pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24709 · v1 · pith:MTCKBDLKnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

The a₁(1420) in a Unitary Coupled-Channel Three-Body Approach

Ajay S. Sakthivasan , Yuchuan Feng , Michael D\"oring , Maxim Mai This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 23:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords a1(1420)triangle singularitythree-body amplitudeCOMPASScoupled channelsaxial vector resonancef0(980)unitary model
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unitary nine-channel three-body amplitude reproduces the a1(1420) enhancement via triangle singularity without a resonance pole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether the narrow peak near 1.42 GeV in three-pion data with a1 quantum numbers observed by COMPASS requires a new resonance state or arises from a known kinematic effect. It embeds the triangle singularity from on-shell K*(892) K anti-K intermediates, which produces an f0(980) alignment, into a larger unitary coupled-channel framework. A nine-channel production amplitude that includes up to P-wave isobars and all relevant isospins is constructed and fitted to lineshapes at several momentum transfers. The fit accounts for the observed narrow structure in the pi f0 channel while also determining the a1(1260) parameters from the same data. A reader would care because the result shows that consistent inclusion of final-state interactions can remove the need to postulate an additional pole.

Core claim

Embedding one-loop triangle-singularity calculations into a unitary three-body amplitude allows consistent incorporation of final-state interactions. A nine-channel production amplitude with up to P-wave isobars and all sub-channel isospins, when fitted to COMPASS lineshapes at different momentum transfers, reproduces the narrow enhancement in the (pi f0)_P channel near sqrt(s) approximately 1.42 GeV. This implies that the triangle singularity mechanism sufficiently explains the observed enhancement and an additional genuine a1(1420) pole is not required, while the parameters of the ground-state a1(1260) are extracted from the data.

What carries the argument

A nine-channel unitary three-body production amplitude that embeds the triangle singularity from K*(892) K anti-K intermediates while incorporating final-state interactions across all channels.

If this is right

  • The model accounts for the narrow enhancement in the (pi f0)_P channel at 1.42 GeV without an extra pole.
  • Parameters of the a1(1260) axial-vector resonance are determined from the same COMPASS lineshape data.
  • Final-state interactions beyond the one-loop triangle singularity are consistently included and affect the amplitude.
  • The approach works across different momentum transfers in the COMPASS data set.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar apparent resonances near kinematic thresholds in other three-body channels could be reanalyzed with embedded unitary amplitudes to test for singularity dominance.
  • Precision data on interference patterns between the singularity and nearby resonances would provide a direct test of the separation achieved here.
  • The framework offers a template for checking whether other reported states in the 1.4 GeV region are kinematic rather than dynamical.

Load-bearing premise

The nine-channel unitary amplitude fitted to COMPASS lineshapes at different momentum transfers captures all essential dynamics needed to separate the triangle singularity contribution from any possible resonance pole.

What would settle it

A high-statistics measurement showing that the lineshape near 1.42 GeV cannot be reproduced by the fitted unitary amplitude even after varying all triangle-singularity and isobar parameters, or requires an explicit pole term to fit data at multiple momentum transfers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24709 by Ajay S. Sakthivasan, Maxim Mai, Michael D\"oring, Yuchuan Feng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The schematics of the infinite volume unitarity formalism. The first row depicts the quantity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The two-body amplitudes used as an input for the isobars plotted for relevant two-body invariant mass intervals. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The singularities in the exchange term arising from Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diffractive production of a three-pion system in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of normalized |Γ˜| 2 for different situation at √ σ = 0.99 GeV: the one-loop KK⋆ → πf0 contribution (no coupled-channel rescattering, at all), the KK⋆ → πf0 amplitude including rescattering effects (four-channel model), the six-channel model, and the full nine-channel model. All curves are normalized to the same area beneath them to make them comparable. emphasized that here the explicit f0(980)… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Contour plots of |Γ˜| 2 of Eq. (2.11) for the nine different final states as functions of three-body energy √ s and isobar sub￾energy √ σ. Lighter (darker) colors correspond to larger (smaller) values of |Γ˜| 2 . A pronounced localized enhancement is observed in the (πf0(980))P channel, consistent with the expected triangle singularity, but other channels also show enhancements as discussed in the main tex… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The triangle singularity when only the K∗ (892)K and the f0(500)/f0(980)π channel are turned on. (a) the triangle singularity for a fixed √ σ with a single rescattering and the full amplitude after final state interactions are taken into account; (b) the triangle singularity for three different √ σ after final state interactions are taken into account; (c) the kinematic region on the √ s √ σ-plane in which… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In the top row, independent fits for various momentum transfer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The overall fits for various momentum transferred [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The a1(1260) pole in T11( √ s, p′ , p) of Eq. (2.10) for fixed spectator momenta p, p′ in the fit I-5-11G. The plot on the right shows the neighborhood of the pole zoomed in. The blue blob about the pole shows the uncertainty in the pole position induced by data uncertainties and obtained from samples taken around the χ 2 minimum. The gray bands show the singularities arising in the IVU formalism – these … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The distribution of χ 2 values for samples about the parameters corresponding to χ 2 min corresponding to the fit I-5-11G, see Tab. III. The interval containing χ 2 values up to χ 2 min + 4 is also given. propagate to the fits. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

