

    Spin Structures in String Theory,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Spin Structures in String Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B276(1986) 272

    1986

  73. [73]

    Open strings,

    C. Angelantonj and A. Sagnotti, “Open strings,”Phys. Rept.371(2002) 1–150, arXiv:hep-th/0204089. [Erratum: Phys.Rept. 376, 407 (2003)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  74. [74]

    Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry,

    G. Leone and S. Raucci, “Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry,” arXiv:2509.24703 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Supersymmetry Breaking with Fields, Strings and Branes,

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, “Supersymmetry Breaking with Fields, Strings and Branes,”arXiv:2511.04367 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  76. [76]

    Conformal field theory of AdS background with Ramond-Ramond flux,

    N. Berkovits, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, “Conformal field theory of AdS background with Ramond-Ramond flux,”JHEP03(1999) 018,arXiv:hep-th/9902098

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  77. [77]

    An excursion into the string spectrum,

    C. Markou and E. Skvortsov, “An excursion into the string spectrum,”JHEP12(2023) 055,arXiv:2309.15988 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    On the deep superstring spectrum,

    T. Basile and C. Markou, “On the deep superstring spectrum,”JHEP07(2024) 184, arXiv:2405.18467 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    On the deep string spectrum,

    C. Markou, “On the deep string spectrum,” in24th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity. 4, 2025.arXiv:2505.00177 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    More comments on string theory on AdS(3),

    D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, “More comments on string theory on AdS(3),”JHEP04 (1999) 008,arXiv:hep-th/9903219

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

Showing first 80 references.