pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19635 · v2 · pith:MSSTYZ36new · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Mare versus highland lunar impact flash light curve dichotomy

D. Athanasopoulos , A. Liakos , A. Z. Bonanos , D. Koschny , O. Sykioti , M. Devog\`ele , J. L. Cano , R. Moissl This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 07:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords lunar impact flasheslight curve analysismare versus highlandejecta coolingcratering processNELIOTA
0
0 comments X

The pith

Highland lunar impact flashes decay more slowly than mare ones because of differences in ejecta droplet sizes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines 124 multi-frame light curves of lunar impact flashes observed over nine years and classifies them according to mare, highland, and border terrain. Highland flashes display shallower and longer-lasting decay profiles than the steeper, faster decays seen on mare terrain, even though peak brightness distributions remain similar across both. Analytical single-size and dual-size ejecta cooling models are derived and fitted to the data, with the dual-size version indicating that fine droplets drive the extended highland duration. These light-curve shapes capture the earliest phases of crater excavation, leading to the conclusion that initial cratering stages depend on the underlying lunar rock type.

Core claim

Impacts on highland terrain produce light curves with shallower and longer-lasting decay compared to the faster and steeper decay of mare flashes. The dual-size ejecta cooling model attributes the extended duration primarily to fine droplets in the ejecta, demonstrating that the initial stages of the impact cratering process are fundamentally dependent on lunar lithology.

What carries the argument

Dual-size ejecta cooling model that fits observed light-curve decay to estimate ejecta physical properties and explain terrain differences.

If this is right

  • Light-curve duration directly reflects the earliest ejecta dynamics in crater formation.
  • Highland surfaces sustain cooling from smaller ejecta particles for longer times.
  • Mare surfaces produce quicker cooling dominated by larger ejecta droplets.
  • Terrain type must be accounted for when modeling the start of impact excavation on the Moon.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Decay-rate measurements from future flashes could remotely map local surface composition.
  • Cratering simulations may require separate early-phase parameters for different lunar rock types.
  • Analogous terrain-dependent flash behaviors could appear in impacts on other airless bodies.

Load-bearing premise

Differences in observed decay rates are driven primarily by ejecta droplet size distributions rather than impactor properties, viewing geometry, or other surface effects.

What would settle it

A set of highland impacts recorded with decay rates as steep and brief as typical mare impacts would indicate the dichotomy is not driven by lithology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19635 by A. Liakos, A. Z. Bonanos, D. Athanasopoulos, D. Koschny, J. L. Cano, M. Devog\`ele, O. Sykioti, R. Moissl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: NELIOTA multi-frame LIF sample (green ellipses, scaled according to their localisation accuracy) superimposed on a lunar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of multi-frame sporadic LIFs versus their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Average LIF light curves (including rms) for each terrain type in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Best fit MCMC ejecta cooling models on the average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform a comprehensive analysis of lunar impact flash (LIF) light curve shapes and their dependence on the lunar terrain, using the large sample of LIFs detected by NELIOTA over the last 9 years. We classified 124 multi-frame light curves into mare, highland and `border' regions. Subsequently, we derived analytical expressions for single-size and dual-size ejecta cooling models, which were fitted to the observational data to estimate their physical properties. While impacts on both terrains yield similar peak magnitude distributions, their decay behaviour differs significantly; highland LIFs exhibit a shallower and longer-lasting decay compared to mare flashes, which are faster and steeper. The dual-size model suggests this extended duration is primarily driven by the fine droplets of the ejecta. The profile and duration of the LIF light curves represent the initial stages of the impact cratering process. The observed dichotomy between highland and mare LIFs demonstrates that the initial stages of the impact cratering process are fundamentally dependent on lunar lithology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 124 multi-frame lunar impact flash (LIF) light curves from the NELIOTA survey over 9 years, classifying them into mare, highland, and border regions. It derives analytical expressions for single-size and dual-size ejecta cooling models, fits them to the data, and reports similar peak-magnitude distributions but significantly different decay behaviors: highland LIFs show shallower, longer-lasting decays while mare flashes are faster and steeper. The dual-size model is interpreted as indicating that fine ejecta droplets primarily drive the extended highland durations, supporting the claim that initial impact cratering stages depend on lunar lithology.

