Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Multimodal Conversational AI: A Survey of Datasets and Approaches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.06907 v1 pith:MDW2KN6C submitted 2022-05-13 cs.LG

Multimodal Conversational AI: A Survey of Datasets and Approaches

classification cs.LG
keywords multimodalconversationalmodalitiesresearchapproachesco-learningconversationsdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As humans, we experience the world with all our senses or modalities (sound, sight, touch, smell, and taste). We use these modalities, particularly sight and touch, to convey and interpret specific meanings. Multimodal expressions are central to conversations; a rich set of modalities amplify and often compensate for each other. A multimodal conversational AI system answers questions, fulfills tasks, and emulates human conversations by understanding and expressing itself via multiple modalities. This paper motivates, defines, and mathematically formulates the multimodal conversational research objective. We provide a taxonomy of research required to solve the objective: multimodal representation, fusion, alignment, translation, and co-learning. We survey state-of-the-art datasets and approaches for each research area and highlight their limiting assumptions. Finally, we identify multimodal co-learning as a promising direction for multimodal conversational AI research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. POPS: Recovering Unlearned Multi-Modality Knowledge in MLLMs with Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Prompt-optimized suffixes plus synthetic fine-tuning recover ~82% of knowledge that multimodal unlearning methods claim to erase from MLLMs.

  2. Revisit What You See: Revealing Visual Semantics in Vision Tokens to Guide LVLM Decoding

    cs.CV 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ReVisiT refines LVLM output distributions during decoding by projecting selected vision tokens into text space via context-aware constrained divergence minimization.