Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 163 references

Late-stage cloud infall can deliver enough angular momentum to tilt most Class II disks and explain why so many disks and planets are misaligned with their stars.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-30 14:17 UTC pith:MSM4YCSC

load-bearing objection Useful first catalog of Class II disk angular momenta; the misalignment claim is directionally supported but rests on a steeply age-sensitive analytic infall model and lower-limit streamer masses. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23741 v1 pith:MSM4YCSC submitted 2026-07-26 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Angular Momentum of Planet-Forming Disks: Implications for Infall Driven Misalignments

Aashish Gupta , Cristiano Longarini , L. Ilsedore Cleeves , Giovanni P. Rosotti , Edwin A. Bergin , Cathie J. Clarke , Michael K\"uffmeier , Zhi-Yun Li This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR
keywords protoplanetary disksangular momentumdisk misalignmentlate-stage infallstreamersClass II YSOsplanet formation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

A large share of planet-forming disks and planetary systems do not share the spin axis of their host stars, and the usual isolated-collapse picture does not explain that. This paper measures the total angular momentum of Class II disks from high-resolution gas kinematics, then builds a simple scaling that extends those measurements to a broader sample. It compares those disk values with theoretical late infall from molecular clouds and with observed gas streamers. Most disks sit at or below the angular momentum that late infall is predicted to bring, so sustained or episodic cloud interactions can reorient disks. If that picture holds, misalignments are a natural outcome of how young stars still interact with their birth clouds, not a rare dynamical accident.

Core claim

Using surface densities inferred from dynamical modeling of ALMA rotation curves for 15 large disks, and an empirical relation that estimates angular momentum for 18 more compact disks from stellar mass, disk mass, and the radius enclosing 90 percent of the 13CO flux, the paper finds that most Class II disks have angular momentum lower than theoretical late-infall predictions. Observed streamers show comparable or higher specific angular momentum, so if the unseen reservoirs feeding them are not much less massive than the disks, late-stage infall can supply enough angular momentum to tilt disks and account for the observed misalignment fraction.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the calibrated scaling L ≈ (4.4×10^52) (M_*/M_⊙)^0.5 (M_disk/M_⊙) (R_disk;13CO/AU)^0.5 g cm^2 s^−1, motivated by treating the 13CO 90-percent radius as a proxy for the radius of gyration and applied after direct integration of Σ(R) R^1.5 for the dynamically modeled disks. That catalog is then compared with Bondi–Hoyle-style late-infall angular momentum and with streamer specific angular momenta.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the angular-momentum catalog for ordinary compact disks is trustworthy rests on treating those smaller disks as scaled-down copies of the large, bright disks used to build the scaling relation.

What would settle it

Measure the total mass of the extended gas reservoirs that feed Class II streamers (beyond interferometric filtering and small fields of view); if those reservoirs are systematically orders of magnitude less massive than the disks, late infall cannot supply the angular momentum the paper needs to tilt most systems.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Late cloud–disk interactions can be a common driver of the ≳30% stellar–disk and inner–outer disk misalignment rates.
  • Infall can help set disk sizes because specific angular momentum of disks matches that expected for late accreted material.
  • Class II streamers with reservoir masses near disk mass would be capable of long-lived reorientation of the disk plane.
  • A population comparison of total angular momentum from prestellar cores through disks to planets becomes possible once disk L is observationally anchored.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If smaller disks really do follow the same surface-density family, surveys that only need stellar mass, gas mass, and a 13CO size can map angular momentum across whole star-forming regions without full dynamical modeling.
  • The same catalog that tests misalignment also quantifies how much angular momentum must be removed between core collapse and planet assembly, sharpening magnetic-braking and disk-wind budget tests.
  • Age dependence in the infall model implies misalignment injection should be rarer in older associations unless episodic dense encounters continue.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the total angular momentum of 15 Class II disks by integrating published, dynamically modeled surface-density profiles (MAPS/exoALMA) against Keplerian rotation (Eq. 2), derives an empirical scaling L ∝ M_*^0.5 M_disk R_disk;13CO^0.5 (Eq. 5) from those 15 disks, applies it to 18 AGEPRO disks, and compares the resulting disk angular momenta to (i) the Padoan et al. (2025) Bondi–Hoyle analytic model of late-stage infall, integrated over 1–3 Myr, and (ii) a literature compilation of observed streamers. It concludes that predicted late-infall angular momentum is comparable to or exceeds that of most Class II disks, so cloudlet capture can potentially explain the ≳30% observed disk/planetary misalignment fraction, while noting that streamer masses (and hence their total L) are lower limits and that reservoir masses must be characterized to confirm the picture.