An enhancement in the three-pion energy at around $\sqrt{s}\approx 1.42~\textrm{GeV}$ with $a_1$ quantum numbers was observed at the COMPASS experiment. This was later attributed to the triangle singularity mechanism involving an on-shell $K^*(892)$, $K$ and $\bar K$ intermediate states. The alignment of the decay $K$ with the spectator $\bar K$ produces an $f_0(980)$, resulting in a kinematic enhancement, which is classically explained by the Landau equations. However, this one-loop process forms only part of a non-diagonal transition in a much larger coupled-channel framework. This study demonstrates the feasibility of embedding one-loop triangle-singularity calculations into a unitary three-body amplitude allowing one to consistently incorporate final-state interactions and their potentially substantial effect. For this, up to $P$-wave isobars and all sub-channel isospins are combined in a nine-channel production amplitude that is fitted to COMPASS lineshapes at different momentum transfers. The fitted amplitude reproduces the narrow enhancement in the $(\pi f_0)_P$ channel near $\sqrt{s}\approx1.42$ GeV. This implies that the triangle singularity mechanism sufficiently explains the observed enhancement, and an additional genuine $a_1(1420)$ pole is not required. Incidentally, the parameters of the ground state axial vector resonance (the $a_1(1260)$) are also extracted from that data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unitary nine-channel coupled-channel three-body production amplitude incorporating the K* K ar K triangle singularity, P-wave isobars, and all sub-channel isospins. This amplitude is fitted to COMPASS three-pion lineshapes at varying momentum transfers. The fit reproduces the narrow enhancement near 1.42 GeV in the (π f0)_P channel, from which the authors conclude that the triangle singularity mechanism suffices to explain the a1(1420) structure without an additional resonance pole. Parameters of the a1(1260) are extracted as a byproduct.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work advances the treatment of triangle singularities by embedding them consistently into a unitary multi-channel framework that includes final-state interactions, rather than relying on isolated one-loop diagrams. This approach could clarify the origin of other near-threshold enhancements in hadron spectroscopy. The use of data at multiple |t| values provides a non-trivial consistency check. The manuscript does not report machine-checked proofs or fully parameter-free predictions, but the unitary construction itself is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results of the fit to COMPASS data] In the results of the fit to COMPASS lineshapes (described after the amplitude construction), no explicit comparison is shown between the full nine-channel amplitude and the identical amplitude with the one-loop TS diagram removed. Such a test is required to establish that the narrow peak is generated by the TS mechanism rather than by the adjustable parameters of the production vertices and coupled channels.
  2. [Discussion of the a1(1420) interpretation] In the discussion of the a1(1420) interpretation, the manuscript does not present a fit in which an explicit a1(1420) pole term is added to the amplitude. Without this comparison, the claim that the TS mechanism is sufficient and that an additional pole is not required cannot be directly verified against the data.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Amplitude construction] The precise definition of the nine channels and the choice of which P-wave isobars are retained should be stated explicitly (e.g., in a table) to allow independent reproduction of the amplitude.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the results of the fit to COMPASS lineshapes (described after the amplitude construction), no explicit comparison is shown between the full nine-channel amplitude and the identical amplitude with the one-loop TS diagram removed. Such a test is required to establish that the narrow peak is generated by the TS mechanism rather than by the adjustable parameters of the production vertices and coupled channels.

