Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 124 references

On Integrable Structures on Non-compact Boundaries in Three-Dimensional Gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The radial flow of 3D gravity is exactly a T-bar-T deformation.

desk verdict Solid, careful extension of integrable boundary conditions to finite cutoff; the central radial flow is correct on the physical branch, but the 'arbitrary profiles' claim hides a sign restriction that should be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06867 v2 pith:M6675RSB submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th gr-qc

Hamed Adami , Kristiansen Lara , Anouchah Latifi , René Meyer This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords three-dimensionalgravityChern–SimonstheoryT-bar-Tdeformationquasi-localstresstensorintegrablehierarchiesinversescatteringbi-Hamiltonianstructurefinitecutoff
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies three-dimensional Einstein gravity with negative cosmological constant, formulated as a Chern–Simons theory, on spatial slices that extend to infinity. Within a diagonal sector of the phase space that reduces the gauge connection to two chiral currents, the author derives an exact, closed radial flow equation for the quasi-local energy density: ∂_r ρ = −(4ℓ²r/(r⁴−ℓ⁴))√(ρ²−J²). This equation has precisely the structure of a T-bar-T deformation and resums all orders in the radial cutoff, giving a non-perturbative holographic renormalization-group flow. The paper also shows that the boundary time evolution is governed by an integrable bi-Hamiltonian hierarchy, while the radial flow itself is not Hamiltonian with respect to the canonical Poisson structure; the two notions of evolution are distinct at finite cutoff. The mechanical core is the exact fluid/gravity dictionary that expresses the energy and momentum densities as algebraic functions of the chiral currents.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the exact radial flow equation ∂_r ρ = −(4ℓ²r/(r⁴−ℓ⁴))√(ρ²−J²) (Eq. 63), together with the fluid/gravity dictionary (Eqs. 57a–57b) that renders the quasi-local stress tensor an explicit function of the r-independent chiral currents J±. The flow is linearized by X = ρ + √(ρ²−J²), converting it to ∂_r ln X = −4ℓ²r/(r⁴−ℓ⁴), and its integration reproduces the full dictionary. The complementary mechanism is the diagonal ansatz a± = ±A± L0, which abelianizes the flatness condition and splits the boundary dynamics into two independent chiral sectors whose time evolution is a bi-Hamiltonian (Gel'fand–Dikii) hierarchy.

What would settle it

Compute the quasi-local stress tensor from a generic non-diagonal solution of the Chern–Simons equations (e.g., with a± having off-diagonal components) and test whether the radial derivative of its energy density still satisfies Eq. (63). A violation would show the flow equation is an artifact of the diagonal ansatz rather than a universal property of three-dimensional gravity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the diagonal reduction where the sl(2,R) × sl(2,R) gauge connections are restricted to the Cartan direction (a± = ±A± L0), the flatness condition becomes abelian and the phase space is parametrized by two chiral currents J±(t,x). From the exact reconstruction of the bulk metric, the Brown–York stress tensor on a constant-radius hypersurface is computed in closed form; the energy density ρ and momentum density J are explicit algebraic functions of J± and the radial coordinate. Eliminating the chiral currents yields the exact radial flow equation (63), ∂_r ρ = −(4ℓ²r/(r⁴−ℓ⁴))√(ρ²−J²), which the paper interprets as the realization of the T-bar-T deformation at finite cutoff, valid to all ord

