Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

Agentic Services Computing

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes Agentic Services Computing: a lifecycle- and capability-driven paradigm that treats intelligent LLM-based agents as first-class, governable services rather than passive endpoints.

desk verdict A well-organized survey that makes a plausible case for a new subfield, but the core governance mechanism is a promise, not a result. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.24380 v3 pith:MTBNUKTD submitted 2025-09-29 cs.SE

Shuiguang Deng , Hailiang Zhao , Ziqi Wang , Wenzhuo Qian , Xiang Ao , Guanjie Cheng , Jianwei Yin , Albert Y. Zomaya
show 1 more author
Schahram Dustdar
This is my paper
classification cs.SE
keywords agenticservicescomputingLLMagentsmulti-agentsystemsservicelifecyclegovernancetrustworthinessautonomousdecision-makingservice-orientedarchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that large language model-powered agents represent a new kind of service—autonomous, goal-driven, stateful, and collaborative—that existing service paradigms (SOA, microservices, serverless) and existing agent research each handle only partially. It introduces Agentic Services Computing (ASC) as a unifying paradigm, formalized in Definition 1, that brings agents into the full service lifecycle: design, deployment, operation, and evolution. The work maps four research dimensions—perception, decision-making, multi-agent collaboration, and evaluation/alignment/trustworthiness—onto that lifecycle, producing a research agenda rather than a mature implementation. A sympathetic reader would care because, if ASC is right, the engineering discipline that made Web services reliable and governable can be extended to autonomous agents, making them auditable, contract-bound, and evolvable in production systems.

What carries the argument

The organizing mechanism is the ASC framework matrix: a lifecycle axis (Design, Deployment, Operation, Evolution) crossed with four capability dimensions (Perception/Context; Decision-Making/Execution; Multi-Agent Collaboration; Evaluation/Alignment/Trustworthiness). The formal anchor is Definition 1, which defines ASC as a 'lifecycle- and capability-driven paradigm for engineering intelligent agents as first-class services.' Supporting the definition are the SCALE characteristics, which specify what distinguishes an agentic service from a traditional endpoint. This matrix does the argumentative work: it converts scattered agent techniques into a structured service-engineering space, so that

What would settle it

A concrete test: deploy a set of production agentic services under ASC-style ASLOs (alignment fidelity, interpretability thresholds, bounded actions) for a quarter and measure the fraction of tasks where the reasoning-trace audit fails to explain an observed failure or policy violation; if that fraction stays high, the audit/governance premise fails. Alternatively, an experiment where versioned rollback of an agent's prompt or policy does not restore prior behavior would directly undercut the lifecycle-governance claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Definition 1: Agentic Services Computing is a lifecycle- and capability-driven paradigm for engineering intelligent agents as first-class services. The paper asserts that agentic services—persistent, goal-oriented agents that perceive, reason, act, and evolve—can be described, composed, delivered, monitored, audited, and retired using structures inherited from services computing, now extended with cognitive autonomy and emergent collaboration. It organizes the field along two axes: the four-phase lifecycle (Design, Deployment, Operation, Evolution) and four capability pillars (perception and context modeling; autonomous decision-making; multi-agent collaboration; evaluat

Load-bearing premise

The paradigm stands or falls on whether LLM-based agents can be made reliable, interpretable, and deterministic enough that service-level contracts, audit trails, versioning, and safe retirement genuinely apply to them in practice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Agents can be brought under the same lifecycle governance as traditional services, including versioned prompts, policies, memory schemas, canary deployments, and safe retirement protocols.
  • Agent Service Level Objectives (ASLOs) become machine-enforceable contracts covering not only latency and availability but also alignment fidelity, safety boundaries, and interpretability.
  • Monitoring extends from system metrics to cognitive observability: logging reasoning traces and decision pathways, not just API calls.
  • Multi-agent collaboration can be viewed as dynamic service composition, with negotiation, reputation, and fault tolerance replacing static orchestration.
  • Trustworthiness is treated as a lifelong, cross-cutting property enforced through audits, constitutional constraints, and human-in-the-loop governance, not a post-hoc add-on.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If ASC is adopted, the unit of service contracting shifts from 'what function to call' to 'what goal to achieve,' which may require new liability and compliance frameworks for outcomes rather than outputs.
  • The same lifecycle machinery could be applied to non-LLM agents (e.g., robotic or classical BDI agents), giving ASC a broader scope than the LLM-centric examples suggest, though the paper does not develop this.
  • The paper's roadmap implies a testable intermediate milestone: before interoperable agent societies arrive, one could validate ASLOs on a small set of production agents by measuring whether audit-trail completeness correlates with failure recovery speed.
  • The framework suggests that agent registries and audit APIs could become standardized infrastructure akin to package registries or service meshes; a concrete extension would be a reference implementation of a registry with versioned prompts and reasoning-trace hashes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Agentic Services Computing (ASC), a paradigm and research framework for treating LLM-based agents as first-class services. It surveys the foundations in services computing, multi-agent systems, and LLM-based agents; introduces the SCALE characteristics of agentic services; proposes a four-phase lifecycle (Design, Deployment, Operation, Evolution); and organizes research into four dimensions: perception/context modeling, autonomous decision-making, multi-agent collaboration, and evaluation/alignment/trustworthiness. It concludes with a three-horizon roadmap and future trends. The paper is a position/survey contribution rather than an empirical validation of the framework.

Significance. If the proposed framework holds, it could provide a valuable unifying synthesis for a fragmented literature, connecting classical MAS principles, LLM agent capabilities, and service-lifecycle engineering. The paper's strengths are its broad and current coverage, the lifecycle-by-capability matrix in Figure 4, the comparative protocol and benchmark tables, and its explicit identification of open challenges. The roadmap format and the honest acknowledgment of missing pieces are useful for the community. However, the contribution is conceptual and organizational, not evidential: there is no empirical validation, and the central governance claims depend on mechanisms that are described only as future milestones.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV-C; Definition 1 (§IV-A)] The abstract and Definition 1 claim that ASC enables agentic services to be systematically described, composed, delivered, monitored, audited, and evolved as first-class services. This requires a verifiable service contract: an interface specification with observable predicates and satisfaction conditions. The paper does not provide one. §III-B mentions 'service contracts that align with SOA principles' but does not define what a contract is for an autonomous, non-deterministic agent. §IV-C defers ASLOs to a mid-term milestone, and §VIII-D concedes that post-deployment validation is lacking. This is a load-bearing gap, not merely an LLM-reliability concern. Please either add a concrete ASLO/contract sketch with machine-checkable predicates and an evaluation procedure, or explicitly reposition ASC as a research agenda whose operational core is a goal rather than an existing mechanism.
  2. [§VIII-C; §IV-C] The trustworthiness pillar relies on audit APIs that expose 'reasoning-action traces' and 'auditable decision logs.' However, the paper itself notes in Table VI that Rationale-Augmented Agents can produce plausible but factually incorrect justifications. If internal reasoning traces are not causally faithful, they do not provide the accountability that ASC's governance claims require. The paper should specify which observables are verifiable (e.g., tool invocations, state transitions, pre/post conditions, outputs) and which are not (e.g., natural-language rationales), and explain how ASLOs would be checked against the verifiable subset. Without an evidence model, the audit mechanism is asserted rather than defined.
  3. [§VIII-D; §IV-C] The paper's own summary states that evaluation, alignment, and trustworthiness are fragmented: evaluation often ignores alignment, alignment lacks post-deployment validation, and trust mechanisms are added post-hoc. Since the ASC lifecycle is explicitly closed-loop—operational feedback feeds redesign and evolution—this gap is structural rather than a routine list of future work. The milestones in §IV-C are not tied to validation criteria. Please connect each milestone to a concrete success criterion, for example an ASLO that is machine-checkable on production traces, so that the lifecycle claim can be tested or at least sharply scoped.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table I] The 'Classical MAS' row cites reference [63], which is a survey on vision-based robotic grasping, not a survey of classical multi-agent systems. This citation error undermines the comparison table; please replace it with a proper MAS survey reference.
  2. [§IV-C] The sentence 'The following sections elaborate on each of the four research dimensions...' appears twice in consecutive paragraphs at the end of §IV-C. One occurrence should be deleted.
  3. [§VI-B.2] The text refers to 'APRMCTS [68]', but the cited reference title is 'Automated Repair of Programs from Large Language Models'. The label does not match the reference; please align the name or supply the intended citation.
  4. [§III-A] The SCALE framework is described as 'formalized,' but the five characteristics are qualitative. Consider using 'structured characterization' or another term that does not imply a formal specification, unless a formal definition is actually provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: ASC is a definitional/organizational framework; its claims do not reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