    Authors: We agree that a direct comparison with the TS diagram removed is necessary to isolate its contribution from the effects of the adjustable production vertices. In the revised manuscript we will add the results of a fit performed with the one-loop TS diagram omitted and display the corresponding lineshapes for the (π f0)P channel. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the discussion of the a1(1420) interpretation, the manuscript does not present a fit in which an explicit a1(1420) pole term is added to the amplitude. Without this comparison, the claim that the TS mechanism is sufficient and that an additional pole is not required cannot be directly verified against the data.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit comparison with an added a1(1420) pole term would allow a more direct verification of our claim. We will perform and include such a fit in the revised version, reporting the change in fit quality and the resulting lineshapes to support the conclusion that the TS mechanism alone accounts for the observed enhancement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Fitted nine-channel amplitude reproduces enhancement by construction; TS sufficiency claimed without isolating tests

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "The fitted amplitude reproduces the narrow enhancement in the (π f_0)_P channel near √s≈1.42 GeV. This implies that the triangle singularity mechanism sufficiently explains the observed enhancement, and an additional genuine a_1(1420) pole is not required."

    Parameters of the nine-channel production amplitude (with P-wave isobars and all isospins) are adjusted to match COMPASS lineshapes at different |t|. The subsequent statement that this reproduction shows the TS mechanism is sufficient (no pole needed) is therefore a post-fit observation, not an a-priori prediction or falsification test separating TS from resonant dynamics that could be absorbed into the coupled-channel vertices or production terms.

full rationale

The paper's central implication—that the triangle singularity mechanism explains the 1.42 GeV enhancement without needing an a1(1420) pole—rests on a nine-channel unitary production amplitude fitted to COMPASS lineshapes. The reproduction of the narrow peak is therefore a fitted outcome rather than an independent verification. No comparisons (TS diagram removed, or explicit pole added) are described to isolate the mechanism, making the sufficiency claim reduce to the quality of the data-driven fit. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern but is not fully self-definitional or self-citation load-bearing. The derivation chain for the unitary framework itself is not shown to collapse.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a multi-parameter fit of the production amplitude to experimental lineshapes and on the assumption that the chosen channel content and partial-wave truncation are adequate.

free parameters (1)
  • parameters of the nine-channel production amplitude
    Fitted to COMPASS lineshapes at different momentum transfers to reproduce the observed enhancement.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The three-body production amplitude must be unitary
    Invoked to justify the coupled-channel framework that incorporates final-state interactions.
  • domain assumption Up to P-wave isobars and all sub-channel isospins suffice for the relevant dynamics
    Used to define the nine-channel amplitude.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5817 in / 1420 out tokens · 22204 ms · 2026-06-25T23:19:54.794867+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    In the (ℓ, I I) = (0,0) sector, the isobar has two modes,ππandK ¯K, which are counted as separate three-body channels. Channel number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 J LSbasis (πρ)S (πρ)D (KK∗)S (KK∗)D (πf0(500))P (πf0(980))P (ππ2)P (KK∗ 0(700))P (KK3/2)P Helicity basis πρλ=±1,0 KK∗ λ=±1,0 πf0(500) πf0(980) ππ2 Kκ KK3/2 Isobar (ℓ, II) (1,1) (1, 1

  2. [2]

    single” corresponding to a single rescattering (T=B), and the curve labeled “full

    (0, 3 2) Table II. The isospin factorsI F in Eq. (2.4). A given matrix element with a row indexiand a column indexjdenotes a transition from channeljto channeliin theJ LSbasis, see Tab. I. (πρ)S (πρ)D (KK∗)S (KK∗)D (πf0(500))P (πf0(980))P (ππ2)P (KK∗ 0(700))P (KK3/2)P (πρ)S 1 2 1 2 0 0 1√3 0− q 5 12 0 0 (πρ)D 1 2 0 0 1√3 0− q 5 12 0 0 (KK∗)S −1 3 −1 3 0− ...

