Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 93 references

A second-order RG-improved black-hole metric shifts scalar quasinormal frequencies in a controlled, parameter-dependent way that three independent methods agree on.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 21:59 UTC pith:MTVS2U4V

load-bearing objection Solid, self-contained extension of the RG-improved BH program: new second-order metric plus consistent scalar QNMs across three methods; the only soft spot is the conventional ad-hoc scale choice already flagged in the literature. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.12919 v2 pith:MTVS2U4V submitted 2026-03-13 gr-qc

Perturbative Renormalisation Group Improved Black Hole Solution and its Quasinormal Modes

Rupam Jyoti Borah , Umananda Dev Goswami This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords renormalization groupquantum gravityquasinormal modesblack holesSchwarzschild-de SitterSchwarzschild-anti-de Sittereffective field theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a black-hole geometry that includes leading low-energy quantum-gravity corrections by making Newton’s constant and the cosmological constant run with scale under the renormalization group. The resulting metric is expanded to second order in a small parameter that measures those corrections. The authors then compute how a massless scalar field rings when it falls into this black hole, both for positive and for negative cosmological constant. They show that the complex ringing frequencies move systematically with the free correction parameter, and that three different numerical techniques—high-order WKB, direct shooting, and matrix-pencil extraction from time-domain waveforms—return consistent values. The point is that even tiny, controlled quantum corrections leave a clean, measurable imprint on the black hole’s characteristic spectrum.

Core claim

The second-order renormalization-group-improved Schwarzschild-(A)dS metric produces scalar quasinormal frequencies that depend monotonically on the free correction parameter ζ; the frequencies obtained by sixth-order Padé-averaged WKB (de Sitter), direct shooting (anti-de Sitter), and matrix-pencil analysis of time-domain profiles agree to the reported numerical precision.

What carries the argument

The second-order metric function f(r) = 1 − 2M/r − (Λ̄/3)r² + ε(−3/r³ + 4M/r⁴) + ε²(21/(20r⁶) − 25M/(14r⁷) − 13Λ̄/(24r⁴)), with ε = ζM/k₀² ≪ 1, which supplies the effective potential for the scalar wave equation.

Load-bearing premise

The renormalization-group scale is identified by hand with the Kretschmann curvature and then truncated at second order in a small parameter; neither the identification nor the truncation is derived from the full functional renormalization-group flow.

What would settle it

Compute the same scalar quasinormal spectrum for the identical metric with an independent high-precision method (e.g., continued-fraction or spectral) and check whether the real and imaginary parts still shift with ζ exactly as tabulated; any statistically significant mismatch would falsify the claimed consistency.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Positive ζ lowers both the oscillation frequency and the damping rate of scalar modes in de Sitter space; negative ζ raises them.
  • In anti-de Sitter space the opposite trend appears: positive ζ increases both real and imaginary parts of the frequencies.
  • Time-domain waveforms reconstructed from the extracted frequencies reproduce the original ring-down profiles with coefficients of determination R² ≳ 0.99.
  • The same metric can be used to predict shifts in other strong-field observables such as the photon-sphere radius or quasi-periodic oscillation frequencies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the correction is controlled by a single free parameter that can be dialed while remaining perturbative, the model supplies a clean template for forecasting how small quantum corrections would appear in future high-precision ring-down data.
  • The opposite ζ-dependence between de Sitter and anti-de Sitter suggests that the sign of the cosmological constant can reverse the qualitative effect of the same quantum correction, a pattern worth checking in other asymptotically (A)dS theories.
  • Extending the same construction to vector or gravitational perturbations would test whether the reported scalar trends are universal or spin-dependent.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper solves the RG-improved vacuum field equations of Bonanno et al. perturbatively about the Schwarzschild-(A)dS background, obtaining the second-order metric (46) controlled by the free parameter ε = ζM/k_{0}^{2} ≪ 1. It then computes massless scalar QNMs of this metric in SdS (6th-order Padé-averaged WKB) and SAdS (direct shooting), maps their dependence on ζ, and cross-validates both sets against time-domain profiles whose frequencies are extracted by the matrix-pencil method, reporting quantitative consistency via Δ_QNM and R^{2}.

