Pith. sign in

REVIEW

IFTTT vs. Zapier: A Comparative Study of Trigger-Action Programming Frameworks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.02788 v1 pith:MLMGIXEB submitted 2017-09-08 cs.CR

IFTTT vs. Zapier: A Comparative Study of Trigger-Action Programming Frameworks

classification cs.CR
keywords frameworkstrigger-actionchannelsiftttacrossactionsapiscomparative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The growing popularity of online services and IoT platforms along with increased developer's access to devices and services through RESTful APIs is giving rise to a new class of frameworks that support trigger-action programming. These frameworks provide an interface for end-users to bridge different RESTful APIs in a trigger-action model and easily create automated tasks across diverse platforms. Past work has characterized the space of user-created trigger-action combinations in the context of IFTTT, a popular trigger-action framework. In this work, we characterize the space of possible functionality that such frameworks open up to end-users in the context of two major frameworks -IFTTT and Zapier- and discuss results from our comparative analysis of these frameworks. We create a snapshot of 6406 triggers and actions from 1051 channels/apps across these two frameworks and compare the available functions, distribution of channels, and functions shared between them. We examine user's ability to define their own channels, triggers, and actions; analyze the growth of these frameworks; and discuss future research opportunities in this domain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.