Significance. If the result holds, this is a useful contribution: the first observationally anchored angular-momentum catalog for planet-forming disks, replacing earlier dust-radius-based estimates, plus a simple, nearly parameter-free scaling relation (Eq. 5) that makes the quantity accessible for large disk surveys. The streamer compilation is the most complete to date, and the paper is commendably honest that streamer masses are lower limits, so the observational half of the comparison is not yet confirmatory. The infall-vs-disk comparison is a concrete, falsifiable framing of the cloudlet-capture misalignment scenario, and Appendix A usefully connects disk L to core collapse and planetary-system angular momentum budgets.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, §4, and Appendix D (Eqs. 8–9, Fig. 3)] The central comparison in Fig. 3 integrates the Padoan et al. (2025) infall model over 1–3 Myr for all sources. Because Ṁ_BH ∝ t^−5 (Eq. 8) and j_BH ∝ t^−4 (Eq. 9), the integrated infall mass and angular momentum drop by ~4 dex between 2 and 10 Myr, as the manuscript itself shows in Appendix D. Yet roughly half the AGEPRO sample (Upper Sco) is acknowledged to be 'a few Myr older' than the 1–3 Myr window. Integrated self-consistently at, say, 4–6 Myr, the predicted infall L would fall ~2–3 dex below the plotted curve and could sit below the Upper Sco disk L values, undercutting the 'most disks' conclusion for half the sample. The authors should either (a) integrate the model over age-appropriate windows for each subsample and show both curves in Fig. 3, or (b) explicitly restrict the claim to young systems and discuss tilt persistence (noting that the present comparison is magnitude-only
  2. [§3.1 (Eqs. 6–7) and Fig. 3] The entire theory side of the comparison rests on Eq. 7, whose inputs n_H(t) and v_rel(t) are admitted to be 'not observationally well constrained'; the checks offered (Rygl et al. 2013 columns with an assumed 1 pc line-of-sight depth; ~1 km/s velocity dispersions) are order-of-magnitude. Since Ṁ_BH ∝ n_H (Eq. 6), a factor-of-few density error shifts the Fig. 3 theory curve by the same factor, and the Pelkonen et al. (2025) simulations the paper cites show ~3 dex of source-to-source scatter in Ṁ. A single dashed line in Fig. 3 overstates the precision of the theory side. Please add a sensitivity band to Fig. 3 (e.g., n_H and the integration window each varied by a factor of a few) and state in §5 how the 'comparable or exceeding' conclusion degrades across that band.
  3. [§2.3 (Eq. 5 applied to AGEPRO)] The scaling relation (Eq. 5) is calibrated on 15 large MAPS/exoALMA disks and applied to 18 more compact AGEPRO disks under the assumption that the small disks are 'scaled down versions' of the big ones. The observational justification given — the Trapman et al. (2025) M_disk–size relation — is based on CO (2–1) sizes and constrains the mass–size locus, not the internal surface-density structure (the radius of gyration relative to R_disk;13CO), which is what Eq. 5 actually requires. Since the majority of the catalog (18 of 33 disks) depends on this extrapolation, the authors should quantify the potential bias: e.g., show in Fig. 2 where the AGEPRO M_disk–R_disk;13CO locus sits relative to the calibration sample, and estimate how much L changes if the gyration radius of compact disks differs by, say, 30% from the scaled-down assumption.
  4. [§2.3 (Eq. 5 fit) and §2.4] Two aspects of the fit need clarification and possibly rework. (1) The quoted uncertainty on the Eq. 5 coefficient (±1.3×10^52, ~30%) is propagated to the AGEPRO L values, but it is not stated whether the intrinsic scatter of the 15 disks around the relation is also propagated; with Spearman 0.91 on 15 points, the point-to-point scatter in Fig. 2 looks comparable to or larger than the coefficient uncertainty, so AGEPRO error bars may be underestimated. (2) The fit uses scipy.optimize.minimize_scalar, a 1-D minimizer; fitting a power law with asymmetric errors in both variables normally requires orthogonal-distance regression or a 2-D likelihood. Please describe the actual procedure (what is minimized over which variables) and report the intrinsic scatter.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Appendix B / Table B.1] ∆L_disk for γ=1.5 is −57±34%, which is only 'within typical uncertainties' for the disks with the largest error bars; calling the γ=1 choice robust to 'few tens of percent' is a bit optimistic for L specifically. A sentence noting that a steeper γ systematically lowers L by up to ~50% would be more accurate.