Significance. If the results hold inside the stated perturbative regime, the work supplies a transparent, multi-method map of how leading RG corrections (under the conventional Kretschmann-scale identification) shift scalar QNM frequencies in both SdS and SAdS. The mutual agreement of three independent pipelines (Padé-WKB, shooting, matrix pencil) with explicit error measures is a clear strength and makes the numerical claims reproducible. The free parameter ζ is treated as such rather than fitted, so the paper offers a concrete, falsifiable addition to the literature on low-energy quantum-gravity imprints in black-hole ringdown.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III, Eqs. (25)–(46); Figs. 2–6] Section III and the numerical sections that follow: the second-order metric (46) is derived under the explicit assumption ε = ζM/k_{0}^{2} ≪ 1, and the text repeatedly states that all numerical work respects this condition (k_{0} = 10, M = 1). Yet Figs. 2, 3, 5 and 6 display QNM frequencies for |ζ| up to 50 (ε = 0.5), and several table entries reach |ζ| = 21 (ε ≈ 0.21). At these values the neglected O(ε^{3}) terms are no longer parametrically small, so the plotted curves lie outside the domain of validity of the metric that is being perturbed. Restrict the displayed range to ε ≪ 1 (or supply a truncation-error estimate) before the dependence on ζ can be trusted.
  2. [Sec. III, Eqs. (18)–(23)] Section III, Eqs. (18)–(23): the identification k^{2} = k_{0}^{2} + ζM/r^{3} is imposed by hand (following earlier literature) rather than derived from the functional RG equation. While this is a conventional choice, the subsequent claim that the QNM shifts encode “low-energy QG effects” rests entirely on it. A short paragraph quantifying the sensitivity of the frequencies to alternative scale choices (or at least stating the limitation clearly) is needed for the interpretation to be robust.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. VI] Section VI title is misspelled “SUMMERY”; correct to “SUMMARY”.
  2. [passim] Throughout: numerous spacing and accent artifacts (“Pad ´e”, “Schr¨odinger”, “V on Neumann”, “Renormalisa tion”) remain from typesetting; clean them for the final version.
  3. [Figs. 1, 4] Figure 1 and Figure 4 captions: state explicitly that the curves are for the second-order metric (46) and give the precise value of k_{0} used.
  4. [Tables IV, V] Table IV and Table V: the quantity Δ_QNM is defined with a factor 1/2; either justify the conventional factor or drop it so that the absolute difference is reported.
  5. [Sec. IV A] Eq. (54) and surrounding text: the WKB error estimator Δ_{6} is standard, but a one-sentence reminder that it is only a rough indicator (not a rigorous bound) would help non-specialist readers.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the metric is solved order-by-order from published field equations and the QNMs are ordinary linear-perturbation outputs; the only soft point is a conventional hand-imposed RG-scale identification that is not used to force the reported frequencies.

specific steps
  1. other [Section III, Eqs. (18)–(25)]
    "k² = k₀² + ζM/r³. … ξ = ln(k₀² + ζM/r³). Expanding … ξ = ξ₀ + ε/r³ − ½ ε²/r⁶ + O(ε³/r⁹), where … ε = ζM/k₀²."

    The functional form of the RG scale is imposed by hand rather than derived from the functional renormalization group. This is an ansatz, not a circular reduction of a claimed prediction: the subsequent metric solution and QNM spectra are ordinary consequences of that ansatz and are not forced to match any external data or self-cited uniqueness result. Flagged only for completeness; it does not raise the circularity score above 1.

full rationale

The derivation chain is linear and non-circular. The RG-improved field equations (9) are taken from independent prior work (Bonanno et al. 2021, 2025). The authors then impose a conventional identification of the RG scale with the Kretschmann scalar (Eqs. 18–20), expand ξ to second order in the small parameter ε = ζM/k₀² ≪ 1, and solve the vacuum equations order-by-order for the metric functions a_i(r), obtaining the explicit second-order solution (46). The scalar effective potential (52) is the standard GR expression evaluated on that metric. QNM frequencies are subsequently computed by three independent numerical pipelines (6th-order Padé-averaged WKB for SdS, direct shooting for SAdS, matrix-pencil extraction from time-domain profiles) and shown to agree to the reported precision (Tables I–V, Figs. 9–10). The free parameter ζ is scanned, not fitted to any target spectrum. No observable is forced by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ own prior work, and no self-citation carries the load of the central claim. The hand-imposed scale identification is an assumption (already flagged by the reader), not a circular reduction of the QNM results. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing character of that conventional choice.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the RG-improved field equations of Bonanno et al., on an ad-hoc identification of the RG scale with curvature, and on a small free parameter that controls the size of the correction. No new dynamical fields or particles are introduced; the only free numbers are the conventional mass, cosmological constant, and the RG-correction amplitude ζ (with k₀ fixed by hand).

