Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Engorgio Prompt Makes Large Language Model Babble on

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.19394 v2 pith:MKMMPNKK submitted 2024-12-27 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords engorgiollmsinferencenovelprocesspromptsauto-regressivecost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Auto-regressive large language models (LLMs) have yielded impressive performance in many real-world tasks. However, the new paradigm of these LLMs also exposes novel threats. In this paper, we explore their vulnerability to inference cost attacks, where a malicious user crafts Engorgio prompts to intentionally increase the computation cost and latency of the inference process. We design Engorgio, a novel methodology, to efficiently generate adversarial Engorgio prompts to affect the target LLM's service availability. Engorgio has the following two technical contributions. (1) We employ a parameterized distribution to track LLMs' prediction trajectory. (2) Targeting the auto-regressive nature of LLMs' inference process, we propose novel loss functions to stably suppress the appearance of the <EOS> token, whose occurrence will interrupt the LLM's generation process. We conduct extensive experiments on 13 open-sourced LLMs with parameters ranging from 125M to 30B. The results show that Engorgio prompts can successfully induce LLMs to generate abnormally long outputs (i.e., roughly 2-13$\times$ longer to reach 90%+ of the output length limit) in a white-box scenario and our real-world experiment demonstrates Engergio's threat to LLM service with limited computing resources. The code is released at: https://github.com/jianshuod/Engorgio-prompt.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LingoLoop Attack: Trapping MLLMs via Linguistic Context and State Entrapment into Endless Loops

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    LingoLoop traps MLLMs into generating up to 367 times more tokens by applying POS-aware attention adjustments to postpone EOS tokens and pruning generative paths to sustain repetitive loops.

  2. Inference Cost Attacks for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Poisoning external knowledge bases with LLM-agent-crafted documents can increase RAG inference token consumption by up to 13.12 times at over 90% success rate while preserving answer quality.

Pith tools