Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 59 references

Measured backgrounds at the Bedretto tunnel show it can host next-generation underground experiments.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 15:58 UTC pith:MPA5UVLH

load-bearing objection Useful first characterization of Bedretto; direct muon, seismic, and magnetic data are convincing, but the fast-neutron flux is assumed to match LSM and that assumption is load-bearing. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.14815 v2 pith:MPA5UVLH submitted 2025-12-16 astro-ph.IM hep-ex

Characterisation of the Bedretto Underground Site for Fundamental Physics Experiments

Bj\"orn Penning , Nicolas Angelides , Laura Baudis , Harvey Birch , Abigail Flowers , Florian J\"org , Alexander Kavner , Marcelle Soares-Santos
show 28 more authors
Aravind Sreekala Johannes W\"uthrich Guandi Zhao Chiara Capelli John Clinton Jose Cuenca Garc\'ia Paolo Crivelli Domenico Giardini Evangelos-Leonidas Gkougkousis Yacine Haddad Marian Hertrich Rebecca Hochreutener Luisa H\"otzsch Philippe Jetzer Ben Kilminster Boris Korzh Frederick Massin Knut Dundas Mor{\aa} Margherita Noia Francesco Piastra Christian Regenfus Federico Sanchez Steven Schramm Francesco Riva Serhan Tufanli Michele Weber Stefan Wiemer Mathilde Wimez
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IM hep-ex
keywords underground laboratorymuon fluxgamma-ray backgroundneutron fluxradonseismic noisemagnetic backgroundatom interferometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper attempts to establish that the Bedretto tunnel in Ticino, at a site called TM3500, has the environmental qualities needed for a deep-underground laboratory for fundamental physics. The authors measure the main backgrounds that matter for rare-event searches and atom-interferometric gravitational-wave detectors: cosmic muons, gamma rays, neutrons, radon, magnetic noise, and seismic vibrations. Their numbers — a muon flux about a million times lower than at the surface, a magnetic noise floor near 15 pT/√Hz, and seismic noise two orders of magnitude below the target for next-generation atom interferometers — put the site on par with established European underground labs once standard shotcrete and radon shielding are added. If the characterisation holds, the site could quickly host a roughly 100 m² low-background R&D laboratory with horizontal access.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the TM3500 site in the Bedretto tunnel is a competitive deep-underground location, with an effective depth of about 4000 metre water equivalent. The measured muon flux is (2.54±0.97)×10⁻⁸ µ/s/cm², consistent with simulations; the thermal neutron flux is (5.56±0.26)×10⁻⁵ n/cm²/s; the magnetic white-noise floor is about 15 pT/√Hz; and the seismic acceleration stays two orders of magnitude below the target for next-generation atom-interferometric gravitational-wave detectors. With standard laboratory outfitting — 15 cm of shotcrete, ventilation, and radon barriers — the authors project that gamma and neutron backgrounds will match or beat those of established d

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the measurement campaign itself: a four-panel EJ-200 plastic scintillator telescope for muons, a 3He proportional counter (bare and moderated) for neutrons, an NaI(Tl) detector for gamma mapping, a RAD7 monitor for radon, a Bartington Mag-13 fluxgate magnetometer for magnetic fields, and permanent seismometers. These instruments produce the background field that determines the site's qualifications; the analysis also uses MCNPX-PoliMi and Geant4 simulations to translate bare-rock measurements to post-outfitting backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The fast-neutron flux estimate assumes the neutron energy spectrum at Bedretto is the same as at a reference deep underground laboratory in France; if the true spectrum differs, the neutron background and the required shielding would change.

