MTCNet: Motion and Topology Consistency Guided Learning for Mitral Valve Segmentationin 4D Ultrasound

Dan Jia; Dong Ni; Haoran Dou; Hongning Song; Jiezhi Yao; Ji Zhang; Qing Zhou; Ronghao Yang; Rusi Chen; Xing Tao

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 28 references

MTCNet: Motion and Topology Consistency Guided Learning for Mitral Valve Segmentationin 4D Ultrasound

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MTCNet claims that 4D mitral valve segmentation can be trained with only end-systolic and end-diastolic annotations by enforcing motion and topology consistency across cardiac phases.

desk verdict The new dataset and memory bank design are real contributions, but the TCR loss is non-differentiable as written, which makes the ablation crediting it suspect. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00660 v2 pith:MLI6DDD6 submitted 2025-07-01 eess.IV cs.AIcs.CV

Rusi Chen , Yuanting Yang , Jiezhi Yao , Hongning Song , Ji Zhang , Yongsong Zhou , Yuhao Huang , Ronghao Yang

show 7 more authors

Dan Jia Yuhan Zhang Xing Tao Haoran Dou Qing Zhou Xin Yang Dong Ni

This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV

keywords mitralvalvesegmentation4Dultrasoundsemi-supervisedlearningconsistencyguidedbidirectionalmemorybanktopologyregularizationcardiactemporal

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Mitral regurgitation assessment needs the mitral valve segmented in every phase of the cardiac cycle, but 4D ultrasound annotation is scarce and motion artifacts are severe. This paper tries to establish that a segmentation network can learn all phases from just two labeled frames per patient — end-systole and end-diastole — if training explicitly enforces two kinds of cross-phase coherence. The first is motion coherence, propagated through a bidirectional attention memory bank that lets unlabeled intermediate phases borrow feature context from neighboring frames. The second is anatomical plausibility: normalized surface area and volume of the segmented valve are regularized to stay close to the values measured at the annotated phase. If the claim holds, it removes a major bottleneck for dynamic mitral valve analysis and for patient-specific modeling such as 3D printing.

What carries the argument

The engine is the bidirectional attention memory bank. It stores forward and backward multi-scale features of a patient's phases, computes a normalized affinity matrix between memory keys and query keys, and returns a top-k weighted readout that concatenates forward and backward context before the decoder. The second mechanism is the topology-guided correlation regularizer: for each phase's probability map $P_t$, it forms a hard mask $B_t = \mathbb{I}(P_t > 0.5)$, then defines normalized surface area via 3D Sobel gradients and volume via voxel summation, penalizing both the relative and absolute deviation of unlabeled phases from the annotated phase's values. Together, the memory bank carries temporal context and the regularizer carries the anatomical prior that surface area and volume should not drift across phases.

What would settle it

In the released training code, isolate the topology loss by setting the supervised and consistency losses to zero, then check the gradient norm of the surface and volume losses with respect to the network weights; if those norms are zero, the topology term cannot be producing the ablation gains attributed to it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the proposed MTCNet, a Mean Teacher-based semi-supervised framework operating on triplets of phases (one labeled, two unlabeled), achieves cross-phase consistent 4D mitral valve segmentation. A forward and backward memory bank stores multi-scale features of all phases and computes a normalized affinity between memory and current query, producing a top-k attention readout that propagates motion-aware semantic features to unlabeled frames. A topology-guided correlation regularizer then enforces that each phase's binary prediction has a normalized surface area and volume close to the annotated phase's, under the physical prior that the mitral valve's surface and volume stay approximately stable during deformation. The paper reports all-phase Dice of 87.30%, HD of 1.75 mm, and conformity of 66.71% on its 1408-phase, 160-patient dataset, and the ablation attributes about 1.5 Dice points of gain to motion consistency and further consistency gains to the topology term.

