Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

From Loops to Oops: Fallback Behaviors of Language Models Under Uncertainty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.06071 v2 pith:MJ2XCTPT submitted 2024-07-08 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords behaviorsmodelssequencehallucinationsrepetitionsfallbackdegeneratetext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) often exhibit undesirable behaviors, such as hallucinations and sequence repetitions. We propose to view these behaviors as fallbacks that models exhibit under epistemic uncertainty, and investigate the connection between them. We categorize fallback behaviors - sequence repetitions, degenerate text, and hallucinations - and extensively analyze them in models from the same family that differ by the amount of pretraining tokens, parameter count, or the inclusion of instruction-following training. Our experiments reveal a clear and consistent ordering of fallback behaviors, across all these axes: the more advanced an LLM is (i.e., trained on more tokens, has more parameters, or instruction-tuned), its fallback behavior shifts from sequence repetitions, to degenerate text, and then to hallucinations. Moreover, the same ordering is observed during the generation of a single sequence, even for the best-performing models; as uncertainty increases, models shift from generating hallucinations to producing degenerate text and finally sequence repetitions. Lastly, we demonstrate that while common decoding techniques, such as random sampling, alleviate unwanted behaviors like sequence repetitions, they increase harder-to-detect hallucinations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Every Wrong Answer Counts: Option-Level Psychometrics for LLM Multiple-Choice Benchmarks

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An option-level item response model for LLMs shows that the identity of wrong multiple-choice answers carries substantial information about model ability, improving ranking and enabling 770x benchmark compression.

Pith tools