free parameters (3)
  • ζ
    Free amplitude of the RG correction; scanned over positive and negative values while keeping ε = ζM/k₀² ≪ 1. Controls all reported shifts in the metric and QNMs.
  • k₀
    Asymptotic IR value of the RG scale; fixed by hand to k₀ = 10 (geometrized units) so that ε remains small. Not derived from the functional RG equation.
  • Λ-bar
    Reference cosmological constant treated as an IR input; set to ±0.001 for numerical work. Standard but free within the EFT framework.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The RG-improved vacuum field equations (Eq. 9 / Eq. 30) obtained from the effective action of Bonanno, Dialektopoulos & Zarikas (2025) are the correct low-energy dynamics.
    Taken as given from Refs. [57,58]; the entire metric derivation rests on them.
  • ad hoc to paper The RG scale may be identified with the Kretschmann scalar via k² = k₀² + ζM/r³ (Eqs. 18–20).
    Standard but non-unique choice in the RG-improved black-hole literature; different cut-off identifications would yield different metrics.
  • domain assumption The expansion parameter ε = ζM/k₀² is small enough that truncation at second order is consistent and higher-order terms may be neglected.
    Stated explicitly; required for the perturbative solution (Eq. 46) to be reliable.
  • standard math Standard linear scalar-wave equation on a fixed background with Dirichlet (SAdS) or outgoing (SdS) boundary conditions yields the physical QNMs.
    Textbook black-hole perturbation theory.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 25271 in / 2821 out tokens · 30357 ms · 2026-07-14T21:59:04.351451+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we construct a perturbative black hole (BH) solution motivated by renormalization group (RG) improvement and investigate the quasinormal modes (QNMs) of the BH under scalar field perturbations in both Schwarzschild-de Sitter (SdS) and Schwarzschild-anti-de Sitter (SAdS) backgrounds. To compute the QNMs in the SdS spacetime, we employ the 6th-order Pad\'e-averaged WKB approximation method, while for the SAdS background we utilize the direct shooting method. We examine the dependence of the QNM frequencies on the free parameter of the solution. Furthermore, we analyze the time evolution of a scalar field perturbation around the BH and present the corresponding time-domain profiles. The QNMs are also extracted from the time-domain data using the matrix pencil method. Using the extracted QNM frequencies, we reconstruct the waveform and compare it with the original time-domain profile, finding good agreement between the two. The QNM frequencies obtained from the 6th-order Pad\'e-averaged WKB method and the time-domain analysis in the SdS background, as well as those obtained from the direct shooting method and time-domain analysis in the SAdS spacetime, show very good consistency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12919 by Rupam Jyoti Borah, Umananda Dev Goswami.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Behaviour of the effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Variation of real and imaginary parts of QNMs with respect to positive values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Variation of real and imaginary parts of QNMs with respect to negative values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Behaviour of the effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Variation of real and imaginary parts of QNMs with respect to positive values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variation of real and imaginary parts of QNMs with respect to negative values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time-domain profiles of scalar field perturbations in the BH spacetime described by the metric ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time-domain profiles of scalar field perturbations in the BH spacetime described by the metric ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Comparison between the scalar field QNM time-domain profiles and the waveforms reconstructed using the Matrix Pencil method for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Comparison between the QNM time-domain profile and the waveform reconstructed using the Matrix Pencil method for the SAdS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The perturbative solution obtained in this work is valid in the regimeϵ≪1, for which the RG corrections represent a small deformation of the Schwarzschild-(A)dS spacetime

    The parameterϵ=ζM/k 2 0 controls the strength of the RG induced corrections to the classical geometry. The perturbative solution obtained in this work is valid in the regimeϵ≪1, for which the RG corrections represent a small deformation of the Schwarzschild-(A)dS spacetime. In this regime, higher-order terms in the expansion ofξ and the metric functions a...

