Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 99 references

Exponential Speedup of Entanglement Generation by Quantum Mpemba Effects

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that entanglement can be generated exponentially faster by exploiting quantum Mpemba effects, where the slowest relaxation modes of an open quantum system are bypassed through the initial state or through the entanglement…

desk verdict A genuinely useful spectral formalism for entanglement Mpemba effects, but the reported exponential speedup in the many-body example is confounded by the initial-state rotation changing entanglement. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05935 v1 pith:MKP3DJ2H submitted 2026-08-06 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Sara M. Benjadi , Reinhold Egger , Igor Gornyi , Andrea Nava This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantumMpembaeffectentanglementgenerationLindbladmasterequationspectraldecompositionFréchetderivativelogarithmicnegativitylong-rangeIsingmodelopensystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the slowest relaxation modes of an open quantum system can be bypassed when the quantity being monitored is entanglement, and that this produces exponential speedups in entanglement generation or decay slowdown. It defines two operational effects: the preparation entanglement Mpemba effect, in which a less-entangled initial state reaches a target entanglement before a more-entangled one, and the relaxation effect, in which a state reaches the steady-state entanglement sooner within a given accuracy. The mechanism is spectral: expanding the entanglement measure around the stationary state gives coefficients that depend on the measure but not on the initial state, so suppressing either initial-state overlaps or those measure coefficients removes the slowest channels. The same logic is extended to many-body systems by eliminating whole clusters of slow modes, with a numerical demonstration on a dissipative long-range Ising chain. If correct, these effects give a practical route to faster preparation and longer preservation of entangled resources.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spectral decomposition of the Lindblad superoperator combined with the Fréchet expansion of an entanglement monotone around the stationary state. The workhorse formula is Equation (4), which expresses the entanglement dynamics as a sum over eigenvalues $\lambda_n$ weighted by initial-state overlaps $c_n$ and measure-dependent coefficients $Z_n,Z_{nm}$; suppressing $c_k$ or $Z_k$ for slow modes changes the governing decay rate and produces the exponential speedup.

What would settle it

For a fixed many-body Lindbladian, numerically search over unitary rotations $U$ for the largest set of slow-cluster coefficients $c_n$ that can be zeroed simultaneously; if for generic parameters the maximum is smaller than the cluster size, the cluster-elimination speedup is not generic. Experimentally, prepare the rotated state and measure the logarithmic negativity $\mathcal{N}(t)$: if its asymptotic decay rate still equals $|\mathrm{Re}\,\lambda_1|$ rather than a faster rate, the central claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from a Lindblad master equation with a unique stationary state, the paper expands the evolving state as $\rho(t)=\rho^{(\mathrm{st})}+\sum_{n\geq 1} c_n e^{\lambda_n t} R_n$, with eigenvalues $\lambda_n$ ordered by decay rate. For any Fréchet-differentiable entanglement monotone $E$, it then obtains, near stationarity, $E(t)=E_\infty+\sum_n c_n Z_n e^{\lambda_n t}+\sum_{n,m} c_n c_m Z_{nm} e^{(\lambda_n+\lambda_m)t}+\cdots$, where $Z_n$ and $Z_{nm}$ are Fréchet derivatives of $E$ evaluated on the Lindblad eigenmodes and are independent of the initial state. Therefore, if the initial state has $c_n=0$ for all slow modes, or if the chosen measure has $Z_n=0$ for those modes, the slowest contributing channel is skipped and entanglement approaches $E_\infty$ with a faster decay rate; iterating this removal gives arbitrarily large speedups. The paper calls the resulting operational effects the preparation and relaxation entanglement Mpemba effects, and shows that they are independent of conventional Mpemba effects and depend on which entanglement measure is used. In many-body systems, where slow eigenmodes form clusters, the same suppression is applied cluster by cluster, yielding exponential speedups demonstrated numerically for a dissipative long-range Ising chain.