Load-bearing premise

The diagonal reduction of the gauge connections to the Cartan subalgebra (a± = ±A± L0), which abelianizes the flatness condition and reduces the phase space to two chiral u(1) currents; all results—including the radial flow equation and its T-bar-T interpretation—hold only within this subsector.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The quasi-local energy at any finite cutoff is known non-perturbatively from the chiral data: E(r) = (r⁴+ℓ⁴)/(r⁴−ℓ⁴) E_∞ + (4ℓ²r²)/(r⁴−ℓ⁴) E_int, providing a closed-form holographic RG flow.
  • The boundary dynamics is exactly solvable by inverse-scattering methods: the chiral currents are Schrödinger potentials, and the gravitational solution space is parameterized by scattering data (reflection coefficient, discrete eigenvalues, norming constants).
  • The integrable hierarchy and all its conserved charges are common to every cutoff slice; the T-bar-T deformation changes only the dictionary from currents to observables, not the dynamics itself.
  • The radial flow is exactly solvable yet not Hamiltonian with respect to the canonical Poisson structure, showing that solvability and Hamiltonian integrability are distinct once finite-cutoff effects are included.
  • On non-compact boundaries, the finite cutoff produces an effective interaction energy between left- and right-moving solitons that depends on their separation and vanishes in the asymptotic limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same variable X = ρ + √(ρ²−J²) that linearizes the radial flow might generalize to higher-dimensional T-bar-T-like flows, where the square root becomes the determinant of the stress tensor; this suggests a broader class of exactly solvable radial evolutions.
  • The no-go theorem indicates that a Hamiltonian description of radial evolution would require an enlarged phase space or a non-commutative deformation of the Poisson structure; such a structure may become relevant when 1/c quantum corrections are included.
  • Because the integrable hierarchy is cutoff-independent, the spectral data (discrete eigenvalues and norming constants) provide universal, scale-invariant labels for gravitational states, potentially offering a sharp characterization across renormalization-group scales.
  • The inverse-scattering description could be used to define a gravitational S-matrix for boundary excitations, with the reflection coefficient playing the role of scattering data; this might connect to flat-space or celestial holography in the appropriate limits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies AdS3 Einstein gravity in the Chern–Simons formulation, restricted to the diagonal Cartan subsector a± = ±A±L0 (Eq. 13). In this sector the flatness condition is abelian, and the authors derive an exact fluid/gravity dictionary (Eqs. 57a–57b), a closed radial flow equation for the quasi-local energy density (Eq. 63), and interpret it as a holographic T\bar T-type deformation at finite cutoff. They combine this with a bi-Hamiltonian Gel'fand–Dikii hierarchy for the chiral currents, an inverse-scattering description on non-compact boundaries, explicit one-soliton solutions, and an argument that the radial flow is not a Hamiltonian flow on the canonical phase space.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, the paper provides a nonperturbative, exactly solvable radial evolution of the quasi-local Brown–York stress tensor in a nontrivial sector of AdS3, together with a clean gravitational interpretation of inverse-scattering data for KdV-type boundary conditions. The algebraic derivation of Eq. (63) from Eqs. (57) is correct in the physical domain where the induced boundary metric has Lorentzian signature, and the soliton velocities (117) and Hamiltonians (118) are consistent with the Lifshitz scaling structure. These are concrete, checkable results with clear value for finite-cutoff holography and integrable boundary conditions. However, the results are confined to the abelian diagonal ansatz (13), and the domain/sign issue in Eq. (63) discussed below must be addressed before the claims as written are fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section VII, Eq. (63)] The radial-flow equation is stated without qualification, but it holds only when W in Eq. (35) is positive. Differentiating (57a) and using (57b) gives ∂_r ρ = −(4ℓ² r/(r⁴−ℓ⁴)) sgn(W) √(ρ²−𝒥²). For W<0, e.g. J₊=−J₋ at r>ℓ, the correct sign is opposite to (63). Since W>0 forces J₊J₋≥0 for r>ℓ, the statement in Sec. VII that the equation holds for 'arbitrary boundary profiles' is overbroad. Please either restrict the claim to the physical domain W>0 (and state that restriction explicitly) or include sgn(W) in Eq. (63).
  2. [Abstract; Section II, Eq. (13)] All subsequent results—the fluid dictionary (57), the radial flow (63), the bi-Hamiltonian hierarchy, and the inverse-scattering description—are derived only in the diagonal Cartan subsector (13), where the flatness condition is abelian. The abstract and title present the results as valid for 'three-dimensional gravity' on non-compact boundaries without this qualifier. Although Section II discloses the restriction, the abstract should do so as well; otherwise the paper promises more than it proves.
  3. [Section XII.D] The 'no-go theorem' that the radial flow is not Hamiltonian is essentially a consequence of the radial-gauge choice: J± are r-independent by construction, so the radial flow does not act on the canonical phase space at all. The argument is correct but is more a clarification of the setup than a theorem. Recommend either giving a precise formal statement of the class of Hamiltonian functionals and Poisson brackets considered, or softening the terminology.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sections VI–VII] The notation is confusing because 𝒥 in Eqs. (57b) and (62) denotes the momentum density while J± in Eq. (14) denote the chiral currents. The radial-flow equation (63) would be much clearer with a distinct symbol, e.g. 𝒥 or Π, for the momentum density.
  2. [Introduction] The text refers to 'the marginal composite operator √(T T̄)'. Finite-cutoff holography is usually associated with the irrelevant T T̄ deformation, while root-T T̄ is marginal. The wording should be checked and clarified to avoid confusion with the standard dictionary.
  3. [Section VII] The statement 'p=ρ, so the Brown–York tensor is traceless' is surprising in the T T̄ context, where the trace is generally nonvanishing. The caveat in Section VII is helpful, but the paper should explicitly state that this trace-free property is a feature of the diagonal fluid dictionary, not of the deformed CFT stress tensor.
  4. [Section X.B.2, Eq. (114)] The sign convention for c± should be stated explicitly. With c±>0 and ν±=c±/(6π), the soliton profiles (108) and Hamiltonians (118) have negative values; this is consistent but nonstandard for readers accustomed to positive-definite KdV charges.
  5. [Section XII.A] The paper notes that explicit trace identities have not been derived. Since the Hamiltonians are claimed to admit an equivalent spectral representation, adding a reference or a brief derivation for the KdV convention used here would strengthen the inverse-scattering interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; Eq. (63) is derived algebraically from the exact dictionary (57), not fitted or assumed; self-citations are scaffolding only.