What would settle it

A direct fast-neutron spectrum measurement at TM3500 using a capture-gated spectrometer that gives a flux or spectral shape markedly different from the assumed reference spectrum would invalidate the current neutron-background projection; likewise, a longer muon exposure inconsistent with (2.54±0.97)×10⁻⁸ µ/s/cm² would call the depth characterisation into question.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A roughly 100 m² low-background R&D laboratory could be built at TM3500 in the existing tunnel, with horizontal access and the ability to move loads up to 18 t.
  • After 15 cm of shotcrete and a radon barrier, gamma and neutron backgrounds are projected to match or fall below those of established deep underground laboratories, enabling competitive rare-event searches.
  • The measured muon flux, about a million times below the surface, sits between two of Europe's deepest labs, so muon-induced spallation backgrounds are acceptable for dark-matter and double-beta experiments.
  • Seismic noise two orders below the atom-interferometer criterion makes Bedretto a candidate site for a long-baseline quantum gravitational-wave detector.
  • Radon levels fluctuate with forced ventilation and train-induced pressure changes, so a targeted air supply can keep the concentration low.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fast-neutron spectrum differs from the assumed reference spectrum taken from a French deep underground laboratory, the neutron background and the shielding design could change; the planned capture-gated spectroscopy campaign would settle this.
  • The strong 16.7 Hz magnetic line from the adjacent railway suggests that quantum sensors could schedule data taking during night hours or add active compensation, improving on the already-low magnetic floor.
  • The observed disequilibrium in the uranium decay chain (radium leaching) implies that gamma-background models for the rock should not assume secular equilibrium, which could affect material-screening assumptions for nearby detectors.
  • Because the site has horizontal access and is close to major research cities, smaller university-led R&D projects could realistically operate deep underground, possibly accelerating prototyping for larger experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports a characterization of the Bedretto tunnel (Switzerland) at the TM3500 site, measuring cosmic muon flux, gamma-ray rate and granite activities, thermal and fast neutron fluxes, radon concentration, magnetic-field spectral density, and seismic noise. The authors find a muon flux of (2.54 +/- 0.97) x 10^-8 mu/s/cm2, a thermal neutron flux of (5.56 +/- 0.26) x 10^-5 n/cm2/s, a magnetic noise floor around 15 pT/sqrt(Hz), and seismic noise two orders of magnitude below the MAGIS-100 criterion. On this basis they argue that, after standard shotcrete, ventilation, and radon-barrier outfitting, TM3500 could be a highly competitive European deep-underground laboratory for rare-event searches and atom-interferometric gravitational-wave detectors.

Significance. If the measurements hold, this is a useful and transparent site-characterization paper. The direct measurements of muon, gamma-ray, seismic, magnetic, and radon backgrounds are exactly what the community needs for planning future experiments. The authors quote statistical and systematic uncertainties, cross-check the muon flux with MUSIC/MUSUN, and explicitly flag the main assumptions. The muon suppression and the seismic quietness are the two strongest results. The main caveat is the fast-neutron flux, which is not measured but assumed spectrally identical to LSM; this weakens the post-outfitting background claim. In addition, the absolute muon calibration depends on an external surface-flux reference and on only 8 underground events, although the order-of-magnitude suppression is robust. The paper is primarily of practical value for facility planning rather than a new physics result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2 and Section 8] The fast-neutron flux of (6.3 +/- 0.5) x 10^-5 n/cm2/s is not a direct measurement: the moderated 3He capture rate is converted using MCNPX-Polimi under the explicit assumption that the Bedretto neutron spectrum is identical to that of LSM. A 3He counter is mainly thermal-sensitive, so the inferred fast flux depends strongly on the assumed spectral shape. Given the high measured 238U and 232Th activities in Bedretto granite (77 and 84 Bq/kg at TM3500), the (alpha,n) and spontaneous-fission spectrum may differ from LSM by a factor of several, far exceeding the quoted systematic uncertainty. Since Section 8 uses this number to claim that shotcrete will bring ionizing backgrounds 'comparable or lower' than established laboratories, this assumption is load-bearing. I recommend either providing a sensitivity study over plausible spectral shapes or explicitly reframing the fast-neutron and pos
  2. [Sections 2.1-2.2] The absolute muon flux is based on 8 events (35.4% statistical uncertainty) and a detection efficiency of 29.6 +/- 2.0% derived by normalizing to a surface flux of 1.67 x 10^-2 cm^-2 s^-1 from Ref. [22]. The quoted total uncertainty of 38% does not include the uncertainty of that external reference, nor any possible difference between the surface and underground muon angular or energy distributions. The MUSIC/MUSUN cross-check is valuable but does not remove the calibration dependence. I ask the authors to quantify how sensitive the flux and the 'six orders of magnitude' statement are to the assumed surface flux and efficiency, or to provide a direct efficiency measurement.
  3. [Section 3.2, Table 1, footnote 2] The 226Ra break in the 238U chain is inferred from the TM2500 sample and then assumed to be identical for the TM3500 sample ('the equilibrium is assumed to have the same break'). The TM3500 238U-230Th and 226Ra-206Pb activities in Table 1 therefore carry an unquantified extrapolation over 1 km. Since these activities guide shielding design and neutron predictions, the transfer should be justified mineralogically, or the activities should be presented with a corresponding caveat or an additional sensitivity estimate.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.1] Units: the surface flux is written as '1.67 x 10^-2 mu/cm/s'; it should be muons cm^-2 s^-1. The same missing square appears in several places, including 'mu/s/cm2' in the abstract and body.
  2. [Section 6] Typo: 'Welsch's method' should be 'Welch's method', and 'hamming averaging window o 100s' should be 'of 100 s'.
  3. [Section 5] The reference to 'Fig. 3' for uranium and thorium content appears to be a cross-reference error; the relevant spectrum is Fig. 4 (the Gator HPGe spectrum), not Fig. 3 (the muon/gamma pulse-height spectrum).
  4. [Section 3.1] 'T2500' should be 'TM2500'.
  5. [Section 4.2] Typo: 'the neutron energy spectrum in similar to that at LSM' should read 'is similar to that at LSM'.
  6. [Figure 2 caption] The statement 'better than almost all existing underground laboratories in Europe designated in red' is confusing because the color coding of data points is not explained in the caption; please clarify which symbols are European and what 'designated in red' means.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: site-characterization results are measured or cross-checked against external references, and the one imported neutron-spectrum assumption is explicitly disclosed.