Load-bearing premise

In many-body cases, the exponential speedup assumes that a single unitary rotation of the initial state can make the state's overlap vanish for every mode in the slow cluster at once, because the corresponding real constraints are independent and regular; if that regularity fails, the many-body speedup may disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any open system with a known Lindblad spectrum, initial states with $c_n=0$ for all slow modes will reach a target entanglement in exponentially shorter time than states overlapping those modes.
  • Choosing an entanglement measure with vanishing first-order Fréchet coefficients $Z_k$ for slow modes can give a speedup of up to a factor of two, and this suppression is robust rather than fine-tuned when it is symmetry-protected.
  • In many-body systems, eliminating an entire slow spectral cluster by a unitary rotation of the initial state yields exponential speedups; the paper demonstrates this for a dissipative long-range Ising chain of six sites.
  • Inverse entanglement Mpemba effects can make highly entangled initial states lose entanglement more slowly, with direct relevance to quantum memories and quantum communication.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the argument only requires Fréchet differentiability of the resource monotone, the same spectral filtering should accelerate generation or preservation of other quantum resources, such as coherence or magic, under the same Lindblad dynamics.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's dimension count for cluster elimination is only a counting argument; in large systems the required unitary may be exponentially complex to find or implement, so the practical speedup could be bounded by state-preparation cost even if the spectral claim is correct.
  • Editorial inference: a direct experimental test would prepare two states with identical entanglement but different slow-mode overlaps and compare logarithmic-negativity relaxation; the paper's logic predicts an exponential difference even when trace-distance curves are practically indistinguishable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces two entanglement-based Mpemba effects (PEME and REME) defined through the time evolution of an entanglement monotone E(ρ). Starting from a Lindblad spectral decomposition, the authors derive an expansion of E(t) near the steady state in terms of initial-state coefficients c_n and Fréchet coefficients Z_n, Z_nm (Eq. (4)). They show that REME depends on |c_1 Z_1| and PEME on (c_1^(H)-c_1^(L)) Z_1, and propose two speedup mechanisms: suppressing the initial-state coefficients c_n of slow modes (cluster elimination) or vanishing Fréchet coefficients Z_n. The framework is illustrated on a dissipative two-site Kitaev model and a dissipative long-range Ising chain, where removal of slow Lindblad modes is claimed to yield exponential speedup of entanglement generation (G(N)≈2.3–3.6) and various PEME/REME phase diagrams.

