Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 112 references

Impurity strength-temperature phase diagram with phase crystals and competing time-reversal symmetry breaking states in nodal $d$-wave superconductors

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phase crystals survive impurities up to ~50% of critical strength

desk verdict A self-consistent numerical phase diagram that makes the phase crystal's disorder robustness credible for ideal surfaces; the specular-edge assumption is the main caveat for real materials. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14876 v2 pith:M7QRQOM5 submitted 2024-12-19 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hall

Kevin Marc Seja , Niclas Wall-Wennerdal , Tomas Löfwander , Annica M. Black-Schaffer , Mikael Fogelström , Patric Holmvall This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hall
keywords phasecrystald-wavesuperconductorAndreevboundstatesimpurityscatteringt-matrixapproachtime-reversalsymmetrybreakingquasiclassicaltheorymesoscopicsuperconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the phase crystal—a spontaneously modulated superconducting state with periodic currents and magnetic fields—survives the disorder that is always present in real materials. Using a t-matrix treatment of nonmagnetic impurities inside quasiclassical theory, fully self-consistent in impurity self-energies, the d-wave order parameter, and the vector potential, it computes the ground-state phase diagram as a function of impurity strength and temperature. The central result is that the phase crystal at [110] edges of a nodal d-wave superconductor survives up to roughly 40–50% of the critical impurity strength that destroys superconductivity, across the whole range from weak (Born) to strong (unitary) scattering. A second result is that in mesoscopic squares, impurities can shrink the effective system size and convert the phase crystal into a competing state with uniform edge currents. The upshot is that phase crystals should be observable in realistic weakly disordered d-wave samples, not only in strongly correlated models.

What carries the argument

The t-matrix impurity self-energy inside quasiclassical theory, parameterized by a scattering energy Γ and phase shift δ0 (Born limit δ0→0, unitary limit |δ0|→π/2), solved self-consistently with the d-wave order parameter and the vector potential. The phase crystal is driven by zero-energy Andreev bound states at pair-breaking [110] edges: Doppler-shifting these states to finite energies lowers the free energy, while the condensate backflow costs kinetic energy, and the nonlocal superfluid stiffness tensor couples the crystal period to the bound-state decay length. The Vorontsov phase is a competing time-reversal breaking state with uniform edge currents that appears when edge-edge hybridization becomes strong in finite systems.

What would settle it

Compute the same phase diagram with diffuse or rough surface scattering instead of specular reflection at the pair-breaking edges. If the phase crystal disappears at impurity strengths below roughly 40% of Γc for realistic roughness, the claimed disorder robustness window would close.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the phase crystal—a spontaneously phase-modulated superconducting ground state with periodic currents and magnetic fields—survives nonmagnetic disorder in weak-coupling nodal d-wave superconductors up to roughly 40–50% of the impurity strength that destroys superconductivity. The authors establish the full ground-state phase diagram in temperature–impurity strength space, solving the quasiclassical Eilenberger equation with t-matrix impurity self-energies, the d-wave order parameter, and the vector potential all self-consistent. Across scattering phase shifts from Born to unitary, the phase crystal transition temperature T* decreases roughly linearly with impurity strength but remains nonzero until Γ* ≈ (0.4–0.5)Γc. In mesoscopic squares with multiple pair-breaking edges, impurity-enhanced coherence length shrinks the effective system size and drives hybridization between edge states, suppressing Tc and eventually converting the phase crystal into the Vorontsov phase with translationally invariant edge currents.

Load-bearing premise

The 40–50% robustness numbers assume atomically flat, specularly reflecting pair-breaking edges; if real surface roughness broadens the zero-energy Andreev bound states as much as impurity scattering does, the phase crystal could vanish well before that window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phase crystals are plausible in real, weakly disordered d-wave superconductors, since disorder at 40–50% of the critical level still leaves them as the ground state.
  • The phase diagram gives experimentalists a concrete temperature–impurity window in which to look for periodic spontaneous currents and fields with scanning probes.
  • In mesoscopic squares, increasing impurity concentration can switch the time-reversal breaking state from a phase crystal to the uniform edge-current (Vorontsov) state, so sample size and disorder jointly select the broken-symmetry pattern.
  • Finite-size effects suppress Tc more strongly than the bulk Abrikosov-Gorkov curve in systems with multiple pair-breaking edges, so interpreting Tc measurements in small grains requires accounting for edge-edge hybridization.
  • The phase crystal is more robust in the unitary scattering limit than in the Born limit, which can be used to identify the dominant scattering regime from the disorder dependence of time-reversal breaking.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's explicit claims, the same self-consistent t-matrix machinery could be run with diffuse surface boundary conditions to produce a roughness–impurity phase diagram; the paper only argues qualitatively that roughness weakens the crystal, leaving the crossover unquantified.
  • Because impurity concentration changes the number and size of current loops, disorder could serve as a control knob for the topological defect structure of the superflow, consistent with the generalized Poincaré–Hopf constraint invoked in the paper.
  • The smooth transition between phase crystal and Vorontsov phase at large Γ suggests that coexisting periodic and uniform edge currents may appear in finite samples, which scanning probes could distinguish.
  • Extending the same phase-diagram computation to other nodal pairings could test whether a roughly 40–50% robustness window is a generic feature of flat-band edge states or specific to d-wave symmetry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses quasiclassical Eilenberger theory with t-matrix impurity self-energies, solved self-consistently in the order parameter, impurity self-energies, and vector potential, to study phase crystals at [110] edges of nodal d-wave superconductors. It quantifies impurity-induced broadening of the surface Andreev bound states, computes Tc(Γ) in single-edge and square geometries against the Abrikosov-Gor'kov benchmark, and maps a T–Γ phase diagram for a range of scattering phase shifts. The central findings are that the phase crystal survives up to roughly 40–50% of the critical impurity strength in the Born and unitary limits, and that in mesoscopic squares edge–edge hybridization stabilizes a distinct translationally invariant TRSB (Vorontsov) state.

