Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 84 references

Spacetime duality between sequential and measurement-feedback circuits

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A broad class of sequential and measurement-feedback circuits are the same computation after a spacetime rotation.

desk verdict Solid 1D GHZ example and useful protocols; the broad two-way duality needs a self-contained proof of the imported structure theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12523 v1 pith:MOKKATWH submitted 2025-07-16 quant-ph cond-mat.str-elhep-th

Tsung-Cheng Lu , Sarang Gopalakrishnan , Yizhi You This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords spacetimedualitysequentialunitarycircuitsmeasurement-feedbackKramers-WanniersymmetrygaugingGHZstatetoriccodemeasurement-inducedlong-rangeorder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Preparing long-range entangled states usually requires either deep circuits or measurements with feedback. This paper argues that these two strategies are often the same strategy viewed after swapping space and time: a linear-depth sequential unitary circuit rotates into a constant-depth circuit that prepares Bell pairs, applies local gates, and measures a subset of qubits, with feedback correcting the outcomes. The central example shows the non-invertible Kramers-Wannier duality implemented by a sequential circuit rotating into a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry-gauging measurement-feedback circuit that produces the same GHZ state. The same dictionary is applied to 2D GHZ states, toric-code topological order, and fractal symmetry-breaking states, and is used to design constant-qubit protocols for measuring disorder operators and detecting measurement-induced long-range order.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the spacetime rotation of the circuit diagram. A sequential circuit is first rearranged with SWAP gates so that a single qubit's worldline winds through every other qubit; rotating the diagram turns that worldline into a spatial chain of Bell pairs, and the sequential two-body gates become a depth-one layer of local $Q$ gates. The $Q$ gate can be computed as a partial transpose of the original controlled gate, and it stays unitary when the original gate is a controlled unitary followed by SWAP. This machinery converts circuit depth into spatial ancillas, and it turns the KW duality's operator mapping into the stabilizer and gauge-symmetry structure of a gauged system, which is what permits feedback to replace postselection.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to search for a state preparable by a constant-depth measurement-feedback circuit whose local tensor obeys the measurement-feedback symmetry but cannot be factored as an isometry followed by a Clifford unitary; the first such tensor would break the reverse half of the claimed duality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that the worldline of the bond qubit in a sequential unitary circuit becomes a layer of Bell pairs when the circuit diagram is rotated by ninety degrees, so the sequential depth of the original circuit becomes a constant-depth network of local $Q$ gates followed by projections. The projection can be read as Pauli-$X$ measurement plus feedback, because the unrotated circuit has a gauge symmetry that lets unwanted measurement outcomes be corrected. The rotated $Q$ gate is obtained from the original controlled-unitary gate by a partial transpose, and for the GHZ circuit the controlled-SWAP structure keeps the rotated gate unitary. In one dimension the KW operator mapping $X_i \to Z_iZ_{i+1}$ becomes a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ Gauss-law stabilizer, so the same underlying circuit implements a non-invertible duality in one frame and symmetry gauging in the other. For the reverse direction the paper invokes a tensor-network structure theorem: a local tensor with measurement-feedback symmetry can be re-read as a sequential unitary circuit after a spacetime rotation.

