Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Assuming f1(1285) is a K* anti-K molecule, a kaon scatters off it strongly enough to produce a bound state about 10 MeV below the K f1 threshold, with a width near 15 MeV — a signature visible in correlation functions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Assuming f1(1285) is a K* anti-K molecule, the K f1 system is predicted to have a near-threshold bound/resonant state with a distinctive correlation function.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-02 challenge →

load-bearing objection A solid application of an established FCA framework to K f1, with a plausible but under-supported bound-state claim; worth refereeing, but the central numbers need a pole search and controlled subthreshold extrapolation. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.16683 v2 pith:M5TXNXWN submitted 2026-02-18 hep-ph

Scattering data and correlation function for the $K f_1(1285)$ interaction

Wen-Hao Jia , Jing Song , Wei-Hong Liang , Eulogio Oset This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords K f1(1285) interactionfixed center approximationcorrelation functionhadronic moleculenear-threshold bound statescattering lengtheffective rangefemtoscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts a resonant K f1(1285) state about 10 MeV below the K f1 threshold, with a width around 15 MeV, on the assumption that the f1(1285) is a molecular state of K* anti-K and anti-K* K. It computes the scattering amplitude, scattering length (0.57 − i0.22 fm) and effective range (−0.84 + i0.24 fm) using a fixed-center approximation that is unitarized to satisfy elastic unitarity. It also calculates the K f1 correlation function, which shows the characteristic rise-then-drop shape of a system with a bound state close to threshold. The paper points out that this differs sharply from treating f1(1285) as an elementary particle, where the leading-order chiral interaction is zero, so measuring the correlation function would discriminate between the two pictures.

Core claim

Assuming the f1(1285) resonance is a two-body molecule of K* anti-K and anti-K* K, the kaon-f1 system is attractive enough to form a near-threshold bound or resonant state: the three-body amplitude develops a resonant structure about 10 MeV below the K f1 threshold with a width of about 15 MeV. The computed correlation function exhibits the distinctive shape of a bound state close to threshold, clearly different from the essentially flat correlation expected if f1 were an elementary particle and the K f1 interaction vanished at leading order. The authors extract a scattering length a = (0.57 − i0.22) fm and an effective range r0 = (−0.84 + i0.24) fm, and they note that the structure can be s

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a modified fixed-center approximation to the Faddeev equations, unitarized to satisfy elastic unitarity exactly. Key ingredients are the cluster form factor Fc(q) built from the f1 wave function, the loop functions G0 and Gc for the external kaon scattering off the cluster constituents, and the two-body amplitudes t1 and t2 for K K* and K anti-K with appropriate isospin combinations. A mass-sharing ansatz ξ = Mc/(M_K* + M_anti-K) distributes the cluster binding between its constituents, and Eqs. (17)–(18) combine the two components of the f1 wave function to produce the total amplitude and correlation function.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction relies on evaluating the K K* and K anti-K scattering amplitudes at subenergies below their own two-body thresholds, using a specific mass-sharing ansatz and cutoff-regulated loops; if that subthreshold continuation is unreliable, the 10 MeV binding and 15 MeV width are artifacts of the extrapolation rather than real three-body physics.