Significance. The spectral-expansion formalism is a valuable conceptual contribution: it gives a general, measure-dependent characterization of entanglement Mpemba effects and makes explicit the distinction between preparation and relaxation times. The derivation of Eq. (4) is self-contained given the differentiability assumptions, and the numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed effects occur in concrete models. If the many-body speedup claim is substantiated, the paper would open a practical route to faster entanglement generation in dissipative platforms. However, as written, the central many-body claim is not fully supported: the speedup metric G(N) in Eq. (10) is confounded by the entanglement change induced by the unitary rotation of the initial state, and the robustness of one of the two mechanisms rests on an unpublished reference. The paper is therefore of moderate-to-high significance, but requires revision before its main claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (10), Fig. 2(a), Fig. A3] The relaxation-time speedup G(N) in Eq. (10) compares τ_rel(ρ) for the product state ρ(0)=|00...0><00...0| with τ_rel(ρ⊥) for ρ⊥(0)=Uρ(0)U†, which is generically entangled. Since the threshold condition |N(t)-N_∞|≤N_th is reached earlier if N(ρ⊥(0)) already lies closer to N_∞ (or if the amplitude of the slow-mode contribution is smaller for reasons unrelated to the decay rate), the reported G(N)≈2.3–3.6 does not by itself establish an exponential speedup of entanglement generation. The paper acknowledges on p.5 that 'the unitary implementing the mode elimination changes the entanglement content and affects the jump structure of G(N)', but it never reports N(ρ⊥(0)) or subtracts the initial-entanglement offset. Moreover, Fig. A3 shows that after eliminating the 15 slowest modes, the ΔN(t) curves 'cluster together, i.e., they share the same asymptotic decay law', indicating that the asymptotic decay rate does not improve further; the jumps in G(N) in Fig. 2(a) may therefore reflect initial-offset or amplitude changes rather than the exponential spectral-rate increase claimed. The authors should provide, for each removed-mode count, the value of N(ρ⊥(0)), the asymptotic decay rate extracted from ΔN(t), and a comparison against the prediction of Eq. (4); without this decomposition, the central many-body speedup claim is not established.
  2. [Spectral theory section, End Matter, Ref. [73]] The robustness of the Z_k=0 symmetry-protected mechanism is stated to follow from Ref. [73], which is an in-preparation preprint by the same authors. Similarly, the statement at p.5 that 'we found [73] similar behavior' for W and cluster states relies on unpublished material. Since the Z_k=0 mechanism is one of the two pillars of the exponential speedup claim, the supporting evidence should be included in the manuscript (e.g., an appendix with the symmetry argument and the additional models) or cited from published work. As written, the claim is not verifiable by the reader.
  3. [p.5, 'Many-body systems' and 'Long-range Ising model'] The condition for cluster elimination, c_n=0 for all n∈C1, is asserted to be realizable by a unitary rotation ρ⊥(0)=Uρ(0)U†. The only justification is a dimension count ('the set Uρ(0)U† has real dimension 2d−2 ... provided the corresponding real constraints are independent and regular'). This regularity condition is non-generic: for a pure state, the constraints c_n=Re/Im Tr(L_n† ρ(0))=0 are 2|C1| real equations on a (2d−2)-dimensional manifold, and there is no guarantee of independence at the intersection. The numerical success for N=6 (Fig. 2) is a single instance and does not demonstrate the general many-body claim. The authors should either (i) provide an explicit construction of U for the Ising chain, (ii) demonstrate the independence/regularity for this model, or (iii) restrict the claim to 'for N=6 we demonstrate...' rather than 'many-body quantum systems also benefit'.
minor comments (4)
  1. [End Matter, Fig. A2] The sentence 'the above inequality translates to 33/2−√21<31/2' is opaque; please specify which eigenvalues are compared and how the inequality is obtained.
  2. [Fig. 2(b,c)] The orange and blue arrows indicating relabeling discontinuity and continuous transition are difficult to distinguish in a print version; please use different symbol shapes or line styles in addition to color.
  3. [p.2, Eq. (4)] The notation O(e^{3 Re λ_1 t}) for the truncation error is only valid if the third-order term is dominated by the slowest mode; a brief clarification of the asymptotic sense (all λ's real, ordered) would help.
  4. [References] The manuscript would benefit from the page numbers or article numbers for some arXiv references, e.g., Refs. [22, 43, 44, 48, 49], to aid the reader in locating the cited work.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Spectral derivation is self-contained; only a minor in-preparation self-citation supports a robustness aside.

  1. other [Spectral theory of entanglement MEs, paragraph after Eq. (4); repeated in Many-body systems section]
    "The condition Z_k = 0 is robust (in fact, symmetry-protected [73]) and does not rely on fine-tuning of Lindbladian parameters (see End Matter)."

    Reference [73] is an in-preparation preprint by the same four authors. It is invoked to support the claim that the Z_k=0 mode-filtering condition is symmetry-protected and, elsewhere, that analogous behavior occurs for W-state and cluster-state jump operators. These are assertions of robustness and generality backed by a non-independent, non-public source. The central exponential-speedup statement, however, follows from the spectral expansion Eq. (4) and from direct numerical solution of Eq. (1); it does not require the cited symmetry argument, and the End Matter supplies an explicit mode-visibility diagram. The self-citation is therefore a minor support issue rather than a load-bearing circular input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is largely self-contained. Equation (2) is the standard Lindblad spectral decomposition, and Eq. (4) is a Fréchet expansion of an entanglement monotone around the stationary state; conditions (5) and (6) follow algebraically from that expansion. The speedup mechanisms c_k=0 and Z_k=0 are not fitted to the examples: they are imposed as initial-state or parameter conditions and then verified by numerically integrating Eq. (1). The relaxation-time ratio G in Eq. (10) is defined through threshold crossing of N(t), not through the coefficients c_n, so the reported speedup is an output of the dynamics rather than a restatement of the mode-elimination premise. The many-body cluster-elimination argument inherits the spectral logic and is supported by explicit N=6 simulations for a long-range Ising chain. The concern that the unitary U changes the initial entanglement content is a validity threat to the operational interpretation of G(N), but it is not a circular reduction: the paper does not define the speedup in terms of U's effect on N(0), and the claimed asymptotic mode elimination is a distinct mechanism. The only notable circularity-adjacent issue is the in-preparation self-citation [73] used for robustness and for W-state/cluster-state analogues; this is not independent evidence, but it is not the source of the central derivation, so the paper merits only a low score. Overall, no prediction here reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. PEME and REME are operational definitions, not entities. No parameters are fitted to data; all model couplings and rates in the numerical examples are chosen by hand for illustration, and the thresholds in the operational definitions are not fitted constants.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The dynamics is Markovian with a unique stationary state, so ρ(t) has the spectral decomposition of Eq. (2).
    Eq. (1) and the ordering of eigenvalues assume a Lindblad generator with a unique steady state. Non-Markovian or multi-stable cases are outside the theory.
  • domain assumption The entanglement monotone E(ρ) is Fréchet differentiable at ρ_st.
    Eq. (3) requires this. For logarithmic negativity, zero or degenerate negative eigenvalues of ρ_st^TB invalidate Eq. (8); for concurrence, the K=0 boundary is non-differentiable.
  • ad hoc to paper The constraints c_n=0 for all n in the slow cluster C1 are independent and regular, so a unitary rotation can satisfy them all.
    p.5 states "provided the corresponding real constraints are independent and regular"; this is not proven and is central to the many-body speedup claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exponential Speedup of Entanglement Generation by Quantum Mpemba Effects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MKP3DJ2H