  2. [§2.3 and Appendix C] The correlation between L and R_disk;13CO is described as 'strong' but the raw Spearman coefficient is 0.59 (p=0.02) on 15 points — significant but modest; only the combined quantity M_*^0.5 M_disk R^0.5 reaches 0.91. Please phrase the intermediate correlation accordingly, and note that Eq. 4's improved correlation partly reflects the shared M_* and M_disk terms rather than new information from R_disk;13CO.
  3. [Fig. 3] Please state in the caption that the theory line is integrated over 1–3 Myr; as printed, a reader could take it as instantaneous.
  4. [§3.2 / §4 (Table 2)] Only lower limits on streamer masses/L are available and four of the comparable-L streamers are Class I; the text handles this honestly, but the abstract sentence 'qualitative agreement with comparison with streamer observations' could be tightened to say the streamer comparison is presently inconclusive for Class II sources.
  5. [Throughout] Typographical: 'surface denisities' (§1); 'biggest and brighest' (§1); abstract 'disks and planetary are misaligned' (missing 'systems'); 'programes' (Fig. 1 caption); 'not straight forward' (§2.3); 'γthe surface-density slope' (§2.2, missing 'is'); 'will a big diversity' (§4, missing 'be').
  6. [§2.3] Notation for the 13CO radius alternates between 'R disk;13CO', 'Rdisk;13CO', and 'R_{disk;13CO}'; please standardize. Also define R_gyration explicitly as the mass-weighted radius at first use in Eq. 3 and state how it relates numerically to R_c for γ=1.
  7. [Appendix A (Fig. A.1)] The comparison with prestellar cores (Tatematsu et al.) and planetary systems (Jiang et al.) is a useful sanity check, but both populations have strong, acknowledged selection biases; consider adding a caveat that the 4-dex core-to-disk drop may partly reflect the different angular scales probed rather than pure angular-momentum loss.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: disk L is measured from independent dynamical Σ(R), then compared to an external analytic infall model and literature streamers.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is not closed by definition or by a self-citation uniqueness claim. Angular momenta of the 15 MAPS/exoALMA disks are obtained by integrating observationally inferred surface-density profiles (Eq. 2) from dynamical rotation-curve modeling; that is an independent measurement step, not a fit to the misalignment fraction or to the infall prediction. The empirical scaling (Eq. 5) is a least-squares calibration of a physically motivated gyration-radius ansatz on those same 15 disks and is used only to extrapolate L to the more compact AGEPRO sample—it is not presented as a first-principles prediction of the calibration set, nor does the central comparison in Fig. 3 rely on re-predicting the 15 disks from the fit. The late-infall side is taken from the external Padoan et al. (2025) Bondi–Hoyle analytic model (Eqs. 6–9) and from compiled streamer literature; author-overlapping streamer papers supply data points and methods, not a theorem that forces the conclusion. Whether the AGEPRO extrapolation or the Padoan age/density normalization is robust is a correctness/assumption issue, not circularity. No step reduces the claimed result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Keplerian disk mechanics, the published self-similar Σ(R) profiles, an empirical three-parameter scaling calibrated on 15 disks, Bondi–Hoyle late-infall analytics taken from Padoan et al. (2025), and the premise that interferometric streamer masses are strict lower limits. No new physical entities are introduced; free parameters are the fitted normalization of Eq. 5 and the fixed integration window/age choices.