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbott et al.,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbott et al.,GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241103 (2016). 17

    2016

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott et al.,GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Abbott et al.,GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses, Phys

    R. Abbott et al.,GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses, Phys. Rev. D102, 043015 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Abbott et al.,Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences, Astrophys

    R. Abbott et al.,Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences, Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L5 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV . Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L4 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L2 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration, Astro- phys. J. Lett.875, L3 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results and the Role of ALMA, The Messenger177, 25 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V . Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L5 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration,First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    A. G. Riess et al.,Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.116, 1009 (1998)

    1998

  14. [14]

    Perlmutter et al.,Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys

    S. Perlmutter et al.,Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J.517, 565 (1999)

    1999

  15. [15]

    P ´erez de los Heros,Status, Challenges and Directions in Indirect Dark Matter Searches, Symmetry12, 1648 (2020)

    C. P ´erez de los Heros,Status, Challenges and Directions in Indirect Dark Matter Searches, Symmetry12, 1648 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    N. A. Bahcall et al.,The Cosmic Triangle: Assessing the State of the Universe, Science284, 1481 (1999)

    1999

  17. [17]

    Amelino-Camelia,Are we at the dawn of quantum gravity phenomenology?, Lect

    G. Amelino-Camelia,Are we at the dawn of quantum gravity phenomenology?, Lect. Notes Phys.541, 1 (2000)

    2000

  18. [18]

    Gambini et al.,Fundamental decoherence from quantum gravity: A Pedagogical review, Gen

    R. Gambini et al.,Fundamental decoherence from quantum gravity: A Pedagogical review, Gen. Rel. Grav.39, 1143 (2007)

    2007

  19. [19]

    De et al.,Quantum gravity as an emergent phenomenon, Int

    S. De et al.,Quantum gravity as an emergent phenomenon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1944003 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Van Raamsdonk,Lectures on gravity and entanglement, Theor

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Lectures on gravity and entanglement, Theor. Adv. Study Inst. Elem. Part. Phys.5, 297 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    Loll,Quantum Gravity from Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Review, Class

    R. Loll,Quantum Gravity from Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Review, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 013002 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Oppenheim,A postquantum theory of classical gravity?, Phys

    J. Oppenheim,A postquantum theory of classical gravity?, Phys. Rev. X13, 041040 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi,A short review of loop quantum gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 042001 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Rovelli,Loop quantum gravity, Living Rev

    C. Rovelli,Loop quantum gravity, Living Rev. Rel.1, 1 (1998)

    1998

  25. [25]

    Sahlmann,Loop Quantum Gravity - A Short Review, arXiv:1001.4188 [gr-qc]

    H. Sahlmann,Loop Quantum Gravity - A Short Review, arXiv:1001.4188 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Girelli, F

    F. Girelli, F. Hinterleitner, and S. Major,Loop Quantum Gravity Phenomenology: Linking Loops to Observational Physics, SIGMA8, 098 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    J. L. F. Barbon,String theory, Eur. Phys. J. C33, S67 (2004)

    2004

  28. [28]

    E. T. Akhmedov,Review of modern string theory, Phys. Atom. Nucl.72, 1574 (2009)

    2009

  29. [29]

    S. B. Giddings,Is string theory a theory of quantum gravity?, Found. Phys.43, 115 (2013)

    2013

  30. [30]

    Maharana,Quantum gravity and string theory,18th Conference of the Indian Association for General Relativity and Gravitation, 155 (1996)

    J. Maharana,Quantum gravity and string theory,18th Conference of the Indian Association for General Relativity and Gravitation, 155 (1996)

    1996

  31. [31]

    Bedford,An Introduction to String Theory, arXiv:1107.3967 [hep-th]

    J. Bedford,An Introduction to String Theory, arXiv:1107.3967 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    J. F. Donoghue,General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D50, 3874 (1994)

    1994

  33. [33]

    J. F. Donoghue,Introduction to the effective field theory description of gravity, arXiv:gr-qc/9512024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Faller,Effective field theory of gravity: Leading quantum gravitational corrections to Newton’s and Coulomb’s law, Phys

    S. Faller,Effective field theory of gravity: Leading quantum gravitational corrections to Newton’s and Coulomb’s law, Phys. Rev. D77, 124039 (2008)

    2008

  35. [35]