Load-bearing premise

The topology regularizer depends on the hard binary mask $B_t = \mathbb{I}(P_t > 0.5)$ still passing a usable gradient to the network through the Sobel-based surface and volume losses, even though a step-function mask has zero derivative almost everywhere.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Only the end-systolic and end-diastolic frames of a patient would need manual labeling; all intermediate phases inherit segmentation through the trained network.
Cross-phase consistency would make measurements of valve area, volume, and motion more reliable across a cardiac cycle, which matters for regurgitation quantification.
The same triplet training with a bidirectional memory bank could extend to other 4D ultrasound targets with sparse annotations, such as other heart valves or fetal structures.
The surface-volume regularization offers a way to inject physical priors into deep segmentation without adding manual annotations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct extension the paper does not spell out: the memory-bank mechanism is essentially a temporal attention module, so it should also transfer to video-object segmentation in ultrasound where only the first and last frames are marked.
One testable refinement is to replace the hard threshold in the topology loss with a soft sigmoid relaxation; if the current hard mask blocks gradient flow, a soft version would show whether the reported gain from the topology term is real or an artifact of the supervised path.
The dataset is described as in-house; an independent replication on a public 4D echocardiography benchmark would clarify whether the reported advantage over the best baseline survives across acquisition protocols.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core idea is appealing: segment the mitral valve in 4D ultrasound with only ES/ED annotations, using a bi-directional attention memory bank for cross-phase consistency and a surface/volume regularizer for anatomical plausibility. The dataset they release, 1408 phases from 160 patients, is a genuine resource for the community, and the comparison study against SSL, registration, and video-object-segmentation baselines is reasonably thorough.

The problem is the topology-guided correlation regularization (TCR). In Eq. (3), they binarize the predicted probabilities with I(P_t > 0.5). That is a hard threshold with zero gradient almost everywhere, so the Sobel-based surface loss cannot backpropagate to the network. The text's claim that "Sobel operators ensure the computation is differentiable" does not fix the composition; the non-differentiability comes from the threshold, not the Sobel kernel. The same issue affects the volume loss in Eq. (5). As written, ∂L_tcp/∂θ = 0, so TCR cannot influence training. Yet Table 2 shows large gains from adding TCR, and the ablations are flagged as statistically significant. Either the released code uses an undescribed relaxation (sigmoid surrogate, straight-through estimation, or just substituting P_t for B_t), or those differences are run-to-run noise and the TCR pillar of the central claim collapses. This is decidable: the code is public.

Other issues are secondary but real. The loss enforces surface-area and volume closeness, not topology in any meaningful sense—no connected components, no Betti numbers. Calling it "topology-guided" overstates what the regularizer measures. Hyperparameters λ, σ, top-k, and β are also incompletely specified, which makes reproduction harder.

If the code does implement a smooth relaxation, then the flaw is a writing problem, not a methodological one, and the paper could be repaired with a clear explanation and possibly a quick rerun of the ablation. If not, the TCR ablation is invalid. Either way, the paper as submitted is not acceptable, but it deserves a serious referee to check the code and verify which case holds. This is a good reading-group paper precisely because the non-differentiability trap is instructive.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MTCNet, a semi-supervised framework for 4D mitral valve segmentation from transesophageal ultrasound, using only end-systolic and end-diastolic annotations. The method combines a Mean Teacher baseline with a bi-directional attention memory bank (MCL) that propagates features across cardiac phases, and a topology-guided correlation regularization (TCR) that penalizes differences in surface area and volume across phases. The authors report state-of-the-art results on a large in-house dataset (Dice 87.30%, HD 1.75mm) and provide code and dataset links. The main technical claims are that MCL improves inter-phase motion coherence and that TCR improves anatomical plausibility and topological coherence.

Significance. If the reported results are valid, the paper addresses a clinically relevant problem—4D mitral valve segmentation with sparse annotations—and the in-house dataset of 1408 phases from 160 patients is a valuable resource. The public release of code and dataset is a significant strength, and the idea of using cross-phase consistency to exploit unlabeled intermediate phases is reasonable. However, the central TCR mechanism as written is non-differentiable and hence cannot contribute to training, and the claimed 'topology' regularization does not enforce any topological invariant. These issues directly affect the ablation conclusions and the framing of the method. The paper has value in its memory-bank consistency idea and its evaluation setup, but the load-bearing technical description needs substantial revision.

major comments (2)

[§2.3, Eq. (3)-(5)] The TCR loss is non-differentiable as written: B_t = I(P_t > 0.5) is a hard threshold, and both L_surf and L_vol depend on this binary mask. The derivative of the indicator function is zero almost everywhere, so ∂L_tcp/∂θ equals zero for essentially all inputs; the Sobel operator being a linear convolution does not restore differentiability after the threshold. The text's statement that 'Sobel operators ensure the computation is differentiable' conflates the smoothness of the convolution with the smoothness of the full composition. Consequently, under the stated objective the training objective of Based+M+T is identical in expectation to Based+M, and the ablation gains in Table 2 (e.g., PL HD 2.23 to 1.92 mm, Conf 64.41% to 66.71%) cannot be attributed to the described mechanism. The authors must either specify and justify a smooth relaxation (e.g., straight-through estimation, sigmoid softening, or a soft threshold) or re-derive the loss and rerun the experiments.
[§2.3, Abstract, Conclusion] The regularizer called 'topology-guided' and the claims of 'topological coherence' are not supported by the actual loss: surface area and volume are geometric quantities, not topological invariants. A surface can undergo a continuous deformation that preserves topology while changing these quantities; conversely, the number of connected components or holes is not directly controlled by L_surf or L_vol. To justify the title and contributions, the authors should either add an actual topological constraint (e.g., on connected components or holes) or rename the component to, for example, 'geometry consistency regularization.'

