Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Why Do Animals Need Shaping? A Theory of Task Composition and Curriculum Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18361 v2 pith:MNXKZQL4 submitted 2024-02-28 q-bio.NC cond-mat.dis-nn

classification q-bio.NCcond-mat.dis-nn
keywords learningshapingtasktaskscompositionalprimitivescomplextheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Diverse studies in systems neuroscience begin with extended periods of curriculum training known as `shaping' procedures. These involve progressively studying component parts of more complex tasks, and can make the difference between learning a task quickly, slowly or not at all. Despite the importance of shaping to the acquisition of complex tasks, there is as yet no theory that can help guide the design of shaping procedures, or more fundamentally, provide insight into its key role in learning. Modern deep reinforcement learning systems might implicitly learn compositional primitives within their multilayer policy networks. Inspired by these models, we propose and analyse a model of deep policy gradient learning of simple compositional reinforcement learning tasks. Using the tools of statistical physics, we solve for exact learning dynamics and characterise different learning strategies including primitives pre-training, in which task primitives are studied individually before learning compositional tasks. We find a complex interplay between task complexity and the efficacy of shaping strategies. Overall, our theory provides an analytical understanding of the benefits of shaping in a class of compositional tasks and a quantitative account of how training protocols can disclose useful task primitives, ultimately yielding faster and more robust learning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Influence Dynamics and Stagewise Data Attribution

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Using Bayesian influence functions and singular learning theory, the authors show that a sample's influence on a model varies non-monotonically over training, peaking and flipping sign at phase transitions.

  2. Pretraining Curricula Enable Selective Fine-tuning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Imbalanced pretraining curricula disentangle task circuits in transformers, improving in-context learning and the selectivity of refusal fine-tuning relative to balanced training.

  3. Distinct Computations Emerge From Compositional Curricula in In-Context Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    When transformer models see easy component examples before a harder combined math problem in one prompt, they solve unseen versions of the combined problem and store intermediate steps internally, unlike models traine...

Pith tools