Load-bearing premise

The two-way version of the claim rests on two imported steps: the theorem that every measurement-feedback-symmetric tensor factors as an isometry followed by a Clifford unitary, and the assertion that any non-unitary gate produced by the rotation can be implemented with ancilla Bell pairs and Bell projection.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Non-invertible duality transformations in sequential circuits and symmetry gauging in shallow circuits are two views of the same circuit, so results about one transfer to the other.
  • Any state with an MF-symmetric tensor representation is preparable by both a constant-depth measurement-feedback circuit and a sequential unitary circuit, not just stabilizer fixed points.
  • Disorder operators, which diagnose the absence of spontaneous symmetry breaking, can be probed using only a constant number of qubits through the dual circuit.
  • Measurement-induced long-range order can be detected without postselection and is a lower bound for strange correlators, providing a practical diagnostic for symmetry-protected topological order.
  • The dictionary is explicitly worked out for 1D GHZ states, 2D GHZ states, toric-code topological order, and fractal symmetry-breaking states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the duality is as general as claimed, the trade-off between circuit depth and measurement or ancilla overhead becomes an exact resource equivalence for any state carrying the relevant tensor symmetry, turning depth lower bounds into measurement-resource lower bounds.
  • Editorial inference: the KW-to-gauging correspondence suggests the dictionary should extend beyond $\mathbb{Z}_2$ to higher-form and subsystem symmetries; the fractal example is a step in that direction, but a general symmetry-categorical statement is not made in the paper.
  • Editorial inference: because the feedback is deterministic, the constant-qubit protocols for disorder operators and measurement-induced long-range order could be repeated without postselection overhead, making them natural companions to shadow-estimation routines on current hardware.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a broad class of sequential unitary (SU) circuits and constant-depth measurement-feedback (MF) circuits are dual to each other under a spacetime rotation, with the concrete exemplar that a linear-depth SU circuit implementing the non-invertible Kramers-Wannier duality for the 1D GHZ state rotates into a constant-depth MF circuit implementing symmetry gauging that prepares the same GHZ state. The paper also extends the construction to 2D GHZ states, toric-code topological order, and fractal symmetry-breaking states, and proposes experimental protocols for measuring disorder operators and measurement-induced long-range order using a constant number of qubits. The explicit 1D GHZ mapping is derived gate-by-gate and appears internally coherent.

Significance. If fully established, the proposed spacetime duality would unify two seemingly distinct state-preparation paradigms and provide a useful dictionary between non-invertible duality transformations and symmetry-gauging operations. The paper's strengths are its explicit diagrammatic derivations for the stabilizer fixed-point examples, the absence of fitted parameters, and the concrete, testable measurement protocols that require only a constant number of qubits. However, the claimed two-way duality for a 'broad class' of circuits is not established at the same level of rigor: it depends on the structure theorem of Ref. [28] and on an appendix-level construction for non-unitary Q gates, both of which are imported or deferred rather than proved in the main text. The correct scope of the central claim is therefore still conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II F, Eq. (17)–(18)] The two-way duality is made to rest on the structure theorem of Ref. [28], which asserts that any tensor obeying the measurement-feedback symmetry (Eq. 17) factors as an isometry V followed by a Clifford unitary Uc (Eq. 18). This theorem is neither proved nor stated with its precise hypotheses. The theorem is then applied to the deformed GHZ state |ψ(β)⟩ (final paragraph of §II F) to claim the existence of a corresponding SU circuit for generic β. Because Eq. 17 is written with Pauli defects and Eq. 18 requires a Clifford unitary factor, it is not demonstrated that non-stabilizer tensors such as those representing |ψ(β)⟩ satisfy the conditions. Please either include a proof of the structure theorem, state its exact hypotheses and verify them for the deformed GHZ tensor, or explicitly restrict the two-way duality claim to the cases in which the theorem is shown to apply.
  2. [§II C and Appendix B] For a general sequential unitary circuit, the spacetime-rotated Q gate is non-unitary, and the paper states that it can be physically implemented by introducing ancilla Bell pairs followed by Bell projection, referring to Appendix B. This construction is load-bearing for the SU-to-MF direction beyond the controlled-SWAP examples, but it is not presented in the main text and the appendix is not available in the manuscript under review. The paper should include the explicit implementation and state whether the resulting protocol is deterministic or post-selected. If Bell projection requires postselection, the dual object is a postselected shallow circuit rather than a measurement-feedback circuit, and the terminology should be adjusted accordingly.
  3. [§II F, Eq. (20) and §III] The reverse direction from MF to SU is shown only through diagrammatic rearrangement (Eq. 20) and the 1D discussion, with higher dimensions deferred to Appendix C. In particular, the case with a nontrivial isometry V in Eq. 18—where the bond dimension exceeds the physical dimension—is not translated explicitly into a sequential unitary circuit, and the spatial overhead of the two-way mapping is not quantified. Since the broad claim includes such cases, the reverse mapping should be made explicit and any restrictions on bond dimension or tensor injectivity should be stated.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§II F] The name 'Kramer-Wannier' appears in the first paragraph of §II F; it should be 'Kramers-Wannier'.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption and §II B] The typeset string 'SW AP' should read 'SWAP' throughout the figure captions and text; likewise, the notation for the tilde-N qubit count in Eq. (3) and its surrounding discussion should be defined consistently.
  3. [§II E, Eq. (12)–(13)] The gauge-symmetry argument states that a string of X operators on matter fields cleans out Z defects on gauge fields, but the text does not specify the order of the feedback unitaries relative to the measurement of all gauge fields; a brief timing diagram or clarified ordering would make the protocol unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the SU→MF equivalence is an explicit spacetime relabeling of the same circuit, and the reverse direction rests on an imported structure theorem rather than on a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The central GHZ example is self-contained: Eq. (3) rewrites the GHZ-preparing sequential circuit as a single-worldline circuit, Eq. (7) gives the spacetime-rotated Q gate, and Eqs. (10)–(13) verify the cluster-state/GHZ output from the KW operator relations and Bell-pair constraints. This is a diagrammatic spacetime rearrangement, not a fit against data and not a definition of the target state in terms of the claimed result. The reverse direction (MF→SU) in Sec. II F is not derived in the main text; it invokes the MF-symmetry structure theorem from Ref. [28] (Eq. 18), which factors a symmetric tensor as an isometry followed by a Clifford unitary, and then uses that factorization to reinterpret an MF circuit as a sequential circuit. Importing an external theorem is a proof dependency, and if Refs. [28,29] are self-citations it would need independent scrutiny, but it is not an equation that reduces by construction to its own conclusion. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the paper explicitly acknowledges that the SU→MF protocol for the GHZ state is 'simply a rearrangement of a circuit diagram.' Therefore no circular step is exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted numerical parameters and no new physical entities. Its load-bearing assumptions are tensor-network correspondences, dual-unitarity of the gate family, the partial-transpose Bell-projection implementation, and the MF-symmetry structure theorem imported from Ref. [28].

