Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AdGraph: A Graph-Based Approach to Ad and Tracker Blocking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.09155 v2 pith:MKADCDZS submitted 2018-05-22 cs.CY cs.LG

classification cs.CYcs.LG
keywords adgraphapproachesexistingadvertisingtrackingwebsitesfilteraccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

User demand for blocking advertising and tracking online is large and growing. Existing tools, both deployed and described in research, have proven useful, but lack either the completeness or robustness needed for a general solution. Existing detection approaches generally focus on only one aspect of advertising or tracking (e.g. URL patterns, code structure), making existing approaches susceptible to evasion. In this work we present AdGraph, a novel graph-based machine learning approach for detecting advertising and tracking resources on the web. AdGraph differs from existing approaches by building a graph representation of the HTML structure, network requests, and JavaScript behavior of a webpage, and using this unique representation to train a classifier for identifying advertising and tracking resources. Because AdGraph considers many aspects of the context a network request takes place in, it is less susceptible to the single-factor evasion techniques that flummox existing approaches. We evaluate AdGraph on the Alexa top-10K websites, and find that it is highly accurate, able to replicate the labels of human-generated filter lists with 95.33% accuracy, and can even identify many mistakes in filter lists. We implement AdGraph as a modification to Chromium. AdGraph adds only minor overhead to page loading and execution, and is actually faster than stock Chromium on 42% of websites and AdBlock Plus on 78% of websites. Overall, we conclude that AdGraph is both accurate enough and performant enough for online use, breaking comparable or fewer websites than popular filter list based approaches.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SST-Guard: Detecting and Characterizing Server-Side Google Analytics in the Wild

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SST-Guard detects server-side Google Analytics on roughly 4% of top websites by identifying semantic tracking artifacts across network, cookie, and browser modalities with over 93% accuracy.

Pith tools