What would settle it

A high-statistics measurement of the K f1(1285) correlation function in high-multiplicity pp collisions: the molecular picture predicts a distinct rise above unity at low relative momentum (roughly 50–200 MeV/c) followed by a drop, whereas the elementary picture predicts a nearly flat function close to 1. If the measured function is flat, the predicted bound state is ruled out.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the predicted state exists, it should appear as a peak in the KKπK̄ invariant-mass spectrum around 1745 MeV, a four-particle final state that current high-luminosity collider experiments can reconstruct.
  • The correlation function shape distinguishes a molecular f1 from an elementary one; measuring CKf1(p) for different source radii provides a direct, model-independent test of the resonance's nature.
  • Application of the inverse method to the measured correlation function can extract the scattering length and effective range; the predicted values a = (0.57 − i0.22) fm and r0 = (−0.84 + i0.24) fm serve as concrete benchmarks for comparison.
  • The framework is transferable to other particle–resonance systems where the resonance is a two-body molecule, potentially covering other axial-vector mesons generated by the same dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted state is real, it would be a three-body hadronic molecule (K K* anti-K), extending the molecular picture from two-body to three-body hadrons and motivating analogous searches for K a1(1260) and K h1(1415) systems.
  • The sharp contrast between the molecular and elementary scenarios — zero leading-order interaction versus a bound state — means the correlation function is effectively a compositeness meter for f1(1285); even an upper limit on the deviation from unity would constrain the molecular probability.
  • A lattice QCD study of K f1(1285) scattering in a finite volume would bypass the subthreshold continuation problem by accessing the physical amplitude directly; agreement with the predicted scattering length would validate the mass-sharing ansatz.
  • Varying the cutoff qmax (fixed at 650 MeV here) and the couplings from the generating model would test the stability of the 10 MeV binding; a strong cutoff dependence would signal that the near-threshold structure is an artifact of the regularization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the K+ f1(1285) interaction under the assumption that the f1(1285) is a hadronic molecule generated by the K\bar K^* and \bar K K^* channels. Using the fixed-center approximation (FCA) to the Faddeev equations, augmented by a unitarization prescription that restores exact elastic unitarity, the authors compute the three-body scattering amplitude, the scattering length and effective range, and the K f1 correlation function for several source radii. From the real-axis shape of the amplitude they identify a resonant structure about 10 MeV below the K f1 threshold and assign it a width of about 15 MeV. They also compare this molecular scenario with an elementary-f1 description and find a strong attractive interaction in the former and a vanishing Weinberg-Tomozawa term in the latter, concluding that correlation-function measurements can discriminate between the two pictures.