assumptions (4)
  • standard math MPS-to-PEPS correspondence: any sequential circuit output is an MPS, which can be viewed as a spatial slice of a PEPS.
    Invoked in Sec. II A to justify rearranging the sequential circuit into a shallow postselected circuit; standard tensor-network fact.
  • domain assumption Dual-unitarity of a controlled gate followed by a SWAP gate.
    Used in Sec. II C around Eq. (6) to ensure the spacetime-rotated Q gate is unitary; asserted for this gate family rather than proven generally.
  • domain assumption Partial transpose of a unitary can be physically implemented with ancilla Bell pairs and Bell projection.
    Used in Sec. II C (Appendix B) to handle non-dual-unitary Q gates; this is the load-bearing implementation step for general SU circuits.
  • domain assumption MF-symmetry structure theorem of Ref. [28]: a tensor satisfying measurement-feedback symmetry factorizes as an isometry V and a Clifford unitary Uc.
    Used in Sec. II F to convert MF circuits back into sequential circuits; imported from prior work without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spacetime duality between sequential and measurement-feedback circuits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MOKKATWH

@misc{pith2026250712523,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spacetime duality between sequential and measurement-feedback circuits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MOKKATWH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12523}
}
abstract

Two prevalent approaches for preparing long-range entangled quantum states are (i) linear-depth sequential unitary (SU) circuits, which apply local unitary gates sequentially, and (ii) constant-depth measurement-feedback (MF) circuits, which employ mid-circuit measurements and conditional feedback based on measurement outcomes. Here, we establish that a broad class of SU and MF circuits are dual to each other under a spacetime rotation. We investigate this spacetime duality in the preparation of various long-range entangled states, including GHZ states, topologically ordered states, and fractal symmetry-breaking states. As an illustration, applying a spacetime rotation to a linear-depth SU circuit that implements a non-invertible Kramers-Wannier duality, originally used to prepare a 1D GHZ state, yields a constant-depth MF circuit that implements a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry gauging map, which equivalently prepares the GHZ state. Leveraging this duality, we further propose experimental protocols that require only a constant number of qubits to measure unconventional properties of 1D many-body states. These include (i) measurement of disorder operators, which diagnose the absence of spontaneous symmetry breaking, and (ii) postselection-free detection of measurement-induced long-range order, which emerges in certain symmetry-protected topological phases. We also show that measurement-induced long-range order provides a lower bound for strange correlators, which may be of independent interest.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12523 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Left: with the addition of SWAP gates, a standard sequential circuit composed of geometrically lo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The output of the shallow dual- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Sequential preparation of the GHZ state in 2d. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) The shallow circuit obtained by space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Left panel: by exchanging the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a) A disorder operator is a string of Pauli [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: (a) The MPS tensor of the cluster state pos [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: (a) The Newman–Moore model defined on a tri Z Z Z [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Gopalakrishnan, and G. Styliaris, Charac- terizing matrix-product states and projected entangled- pair states preparable via measurement and feedback, PRX Quantum 5, 040304 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    E. H. Lieb and D. W. Robinson, The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems, Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics 28, 251 (1972)