free parameters (4)
  • normalization of L scaling (Eq. 5) = 4.4e52 ± 1.3e52 g cm² s⁻¹
    Single coefficient 4.4e52 ± 1.3e52 g cm² s⁻¹ obtained by χ² minimization on the 15 MAPS/exoALMA disks; used to assign L to all AGEPRO sources.
  • surface-density power-law index γ = 1 (default)
    Fixed to 1 for the primary catalog; Appendix B shows changing γ to 0.5 or 1.5 shifts L by tens of percent.
  • infall integration window 1–3 Myr = 1–3 Myr
    Chosen to match typical Class II ages; Appendix D shows mass and L_infall drop by orders of magnitude with age, so the comparison is sensitive to this hand-chosen interval.
  • R_disk = 6.63 R_c (99% mass enclosure) = 6.63 R_c
    Outer integration limit for Eq. 2; authors note halving it changes L by only ~8%, but the factor is still a modeling choice.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Azimuthal velocity is dominated by Keplerian rotation, so ω = sqrt(G M_*/R³) can be used inside the angular-momentum integral.
    Stated in §2.3; pressure and self-gravity corrections are already folded into the published Σ(R) but not re-introduced in the L integrand.
  • domain assumption Surface density follows the Lynden-Bell & Pringle self-similar form (Eq. 1) with the published M_disk, R_c, γ.
    Inherited from Martire et al. (2024) and Longarini et al. (2025); Appendix B tests γ variations.
  • ad hoc to paper Smaller AGEPRO disks are structurally scaled-down versions of the large MAPS/exoALMA disks, so Eq. 5 applies.
    Explicitly assumed in §2.3; justified by scale-invariance of LB&P solutions and an observed M_disk–size correlation, but not directly tested with Σ(R) for compact disks.
  • domain assumption Late infall onto Class II stars can be approximated by Bondi–Hoyle accretion with the n_H(t) and v_rel(t) scalings of Padoan et al. (2025).
    §3.1; authors note large source-to-source scatter in simulations and that n_H, v_rel are only qualitatively constrained observationally.
  • domain assumption Reported streamer masses are lower limits because of interferometric filtering and limited field of view.
    §3.2; used to keep the streamer comparison qualitative.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 23170 in / 3508 out tokens · 56569 ms · 2026-07-30T14:17:30.545406+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Context. A significant fraction (>30%) of planet-forming disks and planetary are misaligned with respect to the rotational axis of their host stars, yet the dominant mechanism responsible for these misalignments remains unclear. Aims. We aim to observationally constrain the angular momentum of Class II protoplanetary disks and assess whether late-stage infall of material can bring sufficient angular momentum to tilt them. Methods. We first computed the angular momenta of 15 disks with surface density profiles inferred from dynamical modeling of high angular resolution ALMA observations. Based on this sample, we derived a relation linking disk angular momentum to stellar mass, disk mass, and the radius enclosing 90% of the 13CO flux and used it to estimate angular momenta of 18 more disks. We then compared disk values with theoretical predictions for late-stage accretion from clouds and observed streamers. Results. Angular momentum for most disks is lower than what theoretical models predict for late infall. This is also in qualitative agreement with comparison with streamer observations, however, characterization of mass of reservoirs feeding the streamers is needed to confirm this picture. Conclusions. Interactions with nearby clouds, resulting in late-stage infall of material onto Class II disks, can potentially explain the observed misalignments within disks and planetary systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23741 by Aashish Gupta, Cathie J. Clarke, Cristiano Longarini, Edwin A. Bergin, Giovanni P. Rosotti, L. Ilsedore Cleeves, Michael K\"uffmeier, Zhi-Yun Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top panel: surface density profiles of disks observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Physically motivated relationship to derive angular mo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Specific angular momentum (top panel), mass (mid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Angular momentum profiles of Class 0 protostellar envelopes. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936364 , archivePrefix =. 2001.10004 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    The Specific Angular Momentum Radial Profile in Dense Cores: Improved Initial Conditions for Disk Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2cd1 , archivePrefix =. 1906.05578 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Signs of Early-stage Disk Growth Revealed with ALMA. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/178 , archivePrefix =. 1611.08416 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Angular Momentum Loss in the Envelope-Disk Transition Region of the HH 111 Protostellar System: Evidence for Magnetic Braking?. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/213 , archivePrefix =. 1605.08132 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Molecular line study of the very young protostar IRAM 04191 in Taurus: infall, rotation, and outflow. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021054 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0207287 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Rotation in the Protostellar Envelopes around IRAS 04169+2702 and IRAS 04365+2535: The Size Scale for Dynamical Collapse. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/304685 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/304685