Significance. If the predicted near-threshold K f1 state is robust, it constitutes a concrete, observable prediction that can be tested with existing ALICE and LHCb techniques, as the manuscript emphasizes. The paper extends the FCA-unitarization formalism of Refs. [42-44] to a new system, and the input two-body amplitudes are taken from established unitarized models. The central observable — the correlation function with a distinctive bound-state-like shape — is falsifiable. However, the main new result depends on evaluating two-body amplitudes at significantly subthreshold energies and on a set of model assumptions (cutoffs, mass-sharing ansatz, zero external momentum). The paper would be substantially strengthened by a complex-plane pole search and a systematic sensitivity study.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Figs. 3 and 5] The claimed bound/resonant state — about 10 MeV binding and 15 MeV width — is extracted from the real-axis behavior of T_tot: the zero of Re T and the maximum of Im T. No pole is searched for in the complex energy plane. Since the amplitude is not analytic by construction (step-function cutoffs, real-axis form factors), the real-axis crossing could be an artifact of the regularization. Please locate the pole in the second Riemann sheet (or, for a bound state, the pole on the physical sheet below threshold), give its position and residue, and define the width from the pole rather than from the height of Im T on the real axis.
  2. [Section II, Eqs. (14)-(16) and Appendix A] The input amplitudes t1 and t2 are evaluated at subthreshold energies. At the nominal resonance position, q0 is approximately 484 MeV, giving s(K+\bar K) ≈ 0.89 GeV^2, below the K\bar K threshold (≈0.975 GeV^2), and s(K+K*) ≈ 1.72 GeV^2, below the K+K* threshold (≈1.92 GeV^2). At such energies the unitarized t2 is controlled by the f0(980)/a0(980) poles and by the cutoff qmax=650 MeV from Ref. [59], while t1 is controlled by the K K* unitarization and its cutoff. The mass-sharing ansatz, Eq. (16), is an additional model assumption. The central claim rests on these continuations. Please show that the bound-state signature survives: (i) variation of qmax for t1 and t2 over a reasonable range, (ii) variation of the coupling rescaling factors used in Eq. (A22), and (iii) a modified mass-sharing prescription. Without such a stability test, the 10 MeV binding may be an artifact of the extrapol
  3. [Section III, after Eq. (27)] The paper reports a, r0, binding energy, and width as unique numbers, but the formalism contains several free parameters: the two-body cutoffs, the coupling rescaling factors, the form factor parametrization, and the mass-sharing parameter ξ. The only parameter dependence shown is the source radius R in the correlation function, which is not the parameter that controls the existence of the state. Please provide a sensitivity study of the position and width of the structure to the model parameters, and quote the resulting ranges. This is necessary to assess whether the 'clear and stable' claim in Section III is quantitatively supported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract as supplied in the metadata reads 'approximately 56 MeV below the K f1 threshold, with a width of around 123 MeV', while the body and conclusions state 'about 10 MeV' and 'about 15 MeV'. Please ensure the abstract matches the results in the text.
  2. [Abstract] Typo: 'the interaction of the K f1 system is differs significantly' should read 'differs significantly'.
  3. [Section II, Eq. (1)] The notation t1, t2 is used both for the two-body amplitudes in Eq. (1) and for the isospin combinations in Eq. (2); consider using different symbols (e.g., t_{KK*}, t_{K\bar K}) to avoid confusion.
  4. [Figures 3 and 5] The vertical line is labeled 'Mc + MK+' but should use a typeset threshold label, e.g., 'M_c + M_{K^+}'. Also, the y-axis units of the scattering amplitude are not stated; please specify them.
  5. [Section IV] The conclusion states that the correlation function could 'already contain sufficient information to predict the existence of this bound state' via the inverse method. This is plausible but would be better supported by citing the explicit inverse-procedure conditions from Refs. [45,46] and stating whether the current K f1 correlation function satisfies them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction: the Kf1 state is an output of the FCA equations, not an input; self-cited model inputs are provenance, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — a Kf1(1285) resonant/bound structure about 10 MeV below threshold — is obtained by solving Eqs. (17)-(18) with the two-body amplitudes t1 and t2 taken from prior models and with f1(1285) treated as a K*Kbar/Kbar*K molecule. The predicted binding and width are not used to define those inputs, and no equation equates the output to the input by construction. Eq. (14) sets the subenergy arguments and Eq. (16) states the mass-sharing assumption openly; these are model assumptions, not tautologies. The comparison with the elementary-f1 case uses an external chiral-limit result (Ref. [53]) rather than the fitted molecular amplitude. Although the two-body amplitudes and the unitarized FCA framework come substantially from Refs. [11,42-44,59] by overlapping authors, those are published, externally tested model ingredients rather than an unverified uniqueness theorem invoked to force the conclusion. The main weakness — uncontrolled subthreshold extrapolation of t1,t2 below their two-body thresholds and the absence of a complex-plane pole search — is a robustness concern about analytic continuation, not a circularity. Accordingly, no specific circular step is identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper's central result rests on a chain of model inputs: the molecular nature of f1(1285), the FCA framework, two-body amplitudes and cutoffs from prior work by the same group, and an explicit mass-sharing prescription. The predicted K f1 state is an emergent output, but the ledger shows how much of the calculation is inherited rather than derived in this paper.