  3. [3]

    Towards a theory of hadron resonances,

    Maxim Mai, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Carsten Urbach, “Towards a theory of hadron resonances,” Phys. Rept.1001, 1–66 (2023), arXiv:2206.01477 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Resonance Production andππS-wave inπ − +p→π −π−π+ +p recoil at 190 GeV/c,

    C Adolphet al.(COMPASS), “Resonance Production andππS-wave inπ − +p→π −π−π+ +p recoil at 190 GeV/c,” Phys. Rev. D95, 032004 (2017), arXiv:1509.00992 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Triangle Singularity as the Origin of thea 1(1420),

    G. D. Alexeevet al.(COMPASS), “Triangle Singularity as the Origin of thea 1(1420),” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 082501 (2021), arXiv:2006.05342 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Light isovector resonances inπ −p→π −π−π+pat 190 GeV/c,

    M. Aghasyanet al.(COMPASS), “Light isovector resonances inπ −p→π −π−π+pat 190 GeV/c,” Phys. Rev. D98, 092003 (2018), arXiv:1802.05913 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Partial-wave analysis ofτ − →π −π−π+ντ at BELLE,

    Andrei Rabusov, Daniel Greenwald, and Stephan Paul (Belle), “Partial-wave analysis ofτ − →π −π−π+ντ at BELLE,” Nuovo Cim. C47, 154 (2024), arXiv:2310.09155 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Measurement of the presence ofa 1(1420) andω(782) inτ − → π−π+π−ντ at Belle,

    Andrei Rabusov, Daniel Greenwald, and Stephan Paul, “Measurement of the presence ofa 1(1420) andω(782) inτ − → π−π+π−ντ at Belle,” SciPost Phys. Proc.17, 008 (2025), arXiv:2405.19264 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Reevaluating thea 1(1420) enhancement and its molecular partners in the low-lying axial-vector meson spectrum,

    Mao-Jun Yan, Chun-Sheng An, and Cheng-Rong Deng, “Reevaluating thea 1(1420) enhancement and its molecular partners in the low-lying axial-vector meson spectrum,” (2025), arXiv:2512.02655 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    A triangle singularity and the LHCb pentaquarks,

    Mikhail Mikhasenko, “A triangle singularity and the LHCb pentaquarks,” (2015), arXiv:1507.06552 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Nature of thea 1(1420),

    M. Mikhasenko, B. Ketzer, and Andrey Sarantsev, “Nature of thea 1(1420),” Phys. Rev. D91, 094015 (2015), arXiv:1501.07023 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    a 1(1420) peak as theπf 0(980) decay mode of thea 1(1260),

    F. Aceti, L. R. Dai, and E. Oset, “a 1(1420) peak as theπf 0(980) decay mode of thea 1(1260),” Phys. Rev. D94, 096015 (2016), arXiv:1606.06893 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions,

    Feng-Kun Guo, Xiao-Hai Liu, and Shuntaro Sakai, “Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.112, 103757 (2020), arXiv:1912.07030 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Effects of final state interactions on Landau singularities,

    Ajay S. Sakthivasan, Maxim Mai, Akaki Rusetsky, and Michael D¨ oring, “Effects of final state interactions on Landau singularities,” JHEP10, 246 (2024), arXiv:2407.17969 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    On the Analytic Properties of Vertex Parts in Quantum Field Theory,

    L. D. Landau, “On the Analytic Properties of Vertex Parts in Quantum Field Theory,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.37, 62–70 (1960)

    1960

  16. [16]

    Singularities in the physical region,

    S. Coleman and R. E. Norton, “Singularities in the physical region,” Nuovo Cim.38, 438–442 (1965)

    1965

  17. [17]

    Sommerfield, and Eyvind H

    Robert Karplus, Charles M. Sommerfield, and Eyvind H. Wichmann, “Spectral Representations in Perturbation Theory

  18. [18]

    Rev.111, 1187–1190 (1958)

    Vertex Function,” Phys. Rev.111, 1187–1190 (1958)

    1958

  19. [19]

    Anomaly in Meson Production in p+d Collisions,

    Norman E. Booth, Alexander Abashian, and Kenneth M. Crowe, “Anomaly in Meson Production in p+d Collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.7, 35–39 (1961)

    1961

  20. [20]

    Logarithmic singularities in the reactionsπ−+p→n+π−+π+ and p+d→He 3 + 2π,

    V. V. Anisovich and L. G. Dakhno, “Logarithmic singularities in the reactionsπ−+p→n+π−+π+ and p+d→He 3 + 2π,” Phys. Lett.10, 221–224 (1964)

