Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifier

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14873 v3 pith:MO36FEFL submitted 2024-02-21 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords textpangramdomainsmodelswritingclassifierlanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present Pangram Text, a transformer-based neural network trained to distinguish text written by large language models from text written by humans. Pangram Text outperforms zero-shot methods such as DetectGPT as well as leading commercial AI detection tools with over 38 times lower error rates on a comprehensive benchmark comprised of 10 text domains (student writing, creative writing, scientific writing, books, encyclopedias, news, email, scientific papers, short-form Q&A) and 8 open- and closed-source large language models. We propose a training algorithm, hard negative mining with synthetic mirrors, that enables our classifier to achieve orders of magnitude lower false positive rates on high-data domains such as reviews. Finally, we show that Pangram Text is not biased against nonnative English speakers and generalizes to domains and models unseen during training.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fiction

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    StoryScope extracts narrative features showing AI stories favor tidy plots and over-explain themes while human stories show more moral ambiguity and temporal complexity, enabling strong detection and attribution.

  2. Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI

    econ.GN 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Off-the-shelf generative AI access raises student knowledge-test scores by 0.27 SD immediately and one week later, with delayed unaided essay gains concentrated among students who use AI to explain concepts rather tha...

  3. Pangram 4 Technical Report

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Pangram 4 is a commercial MoE-based detector claiming 0.9916 AUROC, 0.0041% FPR, 0.3396% FNR, plus tokenwise human/AI-assisted/AI-generated labels and humanizer detection.

  4. Team DACTYL at PAN 2026: Bayesian Data Mixing and Empirical X-risk Minimization for AI-text Detection

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Bayesian-uncertainty text filter, partial-AUROC training, and MCGrad calibration produce the second-ranked AI-text detector (0.974 mean score) on the PAN 2026 leaderboard.

Pith tools