REVIEW 1 cited by
Stealthy Adversarial Attacks on Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Adversarial attacks against stochastic multi-armed bandit (MAB) algorithms have been extensively studied in the literature. In this work, we focus on reward poisoning attacks and find most existing attacks can be easily detected by our proposed detection method based on the test of homogeneity, due to their aggressive nature in reward manipulations. This motivates us to study the notion of stealthy attack against stochastic MABs and investigate the resulting attackability. Our analysis shows that against two popularly employed MAB algorithms, UCB1 and $\epsilon$-greedy, the success of a stealthy attack depends on the environmental conditions and the realized reward of the arm pulled in the first round. We also analyze the situation for general MAB algorithms equipped with our attack detection method and find that it is possible to have a stealthy attack that almost always succeeds. This brings new insights into the security risks of MAB algorithms.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Optimism as a Vulnerability: Deceptive Stackelberg Control of UCB Bandit Followers
Under targetability and exploitability, a two-phase honeypot-then-trap leader strictly exceeds the classical SSE utility ceiling against a UCB follower at O(sqrt(T ln T)) signaling cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.