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    The circumstellar disk of AB Aurigae: evidence for envelope accretion at late stages of star formation?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219414 , archivePrefix =. 1209.1299 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Census of stars and 6D structure with Gaia-DR2 data

    Lupus DANCe. Census of stars and 6D structure with Gaia-DR2 data. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038717 , archivePrefix =. 2010.00233 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Recent star formation in the Lupus clouds as seen by Herschel. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219511 , archivePrefix =. 1211.5232 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/194.4.809 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/194.4.809

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Mass, Luminosity, and Line Width Relations of Galactic Molecular Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/165493 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/165493

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    A Solution to the Pre-Main-Sequence Accretion Problem. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/429562 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0411129 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Scaling Relations Associated with Millimeter Continuum Sizes in Protoplanetary Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadd9f , archivePrefix =. 1808.10510 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    exoALMA. XVIII. Interpreting Large-scale Kinematic Structures as Moderate Warping. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf113 , archivePrefix =. 2507.11669 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Asymmetric signatures of warps in edge-on disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453313 , archivePrefix =. 2504.05399 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Young Stellar Objects in the Gould Belt. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11 , archivePrefix =. 1508.03199 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    The protoplanetary disk population in the -Ophiuchi region L1688 and the time evolution of Class II YSOs. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141380 , archivePrefix =. 2201.04079 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    stellar mass and possible implications for giant planet populations

    Protoplanetary disk lifetimes vs. stellar mass and possible implications for giant planet populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424846 , archivePrefix =. 1502.00631 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    The Gaia mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , archivePrefix =. 1609.04153 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Gaia-4b and 5b: Radial Velocity Confirmation of Gaia Astrometric Orbital Solutions Reveal a Massive Planet and a Brown Dwarf Orbiting Low-mass Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ada9e1 , archivePrefix =. 2410.05654 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Science , keywords =

    Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1185402 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1126/science.1185402

  22. [22]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) , keywords =

    Challenges in planet formation. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) , keywords =. doi:10.1002/2016JE005088 , archivePrefix =. 1610.07202 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Secular evolution of MHD wind-driven discs: analytical solutions in the expanded -framework. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3442 , archivePrefix =. 2111.10145 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    The Time Evolution of \ M\ \_\ d\ / \ M\ in Protoplanetary Disks as a Way to Disentangle between Viscosity and MHD Winds. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf048 , archivePrefix =. 2309.04496 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  25. [25]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , keywords =

    Magnetohydrodynamics of protoplanetary discs. Journal of Plasma Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1017/S0022377820001002 , archivePrefix =. 2007.15967 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Empirical constraints on turbulence in proto-planetary discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2023.101674 , archivePrefix =. 2302.01433 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Demographics of Young Stars and their Protoplanetary Disks: Lessons Learned on Disk Evolution and its Connection to Planet Formation. Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.09930 , archivePrefix =. 2203.09930 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09930 2023

