Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Alignment between Brains and AI: Evidence for Convergent Evolution across Modalities, Scales and Training Trajectories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.01966 v1 pith:MQOP2F7M submitted 2025-06-18 q-bio.NC

classification q-bio.NC
keywords alignmentmodelsbrainlanguagesystemsvisionacrossanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial and biological systems may evolve similar computational solutions despite fundamental differences in architecture and learning mechanisms -- a form of convergent evolution. We demonstrate this phenomenon through large-scale analysis of alignment between human brain activity and internal representations of over 600 AI models spanning language and vision domains, from 1.33M to 72B parameters. Analyzing 60 million alignment measurements reveals that higher-performing models spontaneously develop stronger brain alignment without explicit neural constraints, with language models showing markedly stronger correlation (r=0.89, p<7.5e-13) than vision models (r=0.53, p<2.0e-44). Crucially, longitudinal analysis demonstrates that brain alignment consistently precedes performance improvements during training, suggesting that developing brain-like representations may be a necessary stepping stone toward higher capabilities. We find systematic patterns: language models exhibit strongest alignment with limbic and integrative regions, while vision models show progressive alignment with visual cortices; deeper processing layers converge across modalities; and as representational scale increases, alignment systematically shifts from primary sensory to higher-order associative regions. These findings provide compelling evidence that optimization for task performance naturally drives AI systems toward brain-like computational strategies, offering both fundamental insights into principles of intelligent information processing and practical guidance for developing more capable AI systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Disentangling the Factors of Convergence between Brains and Computer Vision Models

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    By systematically varying model size, training amount, and image type in DINOv3 vision transformers, this paper shows that brain similarity increases with scale and human-centric data and emerges in a characteristic t...

  2. Reward Valuation in Vision Language Models: Causal Mechanisms Underlying Anhedonia

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Targeted perturbation of reward-anticipatory units in VLMs induces anhedonia-like effort avoidance and clinical-scale score drops without impairing baseline task competence.

Pith tools