Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cosmic PeV Neutrinos and the Sources of Ultrahigh Energy Protons

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1301.1703 v3 pith:M6CNMFZN submitted 2013-01-08 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COhep-ph

Cosmic PeV Neutrinos and the Sources of Ultrahigh Energy Protons

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords cosmicfluxneutrinosneutrinoprotonsrayssourcesaccelerator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The IceCube experiment recently detected the first flux of high-energy neutrinos in excess of atmospheric backgrounds. We examine whether these neutrinos originate from within the same extragalactic sources as ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays. Starting from rather general assumptions about spectra and flavors, we find that producing a neutrino flux at the requisite level through pion photoproduction leads to a flux of protons well below the cosmic-ray data at ~10^18 eV, where the composition is light, unless pions/muons cool before decaying. This suggests a dominant class of accelerator that allows for cosmic rays to escape without significant neutrino yields.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Four, One, and None: Quantifying the Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Anomaly Across ANITA-IV, KM3NeT, and IceCube

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A joint three-detector analysis finds that ANITA-IV's four events and KM3NeT's 220 PeV event cannot be reconciled with IceCube's silence under any Standard Model diffuse or transient flux, leaving a 5.9-7.9σ anomaly.