This paper is a survey/position paper: the central claim is Definition 1, which stipulates what Agentic Services Computing is, and the SCALE characteristics and four-phase lifecycle are presented as an organizing taxonomy rather than as consequences derived from prior equations or fitted data. The paper makes no quantitative predictions from fitted parameters, and no output is equivalent to an input by construction. The load-bearing external evidence consists of independently published agent systems, benchmarks, and standards (e.g., ReAct, Reflexion, AutoGen, MCP, A2A), which are used as examples and foundations, not as premises that presuppose ASC. The authors' self-citations (Refs. 57, 58, 199–202) appear in peripheral discussions of cloud-native background and scheduling examples; none is used to justify the ASC framework itself, to exclude alternatives, or to import a uniqueness theorem. Section IV-C explicitly defers ASLOs and agent contracts to mid-term milestones, and Section VIII-D admits evaluation/alignment integration remains fragmented; these are honest limitations, not disguised circular inputs. The framework's contribution is organizational and definitional, and no derivation loop was identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper's central contribution is conceptual, not empirical, so the axiom ledger is dominated by domain assumptions about agent capability and governance feasibility. It introduces three invented entities that are terminological rather than falsifiable, and no free parameters are fit to data.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption LLM-based agents can reliably perceive, reason, act, and collaborate in open environments.
    The entire premise of ASC is that agents are capable enough to be treated as autonomous services. This is argued through examples but not demonstrated in the paper (Sections II-C, VI).
  • domain assumption Service lifecycle governance (versioning, monitoring, SLAs, retirement) is applicable to autonomous agents.
    The paper assumes that governance mechanisms from services computing extend to non-deterministic agents. This is asserted in Sections II-D and IV-C, but no evidence is provided that such governance is feasible at scale.
  • domain assumption Classical MAS, services computing, and LLM-based agents are complementary and can be unified into one discipline.
    The synthesis claim underlying ASC, stated in Section II-D, requires that the three paradigms integrate without fundamental conflict. This is a reasonable but unproven position.
invented entities (3)
  • Agentic Service
    purpose: Defines the central unit of ASC, a persistent goal-driven agent treated as a service.
    Conceptual term introduced by the paper; no external falsifiable handle beyond the authors' definition.
  • SCALE framework
    purpose: Five characteristics (Stateful, Cognitive, Agent as goal executor, Lifelong collaborative learning, End-to-end lifecycle governance) that define an agentic service.
    An acronym/framework proposed by the authors to organize their definition.
  • Agent Service Level Objective (ASLO)
    purpose: Extension of SLA to specify alignment, safety, interpretability, and sustainability commitments for agents.
    Proposed metric in Section IV-C; not yet operationalized or measured anywhere.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Agentic Services Computing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MTBNUKTD

@misc{pith2026250924380,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Agentic Services Computing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MTBNUKTD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.24380}
}
read the original abstract

Services computing has evolved from Web services and microservices to cloud-native and serverless paradigms. These approaches established mature principles for describing, composing, deploying, operating, and governing reusable software functions. LLM-based agents now introduce a fundamentally different service form. Service value in this paradigm emerges not only from invoking predefined functions but also from delegating goals to autonomous entities. These entities understand context, use tools, collaborate with peers, and act across open environments. This shift raises a core question for services computing. How can goal-driven, stateful, tool-mediated, and accountable autonomous behavior be engineered and managed as a service? Recent studies on LLM agents and multi-agent systems provide important foundations. A clear service-centered research roadmap for this emerging paradigm nevertheless remains absent. This work introduces Agentic Services Computing (ASC) to address this gap. ASC extends services computing from managing reusable functional endpoints to engineering and governing autonomous service entities. It defines agentic services as service-oriented autonomous agents. Related research is organized through a lifecycle view that connects service objects, system structures, enabling infrastructure, evaluation metrics, application evidence, and open challenges. This service-centered perspective establishes a foundation for future service ecosystems. Autonomous agents can thus be systematically described, composed, delivered, monitored, audited, and evolved as first-class services.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.24380 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We define Agentic Services Computing as an emer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The orchestration of core sections in this paper. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison between agentic and traditional services. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Research framework of Agentic Services Computing, mapping core research dimensions across the service lifecycle. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Key dimensions of perception, context, and environ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Core paradigms and mechanisms for the autonomous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Core paradigms and mechanisms for multi-agent col [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The Model layer captures shared domain seman￾Services / Frameworks Tools / Resources Without MCP With MCP MCP Protocol MCP Server A MCP Server N Data Remote Service MCP Protocol MCP Protocol … Host with MCP Client (Claude, IDEs) Web APIs MCP Architecture Server Host Cl…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Agent collaboration and task coordination via CNP. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Does Hierarchy Help? Benchmarking Agent Coordination in Event-Driven Industrial Scheduling

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DESBench reveals structural trade-offs among centralized, hierarchical, heterarchical, and holonic coordination in dynamic industrial scheduling that outcome metrics alone miss.

  2. Credibility Trilemma in Polymatroidal Service Markets

    cs.GT 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    In non-modular polymatroidal service markets, revenue-optimal DSIC mechanisms cannot also be credible for strategic operators, with tight welfare-loss bounds on the Cost of Non-Credibility across network topologies.

  3. AgentOpt v0.1 Technical Report: Client-Side Optimization for LLM-Based Agent

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    AgentOpt introduces a framework-agnostic package that uses algorithms like UCB-E to find cost-effective model assignments in multi-step LLM agent pipelines, cutting evaluation budgets by 62-76% while maintaining near-...

  4. Industrial Data-Service-Knowledge Governance: Toward Integrated and Trusted Intelligence

    cs.CE 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    TRISK is a taxonomy and architecture for governing industrial AI trust across data, service, and knowledge layers, backed by a survey of 120+ works and one unreported case study.

  5. Agentic Metaverse Services: A New As-a-Service Paradigm

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Agent capabilities can be delivered as Meta-AaaS so that autonomous, embodied agents become the unit of service in metaverse business processes.