full rationale

This paper is an empirical site-characterization campaign rather than a derivation chain. The muon flux is measured with a scintillator telescope whose efficiency is calibrated against an external surface flux (Ref. 22), and the underground result is cross-checked with MUSIC/MUSUN simulations using topographic overburden data; the target quantity is never used as its own input. The gamma-ray activities are measured at the external Gator HPGe facility, and the thermal-neutron flux is independently checked with a LiI(Eu) detector. Seismic and magnetic results are direct sensor measurements compared with externally published thresholds or noise models. The only imported modeling assumption is the fast-neutron spectral shape taken from LSM in Sec. 4.2. This is explicitly stated by the authors: “The fast neutron flux was assumed to be spectrally similar to that of Laboratoire souterrain de Modane (LSM) as reported in Reference [40]” and “This flux however relies on a fundamental assumption that the neutron energy spectrum in similar to that at LSM.” That is a disclosed model-dependent estimate, not a circular reduction: the assumed spectrum is an external input used to interpret a measured moderated capture rate, and it does not make the output equal to the input by construction. No load-bearing self-citation chain, no fitted value relabeled as a prediction, and no imported uniqueness theorem occur in the argument. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or forces. Its central claims rest on standard measurement assumptions, the most fragile being the LSM spectral-shape assumption for fast neutrons and the external surface-muon-flux calibration. All other inputs are prior laboratory comparisons or simulation codes.