@misc{pith2026260805935,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exponential Speedup of Entanglement Generation by Quantum Mpemba Effects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MKP3DJ2H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05935}
}
read the original abstract

Entanglement is a key resource for quantum technologies. We show that protocols employing quantum Mpemba effects allow one to exponentially accelerate the generation of entanglement, or to slow down the decay thereof. Two entanglement Mpemba effects with different operational meaning are introduced, focusing either on the task of rapidly generating a certain threshold value for entanglement or on achieving the asymptotic steady-state value. We show that entanglement Mpemba effects depend on the chosen entanglement measure. Using cluster elimination methods, many-body quantum systems also benefit from the exponential speedup of entanglement generation, as we demonstrate for a dissipative long-range Ising chain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05935 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Entanglement MEs for the concurrence, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Results for the dissipative long-range Ising model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [73]

    S. M. Benjadi, R. Egger, I. Gornyi, and A. Nava, preprint (in preparation)

    work page

  2. [1]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

    2009

  3. [2]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  4. [3]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr´ epeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1895 (1993)

    1993

  5. [4]

    Dooley, S

    S. Dooley, S. Pappalardi, and J. Goold, Entanglement enhanced metrology with quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. B107, 035123 (2023)

    2023

  6. [5]

    Shen and J

    H. Shen and J. Zhang, Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology with neutral atom arrays, National Science Review12, nwaf149 (2025)

    2025

  7. [6]

    A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bellˆ as theorem, Physical Review Letters67, 661 (1991)

    1991

  8. [7]

    T. Brun, I. Devetak, and M.-H. Hsieh, Correcting Quantum Errors with Entanglement, Science314, 436 (2006)

    2006

Show all 99 references
  1. [8]

    B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 307 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Bravyi, D

    S. Bravyi, D. Lee, Z. Li, and B. Yoshida, How Much Entanglement Is Needed for Quantum Error Correction?, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 210602 (2025)

    2025

  3. [10]

    T. L. Vu, S. S. Ge, and C. C. Hang, Real-time deterministic generation of maximally entangled two- qubit and three-qubit states via bang-bang control, Phys. 6 Rev. A85, 012332 (2012)

    2012

  4. [11]

    Y. Liu, D. Dong, S. Kuang, I. R. Petersen, and H. Yonezawa, Two-step feedback preparation of entanglement for qubit systems with time delay, Automatica125, 109174 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    Pauwels, A

    J. Pauwels, A. Tavakoli, E. Woodhead, and S. Pironio, Entanglement in prepare-and-measure scenarios: many questions, a few answers, New Journal of Physics24, 063015 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Eckart, D

    S. Eckart, D. Trabert, J. Rist, A. Geyer, L. P. H. Schmidt, K. Fehre, and M. Kunitski, Ultrafast preparation and detection of entangled atoms, Science Advances9, eabq8227 (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    G. Teza, J. Bechhoefer, A. Lasanta, O. Raz, and M. Vucelja, Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relaxation: Mpemba and related effects, Physics Reports 1164, 1 (2026)