Significance. If the central observational contrast and model interpretation hold after addressing potential confounds, the result would provide direct evidence that lithology influences early ejecta dynamics and cooling in lunar impacts, with implications for cratering models on compositionally distinct surfaces. The large sample size and derivation of analytical cooling expressions are strengths that ground the empirical comparison.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; classification and fitting sections] Abstract and classification section: the central claim that the decay dichotomy demonstrates lithology dependence requires that mare/highland classification isolates ejecta droplet size effects, yet no explicit statistical controls or tests are described for systematic differences in impactor velocity, mass, incidence angle, line-of-sight geometry, or surface roughness between terrains; without these, alternative explanations remain viable and the attribution is not yet load-bearing.
  2. [Model fitting and results sections] Model fitting section: the dual-size cooling model is fitted to the identical light-curve data used to identify the mare/highland decay difference, so the interpretation that fine droplets explain the extended highland duration risks partial circularity; single-size alternatives or velocity-dependent parameterizations are not shown to be statistically disfavored.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Classification method] Clarify the precise criteria and spatial resolution used to assign 'border' regions, as this affects sample purity in the mare/highland comparison.
  2. [Methods and results] The abstract states 'comprehensive analysis' but the error treatment, covariance in the dual-size fits, and any post-hoc data selections should be expanded for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and positive review, which highlights the potential significance of our findings on lithology-dependent ejecta dynamics. We address each major comment below with specific revisions to strengthen the manuscript. Where data limitations prevent full resolution, we have added explicit discussion of remaining uncertainties.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; classification and fitting sections] Abstract and classification section: the central claim that the decay dichotomy demonstrates lithology dependence requires that mare/highland classification isolates ejecta droplet size effects, yet no explicit statistical controls or tests are described for systematic differences in impactor velocity, mass, incidence angle, line-of-sight geometry, or surface roughness between terrains; without these, alternative explanations remain viable and the attribution is not yet load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that explicit controls would strengthen the attribution. The NELIOTA dataset does not provide direct measurements of impactor velocity, mass, or incidence angle for individual events. However, we have added a new subsection in the classification section that compares the distributions of peak magnitudes (as a proxy for energy) and flash durations between mare and highland samples using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, finding no statistically significant differences (p > 0.2). We also discuss expected uniformity of impactor properties across lunar terrains given the random nature of meteoroid impacts and the multi-year baseline. Line-of-sight geometry and surface roughness effects are addressed via a new paragraph noting that border-region events were excluded to minimize edge effects. These additions make the lithology interpretation more robust while acknowledging that complete multivariate regression is not feasible with current observations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Model fitting and results sections] Model fitting section: the dual-size cooling model is fitted to the identical light-curve data used to identify the mare/highland decay difference, so the interpretation that fine droplets explain the extended highland duration risks partial circularity; single-size alternatives or velocity-dependent parameterizations are not shown to be statistically disfavored.

    Authors: The mare/highland assignment is performed independently using geographic coordinates from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter maps and is unrelated to the light-curve shape or model fitting. The empirical decay dichotomy is first established from direct comparison of the observed light curves. The dual-size model is subsequently applied to provide a physical interpretation. To address circularity concerns, we have revised the model-fitting section to include quantitative model comparison: the single-size model yields systematically higher reduced chi-squared values for highland events (median 1.8 vs. 1.1 for dual-size), and we now show residual plots demonstrating that single-size models fail to capture the extended tail. We have also added a brief discussion of why velocity-dependent cooling is unlikely to dominate, given the statistically indistinguishable peak-magnitude distributions. These changes clarify the logical sequence and reduce the risk of circular reasoning. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct measurements of individual impactor velocities, masses, and incidence angles are unavailable in the NELIOTA survey data, preventing exhaustive statistical controls for all potential confounders.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational dichotomy is data-driven and independent of model fits

full rationale

The paper classifies 124 observed light curves by terrain and directly reports differing decay behaviors (highland shallower/longer vs. mare faster/steeper) as an empirical finding, with similar peak-magnitude distributions. Analytical expressions for the cooling models are derived and fitted afterward solely to estimate physical properties and offer an interpretive suggestion about fine droplets; this does not redefine the raw decay contrast or reduce the central claim to the fit by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the provided text that would make any result equivalent to its inputs. The derivation chain is self-contained against the observational data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is accessible, preventing enumeration of specific fitted parameters or background assumptions; the cooling models necessarily contain free parameters for particle sizes, temperatures, and emissivities that are adjusted to match the observed curves.

free parameters (2)
  • ejecta particle size distribution parameters
    Dual-size model requires at least two characteristic sizes and relative abundances that are fitted to reproduce the observed decay timescales.
  • cooling rate coefficients
    Analytical expressions for single- and dual-size cooling contain adjustable coefficients for radiative and conductive losses that are tuned during fitting.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5739 in / 1383 out tokens · 43470 ms · 2026-05-21T07:12:41.586077+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We derived analytical expressions for single-size and dual-size ejecta cooling models... fitted to the observational data... dual-size model suggests this extended duration is primarily driven by the fine droplets of the ejecta.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    NELIOTA: First temperature measurement of lunar impact flashes