Significance. The result is significant because it extends phase-crystal predictions to weak-coupling d-wave superconductors with disorder, which is important for experimental feasibility. The paper's numerical scheme is a strength: full self-consistency, benchmarks against analytic ABS broadening and the Abrikosov-Gor'kov Tc curve, and public open-source code and data. The 40–50% window is an emergent output of a free-energy comparison rather than a fitted target. The remaining concerns are about how the ideal-surface result is worded, not about the internal consistency of the calculation.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. I] The sentence beginning 'We find find that the ABS...' contains a duplicated word and should be corrected to 'We find that...'.
  2. [Sec. IIF and Sec. VI] Because the calculations assume specular, atomically flat pair-breaking edges, the abstract and conclusions should explicitly qualify the robustness claim: surface roughness broadens the ABS and the critical roughness is not quantified here. This is not a flaw in the numerical phase diagram, but the real-material inference would be clearer if the caveat appeared in the abstract or conclusions rather than only in the outlook.
  3. [Sec. V and Fig. 4] Please state explicitly whether the 40–50% of the critical impurity strength is quoted for the triangular single-edge geometry or the square, and whether the square's low-temperature TRSB state at the largest Γ is the Vorontsov phase rather than the phase crystal; as written, Fig. 4(b) shows that region as Vorontsov, so the headline claim needs this qualification.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption] 'edges rotated45◦ degrees' should read 'edges rotated 45°' or 'edges rotated by 45 degrees'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the phase-crystal robustness window emerges from a self-consistent Eilenberger/t-matrix calculation with no fitted target, and the phase-crystal starting state from earlier work is not load-bearing for the new impurity phase diagram.

full rationale

The central claim—that the phase crystal survives up to ~40–50% of the critical impurity strength in the Born and unitary limits—is an emergent output of the numerical calculation, not an input. The paper solves the Eilenberger equation (Eq. 1) with self-consistency in the impurity self-energy, order parameter, and vector potential, and compares the free energy (Eq. 27) of different self-consistent states. No parameter is fitted to reproduce the phase-crystal boundary; the critical impurity strength is independently defined as the point where the superconducting order parameter vanishes (Sec. IIC), and T*(Γ) is computed from the same self-consistent solutions. The numerical framework is benchmarked against external results: T_c(Γ) is compared to the Abrikosov-Gor'kov formula (Eq. 19), and the impurity broadening of ABS is checked against analytic calculations (Refs. [49,50]). The free-energy functional is justified by the Luttinger-Ward functional with independent support (Ref. [74], Virtanen et al.), not only by the authors' prior thesis. The phase-crystal concept and its clean-limit properties are taken from earlier works by overlapping authors (Refs. [5–7,35]), but those references are used as background establishing the starting state; they do not pre-impose the impurity-strength–temperature phase diagram, which is computed self-consistently here. The Vorontsov phase is explicitly attributed to Ref. [54] rather than being presented as a new prediction. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained for the claimed new result, and no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data-fitting was used; Gamma_u, delta_0 and D are scanned physical model parameters, and all other scales are set by T_c0 or the Fermi velocity. The central claim therefore rests on standard quasiclassical assumptions rather than on hidden fitted constants. No new physical entity is introduced; the phase crystal and Vorontsov states are pre-existing constructs.