minor comments (7)

[Eq. (3)] The integral notation ∫_S is used without defining the surface S, and the discrete approximation with ΔA(v) is informal; please clarify the exact voxel-level computation.
[Tables 1 and 2] Statistical significance is claimed via t-tests, but no standard deviations, confidence intervals, or number of repeated runs are reported, so the p-values cannot be independently evaluated.
[References [20] and [21]] References 20 and 21 are the same Mean Teacher paper; please cite it once and correct the numbering.
[§2.2 and §2.3] Several hyperparameters are not fully specified in the text: the top-k value in the memory bank, the weight λ in Eqs. (4)–(5), and the consistency weight β in Eq. (1) are not given (only σ = 0.1 is stated), which hampers reproducibility from the description alone.
[Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains a typo ('bule arrows') and the arrows are not visible in the grayscale copy; please fix the typo and ensure the figure is legible.
[§2.3 heading] The heading says 'T opology-guided Consistency Regulation' and later 'regularization'; please use a consistent term.
[§3, Datasets and Evaluation Metrics] The 'MD-1' phase is described only as the adjacent transitional phase between MD and ED; please specify the exact phase index and annotation protocol.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MTCNet's regularizers and consistency learning are independent of the reported metrics and are evaluated against external baselines.

full rationale

MTCNet's central claims are the MCL memory-bank consistency strategy and the TCR surface/volume regularization. Neither reduces to its inputs by construction: MCL is a standard teacher-student consistency mechanism with a learned memory bank, and TCR enforces a physical prior (surface area and volume stability) cited to external work [15], with the regularization target S(P1)/V(P1) taken from the annotated phase rather than from the test quantities being reported. The reported Dice/HD/Conf improvements are measured on held-out test patients and compared with external baselines, so the results are not fitted inputs renamed as predictions. The paper's self-citations (e.g., refs. 8, 9, 13, 26) appear as background for medical-image segmentation and are not load-bearing for the proposed framework. The only flagged concern is a correctness issue rather than circularity: the hard threshold B_t = I(P_t > 0.5) in Eq. (3) makes the TCR gradient zero almost everywhere, so the sentence 'Sobel operators ensure the computation is differentiable' (Sec. 2.3) is likely inaccurate as written. This concerns whether the loss backpropagates as described, not whether the claimed prediction is definitionally equivalent to its input, and it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The method relies on established neural network components and a physical prior about valve surface and volume stability. The key unstated assumption is the differentiability of the binarization step, which is not true as written.

free parameters (5)

λ
Weight for the absolute term in surface and volume consistency losses, Eq. (4) and (5); chosen by hand, value not reported.
σ = 0.1
Weight for the total topology regularization loss; set based on empirical observations.
β
Weight for the consistency loss in Eq. (1); chosen by hand, value not reported.
top-k
Number of memory features aggregated in the memory bank; value not reported.
binarization threshold = 0.5
Threshold for I(P_t > 0.5) in Eq. (3); standard but arbitrary.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Surface area and volume of the mitral valve are approximately invariant during the cardiac cycle
Used in Section 2.3 to justify TCR; supported by citation [15], but may not hold for pathological valves.
ad hoc to paper The binarization operation is differentiable or is implicitly relaxed via a straight-through estimator
Required for Eq. (3) to produce a gradient, but not stated in the paper.
domain assumption ED and ES annotations provide sufficient information to supervise intermediate phases through cross-phase consistency
Core to the SSL setup; not proven.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MTCNet: Motion and Topology Consistency Guided Learning for Mitral Valve Segmentationin 4D Ultrasound." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MLI6DDD6

