Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring Key Point Analysis with Pairwise Generation and Graph Partitioning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11384 v1 pith:M6437V7D submitted 2024-04-17 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords argumentspointsgraphpointmodelspartitioningsharedanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Key Point Analysis (KPA), the summarization of multiple arguments into a concise collection of key points, continues to be a significant and unresolved issue within the field of argument mining. Existing models adapt a two-stage pipeline of clustering arguments or generating key points for argument clusters. This approach rely on semantic similarity instead of measuring the existence of shared key points among arguments. Additionally, it only models the intra-cluster relationship among arguments, disregarding the inter-cluster relationship between arguments that do not share key points. To address these limitations, we propose a novel approach for KPA with pairwise generation and graph partitioning. Our objective is to train a generative model that can simultaneously provide a score indicating the presence of shared key point between a pair of arguments and generate the shared key point. Subsequently, to map generated redundant key points to a concise set of key points, we proceed to construct an arguments graph by considering the arguments as vertices, the generated key points as edges, and the scores as edge weights. We then propose a graph partitioning algorithm to partition all arguments sharing the same key points to the same subgraph. Notably, our experimental findings demonstrate that our proposed model surpasses previous models when evaluated on both the ArgKP and QAM datasets.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ArgCMV: An Argument Summarization Benchmark for the LLM-era

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ArgCMV is a new LLM-curated benchmark of about 12,000 arguments from r/ChangeMyView, and current key point extraction methods transfer poorly to it.

Pith tools