    2026

  8. [15]

    F. Ares, P. Calabrese, and S. Murciano, The quantum Mpemba effects, Nature Reviews Physics7, 451 (2025)

    2025

  9. [16]

    E. B. Mpemba and D. G. Osborne, Cool?, Physics Education4, 172 (1969)

    1969

  10. [17]

    Lu and O

    Z. Lu and O. Raz, Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of the Markovian Mpemba effect and its inverse, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 5083 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    Lasanta, F

    A. Lasanta, F. Vega Reyes, A. Prados, and A. Santos, When the Hotter Cools More Quickly: Mpemba Effect in Granular Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 148001 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    Klich, O

    I. Klich, O. Raz, O. Hirschberg, and M. Vucelja, Mpemba Index and Anomalous Relaxation, Phys. Rev. X9, 021060 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    Ch´ etrite, A

    R. Ch´ etrite, A. Kumar, and J. Bechhoefer, The Metastable Mpemba Effect Corresponds to a Non- monotonic Temperature Dependence of Extractable Work, Frontiers in Physics9, 654271 (2021)

    2021

  14. [21]

    Ib´ a˜ nez, C

    M. Ib´ a˜ nez, C. Dieball, A. Lasanta, A. Godec, and R. A. Rica, Heating and cooling are fundamentally asymmetric and evolve along distinct pathways, Nature Physics20, 135 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    S. A. Shapira, G. Chen, M. Vucelja, and O. Raz, Extending the Mpemba effect to the underdamped realm (2026), arXiv:2607.11797 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2026 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Nava and M

    A. Nava and M. Fabrizio, Lindblad dissipative dynamics in the presence of phase coexistence, Phys. Rev. B100, 125102 (2019)

    2019

  17. [24]

    Rylands, K

    C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Murciano, and B. Bertini, Microscopic Origin of the Quantum Mpemba Effect in Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010401 (2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    Nava and R

    A. Nava and R. Egger, Mpemba Effects in Open Nonequilibrium Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136302 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    Murciano, F

    S. Murciano, F. Ares, I. Klich, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in the XY spin chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2024, 013103 (2024)

    2024

  20. [27]

    Liu, H.-K

    S. Liu, H.-K. Zhang, S. Yin, and S.-X. Zhang, Symmetry Restoration and Quantum Mpemba Effect in Symmetric Random Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140405 (2024)

    2024

  21. [28]

    Moroder, O

    M. Moroder, O. Culhane, K. Zawadzki, and J. Goold, Thermodynamics of the Quantum Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140404 (2024)

    2024

  22. [29]

    F. Ares, V. Vitale, and S. Murciano, Quantum Mpemba effect in free-fermionic mixed states, Phys. Rev. B111, 104312 (2025)

    2025

  23. [30]

    Zatsarynna, A

    K. Zatsarynna, A. Nava, R. Egger, and A. Zazunov, Green’s function approach to Josephson dot dynamics and application to quantum Mpemba effects, Phys. Rev. B111, 104506 (2025)

    2025

  24. [31]

    Y. Su, F. Qi, and G. Jin, Mpemba effect caused by anomalous heat conduction in a quantum dot system, Phys. Rev. B111, 125404 (2025)

    2025

  25. [32]

    Wang and J

    X. Wang and J. Wang, Mpemba effects in nonequilibrium open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033330 (2024)

    2024

  26. [33]

    Di Giulio, X

    G. Di Giulio, X. Turkeshi, and S. Murciano, Measurement-Induced Symmetry Restoration and Quantum Mpemba Effect, Entropy27, 407 (2025)

    2025

  27. [34]

    D. J. Strachan, A. Purkayastha, and S. R. Clark, Non- Markovian Quantum Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 220403 (2025)

    2025

  28. [35]

    Turkeshi, P

    X. Turkeshi, P. Calabrese, and A. De Luca, Quantum Mpemba Effect in Random Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 040403 (2025)

    2025

  29. [36]

    D. Qian, H. Wang, and J. Wang, Intrinsic quantum Mpemba effect in Markovian systems and quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B111, L220304 (2025)

    2025

  30. [37]

    A. M. Lacerda, L. P. Bettmann, and J. Goold, Information geometry of transitions between quantum nonequilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. E112, L022101 (2025)

    2025

  31. [38]