  6. OpenClaw and Ollama in Agentic AI: Toward Fully Autonomous and Scalable AI Agent Systems

    cs.AI 2026-04 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review-plus-demo claiming agentic capabilities emerge from system integration, backed by a 15-task benchmark whose C1→C3 performance gap is largely built into the test design.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

199 extracted references · 26 linked inside Pith · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    https://airflow.apache.org/

    Apache airflow. https://airflow.apache.org/. Accessed: 2025-08-27

    2025

  2. [2]

    https://babyagi.org/

    Babyagi. https://babyagi.org/. Accessed: 2025-08-27

    2025

  3. [3]

    https://camunda.com/

    Camunda: The universal process orchestrator. https://camunda.com/. Accessed: 2025-09-03

    2025

  4. [4]

    https://grafana.com/

    Grafana: The open-source platform for monitoring and observability. https://grafana.com/. Accessed: 2025-08-27

    2025

  5. [5]

    https:// kubernetes.io/

    Kubernetes: Production-grade container orchestration. https:// kubernetes.io/. Accessed: 2025-08-27

    2025

  6. [6]

    https:// www.llamaindex.ai/

    Llamaindex: Redefine document workflows with ai agents. https:// www.llamaindex.ai/. Accessed: 2025-08-28

    2025

  7. [7]

    https://opentelemetry.io/

    Prometheus: High-quality, ubiquitous, and portable telemetry to enable effective observability. https://opentelemetry.io/. Accessed: 2025-08- 27

    2025

  8. [8]

    https://prometheus.io/

    Prometheus: Open source metrics and monitoring for your systems and services. https://prometheus.io/. Accessed: 2025-08-27

    2025

Show all 199 references
  1. [9]

    https://github.com/ microsoft/semantic-kernel

    Semantic kernel: Build intelligent ai agents and multi-agent systems with this enterprise-ready orchestration framework. https://github.com/ microsoft/semantic-kernel. Accessed: 2025-08-28

    2025

  2. [10]

    Autogpt: An autonomous gpt-4 experiment. 2023. GitHub Repository: https://github.com/DataBassGit/Auto-GPT. [11]The Agent2Agent Protocol, 2025. https://a2a-protocol.org/latest/

    2023

  3. [12]

    https://www

    Guardrails ai: Mitigate gen ai risks with guardrails, 2025. https://www. guardrailsai.com/. [13]HayStack: The Production-Ready Open Source AI Framework, 2025. https://haystack.deepset.ai/. [14]LangGraph: Multi-Actor Application Framework, 2025. https://www. langchain.com/langgraph

    2025

  4. [15]

    https://www.langchain

    Langsmith: Ship agents with confidence, 2025. https://www.langchain. com/langsmith. [16]Model Context Protocol, 2025. https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/ getting-started/intro. [17]OpenAI Function Calling Guide, 2025. https://platform.openai.com/ docs/guides/function-calling...

    2025

  5. [19]

    https: //www.pinecone.io/

    Pinecone: The vector database for scale in production, 2025. https: //www.pinecone.io/. [20]TrustChain: Fostering a Human-Centred, Trustworthy and Sustainable Internet, 2025. https://trustchain.ngi.eu/

    2025

  6. [21]

    https:// weaviate.io/

    Weaviate: The ai-native database developers love, 2025. https:// weaviate.io/

    2025

  7. [22]

    Deep learning with differential privacy

    Martin Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian Goodfellow, H Brendan McMahan, Ilya Mironov, Kunal Talwar, and Li Zhang. Deep learning with differential privacy. InProceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, pages 308–318, 2016

    2016

  8. [23]

    Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

    Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  9. [24]

    Act-1: A generalist agent for tool use

    Adept AI. Act-1: A generalist agent for tool use. Technical report,

  10. [25]

    Flamingo: a visual language model for few- shot learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:23716–23736, 2022

    Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech, Iain Barr, Yana Hasson, Karel Lenc, Arthur Mensch, Katherine Millican, Malcolm Reynolds, et al. Flamingo: a visual language model for few- shot learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:23716...

    2022

  11. [26]

    Vision-and-language navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments

    Peter Anderson, Qi Wu, Damien Teney, Jake Bruce, Mark Johnson, Niko Sünderhauf, Ian Reid, Stephen Gould, and Anton Van Den Hen- gel. Vision-and-language navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments. InProceedings of the IEEE conferenc...

    2018

  12. [27]

    https://argilla.io

    Argilla.Argilla, 2025. https://argilla.io

    2025

  13. [28]

    Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073, 2022

    Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jack- son Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, et al. Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  14. [29]

    Serverless computing: Current trends and open problems

    Ioana Baldini, Paul Castro, Kerry Chang, Perry Cheng, Stephen Fink, Vatche Ishakian, Nick Mitchell, Vinod Muthusamy, Rodric Rabbah, Aleksander Slominski, et al. Serverless computing: Current trends and open problems. InResearch advances in cloud computing, pages 1–20. Springer, 2017

    2017

  15. [30]

    Beit: Bert pre- training of image transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08254, 2021

    Hangbo Bao, Li Dong, Songhao Piao, and Furu Wei. Beit: Bert pre- training of image transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08254, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  16. [31]

    Addison-Wesley Professional, 2015

    Len Bass, Ingo Weber, and Liming Zhu.DevOps: A software architect’s perspective. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2015

    2015

  17. [32]

    Jade–a fipa-compliant agent framework

    Fabio Bellifemine, Agostino Poggi, and Giovanni Rimassa. Jade–a fipa-compliant agent framework. InProceedings of PAAM, volume 99, page 33. London, 1999

    1999

  18. [33]

    O’Reilly Media, Inc

    Betsy Beyer, Chris Jones, Jennifer Petoff, and Niall Richard Murphy. Site reliability engineering: how Google runs production systems. " O’Reilly Media, Inc.", 2016

    2016

  19. [34]

    Large ai models and their applications: Classification, limitations, and potential solutions

    Jing Bi, Ziqi Wang, Haitao Yuan, Xiankun Shi, Ziyue Wang, Jia Zhang, MengChu Zhou, and Rajkumar Buyya. Large ai models and their applications: Classification, limitations, and potential solutions. Software: Practice and Experience, 55(6):1003–1017, January 2025

    2025

  20. [35]

    https: //wandb.ai/site/

    Weights & Biases.Weights & Biases: The AI developer platform to build AI agents, applications, and models with confidence, 2025. https: //wandb.ai/site/

    2025

  21. [36]

    Service-oriented computing.Computer, 39(3):99–101, 2006

    M Bichier and K-J Lin. Service-oriented computing.Computer, 39(3):99–101, 2006

    2006

  22. [37]

    John Wiley & Sons, 2007

    Rafael H Bordini, Jomi Fred Hübner, and Michael Wooldridge.Pro- gramming multi-agent systems in AgentSpeak using Jason. John Wiley & Sons, 2007

    2007

  23. [38]

    Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning.Computational intelligence, 4(3):349–355, 1988

    Michael E Bratman, David J Israel, and Martha E Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning.Computational intelligence, 4(3):349–355, 1988

    1988

  24. [39]

    Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 8(3):203– 236, 2004

    Paolo Bresciani, Anna Perini, Paolo Giorgini, Fausto Giunchiglia, and John Mylopoulos. Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 8(3):203– 236, 2004

    2004

  25. [40]

    A complete stit logic for knowledge and action, and some of its applications

    Jan Broersen. A complete stit logic for knowledge and action, and some of its applications. InInternational workshop on declarative agent languages and technologies, pages 47–59. Springer, 2008

    2008

  26. [41]

    A robust layered control system for a mobile robot

    Rodney Brooks. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE journal on robotics and automation, 2(1):14–23, 2003

    2003

  27. [42]

    Language models are few-shot learners

    Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020

    1901

  28. [43]

    Borg, omega, and kubernetes.Communications of the ACM, 59(5):50–57, 2016

    Brendan Burns, Brian Grant, David Oppenheimer, Eric Brewer, and John Wilkes. Borg, omega, and kubernetes.Communications of the ACM, 59(5):50–57, 2016

    2016

  29. [44]

    Agent oriented analysis using message/uml

    Giovanni Caire, Wim Coulier, Francisco Garijo, Jorge Gomez, Juan Pavon, Francisco Leal, Paulo Chainho, Paul Kearney, Jamie Stark, Richard Evans, et al. Agent oriented analysis using message/uml. InInternational Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, pages 119–135. Sp...

    2001

  30. [45]

    An approach for qos-aware service composition based on genetic algorithms

    Gerardo Canfora, Massimiliano Di Penta, Raffaele Esposito, and Maria Luisa Villani. An approach for qos-aware service composition based on genetic algorithms. InProceedings of the 7th Annual Con- ference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO ’05, page 1069–1075, New Y...