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Protostellar disk formation and transport of angular momentum during magnetized core collapse. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118730 , archivePrefix =. 1203.1193 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Collapse of Magnetized Singular Isothermal Toroids. II. Rotation and Magnetic Braking. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/379243 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0311377 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Gravitational Collapse of Magnetized Clouds. I. Ideal Magnetohydrodynamic Accretion Flow. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/505257 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0604573 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Magnetic Braking and Protostellar Disk Formation: The Ideal MHD Limit. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/587542 , archivePrefix =. 0709.0445 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Effects of Magnetic Field Orientations in Dense Cores on Gas Kinematics in Protostellar Envelopes. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac63bc , archivePrefix =. 2204.05636 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Angular Momentum Distributions for Observed and Modeled Exoplanetary Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3242 , archivePrefix =. 2108.02890 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Angular momentum of the N _ 2 H ^ + cores in the Orion A cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psw002 , archivePrefix =. 1601.00362 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    ALMA chemical survey of disk-outflow sources in Taurus (ALMA-DOT). VI. Accretion shocks in the disk of DG Tau and HL Tau. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141264 , archivePrefix =. 2110.13820 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    PRODIGE - envelope to disk with NOEMA. I. A 3000 au streamer feeding a Class I protostar. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243310 , archivePrefix =. 2208.01023 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Flow of gas detected from beyond the filaments to protostellar scales in Barnard 5★. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346357 , archivePrefix =. 2307.14337 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    ALMA dual-band constraints on grain properties and the mass-infall rate

    A dusty streamer infalling onto the disk of a class I protostar. ALMA dual-band constraints on grain properties and the mass-infall rate. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347486 , archivePrefix =. 2311.13723 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of an Accretion Streamer and a Slow Wide-angle Outflow around FU Orionis. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad31a1 , archivePrefix =. 2405.03033 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Early Planet Formation in Embedded Disks (eDisk). XII. Accretion Streamers, Protoplanetary Disk, and Outflow in the Class I Source Oph IRS 63. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf7c1 , archivePrefix =. 2310.14617 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    The ALMA Survey of Gas Evolution of PROtoplanetary Disks (AGE-PRO). V. Protoplanetary Gas Disk Masses. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcd6e , archivePrefix =. 2506.10738 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    The ALMA Survey of Gas Evolution of PROtoplanetary Disks (AGE-PRO). IV. Dust and Gas Disk Properties in the Upper Scorpius Star-forming Region. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc7ab , archivePrefix =. 2506.10735 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    The ALMA Survey of Gas Evolution of PROtoplanetary Disks (AGE-PRO). III. Dust and Gas Disk Properties in the Lupus Star-forming Region. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add43a , archivePrefix =. 2506.10734 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    The ALMA Survey of Gas Evolution of PROtoplanetary Disks (AGE-PRO). I. Program Overview and Summary of First Results. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addebe , archivePrefix =. 2506.10719 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Molecules with ALMA at Planet-forming Scales (MAPS). I. Program Overview and Highlights. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac1432 , archivePrefix =. 2109.06268 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    A Tale of Three Tails: A Misaligned Streamer and Mysterious Structures around [BHB2007]-1. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2477 , archivePrefix =. 2512.00295 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    Newtonian approach

    Analytic solutions to the accretion of a rotating finite cloud towards a central object - I. Newtonian approach. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14210.x , archivePrefix =. 0803.1020 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    A protostellar system fed by a streamer of 10,500 au length. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1150-z , archivePrefix =. 2007.13430 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Mapping the Merging Zone of Late Infall in the AB Aur Planet-forming System. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb7d5 , archivePrefix =. 2503.01957 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  50. [50]

    Dynamical analysis of the streamers around S CrA and HL Tau

    TIPSY: Trajectory of Infalling Particles in Streamers around Young stars. Dynamical analysis of the streamers around S CrA and HL Tau. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348007 , archivePrefix =. 2401.10403 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    , year = 1944, month = jan, volume =

    On the mechanism of accretion by stars. , year = 1944, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/104.5.273 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/104.5.273 1944

  52. [52]

    , year = 1952, month = jan, volume =

    On spherically symmetrical accretion. , year = 1952, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/112.2.195 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/112.2.195 1952

  53. [53]

    exoALMA. III. Line-intensity Modeling and System Property Extraction from Protoplanetary Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc439 , archivePrefix =. 2504.19986 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  54. [54]

    exoALMA. VI. Rotating under Pressure: Rotation Curves, Azimuthal Velocity Substructures, and Gas Pressure Variations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adb152 , archivePrefix =. 2504.20036 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  55. [55]