    Westhoff, S

    P. Westhoff, S. Paeckel, and M. Moroder, Fast and direct preparation of a genuine lattice Bose-Einstein condensate via the quantum Mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. A112, L061304 (2025)

    2025

  32. [39]

    Nava and R

    A. Nava and R. Egger, Pontus-Mpemba effects, Physical Review Letters135, 140404 (2025)

    2025

  33. [40]

    A. Nava, R. Egger, B. Dey, and D. Giuliano, Speeding up Pontus-Mpemba effects via dynamical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043332 (2025)

    2025

  34. [41]

    Peluso, R

    M. Peluso, R. Egger, and A. Nava, Optimal speed-up of multi-step Pontus–Mpemba protocols, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical59, 185001 (2026)

    2026

  35. [42]

    H.-Z. Li, C. H. Lee, S. Liu, S.-X. Zhang, and J.-X. Zhong, Quantum Mpemba effect in long-ranged U(1)-symmetric random circuits, Phys. Rev. B113, 134310 (2026)

    2026

  36. [43]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    P. Chattopadhyay, J. F. G. Santos, and A. Misra, Anomaly to Resource: The Mpemba Effect in Quantum Thermometry (2026), arXiv:2601.05046 [quant-ph]

    2026

  37. [44]

    Melles, H

    J. Melles, H. L¨ owen, B. Liebchen, M. te Vrugt, G. Morigi, A. Widera, and A. P. Antonov, Quantization of the classical Mpemba effect (2026), arXiv:2607.06071 [quant- ph]

    2026 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Summer, M

    A. Summer, M. Moroder, L. P. Bettmann, X. Turkeshi, I. Marvian, and J. Goold, Resource-Theoretical Unification of Mpemba Effects: Classical and Quantum, Phys. Rev. X16, 011065 (2026)

    2026

  39. [46]

    Bagui, A

    P. Bagui, A. Chatterjee, and B. K. Agarwalla, Detection of Mpemba effect through observables in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B114, 014311 (2026)

    2026

  40. [47]

    Chang, S

    W.-X. Chang, S. Yin, S.-X. Zhang, and Z.-X. Li, Imaginary-Time Mpemba Effect in Quantum Many- Body Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 100403 (2026)

    2026

  41. [48]

    M. Xu, K. Lu, X.-P. Jiang, H. Hu, and L. Pan, Strong Quantum Mpemba Effect from Exact Slow- Mode Selection in Constrained Rydberg Chains (2026), arXiv:2607.17975 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Z. Liu, Z. Tian, and J. Wang, Stronger Entanglement Dies Faster: Quantum Mpemba Effect in Dissipative 7 Qubits (2026), arXiv:2605.23197 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  43. [50]

    L. K. Joshi, J. Franke, A. Rath, F. Ares, S. Murciano, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, P. Calabrese, C. F. Roos, and M. K. Joshi, Observing the Quantum Mpemba Effect in Quantum Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010402 (2024)

    2024

  44. [51]

    Aharony Shapira, Y

    S. Aharony Shapira, Y. Shapira, J. Markov, G. Teza, N. Akerman, O. Raz, and R. Ozeri, Inverse Mpemba Effect Demonstrated on a Single Trapped Ion Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010403 (2024)

    2024

  45. [52]

    Zhang, G

    J. Zhang, G. Xia, C.-W. Wu, T. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Xie, W.-B. Su, W. Wu, C.-W. Qiu, P.-X. Chen, W. Li, H. Jing, and Y.-L. Zhou, Observation of quantum strong Mpemba effect, Nature Commun.16, 301 (2025)

    2025

  46. [53]

    Y. Tian, Y. Zheng, L.-H. Liu, L. Wang, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Experimental study of Mpemba effect in an energy Langevin system, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L042020 (2025)

    2025

  47. [54]

    Xu, C.-P

    Y. Xu, C.-P. Fang, B.-J. Chen, M.-C. Wang, Z.-Y. Ge, Y.-H. Shi, Y. Liu, C.-L. Deng, K. Zhao, Z.-H. Liu, T.-M. Li, H. Li, Z. Wang, G.-H. Liang, D. Feng, X.-Y. Guo, X.-Y. Gu, Y. He, H.-T. Liu, Z.-Y. Mei, Y. Xiao, Y. Yan, Y.-H. Yu, W.-P. Yuan, J.-C. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, G. Liu, X. ...