full rationale

The central claim, Eq. (63), is derived in Sec. VII by differentiating the exact dictionary (57a) at fixed J± and eliminating J± in favor of ρ and J. This is an algebraic consequence of the stated definitions, not a fitted input or an assumed TTbar flow: no free parameter is tuned to reproduce the radial dependence, and the equation is not imported from the TTbar literature. The TTbar interpretation is explicitly qualified ('By itself, however, this result does not establish an exact equivalence with the universal TTbar flow governing finite-volume energy levels'), so it is not a disguised renaming. The diagonal ansatz (13) is a disclosed restriction, attributed to [15,29,59], and Sec. XIII lists extension beyond it as future work. The bi-Hamiltonian structure and inverse-scattering machinery are either reconstructed from standard Gel'fand-Dikii/GLM formalism or cited to independent spectral literature; the only notable author-overlapping citation, [32] (Adami--Latifi), is used for context and extension (eigenfunction-forced KdV flows), not as proof of a central equation. The paper's own limitations—the 'arbitrary boundary profiles' claim in Sec. VII requires an unstated sign/positivity condition (W>0 in Eq. (35)); Sec. XII.A notes that explicit trace identities have not been derived; Sec. XII.D gives a terse no-go argument—are correctness/omitted-support concerns, not circularity. No step in the derivation reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data; the central charges c± and the consistency-fixed ν± are physical/structural inputs, not fitted parameters. The central new equation (63) is a rearrangement of the paper's own definitions (57) and does not import the target result. The main unproven inputs are structural: the diagonal subsector ansatz and the choice of chemical potentials as Gel'fand-Dikii polynomials. The paper cites prior work for the Gelfand-Dikii bi-Hamiltonian structure and GLM inverse scattering, which are standard. Hence the ledger is short and the burden is correspondingly low.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Diagonal subsector ansatz a± = ±A± L0 (Eq. 13): the sl(2,R)×sl(2,R) gauge connections are restricted to the Cartan subalgebra, reducing flatness to an abelian equation.
    All main results (fluid dictionary, radial flow, KdV hierarchy, solitons) are derived in this abelian sector; the paper's title/abstract do not disclose this restriction.
  • ad hoc to paper Chemical potentials are chosen as Gel'fand-Dikii polynomials, μ± = R_{I+1}[J±] (Eqs. 80, 112).
    This is a boundary-condition choice, not derived from the action; it is what makes the boundary dynamics the KdV-type hierarchy. The hierarchy is imposed rather than shown to be the unique consequence of the gravity theory.
  • standard math The second Hamiltonian structure D± = ∂xJ± + 2J±∂x − (c±/24π)∂x³ (Eq. 76) is a Poisson operator compatible with P± = ∂x.
    Classical Virasoro/Gel'fand-Dikii bracket; the paper states compatibility but does not compute the Schouten bracket.
  • domain assumption Short-range, rapidly decaying potentials J± on Σ = R (Section X.A).
    Ensures existence of Jost solutions, Volterra representation, and GLM reconstruction; breaks on compact slices, as the paper notes.
  • domain assumption Vanishing symplectic flux through the asymptotic boundary, Ω = 0 (Eq. 67).
    Used to write μ± = δH/δJ± and define a Hamiltonian boundary theory; standard in covariant phase space but assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Integrable Structures on Non-compact Boundaries in Three-Dimensional Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M6675RSB

@misc{pith2026260706867,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Integrable Structures on Non-compact Boundaries in Three-Dimensional Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M6675RSB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06867}
}
abstract

We study three-dimensional Einstein gravity with negative cosmological constant on non-compact spatial boundaries within the Chern-Simons formulation. Using an exact fluid/gravity correspondence, we derive a closed radial flow equation for the quasi-local stress tensor and show that it realizes the holographic $T\bar T$ deformation at finite cutoff. We further develop the inverse-scattering description of the boundary dynamics, identifying the gravitational interpretation of the associated spectral data and analyzing the finite-cutoff deformation of soliton solutions. Although the boundary evolution is governed by an integrable bi-Hamiltonian hierarchy, we show that the radial flow itself is not Hamiltonian with respect to the canonical Poisson structure. Our results establish a unified framework connecting integrability, quasi-local gravitational observables, inverse scattering, and finite-cutoff holography on non-compact boundaries.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 93 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Af- ter a suitable rescaling of the coordinateξ±, it reduces to the Pöschl–Teller potential with parameterl= 1, a prototypical reflectionless system

    Spectral problem For the single–soliton configuration (108), the Schrödinger equation (89) becomes exactly solvable. Af- ter a suitable rescaling of the coordinateξ±, it reduces to the Pöschl–Teller potential with parameterl= 1, a prototypical reflectionless system. In this case, the spectral problem exhibits a sim- ple structure: there is a single bound ...