    1964

  21. [21]

    Searching for observable effects induced by anomalous triangle singularities,

    Xiao-Hai Liu, Makoto Oka, and Qiang Zhao, “Searching for observable effects induced by anomalous triangle singularities,” Phys. Lett. B753, 297–302 (2016), arXiv:1507.01674 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    A Discussion on Triangle Singularities in the Λ b → J/ψK −pReaction,

    Melahat Bayar, Francesca Aceti, Feng-Kun Guo, and Eulogio Oset, “A Discussion on Triangle Singularities in the Λ b → J/ψK −pReaction,” Phys. Rev. D94, 074039 (2016), arXiv:1609.04133 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Radiative Decay ofJ/ψIntoη(1430) and Nearby States,

    J. E. Augustinet al.(DM2), “Radiative Decay ofJ/ψIntoη(1430) and Nearby States,” Phys. Rev. D42, 10–19 (1990)

    1990

  24. [24]

    Partial wave analysis of J / psi —>gamma K0(s) K+- pi-+,

    Z. Baiet al.(MARK-III), “Partial wave analysis of J / psi —>gamma K0(s) K+- pi-+,” Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 2507–2510 (1990)

    1990

  25. [25]

    Partial wave analysis of J / psi –>gamma (K+ K- pi0),

    J. Z. Baiet al.(BES), “Partial wave analysis of J / psi –>gamma (K+ K- pi0),” Phys. Lett. B440, 217–224 (1998)

    1998

  26. [26]

    Partial wave analysis of J / psi —>gamma (K+- K0(S) pi-+),

    J. Z. Baiet al.(BES), “Partial wave analysis of J / psi —>gamma (K+- K0(S) pi-+),” Phys. Lett. B476, 25–32 (2000), arXiv:hep-ex/0002007. 22

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  27. [27]

    First observation ofη(1405) decays intof 0(980)π0,

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), “First observation ofη(1405) decays intof 0(980)π0,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 182001 (2012), arXiv:1201.2737 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    Three-body unitary coupled-channel approach to radiative J/ψdecays andη(1405/1475),

    S. X. Nakamura, Q. Huang, J. J. Wu, H. P. Peng, Y. Zhang, and Y. C. Zhu, “Three-body unitary coupled-channel approach to radiative J/ψdecays andη(1405/1475),” Phys. Rev. D109, 014021 (2024), arXiv:2311.05391 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Revisiting the three-kaon interaction and its relation with K(1460),

    Michael D¨ oring, Kanchan P. Khemchandani, and Alberto Mart´ ınez Torres, “Revisiting the three-kaon interaction and its relation with K(1460),” Phys. Rev. D113, 034032 (2026), arXiv:2511.02543 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Theoretical study of theKK ¯Ksystem and dynamical generation of the K(1460) resonance,

    A. Martinez Torres, D. Jido, and Y. Kanada-En’yo, “Theoretical study of theKK ¯Ksystem and dynamical generation of the K(1460) resonance,” Phys. Rev. C83, 065205 (2011), arXiv:1102.1505 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Remarks on non-perturbative three–body dynamics and its application to theKK ¯Ksystem,

    Xu Zhang, Christoph Hanhart, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Ju-Jun Xie, “Remarks on non-perturbative three–body dynamics and its application to theKK ¯Ksystem,” Eur. Phys. J. A58, 20 (2022), arXiv:2107.03168 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Study ofe +e−ßπ+π−J/ψand Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike State at Belle,

    Z. Q. Liuet al.(Belle), “Study ofe +e−ßπ+π−J/ψand Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike State at Belle,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 252002 (2013), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 019901 (2013)], arXiv:1304.0121 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [33]

    Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure ine +e− →π +π−J/ψat √s=4.26 GeV,

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), “Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure ine +e− →π +π−J/ψat √s=4.26 GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 252001 (2013), arXiv:1303.5949 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    Triangle Singularities and XYZ Quarkonium Peaks,

    Adam P. Szczepaniak, “Triangle Singularities and XYZ Quarkonium Peaks,” Phys. Lett. B747, 410–416 (2015), arXiv:1501.01691 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Dalitz plot distributions in presence of triangle singularities,