    1972

  3. [2]

    Bravyi, M

    S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and F. Verstraete, Lieb- robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050401 (2006)

    2006

  4. [3]

    H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Persistent entangle- ment in arrays of interacting particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910 (2001)

    2001

  5. [4]

    Raussendorf, S

    R. Raussendorf, S. Bravyi, and J. Harrington, Long- range quantum entanglement in noisy cluster states, Phys. Rev. A 71, 062313 (2005)

    2005

  6. [5]

    P. W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995)

    1995

  7. [6]

    A. M. Steane, Error correcting codes in quantum theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996)

    1996

  8. [7]

    Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection, arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/9705052 (1997)

    D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error cor- rection, arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/9705052 (1997)

    arXiv 1997

Show all 84 references
  1. [8]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics 303, 2 (2003)

    2003

  2. [9]

    Dennis, A

    E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, 22 Topological quantum memory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 43, 4452–4505 (2002)

    2002

  3. [10]

    Piroli, G

    L. Piroli, G. Styliaris, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum circuits assisted by local operations and classical communication: Transformations and phases of matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 220503 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Long-range entanglement from measuring symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. X14, 021040 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Bravyi, I

    S. Bravyi, I. Kim, A. Kliesch, and R. Koenig, Adap- tive constant-depth circuits for manipulating non-abelian anyons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01933 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    T.-C. Lu, L. A. Lessa, I. H. Kim, and T. H. Hsieh, Mea- surement as a shortcut to long-range entangled quantum matter, PRX Quantum 3, 040337 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    Verresen, N

    R. Verresen, N. Tantivasadakarn, and A. Vishwanath, Ef- ficiently preparing Schr¨ odinger’s cat, fractons and non- abelian topological order in quantum devices, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03061 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Tantivasadakarn, A

    N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Hierarchy of topological order from finite-depth unitaries, measurement, and feedforward, PRX Quantum4, 020339 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Verresen, and A. Vishwanath, Shortest route to non-abelian topological order on a quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 060405 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    Iqbal, N

    M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Verresen, S. L. Camp- bell, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, J. Jo- hansen, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, A. Ransford, M. Rowe, P. Siegfried, R. P. Stutz, M. Foss-Feig, A. Vish- wanath, and H. Dreyer, Non-abelian topological orde...

    2024

  11. [18]

    Foss-Feig, A

    M. Foss-Feig, A. Tikku, T.-C. Lu, K. Mayer, M. Iqbal, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, et al., Experimental demonstration of the advantage of adaptive quantum circuits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03029 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Iqbal, N

    M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, N. Hewitt, C. V. Horst, M. Matheny, T. Mengle, B. Neyenhuis, A. Vishwanath, M. Foss-Feig, R. Verresen, and H. Dreyer, Topological order from measurements and feed-forward on a trapped...

    2024

  13. [20]

    K. J. Satzinger, Y.-J. Liu, A. Smith, C. Knapp, M. Newman, C. Jones, Z. Chen, C. Quintana, X. Mi, A. Dunsworth, C. Gidney, I. Aleiner, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Bue...

    2021

  14. [21]

    Y. Li, H. Sukeno, A. P. Mana, H. P. Nautrup, and T.-C. Wei, Symmetry-enriched topological order from partially gauging symmetry-protected topologically ordered states assisted by measurements, Phys. Rev. B 108, 115144 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    T.-C. Lu, Z. Zhang, S. Vijay, and T. H. Hsieh, Mixed- state long-range order and criticality from measurement and feedback, PRX Quantum 4, 030318 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    Buhrman, M

    H. Buhrman, M. Folkertsma, B. Loff, and N. M. P. Neu- mann, State preparation by shallow circuits using feed forward, Quantum 8, 1552 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    Piroli, G

    L. Piroli, G. Styliaris, and J. I. Cirac, Approximating many-body quantum states with quantum circuits and measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 230401 (2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    D. T. Stephen and O. Hart, Preparing matrix prod- uct states via fusion: Constraints and extensions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16360 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    Sahay and R