free parameters (4)
  • q_max two-body cutoff(s) = 650 MeV for the KK loop (Eq. A5); q_max^(1), q_max^(2) for G0 and Gc not stated numerically
    Loop cutoff regularizing the two-body and three-body G functions; taken from earlier fits in Refs. [11,59]; controls whether subthreshold amplitudes develop the reported strength.
  • g_{f1,K anti-K*} = 7230 MeV (plus 6147+i183, 6172-i75, 1872-i1486 for h1, b1, a1 couplings)
    Couplings in the Breit-Wigner parametrization Eq. (A22), from the same group's molecular model Ref. [11]; they encode the assumption that f1 is a K anti-K* molecule.
  • a1/h1 coupling rescaling factors = 0.76 (a1), 0.51 (h1)
    Ad hoc rescaling in Appendix A.4 to account for PDG masses differing from Ref. [11]; authors state effect is minimal.
  • source radius R = 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 fm
    Gaussian source size in correlation function Eq. (24); varied to show dependence, not fitted.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption f1(1285) is a molecular state of K anti-K* and anti-K K* in I=0
    Central hypothesis, taken from Refs. [10-15]; all predictions are conditional on this.
  • ad hoc to paper Fixed-center approximation with zero external momentum and binding shared proportionally to cluster masses
    Eqs. (8), (14)-(16): the kaon is taken at zero momentum and the f1 binding is divided between K* and anti-K proportional to their masses; no derivation of this partitioning is given.
  • domain assumption K* to anti-K* transitions inside the cluster are negligible
    Sec. II, Eq. (18): the total amplitude is the average of the K* anti-K and anti-K* K components; transitions between them are suppressed by two-step exchange and ignored.
  • domain assumption Two-body amplitudes from local hidden gauge and unitarization remain valid at subthreshold subenergies used in Eq. (14)
    The t1 and t2 amplitudes are evaluated below their two-body thresholds using cutoffs and form factors; this extrapolation is not independently validated.
  • domain assumption Breit-Wigner parametrization with PDG masses and Ref. [11] couplings reproduces the K anti-K* amplitudes
    Appendix A.4, Eq. (A22): amplitudes for f1, h1, a1, b1 are taken as Breit-Wigner forms with couplings from the same molecular model.
invented entities (1)
  • K f1(1285) bound/resonant state (mass ~ M_K + M_f1 - 10 MeV, width ~15 MeV) independent evidence
    purpose: Explains the resonance-like behavior in K f1 scattering and the distinctive correlation function; serves as a test of f1 compositeness.
    The paper gives falsifiable handles: a predicted four-particle invariant-mass enhancement and a particular femtoscopic correlation shape. These are not used to set the constants.

reviewed 2026-08-02 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scattering data and correlation function for the $K f_1(1285)$ interaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M5TXNXWN

@misc{pith2026260216683,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scattering data and correlation function for the $K f_1(1285)$ interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M5TXNXWN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.16683}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We study the interaction of a kaon with the $f_1(1285)$ resonance, assuming that the $f_1(1285)$ is a molecular state generated by the $K \bar K^*, \bar K K^*$ interaction, evaluating the scattering amplitude, the scattering length and effective range of the $K f_1$ system. The scattering amplitude develops a resonant structure approximately \R{$56$ MeV} below the $K f_1$ threshold, with a width of around \R{$123$ MeV} MeV. The corresponding correlation function has the distinctive shape of a system with a bound state close to threshold. We also show that the interaction of the $K f_1$ system differs significantly from the one obtained assuming that the $f_1(1285)$ is an \R{ordinary, non-molecular,} particle. This provides motivation to continue the search for these observables, already initiated by the measurement of the $p f_1(1285)$ correlation function by the ALICE collaboration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.16683 by Eulogio Oset, Jing Song, Wei-Hong Liang, Wen-Hao Jia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagrams entering the ordinary FCA approach for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Diagrams considering the elastic propagation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Correlation function of the component [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Result for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Correlation function considering the two components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Diagrams for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $KX(3872)$ interaction and correlation function

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A unitarized fixed-center approximation predicts a narrow KX(3872) bound state 50 MeV below threshold and a characteristic femtoscopic correlation function.

  2. Interaction and correlation functions for $\pi f_1(1285)$, $\eta f_1(1285)$

    hep-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Using the fixed-center approximation, the π⁰(η) f₁(1285) interaction yields scattering parameters and correlation functions but no clear poles for the π₁(1400), π₁(1600), or η₁(1855) resonances, only a broad structure...

  3. Correlation function and bound state from the $K D_{s0}^*(2317)$ interaction

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The K D_s0*(2317) system develops a narrow resonance 40 MeV below threshold under the fixed-center molecular assumption, producing a characteristic correlation function for strong attraction.