free parameters (3)
  • Impurity pair-breaking energy Gamma = scanned from 0 to Gamma_c(0), not fitted
    Defined in Eq. (18) as Gamma = Gamma_u sin^2(delta_0); the phase diagram axes and the 40 to 50 percent robustness threshold are expressed relative to Gamma_c. It models impurity concentration and is scanned rather than fit to data.
  • Scattering phase shift delta_0 = scanned between 0 (Born) and pi/2 (unitary)
    Reparameterizes the impurity potential via Eq. (17); the robustness range varies monotonically with delta_0, so the phase diagram is a function of it.
  • System size D = D = 40 coherence lengths for main phase diagrams
    Finite-size effects and the Vorontsov competition are controlled by D/xi(Gamma); the paper states the Vorontsov phase covers more of the diagram at smaller D, so the main phase boundaries are size-dependent.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Quasiclassical Eilenberger theory provides an accurate description of the inhomogeneous superconducting state.
    Used to derive Eq. (1) and the free energy functional Eq. (27); relies on weak coupling and smooth spatial variations on the Fermi wavelength scale. The paper states this framework as the model basis in Sec. IIA.
  • domain assumption A circular Fermi surface and spin degeneracy capture the relevant physics.
    Stated in Sec. IIF: 'we assume equilibrium, spin degeneracy, weak coupling superconductivity, a circular Fermi surface and specular reflection boundary conditions.' Prior work [37] shows Fermi surface shape quantitatively affects phase crystals, so noncircular Fermi surfaces could shift thresholds.
  • domain assumption Nonmagnetic impurities are dilute, momentum-isotropic s-wave scatterers described by the noncrossing t-matrix approximation.
    Introduced in Sec. IIC, Eqs. (13)-(15). Vertex corrections, anisotropic scattering, or finite impurity concentrations are neglected; the paper itself lists noncrossing corrections as future work in Sec. VI.
  • domain assumption Specular reflection at ideal flat superconductor-vacuum interfaces.
    Assumed in Sec. IIF and used for both geometries. Roughness and finite transparency broaden the Andreev bound states and were not modeled; the outlook in Sec. VI acknowledges this could weaken the phase crystal.
  • domain assumption The Eilenberger free energy functional in Eq. (27) is the correct thermodynamic potential in the presence of t-matrix impurities.
    Sec. IIE argues the impurity self-energy vanishes in the Luttinger-Ward functional, referencing Refs. [70-74]. This justifies comparing free energies of different self-consistent states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impurity strength-temperature phase diagram with phase crystals and competing time-reversal symmetry breaking states in nodal $d$-wave superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M7QRQOM5

@misc{pith2026241214876,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impurity strength-temperature phase diagram with phase crystals and competing time-reversal symmetry breaking states in nodal $d$-wave superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M7QRQOM5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14876}
}
abstract

Phase crystals are a class of nonuniform superconducting ground states characterized by spontaneous phase gradients of the superconducting order parameter. These phase gradients nonlocally drive periodic currents and magnetic fields, thus breaking both time-reversal symmetry and continuous translational symmetry. The phase crystal instability is generally triggered by negative and inhomogeneous superfluid stiffness. Several scenarios have been identified that can realize phase crystals, especially flat bands at specific edges of unconventional nodal superconductors. Motivated by omnipresent disorder in all materials, we employ the ${t}$-matrix approach within the quasiclassical theory of superconductivity to study the emergence of phase crystals at edges of a nodal $d$-wave superconductor. We quantify the full phase diagram as a function of the impurity scattering energy and the temperature, with full self-consistency in the impurity self energies, the superconducting order parameter, and the vector potential. We find that the phase crystal survives even up to $\sim 40-50\%$ of the superconducting critical impurity strength in both the Born and unitary scattering limits. Finally, we show how mesoscopic finite-size effects induce a competition with a state still breaking time-reversal symmetry but with translationally invariant edge currents.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14876 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sketch of the two different dx2−y2 -wave supercon￾ductor geometries considered in this work. (a) Square grain with edges rotated 45◦ degrees with respect to the crystal ab￾axes, each of which is pair-breaking due to resonant Andreev reflection. (b) Grain with only one pair-breaking edge, while all other edges are aligned with the ab-axes. Heatmaps show the magnitude of the spontaneous loop currents [arrows at bottom… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. LDOS as a function of energy in the low-energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Magnitude of the spontaneous current density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a)-(b) Ground-state phase diagram as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) shows the free energy difference between configurations with different number of current loops n = 11, 9, 7, as a function of T in the clean limit (Γ = 0). Per definition, the ground state solution has the lowest free energy, while all other solutions are either me…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [110]

    Kamal, R

    S. Kamal, R. Liang, A. Hosseini, D. A. Bonn, and W. N. Hardy, Magnetic penetration depth and surface resis- tance in ultrahigh-purityYBa2Cu3O7−δ crystals, Phys. Rev. B58, R8933 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [1]

    A. A. Abrikosov, On the magnetic properties of super- conductors of the second group, Sov. Phys. JETP5, 1174 (1957)

    1957

  3. [2]

    Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity: Second Edition, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, New York, 2004)

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity: Second Edition, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, New York, 2004)

    2004

  4. [3]

    Rev.135, A550 (1964)

    P.FuldeandR.A.Ferrell,Superconductivityinastrong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev.135, A550 (1964)

    1964

  5. [4]