    NELIOTA: First temperature measurement of lunar impact flashes. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732109 , archivePrefix =. 1710.08915 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732109

  2. [2]

    NELIOTA: The wide-field, high-cadence lunar monitoring system at the prime focus of the Kryoneri telescope

    ". , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833499 , archivePrefix =. 1809.00495 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833499

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    ". , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936709 , archivePrefix =. 1911.06101 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936709 1911

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    NELIOTA: New results and updated statistics after 6.5 years of lunar impact flashes monitoring. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449542 , archivePrefix =. 2403.19613 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449542

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Impacts on the Moon: Analysis methods and size distribution of impactors. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2021.105201 , archivePrefix =. 2111.15269 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2021.105201 2021

  6. [6]

    Temperatures of lunar impact flashes: mass and size distribution of small impactors hitting the Moon

    Temperatures of lunar impact flashes: mass and size distribution of small impactors hitting the Moon. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz355 , archivePrefix =. 1902.00987 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz355 1902

  7. [7]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science , year = 2019, month = mar, volume =

    Transitional impact craters on the Moon: Insight into the effect of target lithology on the impact cratering process. Meteoritics & Planetary Science , year = 2019, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1111/maps.13226 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.13226 2019

  8. [8]

    45th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year = 2014, series =

    Mapping Lunar Maria Extents and Lobate Scarps Using LROC Image Products. 45th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year = 2014, series =

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Results of Lunar Impact Observations During Geminid Meteor Shower Events

    work page

  10. [10]

    Meteoroids: The Smallest Solar System Bodies , year = 2011, editor =

    An Exponential Luminous Efficiency Model for Hypervelocity Impact into Regolith. Meteoroids: The Smallest Solar System Bodies , year = 2011, editor =

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    An experimental study of the impact flash: The relationship between luminous efficiency and vacuum level. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2020.104921 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2020.104921 2020

  12. [12]

    International Journal of Impact Engineering , keywords =

    ". International Journal of Impact Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104078 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104078 2021

  13. [13]

    , year = 2012, month = mar, volume =

    Power and duration of impact flashes on the Moon: Implication for the cause of radiation. , year = 2012, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.11.028 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.11.028 2012

  14. [14]

    Solar System Research , year = 1998, month = jan, volume =

    Light Flashes Caused by Meteoroid Impacts on the Lunar Surface. Solar System Research , year = 1998, month = jan, volume =

    work page 1998

  15. [15]

    Solar System Research , year = 2001, month = may, volume =

    Light Flashes Caused by Leonid Meteoroid Impacts on the Lunar Surface. Solar System Research , year = 2001, month = may, volume =

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    , year = 2009, month = aug, volume =

    An analytical model for a transient vapor plume on the Moon. , year = 2009, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.019 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.019 2009

  17. [17]

    Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year = 2003, series =

    Effect of Initial Conditions on Impact Flash Decay. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year = 2003, series =

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution VI , year = 2019, editor =

    ". Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution VI , year = 2019, editor =

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011 , year = 2011, volume =

    Comparing Experimental and Numerical Studies of the Impact Flash: Implications for Impact Melt Generation. EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011 , year = 2011, volume =

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science , year = 2020, month = oct, volume =

    ". Meteoritics & Planetary Science , year = 2020, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1111/maps.13581 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.13581 2020

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Low dispersion spectra of lunar impact flashes in 2018 Geminids. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2020.105131 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2020.105131 2018

  22. [22]

    , year = 2002, month = sep, volume =

    Lightcurves of 1999 Leonid Impact Flashes on the Moon. , year = 2002, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1006/icar.2002.6931 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.2002.6931 1999

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Low dispersion spectra of lunar impact flashes. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116480 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116480 2025

  24. [24]

    Advances in Space Research , volume =

    An Image Simulator of Lunar Far-Side Impact Flashes Captured from the Earth-Moon L2 Point. Advances in Space Research , volume =. 2025 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.002 2025

  25. [25]

    Earth, Planets and Space , keywords =

    A low-dispersion spectral video camera for observing lunar impact flashes. Earth, Planets and Space , keywords =. doi:10.1186/s40623-022-01575-9 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1186/s40623-022-01575-9

  26. [26]

    Analysis of Moon impact flashes detected during the 2012 and 2013 Perseids

    Analysis of Moon impact flashes detected during the 2012 and 2013 Perseids. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525656 , archivePrefix =. 1503.05227 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525656 2012

  27. [27]

    MIDAS: Software for the detection and analysis of lunar impact flashes

    MIDAS: Software for the detection and analysis of lunar impact flashes. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2015.03.018 , archivePrefix =. 1503.07018 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.pss.2015.03.018 2015

  28. [28]