    2005

  31. [46]

    Dynamic role binding in a service oriented architecture

    Humberto Nicolás Castejón and Rolv Bræk. Dynamic role binding in a service oriented architecture. InInternational Conference on 22 Intelligence in Communication Systems, pages 109–122. Springer, 2005

    2005

  32. [47]

    Agentboard: An analytical evaluation board of multi-turn llm agents.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:74325–74362, 2024

    Ma Chang, Junlei Zhang, Zhihao Zhu, Cheng Yang, Yujiu Yang, Yaohui Jin, Zhenzhong Lan, Lingpeng Kong, and Junxian He. Agentboard: An analytical evaluation board of multi-turn llm agents.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:74325–74362, 2024

    2024

  33. [48]

    Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Paul F Christiano, Jan Leike, Tom Brown, Miljan Martic, Shane Legg, and Dario Amodei. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  34. [49]

    Mobilevlm v2: Faster and stronger baseline for vision language model

    Xiangxiang Chu, Limeng Qiao, Xinyu Zhang, Shuang Xu, Fei Wei, Yang Yang, Xiaofei Sun, Yiming Hu, Xinyang Lin, Bo Zhang, et al. Mobilevlm v2: Faster and stronger baseline for vision language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03766, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [50]

    Model checking

    Edmund M Clarke. Model checking. InInternational conference on foundations of software technology and theoretical computer science, pages 54–56. Springer, 1997

    1997

  36. [51]

    Edward H. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods.Public Choice, 11(1):17–33, 1971

    1971

  37. [52]

    https: //www.jaegertracing.io/

    CNCF.Jaeger: open source, distributed tracing platform, 2025. https: //www.jaegertracing.io/

    2025

  38. [53]

    https://linkerd.io/

    CNCF.Linkerd: Enterprise power without enterprise complexity, 2025. https://linkerd.io/

    2025

  39. [54]

    Business process execution language for web services

    Francisco Curbera, Frank Leymann, Dieter Roller, and Satish R Thatte. Business process execution language for web services. 2003

    2003

  40. [55]

    Embodied question answering

    Abhishek Das, Samyak Datta, Georgia Gkioxari, Stefan Lee, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Embodied question answering. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1–10, 2018

    2018

  41. [56]

    Plug and play language models: A simple approach to controlled text generation

    Sumanth Dathathri, Andrea Madotto, Janice Lan, Jane Hung, Eric Frank, Piero Molino, Jason Yosinski, and Rosanne Liu. Plug and play language models: A simple approach to controlled text generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.02164, 2019

    1912 arXiv

  42. [57]

    Cloud-native computing: A survey from the perspective of services.Proceedings of the IEEE, 112(1):12–46, 2025

    Shuiguang Deng, Hailiang Zhao, Binbin Huang, Cheng Zhang, Feiyi Chen, Yinuo Deng, Jianwei Yin, Schahram Dustdar, and Albert Y Zomaya. Cloud-native computing: A survey from the perspective of services.Proceedings of the IEEE, 112(1):12–46, 2025

    2025

  43. [58]

    Acceler- ating containerized service delivery at the network edge, 2025

    Yinuo Deng, Hailiang Zhao, Dongjing Wang, Peng Chen, Wenzhuo Qian, Jianwei Yin, Schahram Dustdar, and Shuiguang Deng. Acceler- ating containerized service delivery at the network edge, 2025

    2025

  44. [59]

    The dmars architecture: A specification of the distributed multi-agent reasoning system.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 9(1):5–53, 2004

    Mark d’Inverno, Michael Luck, Michael Georgeff, David Kinny, and Michael Wooldridge. The dmars architecture: A specification of the distributed multi-agent reasoning system.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 9(1):5–53, 2004

    2004

  45. [60]

    The observable mind: Enabling an autonomous agent sharing its conscious contents using a cognitive architecture

    Daqi Dong. The observable mind: Enabling an autonomous agent sharing its conscious contents using a cognitive architecture. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, volume 2, pages 172–176, 2023

    2023

  46. [61]

    A survey on in-context learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00234, 2022

    Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Tianyu Liu, et al. A survey on in-context learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00234, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  47. [62]

    Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model

    Danny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Corey Lynch, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan Tompson, Quan Vuong, Tianhe Yu, Wenlong Huang, et al. Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. 2023

    2023

  48. [63]

    Guoguang Du, Kai Wang, Shiguo Lian, and Kaiyong Zhao. Vision- based robotic grasping from object localization, object pose estimation to grasp estimation for parallel grippers: a review.Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(3):1677–1734, 2021

    2021

  49. [64]

    A survey of embodied ai: From simulators to research tasks

    Jiafei Duan, Samson Yu, Hui Li Tan, Hongyuan Zhu, and Cheston Tan. A survey of embodied ai: From simulators to research tasks. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 6(2):230–244, 2022

    2022

  50. [65]

    Htn planning: Complexity and expressivity

    Kutluhan Erol, James Hendler, and Dana S Nau. Htn planning: Complexity and expressivity. InAAAI, volume 94, pages 1123–1128, 1994

    1994

  51. [66]

    Feature flags and dynamic configuration in microservices

    Dorcas Esther and Elizabeth Oliver. Feature flags and dynamic configuration in microservices. 2025

    2025

  52. [67]

    The many faces of publish/subscribe.ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 35(2):114–131, 2003

    Patrick Th Eugster, Pascal A Felber, Rachid Guerraoui, and Anne- Marie Kermarrec. The many faces of publish/subscribe.ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 35(2):114–131, 2003

    2003

  53. [68]

    Automated repair of programs from large language models

    Zhiyu Fan, Xiang Gao, Martin Mirchev, Abhik Roychoudhury, and Shin Hwei Tan. Automated repair of programs from large language models. In2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 1469–1481. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  54. [69]

    Agent/group/roles: Simulating with organizations

    Jacques Ferber, Olivier Gutknecht, Fabien Michel, et al. Agent/group/roles: Simulating with organizations. InFourth International Workshop on Agent-Based Simulation (ABS03), 2003

    2003

  55. [70]

    Towards trustworthy ai: A review of ethical and robust large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13934, 2024

    Md Meftahul Ferdaus, Mahdi Abdelguerfi, Elias Ioup, Kendall N Niles, Ken Pathak, and Steven Sloan. Towards trustworthy ai: A review of ethical and robust large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13934, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  56. [71]

    Fipa communicative act library specification.Change, 2000(01/18), 2000

    T FIPA. Fipa communicative act library specification.Change, 2000(01/18), 2000

    2000

  57. [72]

    Magentic-one: A generalist multi-agent system for solving complex tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04468, 2024

    Adam Fourney, Gagan Bansal, Hussein Mozannar, Cheng Tan, Eduardo Salinas, Friederike Niedtner, Grace Proebsting, Griffin Bassman, Jack Gerrits, Jacob Alber, et al. Magentic-one: A generalist multi-agent system for solving complex tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04468, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  58. [73]

    An overview of it service management.Communications of the ACM, 52(5):124–127, 2009

    Stuart D Galup, Ronald Dattero, Jim J Quan, and Sue Conger. An overview of it service management.Communications of the ACM, 52(5):124–127, 2009

    2009

  59. [74]

    Pal: Program-aided language models, 2022

    Luyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon, Pengfei Liu, Yiming Yang, Jamie Callan, and Graham Neubig. Pal: Program-aided language models, 2022

    2022

  60. [75]

    Datasheets for datasets.Communications of the ACM, 64(12):86–92, 2021

    Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wort- man Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé Iii, and Kate Crawford. Datasheets for datasets.Communications of the ACM, 64(12):86–92, 2021

    2021

  61. [76]

    Modeling rational agents within a bdi- architecture

    M Georgeff and A Rao. Modeling rational agents within a bdi- architecture. InProc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’91). Morgan Kaufmann, pages 473–484. of, 1991

    1991

  62. [77]

    Reactive reasoning and planning

    Michael P Georgeff and Amy L Lansky. Reactive reasoning and planning. InAAAI, volume 87, pages 677–682, 1987

    1987

  63. [78]

    An overview of hierarchical task network planning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.7426, 2014

    Ilche Georgievski and Marco Aiello. An overview of hierarchical task network planning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.7426, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  64. [79]

    Decentralized task alloca- tion in multi-robot systems via bipartite graph matching augmented with fuzzy clustering

    Payam Ghassemi and Souma Chowdhury. Decentralized task alloca- tion in multi-robot systems via bipartite graph matching augmented with fuzzy clustering. InInternational design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, volume 517...