    A. I. Larkin and I. U. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz.47, 1136 (1964), [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762 (1965)]

    1964

  6. [5]

    Håkansson, T

    M. Håkansson, T. Löfwander, and M. Fogelström, Spontaneously broken time-reversal symmetry in high- temperature superconductors, Nat. Phys.11, 755 (2015)

    2015

  7. [6]

    Holmvall, M

    P. Holmvall, M. Fogelström, T. Löfwander, and A. B. Vorontsov, Phase crystals, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013104 (2020)

    2020

  8. [7]

    Holmvall, A

    P. Holmvall, A. B. Vorontsov, M. Fogelström, and T. Löfwander, Broken translational symmetry at edges of high-temperature superconductors, Nat. Commun.9, 1 (2018)

    2018

Show all 112 references
  1. [8]

    Hu, Midgap surface states as a novel signature ford 2 xa-x 2 b-wave superconductivity, Phys

    C.-R. Hu, Midgap surface states as a novel signature ford 2 xa-x 2 b-wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 1526 (1994)

    1994

  2. [9]

    Löfwander, V

    T. Löfwander, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Andreev bound states in high-Tc superconducting junctions, Su- percond. Sci. Technol.14, R53 (2001)

    2001

  3. [10]

    Becherer, C

    T. Becherer, C. Stölzel, G. Adrian, and H. Adrian, Normal electron tunneling in ramp- typeYBa 2Cu3O7/PrBa2Cu3O7/YBa2Cu3O7 junctions prepared by laser ablation, Phys. Rev. B47, 14650 (1993)

    1993

  4. [11]

    Kashiwaya, Y

    S. Kashiwaya, Y. Tanaka, M. Koyanagi, H. Takashima, and K. Kajimura, Evidence for d-wave symmetry in high-tc superconductors based on tunneling theory and stm experiment, Physica C235-240, 1911 (1994)

    1994

  5. [12]

    Kashiwaya, Y

    S. Kashiwaya, Y. Tanaka, M. Koyanagi, H. Takashima, and K. Kajimura, Origin of zero-bias conductance peaks in high-t c superconductors, Phys. Rev. B51, 1350 (1995)

    1995

  6. [13]

    Ryu and Y

    S. Ryu and Y. Hatsugai, Topological origin of zero- energy edge states in particle-hole symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 077002 (2002)

    2002

  7. [14]

    M. Sato, Y. Tanaka, K. Yada, and T. Yokoyama, Topol- ogy of Andreev bound states with flat dispersion, Phys. Rev. B83, 224511 (2011)

    2011

  8. [15]

    Ikegaya and Y

    S. Ikegaya and Y. Asano, Stability of flat zero-energy states at the dirty surface of a nodal superconductor, Phys. Rev. B95, 214503 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    Nagai, Y

    Y. Nagai, Y. Ota, and K. Tanaka, Time-reversal sym- metry breaking and gapped surface states due to spon- taneous emergence of new order ind-wave nanoislands, Phys. Rev. B96, 060503 (2017)

    2017

  10. [17]

    A. B. Vorontsov, Andreev bound states in supercon- ducting films and confined superfluid He-3, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A376, 201501444 (2018)

    2018

  11. [18]

    Geerk, X

    J. Geerk, X. X. Xi, and G. Linker, Electron tunneling into thin films of Y1Ba2Cu3O7, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter73, 329 (1988)

    1988

  12. [19]

    Lesueur, L

    J. Lesueur, L. Greene, W. Feldmann, and A. Inam, Zero biasanomaliesinYBa2Cu3O7tunneljunctions,Physica C191, 325 (1992)

    1992

  13. [20]

    Covington, M

    M. Covington, M. Aprili, E. Paraoanu, L. H. Greene, F. Xu, J. Zhu, and C. A. Mirkin, Observation of Surface-Induced Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry in YBa2Cu3O7 Tunnel Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 277 (1997)

    1997

  14. [21]

    Matsumoto and H

    M. Matsumoto and H. Shiba, Coexistence of Different Symmetry Order Parameters near a Surface in d-Wave Superconductors I, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.64, 3384 (1995)

    1995

  15. [22]

    Fogelström, D

    M. Fogelström, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Tunneling into current-carrying surface states of high-tc supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 281 (1997)

    1997

  16. [23]

    Sigrist, Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking States in High-TemperatureSuperconductors,Prog.Theor.Phys

    M. Sigrist, Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking States in High-TemperatureSuperconductors,Prog.Theor.Phys. 99, 899 (1998)

    1998

  17. [24]

    Honerkamp, K

    C. Honerkamp, K. Wakabayashi, and M. Sigrist, Insta- bilities at [110] surfaces ofdx2−y2 superconductors, Eu- rophys. Lett.50, 368 (2000)

    2000

  18. [25]

    A. C. Potter and P. A. Lee, Edge ferromagnetism from majorana flat bands: Application to split tunneling- conductance peaks in high-Tc cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 117002 (2014)

