REVIEW 2 cited by
Do Influence Functions Work on Large Language Models?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Influence functions are important for quantifying the impact of individual training data points on a model's predictions. Although extensive research has been conducted on influence functions in traditional machine learning models, their application to large language models (LLMs) has been limited. In this work, we conduct a systematic study to address a key question: do influence functions work on LLMs? Specifically, we evaluate influence functions across multiple tasks and find that they consistently perform poorly in most settings. Our further investigation reveals that their poor performance can be attributed to: (1) inevitable approximation errors when estimating the iHVP component due to the scale of LLMs, (2) uncertain convergence during fine-tuning, and, more fundamentally, (3) the definition itself, as changes in model parameters do not necessarily correlate with changes in LLM behavior. Thus, our study suggests the need for alternative approaches for identifying influential samples.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products
ASTRA, an EKFAC-preconditioned Neumann series iteration, computes more accurate inverse Hessian-vector products and improves training data attribution scores over EKFAC baselines.
-
A Survey on Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning
A survey that organizes explainable DRL methods into feature-, state-, dataset-, and model-level approaches and reviews their evaluation, security, and LLM-related uses.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.