  2. [2]

    Fixing the time evolution The dynamics of the hierarchy is determined by the bi- Hamiltonian structure (75). Choosing the Hamiltonian associated with the(I+ 1)-th flow fixes the chemical po- tentials to be µ± =R I+1 [J±].(112) Combining (20) with (109) then yields the evolution equation ∓ π k J± ∂tf± ±∂ tφ± =R I+1 [J±].(113) For generic flows withI≥0, con...

  3. [3]

    T¯T-deformed Gel’fand–Dikii hierarchy

    Hamiltonians The Lifshitz scaling symmetry also determines the functional dependence of the conserved Hamiltonians on the soliton parameters. In the single-soliton sector, the parameterα ± istheonlyindependentdimensionfulquan- tity. Consequently, homogeneity under (85) requires the Hamiltonian generating the(I+ 1)-th flow to scale as H ± I+1 ∝α 2I+3 ± . T...

  4. [4]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,” Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207–226

    1986

  5. [5]

    Asymptotically anti-De Sitter Spaces,

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, “Asymptotically anti-De Sitter Spaces,”Commun. Math. Phys.98 (1985) 391–424

    1985

  6. [6]

    (2+1)-dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system,

    E. Witten, “(2+1)-dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system,”Nucl. Phys.B311(1988) 46

    1988

  7. [7]

    Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions

    S. Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2003

    2003

  8. [8]

    Conformal field theory, (2+1)-dimensional gravity, and the BTZ black hole,

    S. Carlip, “Conformal field theory, (2+1)-dimensional gravity, and the BTZ black hole,”Class. Quant. Grav. 22(2005) R85–R124,gr-qc/0503022

    arXiv 2005

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, “The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 69(1992) 1849–1851,hep-th/9204099

    1992 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Dimensionally continued black holes,

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, “Dimensionally continued black holes,”Phys. Rev. D 49(1994) 975–986,gr-qc/9307033

    1994 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A Chern-Simons action for three-dimensional Anti-de Sitter supergravity theories,

    A. Achucarro and P. K. Townsend, “A Chern-Simons action for three-dimensional Anti-de Sitter supergravity theories,”Phys. Lett.B180(1986) 89

    1986

  4. [12]

    Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,

    S. Elitzur, G. W. Moore, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg, “Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B326(1989) 108–134

    1989

  5. [13]

    The Asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional Einstein gravity with a negative cosmological constant,

    O. Coussaert, M. Henneaux, and P. van Driel, “The Asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional Einstein gravity with a negative cosmological constant,” Class.Quant.Grav.12(1995) 2961–2966, gr-qc/9506019

    1995 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Global charges in Chern-Simons field theory and the (2+1) black hole,

    M. Bañados, “Global charges in Chern-Simons field theory and the (2+1) black hole,”Phys. Rev.D52 (1995) 5816,hep-th/9405171

    1995 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,

    M. Bañados, “Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,”hep-th/9901148

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Advanced Lectures on General Relativity,

    G. Compère and A. Fiorucci, “Advanced Lectures on General Relativity,”Lect. Notes Phys.952(2019) 150, 1801.07064

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Boundary conditions for General Relativity on AdS3 and the KdV hierarchy,

    A. Pérez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Boundary conditions for General Relativity on AdS3 and the KdV hierarchy,”JHEP06(2016) 103,1605.04490

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Boundary conditions for General Relativity in three-dimensional spacetimes, integrable systems and the KdV/mKdV hierarchies,

    E. Ojeda and A. Pérez, “Boundary conditions for General Relativity in three-dimensional spacetimes, integrable systems and the KdV/mKdV hierarchies,” JHEP08(2019) 079,1906.11226

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Integrable systems and the boundary dynamics of higher spin gravity on AdS3,

    E. Ojeda and A. Pérez, “Integrable systems and the boundary dynamics of higher spin gravity on AdS3,” JHEP11(2020) 089,2009.07829

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Revisiting the asymptotic dynamics of General Relativity on AdS3,

    H. A. González, J. Matulich, M. Pino, and R. Troncoso, “Revisiting the asymptotic dynamics of General Relativity on AdS3,”JHEP12(2018) 115, 1809.02749

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields,

    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, S. Pfenninger, and S. Theisen, “Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional gravity coupled to higher-spin fields,”JHEP1011(2010) 007,1008.4744

    2010 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Asymptotic W-symmetries in three-dimensional higher-spin gauge theories,