@misc{pith2026250700660,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MTCNet: Motion and Topology Consistency Guided Learning for Mitral Valve Segmentationin 4D Ultrasound},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MLI6DDD6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00660}
}

read the original abstract

Mitral regurgitation is one of the most prevalent cardiac disorders. Four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound has emerged as the primary imaging modality for assessing dynamic valvular morphology. However, 4D mitral valve (MV) analysis remains challenging due to limited phase annotations, severe motion artifacts, and poor imaging quality. Yet, the absence of inter-phase dependency in existing methods hinders 4D MV analysis. To bridge this gap, we propose a Motion-Topology guided consistency network (MTCNet) for accurate 4D MV ultrasound segmentation in semi-supervised learning (SSL). MTCNet requires only sparse end-diastolic and end-systolic annotations. First, we design a cross-phase motion-guided consistency learning strategy, utilizing a bi-directional attention memory bank to propagate spatio-temporal features. This enables MTCNet to achieve excellent performance both per- and inter-phase. Second, we devise a novel topology-guided correlation regularization that explores physical prior knowledge to maintain anatomically plausible. Therefore, MTCNet can effectively leverage structural correspondence between labeled and unlabeled phases. Extensive evaluations on the first largest 4D MV dataset, with 1408 phases from 160 patients, show that MTCNet performs superior cross-phase consistency compared to other advanced methods (Dice: 87.30%, HD: 1.75mm). Both the code and the dataset are available at https://github.com/crs524/MTCNet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00660 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Illustration of MV volumes and annotations in 4D ultrasound. 1 Introduction Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common cardiovascular disease with high morbidity and mortality [6,16]. Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard for diagnosing and quantifying MR. It offers a real-time view of the mitral valve (MV), providing both temporal and spatial perspectives [22]. Accurate 4D MV segmentation enables… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Overall framework of our proposed MTCNet. momentum mitigating the overfitting of the teacher network on limited labeled data. Ultimately, MTCNet generates the predicted segmentation masks for both the labeled and unlabeled volumes. The total training objective is: Lseg = Lsup(fs(θ), Y ) + β · Lconsis(fs(θ), ft(θ)), (1) where β is the loss weight, Lsup and Lconsis indicate the supervised loss and consistency loss, re… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Detailed design for bi-directional memory bank. Similarly, the query encoder produces a query key k Q ∈ R C k×DHW and a query value v Q ∈ R C v×DHW , where D, H, and W are the multi-scale feature dimensions. The current phase feature is the output feature of encoders, both in the student and teacher models. Therefore, multi-scale memory aggregation minimizes information loss, especially for subtle boundary changes… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Examples in consecutive phases with 3D volumes (Left seven columns) and 2D slices (Right two columns). Blue and red represent the AL and PL, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Examples of 3D printing models of MV among different methods. anatomical plausibility, reducing PL HD by 0.31 mm (2.23 → 1.92) and achieving a mean HD of 1.91 mm. Under full-phase evaluation, applying TCR improves PL Conf by 2.3% (64.41% → 66.71%), which significantly…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[1]

Medical Image Analysis 80, 102513 (2022)

Aly, A.H., Khandelwal, P., Aly, A.H., Kawashima, T., Mori, K., Saito, Y., Hung, J., Gorman III, J.H., Pouch, A.M., Gorman, R.C., et al.: Fully automated 3d segmen- tation and diffeomorphic medial modeling of the left ventricle mitral valve complex in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Medical Image Analysis 80, 102513 (2022)

work page 2022
[2]

IEEE TMI: Trans- actions on Medical Imaging 38, 1788–1800 (2019)

Balakrishnan, G., Zhao, A., Sabuncu, M., Guttag, J., Dalca, A.V.: Voxelmorph: A learning framework for deformable medical image registration. IEEE TMI: Trans- actions on Medical Imaging 38, 1788–1800 (2019)

work page 2019
[3]

In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part V 24

Carnahan, P., Moore, J., Bainbridge, D., Eskandari, M., Chen, E.C., Peters, T.M.: Deepmitral: Fully automatic 3d echocardiography segmentation for patient spe- cific mitral valve modelling. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceeding...

work page 2021
[4]

NeuroImage 47(1), 122–135 (2009)

Chang, H.H., Zhuang, A.H., Valentino, D.J., Chu, W.C.: Performance measure characterization for evaluating neuroimage segmentation algorithms. NeuroImage 47(1), 122–135 (2009)

work page 2009
[5]

Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 79, 104166 (2023)

Chen, J., Li, H., He, G., Yao, F., Lai, L., Yao, J., Xie, L.: Automatic 3d mitral valve leaflet segmentation and validation of quantitative measurement. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 79, 104166 (2023)

work page 2023
[6]

JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 11(4), 628–643 (2018) 10 R.Chen et al

