REVIEW 3 cited by
Why Do Animals Need Shaping? A Theory of Task Composition and Curriculum Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Diverse studies in systems neuroscience begin with extended periods of curriculum training known as `shaping' procedures. These involve progressively studying component parts of more complex tasks, and can make the difference between learning a task quickly, slowly or not at all. Despite the importance of shaping to the acquisition of complex tasks, there is as yet no theory that can help guide the design of shaping procedures, or more fundamentally, provide insight into its key role in learning. Modern deep reinforcement learning systems might implicitly learn compositional primitives within their multilayer policy networks. Inspired by these models, we propose and analyse a model of deep policy gradient learning of simple compositional reinforcement learning tasks. Using the tools of statistical physics, we solve for exact learning dynamics and characterise different learning strategies including primitives pre-training, in which task primitives are studied individually before learning compositional tasks. We find a complex interplay between task complexity and the efficacy of shaping strategies. Overall, our theory provides an analytical understanding of the benefits of shaping in a class of compositional tasks and a quantitative account of how training protocols can disclose useful task primitives, ultimately yielding faster and more robust learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Influence Dynamics and Stagewise Data Attribution
Using Bayesian influence functions and singular learning theory, the authors show that a sample's influence on a model varies non-monotonically over training, peaking and flipping sign at phase transitions.
-
Pretraining Curricula Enable Selective Fine-tuning
Imbalanced pretraining curricula disentangle task circuits in transformers, improving in-context learning and the selectivity of refusal fine-tuning relative to balanced training.
-
Distinct Computations Emerge From Compositional Curricula in In-Context Learning
When transformer models see easy component examples before a harder combined math problem in one prompt, they solve unseen versions of the combined problem and store intermediate steps internally, unlike models traine...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.