    2018

  65. [80]

    Imagebind: One embedding space to bind them all

    Rohit Girdhar, Alaa Ghosh, Kristen Grauman, Thalaiyasingam Ajan- than, Joao Carreira, Christoph Feichtenhofer, and Pedro Pinheiro. Imagebind: One embedding space to bind them all. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20017–20027, 2023

    2023

  66. [81]

    https://cloud.google.com/ products/agent-builder

    Google.Vertex AI Agent Builder, 2025. https://cloud.google.com/ products/agent-builder

    2025

  67. [82]

    Iqa: Visual question answering in interactive environments

    Daniel Gordon, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Mohammad Rastegari, Joseph Redmon, Dieter Fox, and Ali Farhadi. Iqa: Visual question answering in interactive environments. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4089–4098, 2018

    2018

  68. [83]

    Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory

    Alex Graves, Greg Wayne, Malcolm Reynolds, Tim Harley, Ivo Dani- helka, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwi ´nska, Sergio Gómez Colmenarejo, Edward Grefenstette, Tiago Ramalho, John Agapiou, et al. Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory. Nature, 538(7626):471...

    2016

  69. [84]

    Incentives in teams.Econometrica, 41(4):617–631, 1973

    Theodore Groves. Incentives in teams.Econometrica, 41(4):617–631, 1973

    1973

  70. [85]

    Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang

    Taicheng Guo, Xiuying Chen, Yaqi Wang, Ruidi Chang, Shichao Pei, Nitesh V . Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang. Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges, 2025

    2025

  71. [86]

    The off-switch game

    Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Anca D Dragan, Pieter Abbeel, and Stuart Russell. The off-switch game. InAAAI Workshops, 2017

    2017

  72. [87]

    The symbol grounding problem.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1-3):335–346, 1990

    Stevan Harnad. The symbol grounding problem.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1-3):335–346, 1990

    1990

  73. [88]

    Llm-based multi-agent sys- tems for software engineering: Literature review, vision, and the road ahead.ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 34(5):1–30, 2025

    Junda He, Christoph Treude, and David Lo. Llm-based multi-agent sys- tems for software engineering: Literature review, vision, and the road ahead.ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 34(5):1–30, 2025

    2025

  74. [89]

    Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners

    Kaiming He, Xinlei Chen, Saining Xie, Yanghao Li, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 16000–16009, 2022

    2022

  75. [90]

    A baseline for detecting misclassi- fied and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02136, 2016

    Dan Hendrycks and Kevin Gimpel. A baseline for detecting misclassi- fied and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02136, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  76. [91]

    Distilling the knowl- edge in a neural network.arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015

    Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeff Dean. Distilling the knowl- edge in a neural network.arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015. 23

    2015 arXiv

  77. [92]

    Knowledge graphs

    Aidan Hogan, Eva Blomqvist, Michael Cochez, Claudia d’Amato, Gerard De Melo, Claudio Gutierrez, Sabrina Kirrane, José Emilio Labra Gayo, Roberto Navigli, Sebastian Neumaier, et al. Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys (Csur), 54(4):1–37, 2021

    2021

  78. [93]

    Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi- agent collaborative framework

    Sirui Hong, Mingchen Zhuge, Jonathan Chen, Xiawu Zheng, Yuheng Cheng, Ceyao Zhang, Jinlin Wang, Zili Wang, Steven Ka Shing Yau, Zijuan Lin, et al. Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi- agent collaborative framework. International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, 2024

    2024

  79. [94]

    Meta-learning in neural networks: A survey.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(9):5149–5169, 2021

    Timothy Hospedales, Antreas Antoniou, Paul Micaelli, and Amos Storkey. Meta-learning in neural networks: A survey.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(9):5149–5169, 2021

    2021

  80. [95]

    A survey of safety and trustworthiness of large language models through the lens of verification and validation.Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(7):175, 2025

    Xiaowei Huang, Wenjie Ruan, Wei Huang, Gaojie Jin, Yi Dong, Changshun Wu, Saddek Bensalem, Ronghui Mu, Yi Qi, Xingyu Zhao, et al. A survey of safety and trustworthiness of large language models through the lens of verification and validation.Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(...

    2025

  81. [96]

    Ai safety via debate, 2018

    Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei. Ai safety via debate, 2018

    2018

  82. [97]

    Iso/iec/ieee 15288:2023: Systems and software engineering — system life cycle processes, 2023

    ISO. Iso/iec/ieee 15288:2023: Systems and software engineering — system life cycle processes, 2023

    2023

  83. [98]

    https://istio.io

    Istio.Istio, 2025. https://istio.io

    2025

  84. [99]

    An agent-based approach for building complex software systems.Communications of the ACM, 44(4):35–41, 2001

    Nicholas R Jennings. An agent-based approach for building complex software systems.Communications of the ACM, 44(4):35–41, 2001

    2001

  85. [100]

    The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines.Nature machine intelligence, 1(9):389–399, 2019

    Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca, and Effy Vayena. The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines.Nature machine intelligence, 1(9):389–399, 2019

    2019

  86. [101]

    Spatial gossip and resource location protocols.Journal of the ACM (JACM), 51(6):943– 967, 2004

    David Kempe, Jon Kleinberg, and Alan Demers. Spatial gossip and resource location protocols.Journal of the ACM (JACM), 51(6):943– 967, 2004

    2004

  87. [102]

    The vision of autonomic computing.Computer, 36(1):41–50, 2003

    Jeffrey O Kephart and David M Chess. The vision of autonomic computing.Computer, 36(1):41–50, 2003

    2003

  88. [103]

    The emergence of division of labor in multi-agent systems

    David W King and Gilbert L Peterson. The emergence of division of labor in multi-agent systems. In2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO), pages 107–116. IEEE, 2019

    2019

  89. [104]

    Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks.Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 114(13):3521–3526, 2017

    James Kirkpatrick, Razvan Pascanu, Neil Rabinowitz, Joel Veness, Guillaume Desjardins, Andrei A Rusu, Kieran Milan, John Quan, Tiago Ramalho, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwinska, et al. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks.Proceedings of the national academy of scienc...