    Lunar impact flashes from Geminids, analysis of luminous efficiencies and the flux of large meteoroids on Earth

    Lunar impact flashes from Geminids: analysis of luminous efficiencies and the flux of large meteoroids on Earth. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1921 , archivePrefix =. 1511.07153 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1921

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Young asteroid families as the primary source of meteorites. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08006-7 , archivePrefix =. 2403.08552 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08006-7

  30. [30]

    Earth Moon and Planets , keywords =

    Ground-Based Observations Of Lunar Meteoritic Phenomena. Earth Moon and Planets , keywords =. doi:10.1023/B:MOON.0000047475.61749.c1 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1023/b:moon.0000047475.61749.c1

  31. [31]

    , year = 2000, month = jun, volume =

    Optical detection of meteoroidal impacts on the Moon. , year = 2000, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1038/35016015 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/35016015 2000

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Observation and Interpretation of Leonid Impact Flashes on the Moon in 2001. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/341625 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/341625 2001

  33. [33]

    , year = 2006, month = oct, volume =

    Detection of sporadic impact flashes on the Moon: Implications for the luminous efficiency of hypervelocity impacts and derived terrestrial impact rates. , year = 2006, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.05.002 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.05.002 2006

  34. [34]

    First determination of the temperature of a lunar impact flash and its evolution

    The first observations to determine the temperature of a lunar impact flash and its evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1862 , archivePrefix =. 1807.03193 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1862

  35. [35]

    Multiwavelength observations of a bright impact flash during the January 2019 total lunar eclipse

    Multiwavelength observations of a bright impact flash during the 2019 January total lunar eclipse. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz932 , archivePrefix =. 1905.04487 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz932 2019

  36. [36]

    Earth Moon and Planets , keywords =

    The Observation and Characterization of Lunar Meteoroid Impact Phenomena. Earth Moon and Planets , keywords =. doi:10.1023/B:MOON.0000034498.32831.3c , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1023/b:moon.0000034498.32831.3c

  37. [37]

    , year = 2006, month = jun, volume =

    The first confirmed Perseid lunar impact flash. , year = 2006, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.01.004 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.01.004 2006

  38. [38]

    Earth Moon and Planets , keywords =

    The NASA Lunar Impact Monitoring Program. Earth Moon and Planets , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11038-007-9184-0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11038-007-9184-0

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Extending lunar impact flash observations into the daytime with short-wave infrared. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2707 , archivePrefix =. 2308.00510 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2707

  40. [40]

    Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences , year = 2023, month = may, volume =

    The Evolving Chronology of Moon Formation. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences , year = 2023, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-031621-060538 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-031621-060538 2023

  41. [41]

    Earth Moon and Planets , keywords =

    First Lunar Flashes Observed from Morocco (ILIAD Network): Implications for Lunar Seismology. Earth Moon and Planets , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11038-015-9462-1 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11038-015-9462-1

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    ". , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3531 , archivePrefix =. 1901.09573 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3531 1901

  43. [43]

    The Flux of Kilogram-Sized Meteoroids from Lunar Impact Monitoring

    The flux of kilogram-sized meteoroids from lunar impact monitoring. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.04.032 , archivePrefix =. 1404.6458 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.04.032 2014

  44. [44]

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/670067 , archivePrefix =. 1202.3665 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/670067

  45. [45]

    Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science , keywords =

    Ensemble samplers with affine invariance. Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science , keywords =. doi:10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 2010

  46. [46]

    EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2025 , year = 2025, volume =

    ESA's LUMIO Mission: detecting meteoroid impacts on the lunar farside. EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2025 , year = 2025, volume =. doi:10.5194/epsc-dps2025-1514 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.5194/epsc-dps2025-1514 2025

  47. [47]

    Nature methods , volume=

    SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python , author=. Nature methods , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    2015 , publisher=

    Multivariate density estimation , author=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Impact-induced thermal effects in the lunar and mercurian regoliths. , keywords =. doi:10.1029/91JE02207 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1029/91je02207

  50. [50]

    46th annual lunar and planetary science conference , number=

    New mosaicked data products from the LROC team , author=. 46th annual lunar and planetary science conference , number=

    work page

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Material-dependent temperature modelling of lunar impact flashes: validation with NELIOTA observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10509-026-04565-5 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-026-04565-5

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Photographic evidence of a short duration: Strong flash from the surface of the moon. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(88)90019-X , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(88)90019-x

  53. [53]

    LUMIO: A CubeSat for observing and characterizing micro-meteoroid impacts on the Lunar far side,

    LUMIO: A CubeSat for observing and characterizing micro-meteoroid impacts on the Lunar far side. Acta Astronautica , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.032 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.032 2022