Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bounding Stochastic Safety: Leveraging Freedman's Inequality with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Functions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.05745 v5 pith:MCYDKCEK submitted 2024-03-09 eess.SY cs.SY

Bounding Stochastic Safety: Leveraging Freedman's Inequality with Discrete-Time Control Barrier Functions

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords safetybarriercontrolguaranteesinequalitymethodsdiscrete-timedisturbance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

When deployed in the real world, safe control methods must be robust to unstructured uncertainties such as modeling error and external disturbances. Typical robust safety methods achieve their guarantees by always assuming that the worst-case disturbance will occur. In contrast, this paper utilizes Freedman's inequality in the context of discrete-time control barrier functions (DTCBFs) and c-martingales to provide stronger (less conservative) safety guarantees for stochastic systems. Our approach accounts for the underlying disturbance distribution instead of relying exclusively on its worst-case bound and does not require the barrier function to be upper-bounded, which makes the resulting safety probability bounds more directly useful for intuitive safety constraints such as signed distance. We compare our results with existing safety guarantees, such as input-to-state safety (ISSf) and martingale results that rely on Ville's inequality. When the assumptions for all methods hold, we provide a range of parameters for which our guarantee is stronger. Finally, we present simulation examples, including a bipedal walking robot, that demonstrate the utility and tightness of our safety guarantee.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Control Barrier Function-Constrained Model Predictive Control Framework for Safe Reinforcement Learning

    eess.SY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PECTS learns dynamics and CBFs to constrain MPC trajectories probabilistically, enabling safer RL in stochastic unknown environments via sampling-based optimization.