    2026

  48. [55]

    Chitambar and G

    E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025001 (2019)

    2019

  49. [56]

    Vidal, Entanglement monotones, Journal of Modern Optics47, 355 (2000)

    G. Vidal, Entanglement monotones, Journal of Modern Optics47, 355 (2000)

    2000

  50. [57]

    Aolita, F

    L. Aolita, F. de Melo, and L. Davidovich, Open-system dynamics of entanglement: a key issues review, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 042001 (2015)

    2015

  51. [58]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A65, 032314 (2002)

    2002

  52. [59]

    Ac ´ ın, S

    A. Ac ´ ın, S. Massar, and S. Pironio, Randomness versus Nonlocality and Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 100402 (2012)

    2012

  53. [60]

    M. L. Basso and J. Maziero, Entanglement monotones connect distinguishability and predictability, Physics Letters A425, 127875 (2022)

    2022

  54. [61]

    Klein Kvorning, L

    T. Klein Kvorning, L. Herviou, and J. H. Bardarson, Time-evolution of local information: thermalization dynamics of local observables, SciPost Phys.13, 080 (2022)

    2022

  55. [62]

    X. Wang, M. Jing, and C. Zhu, Computable and Faithful Lower Bound on Entanglement Cost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 190202 (2025)

    2025

  56. [63]

    Liu, X.-Y

    J.-L. Liu, X.-Y. Luo, Y. Yu, C.-Y. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Hu, J. Li, M.-Y. Zheng, B. Yao, Z. Yan, D. Teng, J.-W. Jiang, X.-B. Liu, X.-P. Xie, J. Zhang, Q.-H. Mao, X. Jiang, Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, and J.-W. Pan, Creation of memory–memory entanglement in a metropolitan quantum network,...

    2024

  57. [64]

    F. Zhou, Y. Tian, Y. Song, C. Qiu, X. Wang, M. Zhou, B. Chen, N. Xu, and D. Lu, Preserving entanglement in a solid-spin system using quantum autoencoders, Applied Physics Letters121, 134001 (2022)

    2022

  58. [65]

    Carollo, A

    F. Carollo, A. Lasanta, and I. Lesanovsky, Exponentially Accelerated Approach to Stationarity in Markovian Open Quantum Systems through the Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 060401 (2021)

    2021

  59. [66]

    Kochsiek, F

    S. Kochsiek, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Accelerating the approach of dissipative quantum spin systems towards stationarity through global spin rotations, Phys. Rev. A106, 012207 (2022)

    2022

  60. [67]

    Bao and Z

    R. Bao and Z. Hou, Accelerating Quantum Relaxation via Temporary Reset: A Mpemba-Inspired Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 150403 (2025)

    2025

  61. [68]

    E. L. Caldas and D. P. Pires, Exponentially accelerated relaxation and quantum Mpemba effect in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A114, 012418 (2026)

    2026

  62. [69]

    Beato and G

    N. Beato and G. Teza, Relaxation Control of Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 070401 (2026)

    2026

  63. [70]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir` o, Many- body open quantum systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 99 (2025)

    2025

  64. [71]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  65. [72]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford,

  66. [74]

    Leijnse and K

    M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, Parity qubits and poor man’s Majorana bound states in double quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B86, 134528 (2012)

    2012

  67. [75]

    Tsintzis, R

    A. Tsintzis, R. S. Souto, K. Flensberg, J. Danon, and M. Leijnse, Majorana Qubits and Non-Abelian Physics in Quantum Dot–Based Minimal Kitaev Chains, PRX Quantum5, 010323 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Samuelson, V

    W. Samuelson, V. Svensson, and M. Leijnse, Minimal quantum dot based Kitaev chain with only local superconducting proximity effect, Phys. Rev. B109, 035415 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    T. Dvir, G. Wang, N. van Loo, C.-X. Liu, G. P. Mazur, A. Bordin, S. L. D. ten Haaf, J.-Y. Wang, D. van Driel, F. Zatelli, X. Li, F. K. Malinowski, S. Gazibegovic, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, M. Wimmer, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Realization of a minimal Kitaev chain in coupled...

