Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Can Large Language Models Help Multimodal Language Analysis? MMLA: A Comprehensive Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.16427 v2 pith:MNPWOZD7 submitted 2025-04-23 cs.CL cs.AIcs.MM

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.MM
keywords languagemultimodalmmlamodelsanalysislargemllmssemantics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal language analysis is a rapidly evolving field that leverages multiple modalities to enhance the understanding of high-level semantics underlying human conversational utterances. Despite its significance, little research has investigated the capability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to comprehend cognitive-level semantics. In this paper, we introduce MMLA, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to address this gap. MMLA comprises over 61K multimodal utterances drawn from both staged and real-world scenarios, covering six core dimensions of multimodal semantics: intent, emotion, dialogue act, sentiment, speaking style, and communication behavior. We evaluate eight mainstream branches of LLMs and MLLMs using three methods: zero-shot inference, supervised fine-tuning, and instruction tuning. Extensive experiments reveal that even fine-tuned models achieve only about 60%~70% accuracy, underscoring the limitations of current MLLMs in understanding complex human language. We believe that MMLA will serve as a solid foundation for exploring the potential of large language models in multimodal language analysis and provide valuable resources to advance this field. The datasets and code are open-sourced at https://github.com/thuiar/MMLA.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. COSI-Lab: Conference Living Lab for Modeling Multi-Perspective Multimodal Social Intention

    cs.HC 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    COSI-Lab is a weakly scripted conference-workshop dataset with multi-perspective apparent-intent annotations, self-reported goals, and benchmarks for social intention inference and conversation group detection.

  2. Multimodal Large Language Models for End-to-End Affective Computing: Benchmarking and Boosting with Generative Knowledge Prompting

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Benchmarks seven open-source audio-video-text MLLMs on six affective datasets and shows a generative-knowledge prompting step improves fine-tuned emotion recognition.

Pith tools