    Adam P. Szczepaniak, “Dalitz plot distributions in presence of triangle singularities,” Phys. Lett. B757, 61–64 (2016), arXiv:1510.01789 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Systematic study of the singularity mechanism in heavy quarkonium decays,

    Qian Wang, Christoph Hanhart, and Qiang Zhao, “Systematic study of the singularity mechanism in heavy quarkonium decays,” Phys. Lett. B725, 106–110 (2013), arXiv:1305.1997 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Decoding the riddle ofY(4260) andZ c(3900),

    Qian Wang, Christoph Hanhart, and Qiang Zhao, “Decoding the riddle ofY(4260) andZ c(3900),” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 132003 (2013), arXiv:1303.6355 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    Observation of two charged bottomonium-like resonances in Y(5S) decays,

    A. Bondaret al.(Belle), “Observation of two charged bottomonium-like resonances in Y(5S) decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 122001 (2012), arXiv:1110.2251 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  39. [39]

    Triangle singularity inτ − →ν τ π−f0(980) (a0(980)) decays,

    L. R. Dai, Q. X. Yu, and E. Oset, “Triangle singularity inτ − →ν τ π−f0(980) (a0(980)) decays,” Phys. Rev. D99, 016021 (2019), arXiv:1809.11007 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Triangle singularity in theJ/ψ→K +K −f0(980)(a0(980)) decays,

    Wei-Hong Liang, Hua-Xing Chen, Eulogio Oset, and En Wang, “Triangle singularity in theJ/ψ→K +K −f0(980)(a0(980)) decays,” Eur. Phys. J. C79, 411 (2019), arXiv:1903.01252 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Triangle singularities inJ/ψ→ηπ 0ϕandπ 0π0ϕ,

    Hao-Jie Jing, Shuntaro Sakai, Feng-Kun Guo, and Bing-Song Zou, “Triangle singularities inJ/ψ→ηπ 0ϕandπ 0π0ϕ,” Phys. Rev. D100, 114010 (2019), arXiv:1907.12719 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Novel Method for Precisely Measuring theX(3872) Mass,

    Feng-Kun Guo, “Novel Method for Precisely Measuring theX(3872) Mass,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 202002 (2019), arXiv:1902.11221 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Triangle singularity inB − →K −X(3872);X→π 0π+π− and the X(3872) mass,

    Raquel Molina and Eulogio Oset, “Triangle singularity inB − →K −X(3872);X→π 0π+π− and the X(3872) mass,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, 451 (2020), arXiv:2002.12821 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Threshold cusp effects to measure masses of radiatively decaying hadrons: TheB ∗ s0 mass from the Υϕspectrum,

    Hai-Long Fu, Xu Zhang, Feng-Kun Guo, Christoph Hanhart, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Mao-Jun Yan, “Threshold cusp effects to measure masses of radiatively decaying hadrons: TheB ∗ s0 mass from the Υϕspectrum,” (2026), arXiv:2606.16976 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Dynamical coupled-channel models for hadron dy- namics,

    Michael D¨ oring, Johann Haidenbauer, Maxim Mai, and Toru Sato, “Dynamical coupled-channel models for hadron dy- namics,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.146, 104213 (2026), arXiv:2505.02745 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    A unitary coupled-channel three-body amplitude with pions and kaons,

    Yuchuan Feng, Fernando Gil, Michael D¨ oring, Raquel Molina, Maxim Mai, Vanamali Shastry, and Adam Szczepaniak, “A unitary coupled-channel three-body amplitude with pions and kaons,” Phys. Rev. D110, 094002 (2024), arXiv:2407.08721 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Three-body Unitarity in the Finite Volume,

    M. Mai and M. D¨ oring, “Three-body Unitarity in the Finite Volume,” Eur. Phys. J. A53, 240 (2017), arXiv:1709.08222 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Finite-Volume Spectrum ofπ +π+ andπ +π+π+ Systems,

    Maxim Mai and Michael Doring, “Finite-Volume Spectrum ofπ +π+ andπ +π+π+ Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 062503 (2019), arXiv:1807.04746 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Three-body Unitarity with Isobars Revisited,

    M. Mai, B. Hu, M. Doring, A. Pilloni, and A. Szczepaniak, “Three-body Unitarity with Isobars Revisited,” Eur. Phys. J. A53, 177 (2017), arXiv:1706.06118 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Pole position of the a1(1260) resonance in a three-body unitary framework,