    2014

  19. [26]

    Higashitani, Mechanism of paramagnetic meissner ef- fect in high-temperature superconductors, J

    S. Higashitani, Mechanism of paramagnetic meissner ef- fect in high-temperature superconductors, J. Soc. Phys. Jpn.66, 2556 (1997)

    1997

  20. [27]

    Y. S. Barash, M. S. Kalenkov, and J. Kurkijärvi, Low- temperature magnetic penetration depth in d-wave su- perconductors: Zero-energy bound state and impurity effects, Phys. Rev. B62, 6665 (2000)

    2000

  21. [28]

    Löfwander, V

    T. Löfwander, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Time- reversal symmetry breaking at josephson tunnel junc- tions of purely d-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 62, R14653 (2000)

    2000

  22. [29]

    Persky, I

    E. Persky, I. Sochnikov, and B. Kalisky, Studying quan- tum materials with scanning squid microscopy, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 385 (2022)

    2022

  23. [30]

    Carmi, E

    R. Carmi, E. Polturak, G. Koren, and A. Auerbach, Spontaneous macroscopic magnetization at the super- conducting transition temperature of YBa 2Cu3O7−δ, Nature404, 853 (2000)

    2000

  24. [31]

    C. C. Tsuei and J. R. Kirtley, Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.72, 969 (2000)

    2000

  25. [32]

    W. K. Neils and D. J. Van Harlingen, Experimental test for subdominant superconducting phases with complex order parameters in cuprate grain boundary junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 047001 (2002)

    2002

  26. [33]

    J. R. Kirtley, C. C. Tsuei, Ariando, C. J. M. Verwijs, 13 S. Harkema, and H. Hilgenkamp, Angle-resolved phase- sensitive determination of the in-plane gap symmetry in YBa2Cu3O7−δ, Nat. Phys.2, 190 (2006)

    2006

  27. [34]

    Saadaoui, G

    H. Saadaoui, G. D. Morris, Z. Salman, Q. Song, K. H. Chow, M. D. Hossain, C. D. P. Levy, T. J. Parolin, M. R. Pearson, M. Smadella, D. Wang, L. H. Greene, P.J.Hentges, R.F.Kiefl,andW.A.MacFarlane,Search for broken time-reversal symmetry near the surface of superconducting YBa2...

    2011

  28. [35]

    Chakraborty, T

    D. Chakraborty, T. Löfwander, M. Fogelström, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Disorder-robust phase crystal in high-temperature superconductors stabilized by strong correlations, npj Quantum Mater.7, 1 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    K. M. Seja, N. Wall-Wennerdal, T. Löfwander, and M. Fogelström, Spontaneous splitting ofd-wave surface states: Competition between circulating currents and edge magnetization, Phys. Rev. B110, 064502 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    N. W. Wennerdal, A. Ask, P. Holmvall, T. Löfwander, and M. Fogelström, Breaking time-reversal and trans- lational symmetry at edges ofd-wave superconductors: Microscopic theory and comparison with quasiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043198 (2020)

    2020

  31. [38]

    K. M. Seja and T. Löfwander, Finite element method for the quasiclassical theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B106, 144511 (2022)

    2022

  32. [39]

    Holmvall, N

    P. Holmvall, N. Wall Wennerdal, M. Håkansson, P. Stadler, O. Shevtsov, T. Löfwander, and M. Fo- gelström, SuperConga: An open-source framework for mesoscopic superconductivity, Appl. Phys. Rev.10, 10.1063/5.0100324 (2023)

    2023 doi

  33. [40]

    Holmvall, T

    P. Holmvall, T. Löfwander, and M. Fogelström, Sponta- neous generation of fractional vortex-antivortex pairs at single edges of high-Tc superconductors, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.969, 012037 (2018)

    2018

  34. [41]

    Holmvall, A

    P. Holmvall, A. B. Vorontsov, M. Fogelström, and T. Löfwander, Spontaneous symmetry breaking at sur- faces ofd-wave superconductors: Influence of geometry andsurfaceruggedness,Phys.Rev.B99,184511(2019)

    2019

  35. [42]

    P. M. Bonetti, D. Chakraborty, X. Wu, and A. P. Schnyder, Interaction-driven first-order and higher- order topological superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B109, L180509 (2024)

    2024

  36. [43]

    L. J. Buchholtz and D. Rainer, Quasiclassical bound- ary conditions for fermi liquids at surfaces, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter35, 151 (1979)

    1979

  37. [44]

    L. J. Buchholtz and G. Zwicknagl, Identification ofp- wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B23, 5788 (1981)

    1981

  38. [45]

    D. Xu, S. K. Yip, and J. A. Sauls, Nonlinear Meissner effect in unconventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 51, 16233 (1995)

    1995

  39. [46]