  4. Exotic states with charm and/or strangeness

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    D1(2420) and the D_s1 states are modeled as two-hadron molecules, and a new n \bar D_s1(2460) three-body state at ~3265 MeV is predicted.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 44 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    TheKKinteraction 1)KKinteraction inI= 1 We takeK +K + →K +K + and the potential is ob- tained according to Fig. 7. Note that due to the identity of the particles we must consider symmetrized amplitudes and we must take diagrams (a) and (b) of Fig. 7. From the diagram (a), summing the contributions ofρ 0, ω, ϕ exchange, we obtain V (a) = 2g2 M 2 V (p1 +p 3...

  2. [2]

    TheKK ∗ interaction 1)KK ∗ interaction inI= 1 We need now an extra Lagrangian for theV V Vvertex given in the limit of small three momenta by [55–58] LV V V=ig⟨(V µ∂νVµ −∂ νV µVµ)V ν ⟩.(A8) In this limitV ν must be the exchanged vector, because otherwiseϵ ν has only the spatial components and∂ ν be- comes a three momentum which is zero. Then the in- terac...

  3. [3]

    [59], which are evaluated using theπ +π−,π 0π0, K +K −,K 0K 0,π 0η,ηηchannels, updating the work of Ref

    TheK ¯Kamplitudes Here we take these amplitudes from the work of Ref. [59], which are evaluated using theπ +π−,π 0π0, K +K −,K 0K 0,π 0η,ηηchannels, updating the work of Ref. [54] to account explicitly for theη−η ′ mixing TABLE I. Classification of the axial vector resonances. The oldh 1(1380) has been updated in the PDG to theh 1(1415). J P C I= 1I= 0 1+...

  4. [4]

    [11] and we use information obtained in that work

    TheK ¯K ∗ amplitudes Here we take advantage that these amplitudes are eval- uated in Ref. [11] and we use information obtained in that work. In that work the interaction leads to the dynamical generation of the different axial vector resonances, which are classified by spin andC-parity as shown in Table I. Note that thef 1(1420) is dismissed as a differen...

  5. [5]

    Del Grande, L

    R. Del Grande, L. ˇSerkˇ snyt˙ e, L. Fabbietti, V. M. Sarti, and D. Mihaylov, A method to remove lower order con- tributions in multi-particle femtoscopic correlation func- tions, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 244 (2022), arXiv:2107.10227 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Towards the understanding of the genuine three-body interaction forp-p-pandp- p-Λ, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 145 (2023), arXiv:2206.03344 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Study of thep-p-K + andp-p- K − dynamics using the femtoscopy technique, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 298 (2023), arXiv:2303.13448 [nucl-ex]. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Exploring the Strong Inter- action of Three-Body Systems at the LHC, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031051 (2024), arXiv:2308.16120 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Garrido, A

    E. Garrido, A. Kievsky, M. Gattobigio, M. Viviani, L. E. Marcucci, R. Del Grande, L. Fabbietti, and D. Mel- nichenko,pΛ andppΛ correlation functions, Phys. Rev. C110, 054004 (2024), arXiv:2408.01750 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Rzesa, Non-identical particle femtoscopy of pairs containing deuteron and interaction studies of nucleons with strange matter, Ph.D

    W. Rzesa, Non-identical particle femtoscopy of pairs containing deuteron and interaction studies of nucleons with strange matter, Ph.D. thesis, Warsaw U. of Tech. (main) (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Ramos, J

    A. Ramos, J. M. Torres-Rincon, A. de Fagoaga, and E. Cabr´ e, Kaon-deuteron femtoscopy from unitarized chi- ral interactions (2025), arXiv:2507.22593 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    ˇSerkˇ snyt˙ e, S

    L. ˇSerkˇ snyt˙ e, S. Kundu, and M. Korwieser, (Private com- munication)

  13. [13]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Measurement off 1(1285) pro- duction inppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 866, 139562 (2025), arXiv:2409.11936 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    M. F. M. Lutz and E. E. Kolomeitsev, On meson res- onances and chiral symmetry, Nucl. Phys. A730, 392 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0307039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  15. [15]