El Sabbagh, A., Reddy, Y.N., Nishimura, R.A.: Mitral valve regurgitation in the contemporary era: insights into diagnosis, management, and future directions. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 11(4), 628–643 (2018) 10 R.Chen et al

work page 2018
[7]

Computers in Biology and Medicine 165, 107368 (2023)

Huang, H., Chen, Z., Chen, C., Lu, M., Zou, Y.: Complementary consistency semi- supervised learning for 3d left atrial image segmentation. Computers in Biology and Medicine 165, 107368 (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

Medical Image Analysis 102, 103552 (2025)

Huang, Y., Chang, A., Dou, H., Tao, X., Zhou, X., Cao, Y., Huang, R., Frangi, A.F., Bao, L., Yang, X., et al.: Flip learning: Weakly supervised erase to segment nodules in breast ultrasound. Medical Image Analysis 102, 103552 (2025)

work page 2025

Show all 28 references

[9]

Huang, Y., Yang, X., Liu, L., Zhou, H., Chang, A., Zhou, X., Chen, R., Yu, J., Chen, J., Chen, C., et al.: Segment anything model for medical images? Medical Image Analysis 92, 103061 (2024)

2024
[10]

Nature methods 18(2), 203–211 (2021)

Isensee, F., Jaeger, P.F., Kohl, S.A., Petersen, J., Maier-Hein, K.H.: nnu-net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature methods 18(2), 203–211 (2021)

2021
[11]

Computers in Biology and Medicine 182, 109154 (2024)

Ivantsits, M., Tautz, L., Huellebrand, M., Walczak, L., Akansel, S., Khasyanova, I., Kempfert, J., S¨ undermann, S., Falk, V., Hennemuth, A.: Mv-gnn: Generation of continuous geometric representations of mitral valve motion from 3d+ t echocar- diography. Computers in Biology a...

2024
[12]

Li, S., Zhang, C., He, X.: Shape-Aware Semi-supervised 3D Semantic Segmentation for Medical Images, p. 552–561. Springer International Publishing (2020)

2020
[13]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15588 (2025)

Luo, G., Xu, M., Chen, H., Liang, X., Tao, X., Ni, D., Jeong, H., Kim, C., Stock, R., Baumgartner, M., et al.: Tumor detection, segmentation and classification chal- lenge on automated 3d breast ultrasound: The tdsc-abus challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15588 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[14]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

Luo, X., Chen, J., Song, T., Wang, G.: Semi-supervised medical image segmen- tation through dual-task consistency. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 35, pp. 8801–8809 (2021)

2021
[15]

May-Newman, K., Yin, F.: A constitutive law for mitral valve tissue (1998)

1998
[16]

European heart journal 42(36), 3599– 3726 (2021)

McDonagh, T.A., Metra, M., Adamo, M., Gardner, R.S., Baumbach, A., B¨ ohm, M., Burri, H., Butler, J., ˇCelutkien˙ e, J., Chioncel, O., et al.: 2021 esc guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the task force for the diagnosis ...

2021
[17]

IEEE Access (2024)

Munaf` o, R., Saitta, S., Ingallina, G., Denti, P., Maisano, F., Agricola, E., Redaelli, A., Votta, E.: A deep learning-based fully automated pipeline for regurgitant mitral valve anatomy analysis from 3d echocardiography. IEEE Access (2024)

2024
[18]

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing pp

Munaf` o, R., Saitta, S., Tondi, D., Ingallina, G., Denti, P., Maisano, F., Votta, E., et al.: Automatic 4d mitral valve segmentation from transesophageal echocardio- graphy: a semi-supervised learning approach. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing pp. 1–16 (2025)

2025
[19]

In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, Oc- tober 5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18

Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomed- ical image segmentation. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, Oc- tober 5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18....

2015
[20]

Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

Tarvainen, A., Valpola, H.: Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

2017
[21]

Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017) Mitral Valve Segmentation in 4D Ultrasound 11

Tarvainen, A., Valpola, H.: Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017) Mitral Valve Segmentation in 4D Ultrasound 11

2017
[22]

European heart journal 43(7), 561–632 (2022)

Vahanian, A., Beyersdorf, F., Praz, F., Milojevic, M., Baldus, S., Bauersachs, J., Capodanno, D., Conradi, L., De Bonis, M., De Paulis, R., et al.: 2021 esc/eacts guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: developed by the task force for the management of valvula...