free parameters (4)
  • Muon detection efficiency = 29.6±2.0%
    Determined from a surface calibration run using the expected surface muon flux of 1.67e-2 µ/cm²/s from Ref [22]; the underground muon flux scales inversely with this efficiency (Section 2.1).
  • Muon energy threshold = 3.6 MeV
    Set via a Landau-Gaussian fit to surface data to maximize muon acceptance; affects which events are counted (Section 2.1).
  • Thermal-neutron peak fraction = 59.7±2.8%
    Fraction of thermal-neutron events inside the 765 keV capture peak, determined from surface data; used to convert peak counts to flux (Section 4.1).
  • 226Ra break ratio transfer = TM3500 early/late chain activities assumed to match TM2500 break
    Footnote 2 assumes the TM2500 measured 238U-chain secular-equilibrium break at 226Ra applies to the TM3500 granite sample, affecting reported activities.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Surface muon flux reference value 1.67e-2 µ/cm²/s (Ref [22]) is representative of the surface calibration site.
    Used to compute muon detection efficiency in Section 2.1; the calibration site's altitude/location is not stated.
  • domain assumption Fast neutron energy spectrum at Bedretto matches LSM spectrum (Ref [40]).
    Section 4.2: 'The fast neutron flux was assumed to be spectrally similar to that of LSM'; directly admitted by the authors.
  • domain assumption 238U decay chain is out of secular equilibrium with the break at 226Ra due to Ra leaching, and this break is identical in TM3500 and TM2500 samples.
    Section 3.2 and footnote 2; inferred from TM2500 data and applied to TM3500 activities.
  • domain assumption 235U chain is in secular equilibrium because 223Ra (11.4 d half-life) decays before leaching.
    Section 3.2, paragraph 2.
  • domain assumption MUSIC/MUSUN and Geant4 simulations correctly model muon propagation through the measured overburden.
    Used to 'verify' the measured muon flux and to estimate effective depth (Section 2.2); relies on external simulation codes and topographic data.
  • domain assumption MCNPX-Polimi simulation of the POM moderator (57±5% reflectance/absorption) is correct.
    Used to extract fast neutron flux from the moderated counter rate (Section 4.2).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15608 in / 15856 out tokens · 156318 ms · 2026-08-03T15:58:04.736399+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Underground laboratories provide the ultra-low background and low-vibration environments essential for rare-event searches, gravitational-wave detection, and quantum-sensing technologies. We report a comprehensive environmental characterisation of the Bedretto tunnel in Ticino, Switzerland, a site offering horizontal access, excellent infrastructure, and the potential to be be Europe's second-deepest and quietest underground laboratory. At the prospective physics site, located beneath an overburden exceeding 1400 m, we measure the cosmic-muon, gamma-ray, and neutron fluxes, as well as the radon concentration, magnetic-field spectrum, and seismic backgrounds. The muon flux is suppressed by six orders of magnitude relative to the surface, consistent with an effective depth of about 4000 metre water equivalent, gamma-ray and neutron measurements reflect the local geology and guide shielding requirements for future particle and nuclear physics experiments. Magnetic and seismic noise levels are found to be exceptionally low, meeting or exceeding the criteria for next-generation atom-interferometric gravitational-wave detectors. These results establish the site as a highly competitive, accessible deep-underground location for fundamental-physics experiments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 16 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Bedretto underground laboratory for geosciences and geoenergies

    ETH Z¨ urich, “Bedretto underground laboratory for geosciences and geoenergies.” https://www.bedrettolab.ethz.ch/home/

  2. [2]

    Ma et al.,Multi-disciplinary characterizations of the BedrettoLab – a new underground geoscience research facility,Solid Earth13(2022) 301–322

    X. Ma et al.,Multi-disciplinary characterizations of the BedrettoLab – a new underground geoscience research facility,Solid Earth13(2022) 301–322

    2022

  3. [3]

    swissalti3d

    Federal Office of Topography swisstopo, “swissalti3d.” https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/height-model- swissalti3d

  4. [4]

    M. Rast, A. Galli, J. B. Ruh, M. Guillong and C. Madonna,Geology along the Bedretto tunnel: kinematic and geochronological constraints on the evolution of the Gotthard Massif (Central Alps),Swiss Journal of Geosciences115(2022) 8

    2022

  5. [5]

    DAAC(2019)

    NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and US/Japan ASTER Science Team, K,ASTER global digital elevation model V003,NASA EOSDIS Land Process. DAAC(2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Heise,The Sanford Underground Research Facility, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022.2203.08293

    J. Heise,The Sanford Underground Research Facility, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022.2203.08293

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Bruno and W

    G. Bruno and W. Fulgione,Flux measurement of fast neutrons in the Gran Sasso underground laboratory, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 747, [1905.05512]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Woodley, A

    W. Woodley, A. Fedynitch and M.-C. Piro,Cosmic ray muons in laboratories deep underground,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 063006, [2406.10339]. 9.EDEL WEISScollaboration, B. Schmidt et al., Muon-induced background in the EDEL WEISS dark matter search,Astropart. Phys.44(2013) 28–39, [1302.7112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [10]

    Zhang and D

    C. Zhang and D. M. Mei,Measuring Muon-Induced Neutrons with Liquid Scintillation Detector at Soudan Mine,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 122003, [1407.3246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [11]

    Kim and H

    Y. Kim and H. Lee,Yemilab, a new underground laboratory in Korea,AAPPS Bulletin(2024)

    2024

  11. [12]

    Robinson et al.,Measurements of muon flux at 1070 meters vertical depth in the Boulby underground laboratory,Nucl