    R. Sahay and R. Verresen, Finite-depth preparation of tensor network states from measurement, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17087 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    K. C. Smith, A. Khan, B. K. Clark, S. Girvin, and T.- C. Wei, Constant-depth preparation of matrix product states with adaptive quantum circuits, PRX Quantum 5, 030344 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Sahay and R

    R. Sahay and R. Verresen, Classifying one-dimensional quantum states prepared by a single round of measure- ments, PRX Quantum 6, 010329 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Sch¨ on, E

    C. Sch¨ on, E. Solano, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, and M. M. Wolf, Sequential generation of entangled multi- qubit states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 110503 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    Sch¨ on, K

    C. Sch¨ on, K. Hammerer, M. M. Wolf, J. I. Cirac, and E. Solano, Sequential generation of matrix-product states in cavity qed, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032311 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Anikeeva, I

    G. Anikeeva, I. H. Kim, and P. Hayden, Recycling qubits in near-term quantum computers, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042613 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Pichler, S

    H. Pichler, S. Choi, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Uni- versal photonic quantum computation via time-delayed feedback, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 114, 11362 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Foss-Feig, D

    M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, and A. C. Potter, Holographic quantum algorithms for simulating corre- lated spin systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033002 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Anand, J

    S. Anand, J. Hauschild, Y. Zhang, A. C. Potter, and M. P. Zaletel, Holographic quantum simulation of en- tanglement renormalization circuits, PRX Quantum 4, 030334 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Gopalakrishnan, Push-down automata as sequential generators of highly entangled states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 58, 055301 (2025)

    S. Gopalakrishnan, Push-down automata as sequential generators of highly entangled states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 58, 055301 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    X. Chen, A. Dua, M. Hermele, D. T. Stephen, N. Tan- tivasadakarn, R. Vanhove, and J.-Y. Zhao, Sequential quantum circuits as maps between gapped phases, Phys. 23 Rev. B 109, 075116 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    X. Chen, M. Hermele, and D. T. Stephen, Sequential adiabatic generation of chiral topological states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03433 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and em- anant symmetries, SciPost Phys. 16, 064 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Tantivasadakarn and X

    N. Tantivasadakarn and X. Chen, String operators for cheshire strings in topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165149 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Vanhove, V

    R. Vanhove, V. Ravindran, D. T. Stephen, X.-G. Wen, and X. Chen, Duality via sequential quantum circuit in the topological holography formalism, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06647 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    P. Chen, B. Yan, and S. X. Cui, Quantum circuits for toric code and X-cube fracton model, Quantum 8, 1276 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Hu, M.-Y

    Y.-T. Hu, M.-Y. Li, and P. Ye, Preparing tetra-digit long- range entangled states via unified sequential quantum cir- cuit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05374 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Akila, D

    M. Akila, D. Waltner, B. Gutkin, and T. Guhr, Particle- time duality in the kicked Ising spin chain, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 375101 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact spectral form factor in a minimal model of many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 264101 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Entanglement spread- ing in a minimal model of maximal many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021033 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact correlation func- tions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 210601 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Piroli, B

    L. Piroli, B. Bertini, J. I. Cirac, and T. Prosen, Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 094304 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Klobas and B

    K. Klobas and B. Bertini, Entanglement dynamics in Rule 54: Exact results and quasiparticle picture, SciPost Phys. 11, 107 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Spectral Lya- punov exponents in chaotic and localized many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 023118 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    S. J. Garratt and J. T. Chalker, Local pairing of Feynman histories in many-body Floquet models, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021051 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    S. J. Garratt and J. T. Chalker, Many-body delocaliza- tion as symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 026802 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Ippoliti and V

    M. Ippoliti and V. Khemani, Postselection-free entangle- ment dynamics via spacetime duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 060501 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Lu and T

    T.-C. Lu and T. Grover, Spacetime duality between local- ization transitions and measurement-induced transitions, PRX Quantum 2, 040319 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Ippoliti, T

    M. Ippoliti, T. Rakovszky, and V. Khemani, Fractal, log- arithmic, and volume-law entangled nonthermal steady states via spacetime duality, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011045 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Kos and G