    Eilenberger, Transformation of Gorkov’s equation for typeIIsuperconductorsintotransport-likeequations,Z

    G. Eilenberger, Transformation of Gorkov’s equation for typeIIsuperconductorsintotransport-likeequations,Z. Physik214, 195 (1968)

    1968

  40. [47]

    Larkin and Y

    A. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Quasiclassical Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.55, 2262 (1968), [Sov. Phys. JETP28, 1200, 1969]

    1968

  41. [48]

    Eliashberg, Inelastic electron collisions and nonequi- librium stationary states in superconductors, Zh

    G. Eliashberg, Inelastic electron collisions and nonequi- librium stationary states in superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.61, 1254 (1971), [Sov. Phys. JETP34, 668 (1972)]

    1971

  42. [49]

    Poenicke, Y

    A. Poenicke, Y. S. Barash, C. Bruder, and V. Istyukov, Broadening of Andreev bound states indx2−y2 super- conductors, Phys. Rev. B59, 7102 (1999)

    1999

  43. [50]

    A. Zare, A. Markowsky, T. Dahm, and N. Schopohl, Modification of born impurity scattering near the sur- face ofd-wave superconductors and influence of external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B78, 104524 (2008)

    2008

  44. [51]

    Iniotakis, S

    C. Iniotakis, S. Graser, T. Dahm, and N. Schopohl, Lo- cal density of states at polygonal boundaries ofd-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B71, 214508 (2005)

    2005

  45. [52]

    J. A. Sauls, Surface states, edge currents, and the angu- lar momentum of chiralp-wave superfluids, Phys. Rev. B84, 214509 (2011)

    2011

  46. [53]

    Wu and J

    H. Wu and J. A. Sauls, Weyl fermions and broken sym- metry phases of laterally confined 3he films, J. Phys. Condens. Matter35, 495402 (2023)

    2023

  47. [54]

    A. B. Vorontsov, Broken translational and time-reversal symmetry in unconventional superconducting films, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 177001 (2009)

    2009

  48. [55]

    Nagato, K

    Y. Nagato, K. Nagai, and J. Hara, Theory of the An- dreev reflection and the density of states in proximity contactnormal-superconductinginfinite double-layer,J. Low Temp. Phys.93, 33 (1993)

    1993

  49. [56]

    Schopohl and K

    N. Schopohl and K. Maki, Quasiparticle spectrum around a vortex line in a d-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B52, 490 (1995)

    1995

  50. [57]

    Schopohl, Transformation of the Eilenberger Equa- tions of Superconductivity to a Scalar Riccati Equation, arXiv (1998), cond-mat/9804064

    N. Schopohl, Transformation of the Eilenberger Equa- tions of Superconductivity to a Scalar Riccati Equation, arXiv (1998), cond-mat/9804064

    1998 arXiv

  51. [58]

    M. J. Graf, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Coupled two- dimensional fermi liquids as a model for layered su- perconductors: Basic equations and elementary results, Phys. Rev. B47, 12089 (1993)

    1993

  52. [59]

    Grein, T

    R. Grein, T. Löfwander, and M. Eschrig, Inverse prox- imity effect and influence of disorder on triplet super- currents in strongly spin-polarized ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B88, 054502 (2013)

    2013

  53. [60]

    Holmvall,Crystallization of the superconducting phase in unconventional superconductors(Chalmers University of Technology, 2019) phd thesis

    P. Holmvall,Crystallization of the superconducting phase in unconventional superconductors(Chalmers University of Technology, 2019) phd thesis

    2019

  54. [61]

    Rammer,Quantum Field Theory of Non-equilibrium States(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    J. Rammer,Quantum Field Theory of Non-equilibrium States(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  55. [62]

    A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor’kov, Contribution to the theory of superconducting alloys with paramagnetic im- purities, Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz.39(1960), [Sov. Phys. JETP 12, 1243 (1961)]

    1960

  56. [63]

    Monien, K

    H. Monien, K. Scharnberg, L. Tewordt, and D. Walker, Specific heat, thermal conductivity, and ultrasound at- tenuation in d-wave superconductors, Sol. St. Comm. 61, 581 (1987)

    1987

  57. [64]

    B. Arfi, H. Bahlouli, C. J. Pethick, and D. Pines, Un- usual transport effects in anisotropic superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2206 (1988)

    1988

  58. [65]

    B. Arfi, H. Bahlouli, and C. J. Pethick, Transport prop- erties of anisotropic superconductors: Influence of arbi- trary electron-impurity phase shifts, Phys. Rev. B39, 8959 (1989)

    1989

  59. [66]

    M. I. Salkola, A. V. Balatsky, and D. J. Scalapino, The- ory of scanning tunneling microscopy probe of impurity states in ad-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1841 (1996)

    1996

  60. [67]

    Löfwander and M

    T. Löfwander and M. Fogelström, Large thermoelectric effects in unconventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 70, 024515 (2004)

    2004

  61. [68]