    M. Robinson et al.,Measurements of muon flux at 1070 meters vertical depth in the Boulby underground laboratory,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A511(2003) 347–353, [hep-ex/0306014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  12. [13]

    W. H. Trzaska et al.,Cosmic-ray muon flux at Canfranc Underground Laboratory,Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 721, [1902.00868]. 14.Borexinocollaboration, M. Agostini et al., Modulations of the Cosmic Muon Signal in Ten Years of Borexino Data,JCAP02(2019) 046, [1808.04207]. 15.MAJORANAcollaboration, N. Abgrall et al.,Muon Flux Measurements at the Davis Campus of ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [18]

    EJ-200, EJ-204, EJ-208, EJ-212 - Plastic Scintillators

    Eljen Technology, “EJ-200, EJ-204, EJ-208, EJ-212 - Plastic Scintillators.” https://eljentechnology.com/products/plastic- scintillators/ej-200-ej-204-ej-208-ej-212

  14. [19]

    Single Channel 85 V/10 mA Power Supply Module for SiPM

    CAEN, “Single Channel 85 V/10 mA Power Supply Module for SiPM.” https://www.caen.it/subfamilies/up-to-85-v-power- supply-module-for-sipm-a7585d/

  15. [20]

    DT5730S 8 Channel 14 bit 500 MS/s Digitizer

    CAEN, “DT5730S 8 Channel 14 bit 500 MS/s Digitizer.” https://www.caen.it/products/dt5730/

  16. [21]

    Digital Pulse Processing for the Pulse Height Analysis

    CAEN, “Digital Pulse Processing for the Pulse Height Analysis.” https://www.caen.it/products/dpp-pha/

  17. [22]

    Ramesh, M

    N. Ramesh, M. Hawron, C. Martin and A. Bachri,Flux Variation of Cosmic Muons,J. Arkansas Acad. Sci.65 (2011) 67–72, [1203.0101]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [23]

    Antonioli, C

    P. Antonioli, C. Ghetti, E. V. Korolkova, V. A. Kudryavtsev and G. Sartorelli,A Three-dimensional code for muon propagation through the rock: Music, Astropart. Phys.7(1997) 357–368, [hep-ph/9705408]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  19. [24]

    V. A. Kudryavtsev,Muon simulation codes MUSIC and MUSUN for underground physics,Comput. Phys. Commun.180(2009) 339–346, [0810.4635]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [25]

    G. R. Araujo, L. Baudis, Y. Biondi, A. Bismark and M. Galloway,The upgraded low-background germanium counting facility Gator for high-sensitivityγ-ray spectrometry,JINST17(2022) P08010, [2204.12478]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [26]

    Baudis et al.,Gator: a low-background counting facility at the Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory, JINST6(2011) P08010, [1103.2125]

    L. Baudis et al.,Gator: a low-background counting facility at the Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory, JINST6(2011) P08010, [1103.2125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [27]

    Barbhuiya, B

    S. Barbhuiya, B. Das, P. Norman and T. Qureshi,A comprehensive review of radiation shielding concrete: Properties, design, evaluation, and applications, Structural Concrete26(2024)

    2024

  23. [28]

    Haffke et al.,Background Measurements in the Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory,Nucl

    M. Haffke et al.,Background Measurements in the Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 643(2011) 36–41, [1101.5298]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [29]

    Malczewski, J

    D. Malczewski, J. Kisiel and J. Dorda,Gamma background measurements in the laboratoire souterrain de modane,J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.292(2012) 751–756

    2012

  25. [30]

    252108: Cylindrical He3 neutron detector

    LND Inc., “252108: Cylindrical He3 neutron detector.” https://www.lndinc.com/products/neutron- detectors/252108/

  26. [31]

    DT5533E 4 Channel 4 kV/3 mA (4 W) Desktop HV Power Supply Module

    CAEN, “DT5533E 4 Channel 4 kV/3 mA (4 W) Desktop HV Power Supply Module.” https://www.caen.it/products/dt5533e/

  27. [32]

    142PC Preamplifier

    Ortec Amptek, “142PC Preamplifier.” https://www.ortec-online.com/products/electronic- instruments/preamplifiers/142pc

  28. [33]