    A. Campoleoni, S. Fredenhagen, and S. Pfenninger, “Asymptotic W-symmetries in three-dimensional higher-spin gauge theories,”JHEP1109(2011) 113, 1107.0290

    2011 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Integrable Systems and Spacetime Dynamics,

    M. Cárdenas, F. Correa, K. Lara, and M. Pino, “Integrable Systems and Spacetime Dynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 16, 161601,2104.09676

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Integrable black hole dynamics in the asymptotic structure of AdS3,

    M. Cárdenas, F. Correa, and M. Pino, “Integrable black hole dynamics in the asymptotic structure of AdS3,”2504.20292

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    1/c deformations of AdS3 boundary conditions and the Dym hierarchy,

    K. Lara, M. Pino, and F. Reyes, “1/c deformations of AdS3 boundary conditions and the Dym hierarchy,” JHEP11(2024) 042,2401.12338

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Non-axisymmetric (2+1) black holes with Dym boundary conditions,

    M. Pino and F. Reyes, “Non-axisymmetric (2+1) black holes with Dym boundary conditions,”2511.06567

  19. [27]

    Wsymmetry and integrability of higher spin black holes,

    G. Compère and W. Song, “Wsymmetry and integrability of higher spin black holes,”JHEP1309 (2013) 144,1306.0014

    2013 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lifshitz Scaling, Microstate Counting from Number Theory and Black Hole Entropy,

    D. Melnikov, F. Novaes, A. Pérez, and R. Troncoso, “Lifshitz Scaling, Microstate Counting from Number Theory and Black Hole Entropy,”JHEP06(2019) 054,1808.04034

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Generalized Fefferman-Graham gauge and boundary Weyl structures,

    G. Arenas-Henriquez, F. Diaz, and D. Rivera-Betancour, “Generalized Fefferman-Graham gauge and boundary Weyl structures,”JHEP02 (2025) 007,2411.12513

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Integrable systems with BMS3 Poisson structure and the dynamics of locally flat spacetimes,

    O. Fuentealba, J. Matulich, A. Pérez, M. Pino, P. Rodríguez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Integrable systems with BMS3 Poisson structure and the dynamics of locally flat spacetimes,”JHEP01(2018) 148,1711.02646

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Soft Heisenberg hair on black holes in three dimensions,

    H. Afshar, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, A. Perez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Soft Heisenberg hair on black holes in three dimensions,” Phys. Rev.D93(2016), no. 10, 101503,1603.04824

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Near horizon dynamics of three dimensional black holes,

    D. Grumiller and W. Merbis, “Near horizon dynamics of three dimensional black holes,”SciPost Phys.8 (2020), no. 1, 010,1906.10694

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    BTZ black hole with Korteweg–de Vries-type boundary conditions: Thermodynamics revisited,

    C. Erices, M. Riquelme, and P. Rodríguez, “BTZ black hole with Korteweg–de Vries-type boundary conditions: Thermodynamics revisited,”Phys. Rev. D 100(2019), no. 12, 126026,1907.13026

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    KdV-charged black holes,

    A. Dymarsky and S. Sugishita, “KdV-charged black holes,”JHEP05(2020) 041,2002.08368

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Integrability in Three-Dimensional Gravity: Eigenfunction-Forced KdV Flows,

    H. Adami and A. Latifi, “Integrability in Three-Dimensional Gravity: Eigenfunction-Forced KdV Flows,”2510.10519

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    On the holographic renormalization group,

    J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “On the holographic renormalization group,”JHEP08(2000) 003,hep-th/9912012

    2000 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Holographic Renormalization,

    M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman, and K. Skenderis, “Holographic Renormalization,”Nucl. Phys.B631 (2002) 159–194,hep-th/0112119

    2002 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,

    K. Skenderis, “Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849–5876,hep-th/0209067

    2002 arXiv

  31. [39]

    AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry,

    I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, “AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry,”IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys.8(2005) 73–101,hep-th/0404176

    2005 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Holographic and Wilsonian Renormalization Groups,

    I. Heemskerk and J. Polchinski, “Holographic and Wilsonian Renormalization Groups,”JHEP06(2011) 031,1010.1264. 24

    2011 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Integrating out geometry: Holographic Wilsonian RG and the membrane paradigm,

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu, and M. Rangamani, “Integrating out geometry: Holographic Wilsonian RG and the membrane paradigm,”JHEP08(2011) 051, 1010.4036

    2011 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Gravity Is Induced By Renormalization Group Flow,

    H. Adami, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and V. Taghiloo, “Gravity Is Induced By Renormalization Group Flow,” 2508.09633

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Moving the CFT into the bulk withTT,

    L. McGough, M. Mezei, and H. Verlinde, “Moving the CFT into the bulk withTT,”JHEP04(2018) 010, 1611.03470

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,”hep-th/0401146

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    On space of integrable quantum field theories,