    P. Kos and G. Styliaris, Circuits of space and time quan- tum channels, Quantum 7, 1020 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Overcoming the entanglement barrier in quantum many-body dynam- ics via space-time duality, Phys. Rev. B 107, L060305 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Calabrese, M. Collura, K. Klobas, and C. Rylands, Nonequilibrium full counting statistics and symmetry-resolved entanglement from space-time dual- ity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 140401 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Liu and W

    C. Liu and W. W. Ho, Solvable entanglement dynamics in quantum circuits with generalized space-time duality, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012011 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. W. Claeys, and T. Prosen, Exactly solv- able many-body dynamics from space-time duality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11489 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    D. T. Stephen, W. W. Ho, T.-C. Wei, R. Raussendorf, and R. Verresen, Universal measurement-based quantum computation in a one-dimensional architecture enabled by dual-unitary circuits, Physical Review Letters 132, 250601 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Zhang, P

    B. Zhang, P. Xu, X. Chen, and Q. Zhuang, Holographic deep thermalization: theory and experimentation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03587 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: Tasi lectures on non-invertible symmetries, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00747 (2023)

    S.-H. Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: Tasi lectures on non-invertible symmetries, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00747 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Seiberg, S

    N. Seiberg, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor prod- uct Hilbert space, SciPost Phys. 16, 154 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    W. W. Ho and T. H. Hsieh, Efficient variational simula- tion of non-trivial quantum states, SciPost Phys. 6, 029 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    W. Son, L. Amico, and V. Vedral, Topological order in 1d cluster state protected by symmetry, Quantum Infor- mation Processing 11, 1961 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    Verresen, U

    R. Verresen, U. Borla, A. Vishwanath, S. Moroz, and R. Thorngren, Higgs condensates are symmetry- protected topological phases: I. discrete symmetries, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01376 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Fradkin, Disorder operators and their descendants, Journal of Statistical Physics 167, 427 (2017)

    E. Fradkin, Disorder operators and their descendants, Journal of Statistical Physics 167, 427 (2017)

    2017

  62. [70]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B 83, 035107 (2011)

    2011

  63. [71]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Complete classifica- tion of one-dimensional gapped quantum phases in inter- acting spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235128 (2011)

    2011

  64. [72]

    Y.-Z. You, Z. Bi, A. Rasmussen, K. Slagle, and C. Xu, Wave function and strange correlator of short-range en- tangled states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 247202 (2014)

    2014

  65. [73]

    J. Y. Lee, W. Ji, Z. Bi, and M. Fisher, Decoding measurement-prepared quantum phases and transitions: from ising model to gauge theory, and beyond, arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.11699 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  66. [74]

    E. H. Chen, G.-Y. Zhu, R. Verresen, A. Seif, E. B¨ aumer, D. Layden, N. Tantivasadakarn, G. Zhu, S. Sheldon, A. Vishwanath, S. Trebst, and A. Kandala, Nishimori transition across the error threshold for constant-depth quantum circuits, Nature Physics 21, 161 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    G.-Y. Zhu, N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath, S. Trebst, and R. Verresen, Nishimori’s cat: Stable long- range entanglement from finite-depth unitaries and weak measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 200201 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    Z.-Y. Wei, D. Malz, and J. I. Cirac, Sequential generation of projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010607 (2022). 24

    2022

  69. [77]

    Kawabata, R

    K. Kawabata, R. Sohal, and S. Ryu, Lieb-schultz-mattis theorem in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 070402 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    P. Sala, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Oshikawa, and Y. You, Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.02402 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Strong-to-weak spontaneous symme- try breaking in mixed quantum states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.03639 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Haller, W.-T

    L. Haller, W.-T. Xu, Y.-J. Liu, and F. Pollmann, Quan- tum phase transition between symmetry enriched topo- logical phases in tensor-network states, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043078 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Y.-J. Liu, K. Shtengel, and F. Pollmann, Simulating two- dimensional topological quantum phase transitions on a digital quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043256 (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    M. E. J. Newman and C. Moore, Glassy dynamics and aging in an exactly solvable spin model, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5068 (1999)

    1999

  75. [83]

    Devakul, Y

    T. Devakul, Y. You, F. J. Burnell, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractal Symmetric Phases of Matter, SciPost Phys. 6, 007 (2019)

    2019

  76. [84]

    Zhou, X.-F

    Z. Zhou, X.-F. Zhang, F. Pollmann, and Y. You, Frac- tal quantum phase transitions: Critical phenomena be- yond renormalization, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.05851 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.