Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Generative Adversarial Networks for Malware Detection: a Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.08558 v2 pith:MGU4IZ5H submitted 2023-02-16 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords researchadversarialgenerativemalwarenetworksbeencurrentdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Since their proposal in the 2014 paper by Ian Goodfellow, there has been an explosion of research into the area of Generative Adversarial Networks. While they have been utilised in many fields, the realm of malware research is a problem space in which GANs have taken root. From balancing datasets to creating unseen examples in rare classes, GAN models offer extensive opportunities for application. This paper surveys the current research and literature for the use of Generative Adversarial Networks in the malware problem space. This is done with the hope that the reader may be able to gain an overall understanding as to what the Generative Adversarial model provides for this field, and for what areas within malware research it is best utilised. It covers the current related surveys, the different categories of GAN, and gives the outcomes of recent research into optimising GANs for different topics, as well as future directions for exploration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mal-D2GAN: Double-Detector based GAN for Malware Generation

    cs.CR 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Mal-D2GAN, a GAN with two detectors and a least-squares loss, produced adversarial malware that lowered the true positive rate of eight classifiers to near zero on a 20,000-sample dataset.

Pith tools