    Physical model and observational evidence in MAPS disks

    Rotation curves in protoplanetary disks with thermal stratification. Physical model and observational evidence in MAPS disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348546 , archivePrefix =. 2402.12236 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical mass measurements of two protoplanetary discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3223 , archivePrefix =. 2211.03712 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    , year = 1974, month = sep, volume =

    The evolution of viscous discs and the origin of the nebular variables. , year = 1974, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/168.3.603 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/168.3.603 1974

  58. [58]

    exoALMA. V. Gaseous Emission Surfaces and Temperature Structures. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc437 , archivePrefix =. 2504.19902 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  59. [59]

    exoALMA. I. Science Goals, Project Design, and Data Products. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc43b , archivePrefix =. 2504.18688 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  60. [60]

    exoALMA. XII. Weighing and Sizing exoALMA Disks with Rotation Curve Modelling. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc431 , archivePrefix =. 2504.18726 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  61. [61]

    Anatomy of the Class I protostar L1489 IRS with NOEMA. I. Disk, streamers, outflow(s) and bubbles at 3 mm. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348785 , archivePrefix =. 2403.18905 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Origin and evolution of angular momentum of class II disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450682 , archivePrefix =. 2405.06520 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on the primordial misalignment of star-disk systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450410 , archivePrefix =. 2405.12670 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    Misaligned disks induced by infall. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039614 , archivePrefix =. 2110.04309 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    The formation of protoplanetary disks through pre-main-sequence Bondi-Hoyle accretion. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02529-3 , archivePrefix =. 2405.07334 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    A natural formation scenario for misaligned and short-period eccentric extrasolar planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19390.x , archivePrefix =. 1107.2113 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Flyby-induced misalignments in planet-hosting discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3186 , archivePrefix =. 1911.05760 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Cloudlet capture by transitional disk and FU Orionis stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832632 , archivePrefix =. 1911.05158 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  69. [69]

    European Physical Journal Plus , keywords =

    Close encounters: How stellar flybys shape planet-forming discs. European Physical Journal Plus , keywords =. doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03602-w , archivePrefix =. 2207.09752 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    A Gaia Survey for Young Stars Associated with the Lupus Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abb12f , archivePrefix =. 2009.05123 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Interplay between Young Stars and Molecular Clouds in the Ophiuchus Star-forming Complex. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac5cc8 , archivePrefix =. 2204.13797 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Disk Evolution Study Through Imaging of Nearby Young Stars (DESTINYS): Late Infall Causing Disk Misalignment and Dynamic Structures in SU Aur. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdf57 , archivePrefix =. 2102.08781 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  73. [73]

    The full census of planet-forming disks with GTO and DESTINYS programs

    The SPHERE view of the Taurus star-forming region. The full census of planet-forming disks with GTO and DESTINYS programs. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347586 , archivePrefix =. 2403.02158 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Optical and Near-infrared View of Planet-forming Disks and Protoplanets. Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.09991 , archivePrefix =. 2203.09991 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09991 2023

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    Are inner disc misalignments common? ALMA reveals an isotropic outer disc inclination distribution for young dipper stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3361 , archivePrefix =. 1912.01610 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    The Birth Environment of the Solar System. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130830 , archivePrefix =. 1001.5444 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    Constraints from VLTI/GRAVITY and ALMA observations

    Probing inner and outer disk misalignments in transition disks. Constraints from VLTI/GRAVITY and ALMA observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142070 , archivePrefix =. 2112.00123 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    Rotation Periods, Inclinations, and Obliquities of Cool Stars Hosting Directly Imaged Substellar Companions: Spin-Orbit Misalignments Are Common. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acbd34 , archivePrefix =. 2301.04692 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Obliquities in Exoplanetary Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac6c09 , archivePrefix =. 2203.05460 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    One-third of Sun-like stars are born with misaligned planet-forming disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09324-0 , archivePrefix =. 2508.06488 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.