    2017

  90. [105]

    Visualwebarena: Evaluating multimodal agents on realistic visual web tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13649, 2024

    Jing Yu Koh, Robert Lo, Lawrence Jang, Vikram Duvvur, Ming Chong Lim, Po-Yu Huang, Graham Neubig, Shuyan Zhou, Ruslan Salakhutdi- nov, and Daniel Fried. Visualwebarena: Evaluating multimodal agents on realistic visual web tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13649, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  91. [106]

    Machine learning operations (mlops): Overview, definition, and architecture

    Dominik Kreuzberger, Niklas Kühl, and Sebastian Hirschl. Machine learning operations (mlops): Overview, definition, and architecture. IEEE access, 11:31866–31879, 2023

    2023

  92. [107]

    Ai agents: Evolution, architecture, and real-world applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12687, 2025

    Naveen Krishnan. Ai agents: Evolution, architecture, and real-world applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12687, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  93. [108]

    Dvc: Data version control-git for data & models.Zenodo, 2021

    Ruslan Kuprieiev, Dmitry Petrov, Saugat Pachhai, Paweł Redzy ´nski, Casper Da Costa-Luis, Alexander Schepanovski, Peter Rowlands, Ivan Shcheklein, Jorge Orpinel, Fábio Santos, et al. Dvc: Data version control-git for data & models.Zenodo, 2021

    2021

  94. [109]

    Openfaas

    Dac-Nhuong Le, Souvik Pal, and Prasant Kumar Pattnaik. Openfaas. Cloud computing solutions: architecture, data storage, implementation and security, pages 287–303, 2022

    2022

  95. [110]

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 19730–19742. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  96. [111]

    Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation

    Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven Hoi. Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 12888–12900. PMLR, 2022

    2022

  97. [112]

    API-bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs

    Minghao Li, Yingxiu Zhao, Bowen Yu, Feifan Song, Hangyu Li, Haiyang Yu, Zhoujun Li, Fei Huang, and Yongbin Li. API-bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs. In Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali, editors,Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Met...

    2023

  98. [113]

    Taskmatrix

    Yaobo Liang, Chenfei Wu, Ting Song, Wenshan Wu, Yan Xia, Yu Liu, Yang Ou, Shuai Lu, Lei Ji, Shaoguang Mao, et al. Taskmatrix. ai: Completing tasks by connecting foundation models with millions of apis.Intelligent Computing, 3:0063, 2024

    2024

  99. [114]

    Truthfulqa: Mea- suring how models mimic human falsehoods.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958, 2021

    Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. Truthfulqa: Mea- suring how models mimic human falsehoods.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  100. [115]

    Large language model-based agents for software engineering: A survey, 2025

    Junwei Liu, Kaixin Wang, Yixuan Chen, Xin Peng, Zhenpeng Chen, Lingming Zhang, and Yiling Lou. Large language model-based agents for software engineering: A survey, 2025

    2025

  101. [116]

    Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03688, 2023

    Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, et al. Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03688, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  102. [117]

    Sqa3d: Situated question answering in 3d scenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07474, 2022

    Xiaojian Ma, Silong Yong, Zilong Zheng, Qing Li, Yitao Liang, Song- Chun Zhu, and Siyuan Huang. Sqa3d: Situated question answering in 3d scenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07474, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  103. [118]

    Owl-s: Semantic markup for web services

    David Martin, Mark Burstein, Jerry Hobbs, Ora Lassila, Drew Mc- Dermott, Sheila McIlraith, Srini Narayanan, Massimo Paolucci, Bijan Parsia, Terry Payne, et al. Owl-s: Semantic markup for web services. W3C member submission, 22(4), 2004

    2004

  104. [119]

    Astor: A program repair library for java

    Matias Martinez and Martin Monperrus. Astor: A program repair library for java. InProceedings of the 25th international symposium on software testing and analysis, pages 441–444, 2016

    2016

  105. [120]

    Commitment-based and dialogue-game-based protocols: new trends in agent communication languages.The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(2):157–179, 2002

    Nicolas Maudet and Brahim Chaib-Draa. Commitment-based and dialogue-game-based protocols: new trends in agent communication languages.The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(2):157–179, 2002

    2002

  106. [121]

    Docker: lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment.Linux j, 239(2):2, 2014

    Dirk Merkel et al. Docker: lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment.Linux j, 239(2):2, 2014

    2014

  107. [122]

    https://www.microsoft.com/ en-us/microsoft-365-copilot/microsoft-copilot-studio

    Microsoft.Microsoft Copilot Studio, 2025. https://www.microsoft.com/ en-us/microsoft-365-copilot/microsoft-copilot-studio

    2025

  108. [123]

    Multiagent learn- ing through neuroevolution

    Risto Miikkulainen, Eliana Feasley, Leif Johnson, Igor Karpov, Pad- mini Rajagopalan, Aditya Rawal, and Wesley Tansey. Multiagent learn- ing through neuroevolution. InIEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, pages 24–46. Springer, 2012

    2012

  109. [124]

    Metaicl: Learning to learn in context.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.15943, 2021

    Sewon Min, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Metaicl: Learning to learn in context.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.15943, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  110. [125]

    Model cards for model reporting

    Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. Model cards for model reporting. InProceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pages 220–229, 2019

    2019

  111. [126]

    https://mlflow

    MLflow.MLflow: Deliver production-ready AI, 2025. https://mlflow. org

    2025

  112. [127]

    O’Reilly Media, 2015

    Sam Newman.Building microservices: Designing fine-grained systems. O’Reilly Media, 2015

    2015

  113. [128]

    Semantic web service discovery: state-of-the-art and research challenges.Personal and ubiquitous computing, 17(8):1741–1752, 2013

    Le Duy Ngan and Rajaraman Kanagasabai. Semantic web service discovery: state-of-the-art and research challenges.Personal and ubiquitous computing, 17(8):1741–1752, 2013

    2013

  114. [129]

    Nguyen, Thinh Dao, Duy C

    Quang H. Nguyen, Thinh Dao, Duy C. Hoang, Juliette Decugis, Saurav Manchanda, Nitesh V . Chawla, and Khoa D. Doan. Metallm: A high- performant and cost-efficient dynamic framework for wrapping llms, 2025

    2025

  115. [130]

    Multi- agent deep reinforcement learning for task allocation in dynamic environment

    Dhouha Ben Noureddine, Atef Gharbi, and Samir Ben Ahmed. Multi- agent deep reinforcement learning for task allocation in dynamic environment. InICSOFT, pages 17–26, 2017

    2017

  116. [131]

    In search of an understandable consensus algorithm

    Diego Ongaro and John Ousterhout. In search of an understandable consensus algorithm. In2014 USENIX annual technical conference (USENIX ATC 14), pages 305–319, 2014

    2014

  117. [132]

    Patil, Ion Stoica, and Joseph E

    Charles Packer, Sarah Wooders, Kevin Lin, Vivian Fang, Shishir G. Patil, Ion Stoica, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. Memgpt: Towards llms as operating systems, 2023

    2023

  118. [133]

    Service-oriented computing: Concepts, charac- teristics and directions

    Mike P Papazoglou. Service-oriented computing: Concepts, charac- teristics and directions. InProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, 2003. WISE 2003., pages 3–12. IEEE, 2003

    2003

  119. [134]

    Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues.The VLDB journal, 16(3):389–415, 2007

    Mike P Papazoglou and Willem-Jan Van Den Heuvel. Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues.The VLDB journal, 16(3):389–415, 2007

    2007

  120. [135]

    Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review.Neural networks, 113:54–71, 2019

    German I Parisi, Ronald Kemker, Jose L Part, Christopher Kanan, and Stefan Wermter. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review.Neural networks, 113:54–71, 2019

    2019

  121. [136]

    Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior

    Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. InProceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology, pages 1–22, 2023

    2023

  122. [137]

    Negotiation through argumen- tation—a preliminary report

    Simon Parsons and Nicholas R Jennings. Negotiation through argumen- tation—a preliminary report. InProceedings of the 2nd international conference On multi agent systems, pages 267–274, 1996. 24

    1996

  123. [138]

    Agentsociety: Large-scale simulation of llm-driven generative agents advances understanding of human behaviors and society.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08691, 2025

    Jinghua Piao, Yuwei Yan, Jun Zhang, Nian Li, Junbo Yan, Xiaochong Lan, Zhihong Lu, Zhiheng Zheng, Jing Yi Wang, Di Zhou, et al. Agentsociety: Large-scale simulation of llm-driven generative agents advances understanding of human behaviors and society.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502....

