REVIEW 2 cited by
rho-meson longitudinal leading-twist distribution amplitude revisited and the Dto rho semileptonic decay
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
rho-meson longitudinal leading-twist distribution amplitude revisited and the Dto rho semileptonic decay
read the original abstract
Motivated by our previous work [Phys. Rev. D \textbf{104}, no.1, 016021 (2021)] on pionic leading-twist distribution amplitude (DA), we revisit $\rho$-meson leading-twist longitudinal DA $\phi_{2;\rho}^\|(x,\mu)$ in this paper. A model proposed by Chang based on the Dyson-Schwinger equations (DSEs) is adopted to describe the behavior of $\phi_{2;\rho}^\|(x,\mu)$. On the other hand, the $\xi$-moments of $\phi_{2;\rho}^\|(x,\mu)$ are calculated with the QCD sum rules in the framework of the background field theory. The sum rule formula for those moments are improved. More accurate values for the first five nonzero $\xi$-moments at typical scale $\mu =1, 1.4, 2, 3~{\rm GeV}$ are given, e.g., at $\mu = 1~{\rm GeV}$, \modi{$\langle\xi^2\rangle_{2;\rho}^\| = 0.220(6) $, $\langle\xi^4\rangle_{2;\rho}^\| = 0.103(4)$, $\langle\xi^6\rangle_{2;\rho}^\| = 0.066(5)$, $\langle\xi^8\rangle_{2;\rho}^\| = 0.046(4)$ and $\langle\xi^{10}\rangle_{2;\rho}^\| = 0.035(3)$}. By fitting those values with the least squares method, the DSE model for $\phi_{2;\rho}^\|(x,\mu)$ is determined. By taking the left-handed current light-cone sum rule approach, we get the transition form factor at large recoil region, {\it i.e.} $A_1(0) = 0.498^{+0.014}_{-0.012}$, $A_2(0)=0.460^{+0.055}_{-0.047}$, $V(0) = 0.800^{+0.015}_{-0.014}$, and the ratio $r_2 = 0.923^{+0.133}_{-0.119}$, $r_V = 1.607^{+0.071}_{-0.071}$. After making the extrapolation with a rapidly converging series based on $z(t)$-expansion, we present the decay width for the semileptonic decays $D\to\rho\ell^+\nu_\ell$. Finally, the branching fractions are $\mathcal{B}(D^0\to \rho^- e^+ \nu_e) = 1.889^{+0.176}_{-0.170}\pm 0.005$, $\mathcal{B}(D^+ \to \rho^0 e^+ \nu_e) = 2.380^{+0.221}_{-0.214}\pm 0.012$, $\mathcal{B}(D^0\to \rho^- \mu^+ \nu_\mu) = 1.881^{+0.174}_{-0.168}\pm 0.005$, $\mathcal{B}(D^+ \to \rho^0 \mu^+ \nu_\mu) =2.369^{+0.219}_{-0.211}\pm 0.011$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Vector mesons leading-twist longitudinal distribution amplitudes and related semi-leptonic decays within QCD sum rules
New QCD sum-rule calculation gives ξ-moments up to tenth order and PLP-model distribution amplitudes for ρ, K*, φ, which are then used to recalculate D_(s)→V semileptonic observables.
-
Scrutinizing lepton flavor universality and transition form factor correlation from charmed meson semileptonic decay into light strange vector $K^*$ meson
A light-cone sum-rule calculation predicts D_s^+→K^{*0} form factors and a muon/electron branching ratio R=0.950, consistent with the Standard Model.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.