    Daniel Sadasivan, Andrei Alexandru, Hakan Akdag, Felipe Amorim, Ruair´ ı Brett, Chris Culver, Michael D¨ oring, Frank X. Lee, and Maxim Mai, “Pole position of the a1(1260) resonance in a three-body unitary framework,” Phys. Rev. D105, 054020 (2022), arXiv:2112.03355 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Emergence of theπ(1300) Resonance from Lattice QCD,

    Haobo Yan, Maxim Mai, Marco Garofalo, Yuchuan Feng, Michael D¨ oring, Chuan Liu, Liuming Liu, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Carsten Urbach, “Emergence of theπ(1300) Resonance from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 141901 (2026), arXiv:2510.09476 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    ωMeson from Lattice QCD,

    Haobo Yan, Maxim Mai, Marco Garofalo, Ulf-G. Meißner, Chuan Liu, Liuming Liu, and Carsten Urbach, “ωMeson from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211906 (2024), arXiv:2407.16659 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    General Hamiltonian Approach to theN-Body Finite-Volume Formalism: Extracting theωResonance Parameters from Lattice QCD,

    Kang Yu, Derek B. Leinweber, Anthony W. Thomas, Guang-Juan Wang, Jia-Jun Wu, and Zhi Yang, “General Hamiltonian Approach to theN-Body Finite-Volume Formalism: Extracting theωResonance Parameters from Lattice QCD,” (2026), arXiv:2603.07205 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Three-Body Dynamics of the a1(1260) Resonance from Lattice QCD,

    Maxim Mai, Andrei Alexandru, Ruair´ ı Brett, Chris Culver, Michael D¨ oring, Frank X. Lee, and Daniel Sadasivan (GWQCD), “Three-Body Dynamics of the a1(1260) Resonance from Lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 222001 (2021), arXiv:2107.03973 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Lattice QCD and Three-particle Decays of Resonances,

    Maxwell T. Hansen and Stephen R. Sharpe, “Lattice QCD and Three-particle Decays of Resonances,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69, 65–107 (2019), arXiv:1901.00483 [hep-lat]. 23

    arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Multi-particle systems on the lattice and chiral extrapolations: a brief review,

    Maxim Mai, Michael D¨ oring, and Akaki Rusetsky, “Multi-particle systems on the lattice and chiral extrapolations: a brief review,” Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 1623–1643 (2021), arXiv:2103.00577 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Three-particle scattering amplitudes from lattice QCD,

    Stephen R. Sharpe, “Three-particle scattering amplitudes from lattice QCD,” in42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory(2026) arXiv:2601.04147 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Observation of a New Narrow Axial-Vector Mesona 1(1420),

    C. Adolphet al.(COMPASS), “Observation of a New Narrow Axial-Vector Mesona 1(1420),” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 082001 (2015), arXiv:1501.05732 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Dalitz plots and lineshape ofa 1(1260) from a relativistic three- body unitary approach,

    D. Sadasivan, M. Mai, H. Akdag, and M. D¨ oring, “Dalitz plots and lineshape ofa 1(1260) from a relativistic three- body unitary approach,” Phys. Rev. D101, 094018 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 103, 019901 (2021)], arXiv:2002.12431 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Scattering Theory for a Three-Particle System,

    L. D. Faddeev, “Scattering Theory for a Three-Particle System,” Sov. Phys. JETP12, 1014–1019 (1961)

    1961

  61. [61]

    Coupled-channel approach to isotensorπππscattering from lattice QCD,

    Yuchuan Feng, Chris Culver, Michael D¨ oring, Maxim Mai, Andrei Alexandru, and Frank X. Lee, “Coupled-channel approach to isotensorπππscattering from lattice QCD,” (2026), arXiv:2601.16916 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Pole position of thea 1(1260) fromτ-decay,

    M. Mikhasenko, A. Pilloni, M. Albaladejo, C. Fern´ andez-Ram´ ırez, A. Jackura, V. Mathieu, J. Nys, A. Rodas, B. Ket- zer, and A. P. Szczepaniak (JPAC), “Pole position of thea 1(1260) fromτ-decay,” Phys. Rev. D98, 096021 (2018), arXiv:1810.00016 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    J¨ ulich-Bonn-Washington model for pion electroproduction multipoles,