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “On space of integrable quantum field theories,”Nucl. Phys. B915 (2017) 363–383,1608.05499

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    T ¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,

    A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi, and R. Tateo, “T ¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,”JHEP10 (2016) 112,1608.05534

    2016 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Holography at finite cutoff with aT2 deformation,

    T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Holography at finite cutoff with aT2 deformation,”JHEP03(2019) 004,1807.11401

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Modular invariance and uniqueness of T ¯Tdeformed CFT,

    O. Aharony, S. Datta, A. Giveon, Y. Jiang, and D. Kutasov, “Modular invariance and uniqueness of T ¯Tdeformed CFT,”JHEP01(2019) 086,1808.02492

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    T¯Tdeformations in general dimensions,

    M. Taylor, “T¯Tdeformations in general dimensions,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27(2023), no. 1, 37–63, 1805.10287

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cutoff AdS3 versus theT Tdeformation,

    P. Kraus, J. Liu, and D. Marolf, “Cutoff AdS3 versus theT Tdeformation,”JHEP07(2018) 027, 1801.02714

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    T¯Tand the mirage of a bulk cutoff,

    M. Guica and R. Monten, “T¯Tand the mirage of a bulk cutoff,”SciPost Phys.10(2021), no. 2, 024, 1906.11251

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs,

    M. Guica, “An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs,”SciPost Phys. 5(2018), no. 5, 048,1710.08415

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    JT deformed CFT2 and string theory,

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon, and D. Kutasov, “JT deformed CFT2 and string theory,”JHEP10(2018) 057,1806.09667

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Strings on warped AdS3 via T¯Jdeformations,

    L. Apolo and W. Song, “Strings on warped AdS3 via T¯Jdeformations,”JHEP10(2018) 165,1806.10127

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Local Fluid Dynamical Entropy from Gravity,

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, R. Loganayagam, G. Mandal, S. Minwalla, T. Morita, M. Rangamani, and H. S. Reall, “Local Fluid Dynamical Entropy from Gravity,”JHEP06(2008) 055,0803.2526

    2008 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Forced Fluid Dynamics from Gravity,

    S. Bhattacharyya, R. Loganayagam, S. Minwalla, S. Nampuri, S. P. Trivedi, and S. R. Wadia, “Forced Fluid Dynamics from Gravity,”JHEP02(2009) 018, 0806.0006

    2009 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes,

    J. Erdmenger, M. Haack, M. Kaminski, and A. Yarom, “Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes,”JHEP01 (2009) 055,0809.2488

    2009 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Hydrodynamics from charged black branes,

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam, and P. Surowka, “Hydrodynamics from charged black branes,”JHEP 01(2011) 094,0809.2596

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Gravity and Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence,

    M. Rangamani, “Gravity and Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence,”Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 224003,0905.4352

    2009 arXiv

  52. [60]

    The fluid/gravity correspondence,

    V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani, “The fluid/gravity correspondence,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: String theory and its Applications: From meV to the Planck Scale, pp. 348–383. 2012.1107.5780

    2012

  53. [61]

    Most general AdS3 boundary conditions,

    D. Grumiller and M. Riegler, “Most general AdS3 boundary conditions,”JHEP10(2016) 023, 1608.01308

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Near horizon soft hair as microstates of three dimensional black holes,

    H. Afshar, D. Grumiller, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Near horizon soft hair as microstates of three dimensional black holes,”Phys. Rev.D96(2017), no. 8, 084032,1607.00009

    2017 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,” Ann. Phys.88(1974) 286

    1974

  56. [64]

    Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges,

    G. Barnich and F. Brandt, “Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges,”Nucl. Phys.B633(2002) 3–82, hep-th/0111246

    2002 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Local symmetries and constraints,

    J. Lee and R. M. Wald, “Local symmetries and constraints,”J. Math. Phys.31(1990) 725–743

    1990

  58. [66]

    Some properties of Nöther charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Some properties of Nöther charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,”Phys. Rev.D50(1994) 846–864, gr-qc/9403028

    1994 arXiv

  59. [67]

    A General definition of ’conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity,

    R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, “A General definition of ’conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity,”Phys.Rev.D61(2000) 084027, gr-qc/9911095

    2000 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action,

    J. D. Brown and J. W. York, Jr., “Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action,”Phys. Rev.D47(1993) 1407–1419

    1993

  61. [69]

    A stress tensor for anti-de Sitter gravity,

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for anti-de Sitter gravity,”Commun. Math. Phys.208 (1999) 413–428,hep-th/9902121

    1999 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Black hole entropy from near-horizon microstates,

    A. Strominger, “Black hole entropy from near-horizon microstates,”JHEP02(1998) 009,hep-th/9712251

    1998 arXiv

  63. [71]