    L. Roca, E. Oset, and J. Singh, Low lying axial-vector mesons as dynamically generated resonances, Phys. Rev. D72, 014002 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0503273

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  16. [16]

    Garcia-Recio, L

    C. Garcia-Recio, L. S. Geng, J. Nieves, and L. L. Salcedo, Low-lying even parity meson resonances and spin-flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev. D83, 016007 (2011), arXiv:1005.0956 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Zhou, X.-L

    Y. Zhou, X.-L. Ren, H.-X. Chen, and L.-S. Geng, Pseu- doscalar meson and vector meson interactions and dy- namically generated axial-vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014020 (2014), arXiv:1404.6847 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Geng, X.-L

    L.-S. Geng, X.-L. Ren, Y. Zhou, H.-X. Chen, and E. Oset,S-waveKK ∗ interactions in a finite volume and thef 1(1285), Phys. Rev. D92, 014029 (2015), arXiv:1503.06633 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    L¨ u and J

    P.-L. L¨ u and J. He, Hadronic molecular states from theK ¯K ∗ interaction, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 359 (2016), arXiv:1603.04168 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Aceti, J

    F. Aceti, J. M. Dias, and E. Oset,f 1(1285) decays into a0(980)π0,f 0(980)π0 and isospin breaking, Eur. Phys. J. A51, 48 (2015), arXiv:1501.06505 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Aceti, J.-J

    F. Aceti, J.-J. Xie, and E. Oset, TheK ¯Kπdecay of the f1(1285) and its nature as aK ∗ ¯K−ccmolecule, Phys. Lett. B750, 609 (2015), arXiv:1505.06134 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Xie, TheK −p→f 1(1285)Λ reaction within an ef- fective Lagrangian approach, Phys

    J.-J. Xie, TheK −p→f 1(1285)Λ reaction within an ef- fective Lagrangian approach, Phys. Rev. C92, 065203 (2015), arXiv:1509.06196 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    Xie and E

    J.-J. Xie and E. Oset, Role of thef 1(1285) state in the J/ψ→ϕ ¯KK ∗ andJ/ψ→ϕf 1(1285) decays, Phys. Lett. B753, 591 (2016), arXiv:1509.08099 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Molina, M

    R. Molina, M. D¨ oring, and E. Oset, Determination of the compositeness of resonances from decays: the case of theB 0 s →J/ψf 1(1285), Phys. Rev. D93, 114004 (2016), arXiv:1604.02574 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Oset and L

    E. Oset and L. Roca, Triangle singularity inτ→ f1(1285)πντ decay, Phys. Lett. B782, 332 (2018), arXiv:1803.07807 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    D. He, X. Luo, Y. Xie, and H. Sun, Theoretical study in the ¯B0 →J/ψ ¯K ∗0K 0 and ¯B0 →J/ψf 1(1285) decays, Phys. Rev. D103, 094007 (2021), arXiv:2104.01047 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    A. W. Thomas and R. H. Landau, Pion - Deuteron and Pion - Nucleus Scattering: A Review, Phys. Rept.58, 121 (1980)

    1980

  28. [28]

    J. M. Eisenberg and D. S. Koltun, Theory of Meson Interactions with Nuclei, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, N.J, 1980)

    1980

  29. [29]

    S. S. Kamalov, E. Oset, and A. Ramos, Chiral unitary ap- proach to the K- deuteron scattering length, Nucl. Phys. A690, 494 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0010054

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    A. N. Ivanov, M. Cargnelli, M. Faber, H. Fuhrmann, V. A. Ivanova, J. Marton, N. I. Troitskaya, and J. Zmeskal, On kaonic deuterium: Quantum field the- oretic and relativistic covariant approach, Eur. Phys. J. A23, 79 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0406053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Meißner, U

    U.-G. Meißner, U. Raha, and A. Rusetsky, The Pion- nucleon scattering lengths from pionic deuterium, Eur. Phys. J. C41, 213 (2005), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 45, 545 (2006)], arXiv:nucl-th/0501073

