Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AI Driven Knowledge Extraction from Clinical Practice Guidelines: Turning Research into Practice

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.05489 v1 pith:M5DYZDLS submitted 2020-12-10 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords practiceresearchclinicalactioncpgsguidelinesknowledgecondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Background and Objectives: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) represent the foremost methodology for sharing state-of-the-art research findings in the healthcare domain with medical practitioners to limit practice variations, reduce clinical cost, improve the quality of care, and provide evidence based treatment. However, extracting relevant knowledge from the plethora of CPGs is not feasible for already burdened healthcare professionals, leading to large gaps between clinical findings and real practices. It is therefore imperative that state-of-the-art Computing research, especially machine learning is used to provide artificial intelligence based solution for extracting the knowledge from CPGs and reducing the gap between healthcare research/guidelines and practice. Methods: This research presents a novel methodology for knowledge extraction from CPGs to reduce the gap and turn the latest research findings into clinical practice. First, our system classifies the CPG sentences into four classes such as condition-action, condition-consequences, action, and not-applicable based on the information presented in a sentence. We use deep learning with state-of-the-art word embedding, improved word vectors technique in classification process. Second, it identifies qualifier terms in the classified sentences, which assist in recognizing the condition and action phrases in a sentence. Finally, the condition and action phrase are processed and transformed into plain rule If Condition(s) Then Action format. Results: We evaluate the methodology on three different domains guidelines including Hypertension, Rhinosinusitis, and Asthma. The deep learning model classifies the CPG sentences with an accuracy of 95%. While rule extraction was validated by user-centric approach, which achieved a Jaccard coefficient of 0.6, 0.7, and 0.4 with three human experts extracted rules, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comprehensive Modeling and Question Answering of Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines using LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A system that enriches an NCCN NSCLC guideline knowledge graph with LLM node labels and uses LLM-generated Cypher queries for question answering, without a direct evaluation of answer correctness.

Pith tools