    K. M. Seja, L. Jacob, and T. Löfwander, Thermopower 14 and thermophase in ad-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B105, 104506 (2022)

    2022

  62. [69]

    P.Holmvall,Modeling mesoscopic unconventional super- conductors(Chalmers University of Technology, 2017) licentiate thesis

    2017

  63. [70]

    J. M. Luttinger and J. C. Ward, Ground-State Energy of a Many-Fermion System. II, Phys. Rev.118, 1417 (1960)

    1960

  64. [71]

    Rep.101, 221 (1983)

    J.W.SereneandD.Rainer,Thequasiclassicalapproach to superfluid 3He, Phys. Rep.101, 221 (1983)

    1983

  65. [72]

    A. B. Vorontsov and J. A. Sauls, Thermodynamic prop- erties of thin films of superfluid3He−A, Phys. Rev. B 68, 064508 (2003)

    2003

  66. [73]

    S. Ali, L. Zhang, and J. A. Sauls, Thermodynamic Po- tential for Superfluid 3He in Aerogel, J. Low Temp. Phys.162, 233 (2011)

    2011

  67. [74]

    Virtanen, A

    P. Virtanen, A. Vargunin, and M. Silaev, Quasiclassical free energy of superconductors: Disorder-driven first-order phase transition in superconductor/ferromagnetic-insulator bilayers, Phys. Rev. B101, 094507 (2020)

    2020

  68. [75]

    Using realistic values for the penetration depthλ 0 ∼ 80–120ξ0 [109–112], we solve for self-consistency simul- taneously in the superconducting order parameter∆, impurity self energiesh imp and gauge fieldA. We find negligible influence of the self-screening by finiteλ 0 at bo...

  69. [76]

    Sigrist and K

    M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological theory of unconventional superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.63, 239 (1991)

    1991

  70. [77]

    Matsumoto and H

    M. Matsumoto and H. Shiba, On boundary effect in d-wave superconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.64, 1703 (1995)

    1995

  71. [78]

    Nagato and K

    Y. Nagato and K. Nagai, Surface and size effect of adxy- state superconductor, Phys. Rev. B51, 16254 (1995)

    1995

  72. [79]

    Iniotakis, T

    C. Iniotakis, T. Dahm, and N. Schopohl, Effect of sur- face andreev bound states on the bean-livingston bar- rier ind-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 037002 (2008)

    2008

  73. [80]

    A. Zare, T. Dahm, and N. Schopohl, Strong surface con- tribution to the nonlinear meissner effect ind-wave su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 237001 (2010)

    2010

  74. [81]

    Suzuki and Y

    S.-I. Suzuki and Y. Asano, Paramagnetic instability of small topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B89, 184508 (2014)

    2014

  75. [82]

    J. A. Wilcox, M. J. Grant, L. Malone, C. Putzke, D. Kaczorowski, T. Wolf, F. Hardy, C. Meingast, J. G. Analytis, J.-H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, and A. Carrington, Observationofthenon-linearmeissnereffect,Nat.Com- mun.13, 1201 (2022)

    2022

  76. [83]

    Yang and C.-R

    J. Yang and C.-R. Hu, Robustness of the midgap states predicted to exist on a 110 surface of ad2 xa-x 2 b-wave su- perconductor, Phys. Rev. B50, 16766 (1994)

    1994

  77. [84]

    Kashiwaya and Y

    S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Tunnelling effects on sur- face bound states in unconventional superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys.63, 1641 (2000)

    2000

  78. [85]

    Aprili, E

    M. Aprili, E. Badica, and L. H. Greene, Doppler shift of the andreev bound states at the ybco surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4630 (1999)

    1999

  79. [86]

    Hachiya, K

    M. Hachiya, K. Aoyama, and R. Ikeda, Field-induced reentrant superconductivity in thin films of nodal su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B88, 064519 (2013)

    2013

  80. [87]

    Higashitani and N

    S. Higashitani and N. Miyawaki, Phase transition to a time-reversal symmetry-breaking state in d-wave super- conducting films with rough surfaces, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 033708 (2015)

    2015

  81. [88]

    Miyawaki and S

    N. Miyawaki and S. Higashitani, Fermi surface effect on spontaneous breaking of time-reversal symmetry in unconventional superconducting films, Phys. Rev. B91, 094511 (2015)

    2015

  82. [89]

    Miyawaki and S

    N. Miyawaki and S. Higashitani, Temperature depen- dence of the critical thickness of d-wave superconduct- ing films, Physics Procedia65, 25 (2015), proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Superconduc- tivity (ISS 2014) November 25-27, 2014, Tokyo, Japan

    2015

  83. [90]

    Miyawaki and S

    N. Miyawaki and S. Higashitani, Multiple phase tran- sition in unconventional superconducting films, J. Low Temp. Phys.187, 545 (2017)

    2017

  84. [91]