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    Meißner, U

    U.-G. Meißner, U. Raha, and A. Rusetsky, Kaon-nucleon scattering lengths from kaonic deuterium experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C47, 473 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0603029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  33. [33]

    N. V. Shevchenko, One- versus two-pole ¯KN−πΣ po- tential:K −dscattering length, Phys. Rev. C85, 034001 (2012), arXiv:1103.4974 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    D¨ oring and U

    M. D¨ oring and U. G. Meißner, Kaon-nucleon scatter- ing lengths from kaonic deuterium experiments revisited, Phys. Lett. B704, 663 (2011), arXiv:1108.5912 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    M. Mai, V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, and A. Rusetsky, Recoil corrections in antikaon-deuteron scattering, Phys. Rev. D91, 054016 (2015), arXiv:1411.4881 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Encarnaci´ on, A

    P. Encarnaci´ on, A. Feijoo, and E. Oset, Correlation func- tion for thepf 1(1285) interaction, Phys. Rev. D111, 114023 (2025), arXiv:2502.19329 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    L. L. Foldy, The Multiple Scattering of Waves. 1. General Theory of Isotropic Scattering by Randomly Distributed Scatterers, Phys. Rev.67, 107 (1945)

    1945

  38. [38]

    K. A. Brueckner, Multiple Scattering Corrections to the Impulse Approximation in the Two-Body System, Phys. Rev.89, 834 (1953)

    1953

  39. [39]

    K. A. Brueckner, The Elastic Scattering of Pions in Deu- terium, Phys. Rev.90, 715 (1953)

    1953

  40. [40]

    Chand and R

    R. Chand and R. H. Dalitz, Charge-independence in K- -deuterium capture reactions, Annals Phys.20, 1 (1962)

    1962

  41. [41]

    R. C. Barrett and A. Deloff, Strong interaction effects in kaonic deuterium, Phys. Rev. C60, 025201 (1999)

    1999

  42. [42]

    Deloff,ηdandK −dzero energy scattering: A Faddeev approach, Phys

    A. Deloff,ηdandK −dzero energy scattering: A Faddeev approach, Phys. Rev. C61, 024004 (2000)

    2000

  43. [43]

    Martinez Torres, K

    A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, L. Roca, and E. Oset, Few-body systems consisting of mesons, Few Body Syst.61, 35 (2020), arXiv:2005.14357 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Roca and E

    L. Roca and E. Oset, A description of thef 2(1270), ρ3(1690),f 4(2050),ρ 5(2350) andf 6(2510) resonances as multi-ρ(770) states, Phys. Rev. D82, 054013 (2010), arXiv:1005.0283 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2050

  45. [45]

    B. B. Malabarba, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Mar- tinez Torres, and S.-i. Nam, Strangeness +1 light mul- tiquark baryons, Phys. Rev. D111, 016021 (2025), arXiv:2404.04078 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Ikeno and E

    N. Ikeno and E. Oset, Correlation function for the nD∗ s0(2317) interaction and the issue of elastic unitar- ity, Phys. Rev. D112, 094019 (2025), arXiv:2507.16367 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Agat˜ ao, P

    B. Agat˜ ao, P. Brand˜ ao, A. Mart ´ ınez Torres, K. P. Khem- chandani, L. M. Abreu, and E. Oset, Correlation func- tions forn ¯Ds1(2460) andn ¯Ds1(2536), Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1136 (2025), arXiv:2508.05825 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Jia, P.-S

    W.-H. Jia, P.-S. Su, W.-H. Liang, R. Molina, and 10 E. Oset, SuperexoticK ∗+D∗+K ∗+ bound state (2025), arXiv:2512.04001 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Ikeno, G

    N. Ikeno, G. Toledo, and E. Oset, Model independent analysis of femtoscopic correlation functions: An applica- tion to theD ∗ s0(2317), Phys. Lett. B847, 138281 (2023), arXiv:2305.16431 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Albaladejo, A