    2025 arXiv

  124. [139]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. InInternational conference on machine learning, pag...

    2021

  125. [140]

    Robust speech recognition via large- scale weak supervision, 2022

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, and Ilya Sutskever. Robust speech recognition via large- scale weak supervision, 2022

    2022

  126. [141]

    Improving language understanding by generative pre-training

    Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. 2018

    2018

  127. [142]

    Language models are unsupervised multitask learners.OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019

    Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners.OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019

    2019

  128. [143]

    Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:53728–53741, 2023

    Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D Manning, Stefano Ermon, and Chelsea Finn. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:53728–53741, 2023

    2023

  129. [144]

    Mining microservice design patterns

    Kamala Ramasubramanian, Eliana Phillips, and Peter Alvaro. Mining microservice design patterns. InProceedings of the 13th Symposium on Cloud Computing, pages 190–195, 2022

    2022

  130. [145]

    Monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learn- ing.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(178):1–51, 2020

    Tabish Rashid, Mikayel Samvelyan, Christian Schroeder De Witt, Gregory Farquhar, Jakob Foerster, and Shimon Whiteson. Monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learn- ing.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(178):1–51, 2020

    2020

  131. [146]

    Magnnet: Multi-agent graph neural network-based effi- cient task allocation for autonomous vehicles with deep reinforcement learning, 2025

    Lavanya Ratnabala, Aleksey Fedoseev, Robinroy Peter, and Dzmitry Tsetserukou. Magnnet: Multi-agent graph neural network-based effi- cient task allocation for autonomous vehicles with deep reinforcement learning, 2025

    2025

  132. [147]

    Act-r: A cognitive architecture for modeling cognition.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 10(3):e1488, 2019

    Frank E Ritter, Farnaz Tehranchi, and Jacob D Oury. Act-r: A cognitive architecture for modeling cognition.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 10(3):e1488, 2019

    2019

  133. [148]

    Artificial intelligence in service-oriented software design.Engineering Applica- tions of Artificial Intelligence, 53:86–104, 2016

    Guillermo Rodríguez, Álvaro Soria, and Marcelo Campo. Artificial intelligence in service-oriented software design.Engineering Applica- tions of Artificial Intelligence, 53:86–104, 2016

    2016

  134. [149]

    Experience replay for continual learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    David Rolnick, Arun Ahuja, Jonathan Schwarz, Timothy Lillicrap, and Gregory Wayne. Experience replay for continual learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    2019

  135. [150]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffu- sion models, 2021

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffu- sion models, 2021

    2021

  136. [151]

    everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work

    Nithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong, Praveen Paritosh, and Lora M Aroyo. “everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data cascades in high-stakes ai. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI...

    2021

  137. [152]

    Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:68539–68551, 2023

    Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Eric Hambro, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:68539–68551, 2023

    2023

  138. [153]

    Springer, 1980

    John R Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, Manfred Bierwisch, et al.Speech act theory and pragmatics, volume 10. Springer, 1980

    1980

  139. [154]

    Fereshteh Sheikholeslami and Nima Jafari Navimipour. Auction-based resource allocation mechanisms in the cloud environments: a review of the literature and reflection on future challenges.Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 30(16):e4456, 2018

    2018

  140. [155]

    Hugginggpt: Solving ai tasks with chatgpt and its friends in hugging face.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:38154–38180, 2023

    Yongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li, Weiming Lu, and Yueting Zhuang. Hugginggpt: Solving ai tasks with chatgpt and its friends in hugging face.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:38154–38180, 2023

    2023

  141. [156]

    Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforce- ment learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:8634–8652, 2023

    Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforce- ment learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:8634–8652, 2023

    2023

  142. [157]

    Alfred: A benchmark for interpreting grounded instructions for everyday tasks

    Mohit Shridhar, Jesse Thomason, Daniel Gordon, Yonatan Bisk, Win- son Han, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Dieter Fox. Alfred: A benchmark for interpreting grounded instructions for everyday tasks. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern...

    2020

  143. [158]

    The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver.IEEE Transactions on computers, 29(12):1104–1113, 1980

    Reid G Smith. The contract net protocol: High-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver.IEEE Transactions on computers, 29(12):1104–1113, 1980

    1980

  144. [159]

    Corrigibility

    Nate Soares, Benja Fallenstein, Stuart Armstrong, and Eliezer Yud- kowsky. Corrigibility. InAAAI Workshop: AI and Ethics, 2015

    2015

  145. [160]

    Zero trust architecture.NIST special publication, 800(207):800–207, 2020

    V Stafford. Zero trust architecture.NIST special publication, 800(207):800–207, 2020

    2020

  146. [161]

    Sumers, Shunyu Yao, Karthik Narasimhan, and Thomas L

    Theodore R. Sumers, Shunyu Yao, Karthik Narasimhan, and Thomas L. Griffiths. Cognitive architectures for language agents, 2024

    2024

  147. [162]

    Value-decomposition networks for cooperative multi-agent learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05296, 2017

    Peter Sunehag, Guy Lever, Audrunas Gruslys, Wojciech Marian Czar- necki, Vinicius Zambaldi, Max Jaderberg, Marc Lanctot, Nicolas Son- nerat, Joel Z Leibo, Karl Tuyls, et al. Value-decomposition networks for cooperative multi-agent learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05296, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  148. [163]

    Integrated architectures for learning, planning, and reacting based on approximating dynamic programming

    Richard S Sutton. Integrated architectures for learning, planning, and reacting based on approximating dynamic programming. InMachine learning proceedings 1990, pages 216–224. Elsevier, 1990

    1990

  149. [164]

    Memnet: A persistent memory network for image restoration

    Ying Tai, Jian Yang, Xiaoming Liu, and Chunyan Xu. Memnet: A persistent memory network for image restoration. InProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 4539– 4547, 2017

    2017

  150. [165]

    Human-in-the-loop software devel- opment agents, 2025

    Wannita Takerngsaksiri, Jirat Pasuksmit, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Ruixiong Zhang, Fan Jiang, Jing Li, Evan Cook, Kun Chen, and Ming Wu. Human-in-the-loop software devel- opment agents, 2025

    2025

  151. [166]

    Decentralised autonomous organizations (daos): An exploratory survey

    Caiyan Tang, Qi Cai, Chengzu Dong, Qin Wang, and Shiping Chen. Decentralised autonomous organizations (daos): An exploratory survey. Distrib. Ledger Technol., February 2025. Just Accepted

    2025

  152. [167]

    Over- lapping experiment infrastructure: More, better, faster experimentation

    Diane Tang, Ashish Agarwal, Deirdre O’Brien, and Mike Meyer. Over- lapping experiment infrastructure: More, better, faster experimentation. InProceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 17–26, 2010

    2010

  153. [168]

    Open-ended learning leads to generally capable agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12808, 2021

    Open Ended Learning Team, Adam Stooke, Anuj Mahajan, Catarina Barros, Charlie Deck, Jakob Bauer, Jakub Sygnowski, Maja Trebacz, Max Jaderberg, Michael Mathieu, et al. Open-ended learning leads to generally capable agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12808, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  154. [169]

    Python multi-agent framework: Smart agent develop- ment environment

    SPADE Team. Python multi-agent framework: Smart agent develop- ment environment

  155. [170]

    How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction

    Joshua B Tenenbaum, Charles Kemp, Thomas L Griffiths, and Noah D Goodman. How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. science, 331(6022):1279–1285, 2011

    2011

  156. [171]

    Large language models in medicine.Nature medicine, 29(8):1930– 1940, 2023

    Arun James Thirunavukarasu, Darren Shu Jeng Ting, Kabilan Elan- govan, Laura Gutierrez, Ting Fang Tan, and Daniel Shu Wei Ting. Large language models in medicine.Nature medicine, 29(8):1930– 1940, 2023