    Miyawaki and S

    N. Miyawaki and S. Higashitani, Influence of diffuse surface scattering on the stability of superconducting phases with spontaneous surface current generated by andreev bound states, Phys. Rev. B98, 134516 (2018)

    2018

  85. [92]

    Nagato, S

    Y. Nagato, S. Higashitani, K. Yamada, and K. Nagai, Theory of rough surface effects on the anisotropic BCS states, J. Low Temp. Phys.103, 1

  86. [93]

    Yamada, Y

    K. Yamada, Y. Nagato, S. Higashitani, and K. Na- gai, Rough surface effects on d-wave superconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.65, 1540 (1996)

    1996

  87. [94]

    Nagato, M

    Y. Nagato, M. Yamamoto, and K. Nagai, Rough Surface Effects on thep-Wave Fermi Superfluids, J. Low Temp. Phys.110, 1135 (1998)

    1998

  88. [95]

    Higashitani, G

    S. Higashitani, G. Sato, and Y. Nagato, Lifetime of edge modes at rough surfaces of chiral superconductors, Phys. Rev. B110, 224506 (2024)

    2024

  89. [96]

    Suzuki and Y

    S.-I. Suzuki and Y. Asano, Effects of surface roughness on the paramagnetic response of small unconventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B91, 214510 (2015)

    2015

  90. [97]

    Suzuki and Y

    S.-I. Suzuki and Y. Asano, Spontaneous edge current in a small chiral superconductor with a rough surface, Phys. Rev. B94, 155302 (2016)

    2016

  91. [98]

    Suzuki, A

    S.-I. Suzuki, A. A. Golubov, and M. Eschrig, Chiral current inversion induced by flat-band andreev bound states (2024), arXiv:2406.19682 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Z.-X.Li, S.A.Kivelson,andD.-H.Lee,Superconductor- to-metaltransitioninoverdopedcuprates,npjQuantum Materials6, 36 (2021)

    2021

  93. [100]

    C. N. Breiø, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen, Supercurrents and spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking by nonmagnetic disorder in unconventional su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B105, 014504 (2022)

    2022

  94. [101]

    C. N. Breiø, A. Kreisel, M. Roig, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen, Time-reversal symmetry breaking from lattice dislocations in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014505 (2024)

    2024

  95. [102]

    B. M. Andersen, A. Kreisel, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking by dis- order in superconductors, Front. Phys.12, 10.3389/f- phy.2024.1353425 (2024)

    2024

  96. [103]

    Pathak, O

    V. Pathak, O. Can, and M. Franz, Edge currents as probeoftopologyintwistedcupratebilayers,Phys.Rev. B110, 014506 (2024)

    2024

  97. [104]

    L. V. Pupim and M. S. Scheurer, Adatom en- gineering magnetic order in superconductors: Ap- plications to altermagnetic superconductivity (2024), arXiv:2411.02489 [cond-mat.supr-con]. 15

    2024 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Bouhon and M

    A. Bouhon and M. Sigrist, Current inversion at the edges of a chiralp-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 90, 220511(R) (2014)

    2014

  99. [106]

    Y. Li, D. Wang, and C. Wu, Spontaneous breaking of time-reversal symmetry in the orbital channel for the boundary majorana flat bands, New J. Phys.15, 085002 (2013)

    2013

  100. [107]

    D. Wang, Z. Huang, and C. Wu, Fate and remnants of majorana zero modes in a quantum wire array, Phys. Rev. B89, 174510 (2014)

    2014

  101. [108]

    Impuritystrength–temperaturephasediagramwith phase crystals and competing time-reversal symmetry breaking states in nodal d-wave superconductors

    K. M. Seja, N. Wall Wennerdal, T. Löfwander, A. M. Black-Schaffer, M. Fogelström, and P. Holmvall, Data for"Impuritystrength–temperaturephasediagramwith phase crystals and competing time-reversal symmetry breaking states in nodal d-wave superconductors" , 10.5281/zenodo.145243...

    2024 doi

  102. [109]

    Walter, W

    H. Walter, W. Prusseit, R. Semerad, H. Kinder, W. Ass- mann, H. Huber, H. Burkhardt, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Low-Temperature Anomaly in the Penetration Depth ofYBa 2Cu3O7 Films: Evidence for Andreev Bound States at Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3598 (1998)

    1998

  103. [111]

    J. E. Sonier, J. H. Brewer, and R. F. Kiefl,µSR stud- ies of the vortex state in Type-II superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.72, 769 (2000)

    2000

  104. [112]

    Pereg-Barnea, P

    T. Pereg-Barnea, P. J. Turner, R. Harris, G. K. Mullins, J. S. Bobowski, M. Raudsepp, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, and W. N. Hardy, Absolute values of the London pene- tration depth inYBa 2Cu3O6+y measured by zero field ESR spectroscopy on Gd doped single crystals, Phys. Rev. B69, 18...

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.