    M. Albaladejo, A. Feijoo, I. Vida˜ na, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Inverse problem in femtoscopic correlation func- tions: theT cc(3875)+ state, Eur. Phys. J. A61, 187 (2025), arXiv:2307.09873 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Mandl and G

    F. Mandl and G. Shaw, Quantum field theory, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, N.J, 2010) oCLC: ocn460050759

    2010

  52. [52]

    Gamermann, J

    D. Gamermann, J. Nieves, E. Oset, and E. Ruiz Arriola, Couplings in coupled channels versus wave functions: ap- plication to theX(3872) resonance, Phys. Rev. D81, 014029 (2010), arXiv:0911.4407 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    Yamagata-Sekihara, J

    J. Yamagata-Sekihara, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Couplings in coupled channels versus wave functions in the case of resonances: application to the two Λ(1405) states, Phys. Rev. D83, 014003 (2011), arXiv:1007.3923 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  54. [54]

    J. M. Dias, G. Toledo, L. Roca, and E. Oset, Unveil- ing theK 1(1270) double-pole structure in theB − → J/ψρK − andB − →J/ψK ∗−πdecays, Phys. Rev. D 103, 116019 (2021), arXiv:2102.08402 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), A study ofC Pviolation in the decaysB ± →[K +K −π+π−]Dh± (h=K, π) andB ± → [π+π−π+π−]Dh±, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 547 (2023), [Er- ratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 83, 672 (2023)], arXiv:2301.10328 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), First observation of the decays ¯B0 →D +K −π+π− andB − →D 0K −π+π−, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 161801 (2012), arXiv:1201.4402 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [57]

    M.-J. Yan, J. M. Dias, A. Guevara, F.-K. Guo, and B.- S. Zou, On theη 1(1855),π 1(1400) andπ 1(1600) as Dy- namically Generated States and Their SU(3) Partners, Universe9, 109 (2023), arXiv:2301.04432 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    J. A. Oller and E. Oset, Chiral symmetry amplitudes in the S wave isoscalar and isovector channels and the σ,f 0(980),a 0(980) scalar mesons, Nucl. Phys. A620, 438 (1997), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.A 652, 407–409 (1999)], arXiv:hep-ph/9702314

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  59. [59]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki, and T. Yanagida, Is rho Meson a Dynamical Gauge Boson of Hidden Local Symmetry?, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 1215 (1985)

    1985

  60. [60]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, and K. Yamawaki, Nonlinear Real- ization and Hidden Local Symmetries, Phys. Rept.164, 217 (1988)

    1988

  61. [61]

    U. G. Meißner, Low-Energy Hadron Physics from Effec- tive Chiral Lagrangians with Vector Mesons, Phys. Rept. 161, 213 (1988)

    1988

  62. [62]

    Nagahiro, L

    H. Nagahiro, L. Roca, A. Hosaka, and E. Oset, Hidden gauge formalism for the radiative decays of axial-vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D79, 014015 (2009), arXiv:0809.0943 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    Lin, J.-T

    J.-X. Lin, J.-T. Li, S.-J. Jiang, W.-H. Liang, and E. Oset, TheD + s →a 0(980)e+νe reaction and the a0(980)−f0(980) mixing, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 1017 (2021), arXiv:2109.08405 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Bramon, A

    A. Bramon, A. Grau, and G. Pancheri, Intermediate vec- tor meson contributions toV 0 →P 0P 0γdecays, Phys. Lett. B283, 416 (1992)

    1992

  65. [65]

    V. R. Debastiani, F. Aceti, W.-H. Liang, and E. Oset, Re- vising thef 1(1420) resonance, Phys. Rev. D95, 034015 (2017), arXiv:1611.05383 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Lin, J.-T

    J.-X. Lin, J.-T. Li, W.-H. Liang, H.-X. Chen, and E. Oset,j/ψdecays intoω(ϕ)f 1(1285) and ω(ϕ)“f1(1420)′′, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 52 (2024), arXiv:2310.19213 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 2, 2026.