    DT5724 2/4 Channel 14 bit 100 MS/s Digitizer

    CAEN, “DT5724 2/4 Channel 14 bit 100 MS/s Digitizer.” https://www.caen.it/products/dt5724/

  29. [34]

    Korun, R

    M. Korun, R. Martincic, B. Pucelj and M. Ravnik, Measurement of the ambient neutron background with a high-resolutionγ-ray spectrometer,Symposium on radiation protection in neighbouring countries in Central Europe - 1995. Proceedings(Jan, 1996) p. 116–118, [https://inis.iaea.org/records/wmwz9-m0748]

    1995

  30. [35]

    Gorshkov, V

    G. Gorshkov, V. Zyabkin and O. Tsvetkov,The neutron background at the surface of the earth,Soviet Atomic Energy17(1964) 1256 – 1260

    1964

  31. [36]

    Hashemi-Nezhad and L

    S. Hashemi-Nezhad and L. Peak,Limitation on the response of 3He counters due to intrinsic alpha emission,Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A.416 (1998) 100–108

    1998

  32. [37]

    Debicki et al.,Thermal neutrons at Gran Sasso, Nucl

    Z. Debicki et al.,Thermal neutrons at Gran Sasso, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.196(2009) 429–432

    2009

  33. [38]

    Tarka,Studies of Neutron Flux Suppression from a γ-ray Source and The GERDA Calibration System

    M. Tarka,Studies of Neutron Flux Suppression from a γ-ray Source and The GERDA Calibration System. PhD thesis, University of Zurich, May, 2012

    2012

  34. [39]

    J. Choi, J. Park, J. Son and Y. Kim,Study ofn/γ discrimination using 3He proportional chamber in high 10 gamma-ray fields,Nuclear Engineering and Technology 51(2019) 263–268. 40.EDEL WEISScollaboration, R. Lemrani and G. Gerbier,Update of neutron studies in EDEL WEISS, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.39(2006) 145–147

    2019

  35. [41]

    Wulandari, J

    H. Wulandari, J. Jochum, W. Rau and F. von Feilitzsch,Neutron flux underground revisited, Astropart. Phys.22(2004) 313–322, [hep-ex/0312050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  36. [42]

    Ascenzo, G

    L. Ascenzo, G. Benato, Y. Chu, G. Di Carlo, A. Molinario and S. Vernetto,Characterization of a GAGG detector for neutron measurements in underground laboratories,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1057, [2504.16889]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [43]

    Bertoni et al.,Measurement of fast neutron background in the Gran Sasso underground laboratory using a geyser-concept bubble-chamber,Eur

    R. Bertoni et al.,Measurement of fast neutron background in the Gran Sasso underground laboratory using a geyser-concept bubble-chamber,Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2023) 354

    2023

  38. [44]

    Waters et al.,The MCNPX Monte Carlo Radiation Transport Code,AIP Conference Proceedings896 (2007) 81–90

    L. Waters et al.,The MCNPX Monte Carlo Radiation Transport Code,AIP Conference Proceedings896 (2007) 81–90

    2007

  39. [45]

    Miller, S

    E. Miller, S. Clarke, M. Flaska, S. Pozzi and E. Padovani,MCNPX-PoliMi Post-Processing Algorithm for Detector Response Simulation,Journal of Nuclear Materials Management40(2012) 34 – 41

    2012

  40. [46]

    Clarke, E

    S. Clarke, E. Miller, M. Flaska, S. Pozzi, R. Oberer and L. Chiang,Verification and validation of the MCNPX-PoliMi code for simulations of neutron multiplicity counting systems,Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A700(2013) 135–139

    2013

  41. [47]

    T. Shi, J. Nattress, M. Mayer, M. Lin and I. Jovanovic, Neutron spectroscopy by thermalization light yield measurement in a composite heterogeneous scintillator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A839(09, 2016)

    2016

  42. [48]

    RAD7 radon detector

    Durridge, “RAD7 radon detector.” https://durridge.com/products/rad7-radon-detector/

  43. [49]

    Drystik Model ADS-3

    Durridge, “Drystik Model ADS-3.” https://durridge.com/products/drystik/

  44. [50]

    P. R. Scovell, E. Meehan, S. M. Paling, M. Thiesse, X. Liu, C. Ghag et al.,Ultra-low background germanium assay at the Boulby Underground Laboratory,JINST19(2024) P01017, [2308.03444]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [51]