    Maxim Mai, Michael D¨ oring, Carlos Granados, Helmut Haberzettl, Ulf-G. Meißner, Deborah R¨ onchen, Igor Strakovsky, and Ron Workman (J¨ ulich-Bonn-Washington), “J¨ ulich-Bonn-Washington model for pion electroproduction multipoles,” Phys. Rev. C103, 065204 (2021), arXiv:2104.07312 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Meson meson interaction in a nonperturbative chiral approach,

    J. A. Oller, E. Oset, and J. R. Pelaez, “Meson meson interaction in a nonperturbative chiral approach,” Phys. Rev. D59, 074001 (1999), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 60, 099906 (1999), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 099903 (2007)], arXiv:hep-ph/9804209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  65. [65]

    Chiral symmetry amplitudes in the S wave isoscalar and isovector channels and theσ, f 0(980), a0(980) scalar mesons,

    J. A. Oller and E. Oset, “Chiral symmetry amplitudes in the S wave isoscalar and isovector channels and theσ, f 0(980), a0(980) scalar mesons,” Nucl. Phys. A620, 438–456 (1997), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.A 652, 407–409 (1999)], arXiv:hep- ph/9702314

    arXiv 1997

  66. [66]

    The Inverse amplitude method in chiral perturbation theory,

    A. Dobado and J. R. Pelaez, “The Inverse amplitude method in chiral perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D56, 3057–3073 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9604416

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  67. [67]

    K ¯Kscattering amplitude to one loop in chiral perturbation theory, its unitarization and pion form-factors,

    Francisco Guerrero and Jose Antonio Oller, “K ¯Kscattering amplitude to one loop in chiral perturbation theory, its unitarization and pion form-factors,” Nucl. Phys. B537, 459–476 (1999), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 602, 641–643 (2001)], arXiv:hep-ph/9805334

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  68. [68]

    Meson meson scattering within one loop chiral perturbation theory and its unitariza- tion,

    A. Gomez Nicola and J. R. Pelaez, “Meson meson scattering within one loop chiral perturbation theory and its unitariza- tion,” Phys. Rev. D65, 054009 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0109056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  69. [69]

    The Inverse Amplitude Method and Adler Zeros,

    A. Gomez Nicola, J. R. Pelaez, and G. Rios, “The Inverse Amplitude Method and Adler Zeros,” Phys. Rev. D77, 056006 (2008), arXiv:0712.2763 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  70. [70]

    Deep Neural Network Driven Simulation Based Inference Method for Pole Position Estimation under Model Misspecification,

    Daniel Sadasivan, Isaac Cordero, Andrew Graham, Cecilia Marsh, Daniel Kupcho, Melana Mourad, and Maxim Mai, “Deep Neural Network Driven Simulation Based Inference Method for Pole Position Estimation under Model Misspecification,” (2025), arXiv:2507.18824 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Classifying the pole of an amplitude using a deep neural network,

    Denny Lane B. Sombillo, Yoichi Ikeda, Toru Sato, and Atsushi Hosaka, “Classifying the pole of an amplitude using a deep neural network,” Phys. Rev. D102, 016024 (2020), arXiv:2003.10770 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Deep learning framework for disentan- gling triangle singularity and pole-based enhancements,

    Darwin Alexander O. Co, Vince Angelo A. Chavez, and Denny Lane B. Sombillo, “Deep learning framework for disentan- gling triangle singularity and pole-based enhancements,” Phys. Rev. D110, 114034 (2024), arXiv:2403.18265 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    P. A. Zylaet al.(Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle Physics,” PTEP2020, 083C01 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    Theπf 0(500) decay of thea 1(1260),

    R. Molina, M. D¨ oring, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, “Theπf 0(500) decay of thea 1(1260),” Eur. Phys. J. C81, 782 (2021), arXiv:2107.07439 [hep-ph]. 24 m3π [GeV] (Intensity/40 MeV)/10 3 (Error/40 MeV)/103 1.16 1.28 0.13 1.20 2.69 0.19 1.24 5.15 0.22 1.28 6.73 0.24 1.32 7.51 0.24 1.36 8.72 0.26 1.40 9.39 0.24 1.44 5.56 0.2 1.48 2.97 0.14 1.52 1.92 0.11 1.56 1...

    arXiv 2021