2022
[23]

Neural Networks 145, 90–106 (2022)

Verma, V., Kawaguchi, K., Lamb, A., Kannala, J., Solin, A., Bengio, Y., Lopez- Paz, D.: Interpolation consistency training for semi-supervised learning. Neural Networks 145, 90–106 (2022)

2022
[24]

In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Wang, Y., Xiao, B., Bi, X., Li, W., Gao, X.: Mcf: Mutual correction framework for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 15651–15660 (2023)

2023
[25]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Yan, K., Li, X., Wei, F., Wang, J., Zhang, C., Wang, P., Lu, Y.: Two-shot video object segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 2257–2267 (2023)

2023
[26]

In: 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)

Yan, Z., Han, T., Huang, Y., Liu, L., Zhou, H., Chen, J., Shi, W., Cao, Y., Yang, X., Ni, D.: A foundation model for general moving object segmentation in medical images. In: 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). pp. 1–5. IEEE (2024)

2024
[27]

In: Medical image comput- ing and computer assisted intervention–MICCAI 2019: 22nd international confer- ence, Shenzhen, China, October 13–17, 2019, proceedings, part II 22

Yu, L., Wang, S., Li, X., Fu, C.W., Heng, P.A.: Uncertainty-aware self-ensembling model for semi-supervised 3d left atrium segmentation. In: Medical image comput- ing and computer assisted intervention–MICCAI 2019: 22nd international confer- ence, Shenzhen, China, October 13–1...

2019
[28]

In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention- MICCAI 2017: 20th International Conference, Quebec City, QC, Canada, September 11-13, 2017, Proceedings, Part III 20

Zhang, Y., Yang, L., Chen, J., Fredericksen, M., Hughes, D.P., Chen, D.Z.: Deep adversarial networks for biomedical image segmentation utilizing unannotated im- ages. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention- MICCAI 2017: 20th International Conference, Qu...

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Medical Image Analysis 80, 102513 (2022)

Aly, A.H., Khandelwal, P., Aly, A.H., Kawashima, T., Mori, K., Saito, Y., Hung, J., Gorman III, J.H., Pouch, A.M., Gorman, R.C., et al.: Fully automated 3d segmen- tation and diffeomorphic medial modeling of the left ventricle mitral valve complex in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Medical Image Analysis 80, 102513 (2022)

work page 2022

[2] [2]

IEEE TMI: Trans- actions on Medical Imaging 38, 1788–1800 (2019)

Balakrishnan, G., Zhao, A., Sabuncu, M., Guttag, J., Dalca, A.V.: Voxelmorph: A learning framework for deformable medical image registration. IEEE TMI: Trans- actions on Medical Imaging 38, 1788–1800 (2019)

work page 2019

[3] [3]

In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part V 24

Carnahan, P., Moore, J., Bainbridge, D., Eskandari, M., Chen, E.C., Peters, T.M.: Deepmitral: Fully automatic 3d echocardiography segmentation for patient spe- cific mitral valve modelling. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceeding...

work page 2021

[4] [4]

NeuroImage 47(1), 122–135 (2009)

Chang, H.H., Zhuang, A.H., Valentino, D.J., Chu, W.C.: Performance measure characterization for evaluating neuroimage segmentation algorithms. NeuroImage 47(1), 122–135 (2009)

work page 2009

[5] [5]

Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 79, 104166 (2023)

Chen, J., Li, H., He, G., Yao, F., Lai, L., Yao, J., Xie, L.: Automatic 3d mitral valve leaflet segmentation and validation of quantitative measurement. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 79, 104166 (2023)

work page 2023

[6] [6]

JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 11(4), 628–643 (2018) 10 R.Chen et al

El Sabbagh, A., Reddy, Y.N., Nishimura, R.A.: Mitral valve regurgitation in the contemporary era: insights into diagnosis, management, and future directions. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 11(4), 628–643 (2018) 10 R.Chen et al

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Computers in Biology and Medicine 165, 107368 (2023)

Huang, H., Chen, Z., Chen, C., Lu, M., Zou, Y.: Complementary consistency semi- supervised learning for 3d left atrial image segmentation. Computers in Biology and Medicine 165, 107368 (2023)

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Medical Image Analysis 102, 103552 (2025)

Huang, Y., Chang, A., Dou, H., Tao, X., Zhou, X., Cao, Y., Huang, R., Frangi, A.F., Bao, L., Yang, X., et al.: Flip learning: Weakly supervised erase to segment nodules in breast ultrasound. Medical Image Analysis 102, 103552 (2025)

work page 2025