Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey on Human-AI Collaboration with Large Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04931 v3 pith:MCGJBSSC submitted 2024-03-07 cs.AI cs.CLcs.HC

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.HC
keywords lfmsmodelscapabilitieschallengescollaborationdesignfoundationhuman-ai
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) continue to expand rapidly, Human-AI (HAI) Collaboration, combining human intellect and AI systems, has become pivotal for advancing problem-solving and decision-making processes. The advent of Large Foundation Models (LFMs) has greatly expanded its potential, offering unprecedented capabilities by leveraging vast amounts of data to understand and predict complex patterns. At the same time, realizing this potential responsibly requires addressing persistent challenges related to safety, fairness, and control. This paper reviews the crucial integration of LFMs with HAI, highlighting both opportunities and risks. We structure our analysis around four areas: human-guided model development, collaborative design principles, ethical and governance frameworks, and applications in high-stakes domains. Our review shows that successful HAI systems are not the automatic result of stronger models but the product of careful, human-centered design. By identifying key open challenges, this survey aims to give insight into current and future research that turns the raw power of LFMs into partnerships that are reliable, trustworthy, and beneficial to society.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Resilient Human-AI Collaboration: A Lifecycle Taxonomy of Sociotechnical Risks and Cascading Failures

    cs.HC 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A literature synthesis maps human-AI collaboration failures into six interacting risk clusters arranged along a four-stage lifecycle.

  2. Plover: Steering GUI Agents through Plan-Centric Interaction

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An expert repairing visible plans rescued 23 of 26 failed GUI automation runs, turning 17 into full and 6 into partial successes.

Pith tools