    The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The largeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,hep-th/9711200

    1998 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,”Phys. Lett.B428(1998) 105–114, hep-th/9802109

    1998 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Emergence of non-linear electrodynamic theories from TT¯-like deformations,

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. B. Velni, D. M. Yekta, and H. Mohammadzadeh, “Emergence of non-linear electrodynamic theories from TT¯-like deformations,” Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137079,2202.11156

    2022 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Marginal TT¯-like deformation and modified Maxwell theories in two dimensions,

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. Babaei Velni, D. Mahdavian Yekta, and H. Mohammadzadeh, “Marginal TT¯-like deformation and modified Maxwell theories in two dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D 106(2022), no. 8, 086022,2206.12677

    2022 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Metric approach to aT T-like deformation in arbitrary dimensions,

    R. Conti, J. Romano, and R. Tateo, “Metric approach to aT T-like deformation in arbitrary dimensions,” JHEP09(2022) 085,2206.03415

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Root-T¯TDeformations in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories,

    C. Ferko, A. Sfondrini, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Root-T¯TDeformations in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 20, 201604,2206.10515

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Geometric Formulation of Generalized Root-TT¯Deformations,

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, S. He, T. Morone, H. Ouyang, and R. Tateo, “Geometric Formulation of Generalized Root-TT¯Deformations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024), no. 11, 111602,2405.03465. 25

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Root-TT¯deformed boundary conditions in holography,

    S. Ebert, C. Ferko, and Z. Sun, “Root-TT¯deformed boundary conditions in holography,”Phys. Rev. D107 (2023), no. 12, 126022,2304.08723

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Nonlinear automorphism of the conformal algebra in 2D and continuous √ T T deformations,

    D. Tempo and R. Troncoso, “Nonlinear automorphism of the conformal algebra in 2D and continuous √ T T deformations,”JHEP12(2022) 129,2210.00059

    2022 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Mapping relativistic to ultra/non-relativistic conformal symmetries in 2D and finite √ T Tdeformations,

    P. Rodríguez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “Mapping relativistic to ultra/non-relativistic conformal symmetries in 2D and finite √ T Tdeformations,” JHEP11(2021) 133,2106.09750

    2021 arXiv

  74. [82]

    On √ T T deformed pathways: CFT to CCFT,

    A. Banerjee, P. Parekh, and R. Raj, “On √ T T deformed pathways: CFT to CCFT,”JHEP05(2026) 267,2601.15376

    2026 arXiv

  75. [83]

    A simple model of the integrable hamiltonian equation,

    F. Magri, “A simple model of the integrable hamiltonian equation,”Journal of Mathematical Physics19(1978), no. 5, 1156–1162

    1978

  76. [84]

    L. D. Faddeev and L. A. Takhtajan,Hamiltonian methods in the theory of solitons, vol. 23. Springer, 1987

    1987

  77. [85]

    P. J. Olver,Applications of Lie groups to differential equations, vol. 107. Springer Science & Business Media, 1993

    1993

  78. [86]

    Asymptotic behavior of the resolvent of Sturm-Liouville equations and the algebra of the Korteweg-De Vries equations,

    I. M. Gelfand and L. A. Dikii, “Asymptotic behavior of the resolvent of Sturm-Liouville equations and the algebra of the Korteweg-De Vries equations,”Russ. Math. Surveys30(1975), no. 5, 77–113

    1975

  79. [87]

    L. A. Dickey,Soliton equations and Hamiltonian systems, vol. 12. 1991

    1991

  80. [88]

    Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves,

    P. D. Lax, “Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves,”Communications on pure and applied mathematics21(1968), no. 5, 467–490

    1968

  81. [89]

    On the theory of second-order phase transitions i & ii,

    E. Lifshitz, “On the theory of second-order phase transitions i & ii,”Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz11(1941), no. 255, 269

    1941

  82. [90]

    L. A. Dickey,Soliton equations and Hamiltonian systems, vol. 26. World scientific, 2003

    2003

  83. [91]

    M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur,Solitons and the inverse scattering transform. SIAM, 1981

    1981

  84. [92]

    V. A. Marchenko,Sturm-Liouville operators and applications. Springer-Verlag, 2013

    2013

  85. [93]

    Normal forms and versal deformations for hill’s equation,

    V. F. Lazutkin and T. F. Pankratova, “Normal forms and versal deformations for hill’s equation,”Functional Analysis and Its Applications9(1975) 306–311

    1975

  86. [94]

    Oblak,BMS Particles in Three Dimensions

    B. Oblak,BMS Particles in Three Dimensions. PhD thesis, Brussels U., 2016.1610.08526

    2016

  87. [95]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,”JHEP05 (2020) 013,1911.12333

    2020 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,”JHEP09(2020) 002, 1905.08255

