REVIEW 4 cited by
Pole-skipping and Rarita-Schwinger fields
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this note we analyse the equations of motion of a minimally coupled Rarita-Schwinger field near the horizon of an anti-de Sitter-Schwarzschild geometry. We find that at special complex values of the frequency and momentum there exist two independent regular solutions that are ingoing at the horizon. These special points in Fourier space are associated with the `pole-skipping' phenomenon in thermal two-point functions of operators that are holographically dual to the bulk fields. We find that the leading pole-skipping point is located at a positive imaginary frequency with the distance from the origin being equal to half of the Lyapunov exponent for maximally chaotic theories.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Cosmological pole-skipping, shock waves and quantum chaotic dynamics of de Sitter horizons
Pole-skipping in Schwarzschild-de Sitter predicts superluminal and imaginary butterfly velocities, confirmed by shock wave analysis, hinting at nonlocal and non-Hermitian dual dynamics.
-
Pole-skipping without master variable and holographic superfluids
A master-variable-free matrix formalism for pole-skipping, applied to holographic superfluids, shows that the massless order parameter produces no new hydrodynamic pole-skipping point.
-
Butterfly effect and $\textrm{T}\overline{\textrm{T}}$-deformation
For T\bar{T}-deformed BTZ black holes, the butterfly velocity is v_B = sqrt(1 - 8π² μ/β²), exceeding the Mezei-Stanford bound for μ<0 while the Lyapunov exponent stays at the maximal value 2π/β.
-
A Dynamical Systems Framework for Reinforcement Learning Safety and Robustness Verification
The claimed RL safety verification framework is absent from the manuscript; the body text is an unrelated high-energy physics paper about de Sitter horizon chaos.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.