    L. I. Bevilaqua, A. C. Lehum, and A. J. da Silva,Effective field theory of quantum gravity coupled to scalar electrodynamics, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 095008 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    Wallace,Quantum Gravity at Low Energies, arXiv:2112.12235 [gr-qc]

    D. Wallace,Quantum Gravity at Low Energies, arXiv:2112.12235 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    J. F. Donoghue and B. R. Holstein,Low Energy Theorems of Quantum Gravity from Effective Field Theory, J. Phys. G42, 103102 (2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    Cardoso et al.,Black holes in an effective field theory extension of general relativity, Phys

    V . Cardoso et al.,Black holes in an effective field theory extension of general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 109903 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    Hollands, A

    S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi, and H. S. Reall,A stationary black hole must be axisymmetric in effective field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 401, 2757 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    Bhattacharyya, P

    S. Bhattacharyya, P. Biswas, A. Dinda, and N. Kundu,The zeroth law of black hole thermodynamics in arbitrary higher derivative theories of gravity, JHEP2022, 13 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    Bhattacharyya et al.,An entropy current and the second law in higher derivative theories of gravity, JHEP2021, 169 (2021)

    S. Bhattacharyya et al.,An entropy current and the second law in higher derivative theories of gravity, JHEP2021, 169 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Davies and H

    I. Davies and H. S. Reall,Dynamical black hole entropy in effective field theory, JHEP2023, 006 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Bhattacharjee, S

    S. Bhattacharjee, S. Sarkar, and A. C. Wall,Holographic entropy increases in quadratic curvature gravity, Phys. Rev. D92, 064006 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Serra,Black Holes through the Lenses of Effective Field Theory, PhD thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy (2023)

    F. Serra,Black Holes through the Lenses of Effective Field Theory, PhD thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    D. Wu, W. Liu, and J. Wang,Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B858, 139052 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Davies and H

    I. Davies and H. S. Reall,Nonperturbative second law of black hole mechanics in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 171402 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Eichhorn,Asymptotically safe gravity, inProc

    A. Eichhorn,Asymptotically safe gravity, inProc. 57th International School of Subnuclear Physics: In Search for the Unexpected(2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    Lambiase and F

    G. Lambiase and F. Scardigli,Generalized uncertainty principle and asymptotically safe gravity, Phys. Rev. D105, 124054 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    Daas et al.,Asymptotically safe gravity with fermions, Phys

    J. Daas et al.,Asymptotically safe gravity with fermions, Phys. Lett. B809, 135775 (2020). 18

    2020

  50. [50]

    Niedermaier and M

    M. Niedermaier and M. Reuter,The asymptotic safety scenario in quantum gravity, Living Rev. Relativ.9, 5 (2006)

    2006

  51. [51]

    Eichhorn and A

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held,Towards implications of asymptotically safe gravity for particle physics, PoS ALPS2019, 034 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    Cai and D

    Y .-F. Cai and D. A. Easson,Asymptotically safe gravity as a scalar-tensor theory and its cosmological implications, Phys. Rev. D84, 103502 (2011)

    2011

  53. [54]

    Polonyi,Lectures on the functional renormalization group method, Open Phys.1, 1 (2003)

    J. Polonyi,Lectures on the functional renormalization group method, Open Phys.1, 1 (2003)

    2003

  54. [55]

    J. M. Pawlowski,Aspects of the functional renormalisation group, Annals Phys.322, 2831 (2007)

    2007

  55. [56]

    Berges, N

    J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich,Non-perturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics, Phys. Rept.363, 223 (2002)

    2002

  56. [57]

    Reuter,Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys

    M. Reuter,Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D57, 971 (1998)

    1998

  57. [58]

    Bonanno, G

    A. Bonanno, G. Kofinas, and V . Zarikas,Effective field equations and scale-dependent couplings in gravity, Phys. Rev. D103, 104025 (2021)

    2021

  58. [59]

    Bonanno, K

    A. Bonanno, K. F. Dialektopoulos, and V . Zarikas,Renormalization group-improved gravitational action: A Lagrangian framework, Phys. Rev. D112, 064069 (2025)

    2025

  59. [60]

    R. A. Konoplya and O. S. Stashko,Transition from Regular Black Holes to Wormholes in Covariant Effective Quantum Gravity: Scatter- ing, Quasinormal Modes, and Hawking Radiation, arXiv:2502.05689