    2020 arXiv

  89. [97]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,” JHEP12(2019) 063,1905.08762

    2019 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, “Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,”JHEP03(2022) 205,1911.11977

    2022 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Dilaton gravity in two dimensions,

    D. Grumiller, W. Kummer, and D. Vassilevich, “Dilaton gravity in two dimensions,”Physics Reports 369(2002), no. 4, 327–430

    2002

  92. [100]

    Ramifications of lineland,

    D. Grumiller and R. Meyer, “Ramifications of lineland,”Turkish Journal of Physics30(2006), no. 5, 349–378

    2006

  93. [101]

    Near-extremal dynamics away from the horizon,

    A. Castro, R. Mancilla, and I. Papadimitriou, “Near-extremal dynamics away from the horizon,” JHEP11(2025) 083,2507.01126

    2025

  94. [102]

    KdV conformal symmetry breaking in nearly AdS2,

    M. Cárdenas, “KdV conformal symmetry breaking in nearly AdS2,”JHEP10(2024) 052,2405.03128

    2024 arXiv

  95. [103]

    The dS / CFT correspondence,

    A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP10(2001) 034,hep-th/0106113

    2001 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Notes on de Sitter space and holography,

    V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer, and D. Minic, “Notes on de Sitter space and holography,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5655–5700,hep-th/0207245

    2002 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman, and A. Strominger, “Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,” Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017), no. 1, 015009, 1108.5735

    2017 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Three-Dimensional de Sitter Holography and Bulk Correlators at Late Time,

    H.-Y. Chen and Y. Hikida, “Three-Dimensional de Sitter Holography and Bulk Correlators at Late Time,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 6, 061601, 2204.04871

    2022 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions,

    G. Barnich and G. Compere, “Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions,”Class.Quant.Grav.24 (2007) F15–F23,gr-qc/0610130

    2007 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence,

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, “Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence,”JHEP1005(2010) 062, 1001.1541

    2010 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography,

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, D. Grumiller, and M. Riegler, “Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography,”Phys.Rev.Lett.114 (2015), no. 11, 111602,1410.4089

    2015 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories,

    A. Bagchi, “Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories,”Phys.Rev.Lett.105(2010) 171601

    2010

  103. [111]

    Flat-Space Chiral Gravity,

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, and D. Grumiller, “Flat-Space Chiral Gravity,”Phys.Rev.Lett.109 (2012) 151301,1208.1658

    2012 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Cosmic Evolution from Phase Transition of Three-Dimensional Flat Space,

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, D. Grumiller, and J. Simon, “Cosmic Evolution from Phase Transition of Three-Dimensional Flat Space,”Phys.Rev.Lett.111 (2013) 181301,1305.2919

    2013 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Holographic positive energy theorems in three-dimensional gravity,

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak, “Holographic positive energy theorems in three-dimensional gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 152001,1403.3835

    2014 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations,

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak, “Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations,”JHEP 1406(2014) 129,1403.5803

    2014 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Most general flat space boundary conditions in three-dimensional Einstein gravity,

    D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, and M. Riegler, “Most general flat space boundary conditions in three-dimensional Einstein gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017), no. 18, 184001,1704.07419

    2017 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar, and A. Mehra, “Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,”JHEP 12(2016) 147,1609.06203

    2016 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Flat space holography and the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,

    H. Afshar, H. A. González, D. Grumiller, and D. Vassilevich, “Flat space holography and the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,”Phys. Rev. D101 (2020), no. 8, 086024,1911.05739

    2020 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Free field realization of the BMS Ising model,

    Z.-f. Yu and B. Chen, “Free field realization of the BMS Ising model,”JHEP08(2023) 116,2211.06926

    2023 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Carrollian c functions and flat space holographic RG flows in BMS3/CCFT2,

    D. Grumiller and M. Riegler, “Carrollian c functions and flat space holographic RG flows in BMS3/CCFT2,”Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 12, 26 126008,2309.11539

    2023 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Gravitational stress tensor and current at null infinity in three dimensions,

    H. Adami, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and V. Taghiloo, “Gravitational stress tensor and current at null infinity in three dimensions,”Phys. Lett. B855(2024) 138835, 2405.00149

    2024 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current,

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz, and A. Yarom, “Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current,”Physical review letters 109(2012), no. 10, 101601

    2012

  114. [122]

    Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions,

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Jain, S. Minwalla, and T. Sharma, “Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions,”JHEP09(2012) 046,1203.3544

    2012 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Analogue gravity,

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Analogue gravity,”Living Rev. Rel.8(2005) 12,gr-qc/0505065

    2005 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Disorder in AdS3/CFT2,

    M. Dorband, D. Grumiller, R. Meyer, and S. Zhao, “Disorder in AdS3/CFT2,”SciPost Phys.16(2024), no. 1, 017,2204.00596

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.