    M. Ampollini et al.,Sub-background radiation exposure at the LNGS underground laboratory: dosimetric characterization of the external and underground facilities,Frontiers in Physics11(2023) 1274110

    2023

  46. [52]

    Mag-13 Three-Axis Magnetic Field Sensors

    Bartington Instruments, “Mag-13 Three-Axis Magnetic Field Sensors.” https://www.bartingtondownloads.com/wp- content/uploads/DS3143.pdf, Dec., 2024

    2024

  47. [53]

    Magnetometer Power Supplies

    Bartington Instruments, “Magnetometer Power Supplies.” https://www.bartingtondownloads.com/wp- content/uploads/DS2520.pdf, May, 2024

    2024

  48. [54]

    Measurement Computing Corporation,16-bit Voltage Measurement DAQ HAT for Raspberry Pi, Datasheet DS-MCC-128, Digilent Inc., Dec., 2024

    2024

  49. [55]

    ZG-3 Zero Gauss Chambers

    Magnetic Shield Corp., “ZG-3 Zero Gauss Chambers.” https://store- w4rbnih33r.mybigcommerce.com/content/ZG-3- brochure-web%281%29%281%29-REV-3-17-15.pdf, 2013

    2013

  50. [56]

    Spectrum and spectral density estimation by the Discrete Fourier transform (DFT), including a comprehensive list of window functions and some new flat-top windows

    G. Heinzel, A. R¨ udiger and R. Schilling, “Spectrum and spectral density estimation by the Discrete Fourier transform (DFT), including a comprehensive list of window functions and some new flat-top windows.” Max Plank Institut f¨ ur Gravitationsphysik, 2002. 57.MAGIS-100collaboration, M. Abe et al.,Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (M...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  51. [58]

    Jossen, C

    D. Jossen, C. Harbeke and R. Brauchli, Orion-Triebz¨ uge f¨ ur die Matterhorn Gotthard-Bahn, Schweizer Eisenbahn-Revue2024(2024)

    2024

  52. [59]

    Fahrplanfeld 142: Visp - Brig - Oberwald - Andermatt - G¨ oschenen (2025)

    Systemaufgaben Kundeninformation, “Fahrplanfeld 142: Visp - Brig - Oberwald - Andermatt - G¨ oschenen (2025).” https://widgets.oev- info.ch/publikation/jahresfpl/142.pdf, Oct., 2024

    2025

  53. [60]

    Fahrplanfeld 1982: Autoverlad Furka Oberwald - Realp (2025)

    Systemaufgaben Kundeninformation, “Fahrplanfeld 1982: Autoverlad Furka Oberwald - Realp (2025).” https://www.oev- info.ch/sites/default/files/fap/2025/pdf/1982.pdf, Aug., 2024

    1982

  54. [61]

    Arduini et al.,A Long-Baseline Atom Interferometer at CERN: Conceptual Feasibility Study,2304.00614

    G. Arduini et al.,A Long-Baseline Atom Interferometer at CERN: Conceptual Feasibility Study,2304.00614

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [62]

    The Swiss Seismological Service (SED)

    Swiss Seismological Service, “The Swiss Seismological Service (SED).” http://seismo.ethz.ch/export/sites/sedsite/knowledge /.galleries/pdf brochures/Flyer SED EN.pdf 2063069299.pdf, 2016

    2016

  56. [63]

    J. R. Peterson,Observations and modeling of seismic background noise,U.S. Geological Survey(1993)

    1993

  57. [64]

    Mitchell, T

    J. Mitchell, T. Kovachy, S. Hahn, P. Adamson and S. Chattopadhyay,MAGIS-100 environmental characterization and noise analysis,JINST17(Jan.,

  58. [66]

    G. A. P. Cirrone, G. Cuttone, F. Di Rosa, L. Pandola, F. Romano and Q. Zhang,Validation of the Geant4 electromagnetic photon cross-sections for elements and compounds,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A618(2010) 315–322. 11 Appendix A Gator Measurement To determine the activity, the observed gamma-ray lines in the spectra are analyzed by fitting the gamma peaks using ...

    2010

  59. [2022]

    65.GEANT4collaboration, S

    P01007. 65.GEANT4collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al.,GEANT4 - A Simulation Toolkit,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250–303

    2003