    1930

  157. [172]

    Safearena: Evaluating the safety of autonomous web agents, 2025

    Ada Defne Tur, Nicholas Meade, Xing Han Lù, Alejandra Zambrano, Arkil Patel, Esin Durmus, Spandana Gella, Karolina Sta´nczak, and Siva Reddy. Safearena: Evaluating the safety of autonomous web agents, 2025

    2025

  158. [173]

    https://gdpr-info.eu/

    European Union.General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), 2018. https://gdpr-info.eu/

    2018

  159. [174]

    Cultural evolution of cooperation among llm agents, 2024

    Aron Vallinder and Edward Hughes. Cultural evolution of cooperation among llm agents, 2024

    2024

  160. [175]

    Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  161. [176]

    Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders.The Journal of Finance, 16(1):8–37, 1961

    William Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders.The Journal of Finance, 16(1):8–37, 1961

    1961

  162. [177]

    V oyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291, 2023

    Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. V oyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  163. [178]

    A comprehensive survey in llm (-agent) full stack safety: Data, training and deployment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15585, 2025

    Kun Wang, Guibin Zhang, Zhenhong Zhou, Jiahao Wu, Miao Yu, Shiqian Zhao, Chenlong Yin, Jinhu Fu, Yibo Yan, Hanjun Luo, et al. A comprehensive survey in llm (-agent) full stack safety: Data, training and deployment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15585, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  164. [179]

    A survey on large language model based autonomous agents.Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6):186345, 2025

    Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents.Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6):186345, 2025

    2025

  165. [180]

    A survey on large language model based autonomous agents.Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6), March 2024

    Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, Wayne Xin Zhao, Zhewei Wei, and Jirong Wen. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents.Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6), March 2024. 25

    2024

  166. [181]

    Rationale-augmented ensembles in language models, 2022

    Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. Rationale-augmented ensembles in language models, 2022

    2022

  167. [182]

    https: //sre.google/workbook/canarying-releases/

    Alec Warner and Št ˇepán Davidoviˇc.Canarying Releases, 2025. https: //sre.google/workbook/canarying-releases/

    2025

  168. [183]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022

    Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022

    2022

  169. [184]

    The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stew- ardship.Scientific data, 3(1):1–9, 2016

    Mark D Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan- Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E Bourne, et al. The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stew- ardship.Scie...

    2016

  170. [185]

    John wiley & sons, 2009

    Michael Wooldridge.An introduction to multiagent systems. John wiley & sons, 2009

    2009

  171. [186]

    Agent theories, archi- tectures, and languages: a survey

    Michael Wooldridge and Nicholas R Jennings. Agent theories, archi- tectures, and languages: a survey. InInternational Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, pages 1–39. Springer, 1994

    1994

  172. [187]

    The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design.Autonomous Agents and multi-agent systems, 3(3):285–312, 2000

    Michael Wooldridge, Nicholas R Jennings, and David Kinny. The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design.Autonomous Agents and multi-agent systems, 3(3):285–312, 2000

    2000

  173. [188]

    Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversations

    Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Beibin Li, Erkang Zhu, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Shaokun Zhang, Jiale Liu, et al. Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversations. InFirst Conference on Language Modeling, 2024

    2024

  174. [189]

    Mobilevlm: A vision-language model for better intra-and inter-ui understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14818, 2024

    Qinzhuo Wu, Weikai Xu, Wei Liu, Tao Tan, Jianfeng Liu, Ang Li, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, and Shuo Shang. Mobilevlm: A vision-language model for better intra-and inter-ui understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14818, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  175. [190]

    Interactive visual reasoning under uncertainty.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:42409–42432, 2023

    Manjie Xu, Guangyuan Jiang, Wei Liang, Chi Zhang, and Yixin Zhu. Interactive visual reasoning under uncertainty.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:42409–42432, 2023

    2023

  176. [191]

    Survey and evaluation of blue-green deployment techniques in cloud native environments

    Bo Yang, Anca Sailer, and Ajay Mohindra. Survey and evaluation of blue-green deployment techniques in cloud native environments. In International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing, pages 69–

  177. [192]

    Auto-gpt for online deci- sion making: Benchmarks and additional opinions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02224, 2023

    Hui Yang, Sifu Yue, and Yunzhong He. Auto-gpt for online deci- sion making: Benchmarks and additional opinions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02224, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  178. [193]

    Llm4drive: A survey of large language models for autonomous driving, 2023

    Zhenjie Yang, Xiaosong Jia, Hongyang Li, and Junchi Yan. Llm4drive: A survey of large language models for autonomous driving, 2023

    2023

  179. [194]

    Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:11809–11822, 2023

    Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Tom Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:11809–11822, 2023

    2023

  180. [195]

    React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models

    Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. InInternational Conference on Learning Repre- sentations (ICLR), 2023

    2023

  181. [196]

    Fanlong Zeng, Wensheng Gan, Yongheng Wang, Ning Liu, and Philip S. Yu. Large language models for robotics: A survey, 2023

    2023

  182. [197]

    Quality driven web services compo- sition

    Liangzhao Zeng, Boualem Benatallah, Marlon Dumas, Jayant Kalagnanam, and Quan Z Sheng. Quality driven web services compo- sition. InProceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 411–421, 2003

    2003

  183. [198]

    Multi-level value alignment in agentic ai systems: Survey and perspectives, 2025

    Wei Zeng, Hengshu Zhu, Chuan Qin, Han Wu, Yihang Cheng, Sirui Zhang, Xiaowei Jin, Yinuo Shen, Zhenxing Wang, Feimin Zhong, and Hui Xiong. Multi-level value alignment in agentic ai systems: Survey and perspectives, 2025

    2025

  184. [199]

    Hailiang Zhao, Shuiguang Deng, Feiyi Chen, Jianwei Yin, Schahram Dustdar, and Albert Y . Zomaya. Learning to schedule multi-server jobs with fluctuated processing speeds.IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 34(1):234–245, 2023

    2023

  185. [200]

    Distributed redundant placement for microservice-based applications at the edge.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15(3):1732–1745, 2020

    Hailiang Zhao, Shuiguang Deng, Zijie Liu, Jianwei Yin, and Schahram Dustdar. Distributed redundant placement for microservice-based applications at the edge.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15(3):1732–1745, 2020

    2020

  186. [201]

    Data-locality-aware task assignment and scheduling for dis- tributed job executions.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, pages 1–15, 2025

    Hailiang Zhao, Xueyan Tang, Peng Chen, Jianwei Yin, and Shuiguang Deng. Data-locality-aware task assignment and scheduling for dis- tributed job executions.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, pages 1–15, 2025

    2025

  187. [202]

    Online workload scheduling for social welfare maximization in the computing continuum.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 18(4):2267– 2280, August 2025

    Hailiang Zhao, Ziqi Wang, Guanjie Cheng, Wenzhuo Qian, Peng Chen, Jianwei Yin, Schahram Dustdar, and Shuiguang Deng. Online workload scheduling for social welfare maximization in the computing continuum.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 18(4):2267– 2280, August 2025

    2025

  188. [203]

    Least-to-most prompting enables complex reasoning in large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10625, 2022

    Denny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei, Nathan Scales, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Claire Cui, Olivier Bousquet, Quoc Le, et al. Least-to-most prompting enables complex reasoning in large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10625, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  189. [204]

    Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13854, 2023

    Shuyan Zhou, Frank F Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Tianyue Ou, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, et al. Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13854, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  190. [205]

    Rt- 2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control

    Brianna Zitkovich, Tianhe Yu, Sichun Xu, Peng Xu, Ted Xiao, Fei Xia, Jialin Wu, Paul Wohlhart, Stefan Welker, Ayzaan Wahid, et al. Rt- 2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 2165–2183. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  191. [2022]

    https://adept.ai/blog/act-1

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.