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [61]

    Guo et al.,Quasinormal modes of black holes with multiple photon spheres, JHEP2022, 60 (2022)

    G. Guo et al.,Quasinormal modes of black holes with multiple photon spheres, JHEP2022, 60 (2022)

    2022

  61. [62]

    R. J. Borah and U. D. Goswami,Black hole quasi-periodic oscillations in the presence of Gauss-Bonnet trace anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 872, 140124 (2026)

    2026

  62. [63]

    Chen and J

    J. Chen and J. Yang,Shadows and optical appearance of quantum-corrected black holes illuminated by static thin accretions, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 512 (2025)

    2025

  63. [64]

    Y . S. Myung,Lifshitz black holes in the Hoˇrava-Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Lett. B690, 534–540 (2010)

    2010

  64. [65]

    Hazarika and P

    B. Hazarika and P. Phukon,Probing Black Hole Phase Transitions through Quasi-Periodic Oscillations(2025)

    2025

  65. [66]

    M. B. Awal, B. Hazarika, and P. Phukon,Quasi-Periodic Oscillations and Parameter Constraints in ModMax Black Holes(2025)

    2025

  66. [67]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998)

    1998

  67. [68]

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets,Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications, JHEP9, 042 (2002)

    2002

  68. [69]

    D. J. Gogoi and U. D. Goswami,Quasinormal modes of black holes with non-linear-electrodynamic sources in Rastall gravity, Phys. Dark Univ.33, 100860 (2021)

    2021

  69. [70]

    R. J. Borah and U. D. Goswami,Quasinormal modes and shadows of black holes in infinite derivative theory of gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 940 (2025)

    2025

  70. [71]

    D. J. Gogoi and U. D. Goswami,Quasinormal modes and Hawking radiation sparsity of GUP corrected black holes in bumblebee gravity with topological defects, JCAP06, 029 (2022)

    2022

  71. [72]

    Hosseinifar et al.,Quasinormal Modes and Topological Characteristics of a Schwarzschild Black Hole Surrounded by the Dehnen Type Dark Matter Halo, arXiv:2503.03260 [gr-qc] (2025)

    F. Hosseinifar et al.,Quasinormal Modes and Topological Characteristics of a Schwarzschild Black Hole Surrounded by the Dehnen Type Dark Matter Halo, arXiv:2503.03260 [gr-qc] (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  72. [73]

    D. J. Gogoi, R. Karmakar, and U. D. Goswami,Quasinormal modes of nonlinearly charged black holes surrounded by a cloud of strings in Rastall gravity, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.20, 2350007 (2023)

    2023

  73. [74]

    Karmakar and U

    R. Karmakar and U. D. Goswami,Quasinormal modes, temperatures and greybody factors of black holes in a generalized Rastall gravity theory, Phys. Scripta99, 055003 (2024)

    2024

  74. [75]

    Mohan, R

    G. Mohan, R. Karmakar, R. J. Borah and U. D. Goswami,Strong Lensing Effect and Quasinormal Modes of Oscillations of Black Holes inf(R, T)Gravity Theory, Phys. Dark Univ.49, 102007 (2025)

    2025

  75. [76]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko,Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011)

    2011

  76. [77]

    Franciolini et al.,Effective Field Theory of Black Hole Quasinormal Modes in Scalar-Tensor Theories, JHEP2, 127 (2019)

    G. Franciolini et al.,Effective Field Theory of Black Hole Quasinormal Modes in Scalar-Tensor Theories, JHEP2, 127 (2019)

    2019

  77. [78]

    F. S. Miguel,EFT corrections to scalar and vector quasinormal modes of rapidly rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 104016 (2024)

    2024

  78. [79]

    Ishibashi, N

    A. Ishibashi, N. Ohta, and D. Yamaguchi,Quantum improved charged black holes, Phys. Rev. D104, 066016 (2021)

    2021

  79. [80]

    J. M. Pawlowski and D. Stock,Quantum-improved Schwarzschild-(A)dS and Kerr-(A)dS spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D98, 106008 (2018)

    2018

  80. [81]

    R. A. Konoplya,Quasinormal modes in higher-derivative gravity: Testing the black hole parametrization and sensitivity of overtones, Phys. Rev. D107, 064039 (2023)

    2023

Showing first 80 references.