pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.10030 · v1 · pith:MIALU6Y5new · submitted 2024-01-18 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.CY

Framing Analysis of Health-Related Narratives: Conspiracy versus Mainstream Media

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.CY
keywords framingmediaanalysisconspiracyframehealth-relatedmainstreamissues
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Understanding how online media frame issues is crucial due to their impact on public opinion. Research on framing using natural language processing techniques mainly focuses on specific content features in messages and neglects their narrative elements. Also, the distinction between framing in different sources remains an understudied problem. We address those issues and investigate how the framing of health-related topics, such as COVID-19 and other diseases, differs between conspiracy and mainstream websites. We incorporate narrative information into the framing analysis by introducing a novel frame extraction approach based on semantic graphs. We find that health-related narratives in conspiracy media are predominantly framed in terms of beliefs, while mainstream media tend to present them in terms of science. We hope our work offers new ways for a more nuanced frame analysis.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The TEA Nets framework combines AI and cognitive network science to model targets, events and actors in text

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TEA Nets extracts agents, events, and targets from text to reveal emotional and semantic patterns in conspiracy theories and psychotherapy transcripts from humans and LLMs.