    2023

  70. [78]

    Bordin, X

    A. Bordin, X. Li, D. van Driel, J. C. Wolff, Q. Wang, S. L. D. ten Haaf, G. Wang, N. van Loo, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and T. Dvir, Crossed Andreev Reflection and Elastic Cotunneling in Three Quantum Dots Coupled by Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056602 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    S. L. D. ten Haaf, Q. Wang, A. M. Bozkurt, C.-X. Liu, I. Kulesh, P. Kim, D. Xiao, C. Thomas, M. J. Manfra, T. Dvir, M. Wimmer, and S. Goswami, A two-site Kitaev chain in a two-dimensional electron gas, Nature630, 329 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2245 (1998)

    1998

  73. [81]

    Macieszczak, M

    K. Macieszczak, M. Guta, I. Lesanovsky, and J. Garrahan, Towards a Theory of Metastability in Open Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 240404 (2016)

    2016

  74. [82]

    D. C. Rose, K. Macieszczak, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Garrahan, Metastability in an open quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. E94, 052132 (2016)

    2016

  75. [83]

    Macieszczak, D

    K. Macieszczak, D. C. Rose, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Garrahan, Theory of classical metastability in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033047 (2021). 8

    2021

  76. [84]

    Matern, K

    S. Matern, K. Macieszczak, S. Wozny, and M. Leijnse, Metastability and quantum coherence assisted sensing in interacting parallel quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B107, 125424 (2023)

    2023

  77. [85]

    Caneva, M

    T. Caneva, M. Murphy, T. Calarco, R. Fazio, S. Montangero, V. Giovannetti, and G. E. Santoro, Optimal Control at the Quantum Speed Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 240501 (2009)

    2009

  78. [86]

    Ansel, E

    Q. Ansel, E. Dionis, F. Arrouas, B. Peaudecerf, S. Gu´ erin, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, and D. Sugny, Introduction to theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum optimal control, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics57, 133001 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    Koffel, M

    T. Koffel, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagliacozzo, Entanglement Entropy for the Long-Range Ising Chain in a Transverse Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 267203 (2012)

    2012

  80. [88]

    D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Bell’s theorem without inequalities, American Journal of Physics58, 1131 (1990)

    1990

  81. [89]

    J. T. Barreiro, M. M¨ uller, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, C. F. Roos, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, An Open-System Quantum Simulator with Trapped Ions, Nature470, 486 (2011)

    2011

  82. [90]

    J. W. Britton, B. C. Sawyer, A. C. Keith, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, and J. J. Bollinger, Engineered two-dimensional Ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins, Nature484, 489 (2012)

    2012

  83. [91]

    Zhang, G

    J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V. Gorshkov, Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe, Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator, Nature 551, 601 (2017)

    2017

  84. [92]

    D¨ ur, G

    W. D¨ ur, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Physical Review A 62, 062314 (2000)

    2000

  85. [93]

    H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 910 (2001)

    2001

  86. [94]

    C. P. Koch, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, G. Dirr, S. Filipp, S. J. Glaser, R. Kosloff, S. Montangero, T. Schulte- Herbr¨ uggen, D. Sugny, and F. K. Wilhelm, Quantum optimal control in quantum technologies. Strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe...

    2022

  87. [95]

    Lewis, R

    D. Lewis, R. Wiersema, J. Carrasquilla, and S. Bose, Geodesic algorithm for unitary gate design with time- independent Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A111, 052618 (2025)

    2025

  88. [96]

    M. Ma, Y. Li, and J. Shang, Multipartite entanglement measures: A review, Fundamental Research5, 2489 (2025)

    2025

  89. [97]

    A2 will be made available after acceptance on Zenodo

    The data underlying the figures and the precise parameters for the orange curve in Fig. A2 will be made available after acceptance on Zenodo

  90. [98]

    Yu and J

    T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Evolution from entanglement to decoherence of bipartite mixed ”X” states, Quantum Info. Comput.7, 459 (2007)

    2007

  91. [99]

    P. E. Mendon¸ ca, M. A. Marchiolli, and D. Galetti, Entanglement universality of two-qubit X-states, Annals of Physics351, 79 (2014). END MA TTER We here provide technical details on the material in the main text. To start, let us briefly address Eqs. (5) and (6) for degenerat...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.